Home Disaffiliation amongst academically elite students in Singapore: the role of a non-standard variety of English
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Disaffiliation amongst academically elite students in Singapore: the role of a non-standard variety of English

Published/Copyright: September 15, 2021

Abstract

This article seeks to examine whether and how a non-standard variety of English (i.e. Singlish) might contribute to (dis)affiliation amongst a multinational group of academically elite students in Singapore. Using interview data when informants expressed ideologies about Singlish and Standard English, I argue that informants tended to orient to two different social fields in interviews: a field of education where Standard English is consistently valued by them, and an informal field of socialisation where the value of Singlish is contested. Differences in valuation of Singlish suggest disaffiliation between two groups of academically elite students: (a) immigrants from China who arrived more recently and do not value Singlish; (b) localised peer groups (including immigrants and Singaporeans) who claim to value and practise Singlish in their informal interactions. There are implications for our understanding of the role of vernaculars in processes of transnational migration, and Singlish as a local marker of solidarity.


Corresponding author: Luke Lu, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore, E-mail:

References

Agha, Asif. 2004. Registers of language. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 23–45. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996522.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto. 2009. The Asian typology of English: Theoretical and methodological considerations. English World-Wide 30(2). 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.02ans.Search in Google Scholar

Bae, So Hee. 2013. The pursuit of multilingualism in transnational educational migration: Strategies of linguistic investment among Korean jogi yuhak families in Singapore. Language and Education 27(5). 415–431.10.1080/09500782.2012.709863Search in Google Scholar

Ball, Stephen & Dimitra Pavlina Nikita. 2014. The global middle class and school choice: A cosmopolitan sociology. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17. 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0523-4.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rakesh. 2001. World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology 30. 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.527.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah. 2012. The commodification of language: English as a global commodity. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 352–364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199922765.013.0031Search in Google Scholar

Cavallaro, Francesco & Bee Chin Ng. 2009. Between status and solidarity in Singapore. World Englishes 28(2). 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2009.01580.x.Search in Google Scholar

Cavallaro, Francesco, Bee Chin Ng & Mark Fifer Seilhamer. 2014. Singapore Colloquial English: Issues of prestige and identity. World Englishes 33(3). 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12096.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Li Lin. 2016. The reality behind Singlish. New York Times. 23 May.Search in Google Scholar

Chua, Beng-Huat. 1998. Racial-Singaporeans: Absence after the hyphen. In Joel Kahn (ed.), Southeast Asian identities: Culture and the politics of representation in Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, 28–49. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.10.2307/3517767Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, Frederick. 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Merlin Wittrock (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 119–161. NY: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Glick-Schiller, Nina, Linda Basch & Cristina Blanc-Szanton. 1992. Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered, vol. 645. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33483.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gwee, Li Sui. 2016. Do you speak Singlish? New York Times. 13 May.Search in Google Scholar

Hanks, William. 2005. Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 34. 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143907.Search in Google Scholar

Heller, Monica. 2003. Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7. 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00238.x.Search in Google Scholar

Igarashi, Hiroki & Hiro Saito. 2014. Cosmopolitanism as Cultural Capital: Exploring the intersection of globalisation, education and stratification. Cultural Sociology 8(3). 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514523935.Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Braj. 1997. World Englishes and English-using communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 17. 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500003287.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Yoonhee. 2012. Singlish or Globish: Multiple language ideologies and global identities among Korean educational migrants in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(2). 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00522.x.Search in Google Scholar

Kenway, Jane & Aaron Koh. 2013. The elite school as ‘cognitive machine’ and ‘social paradise’: Developing transnational capitals for the national ‘field of power’. Journal of Sociology 49(2–3). 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313481525.Search in Google Scholar

Leimgruber, Jakob. 2014. Singlish as defined by young educated Chinese Singaporeans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 230. 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2014-0026.Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, Peggy & Nina Glick Schiller. 2004. Conceptualising simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review 38(3). 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Luke. 2016a. Academically elite students in Singapore: A collective moral stance toward aspirations and trajectories. AILA Review 29. 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.29.06lu.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Luke. 2016b. ‘Designer immigrant students’ in Singapore: Challenges for linguistic human rights in a globalising world. In Karel Arnaut, Martha Karrebæk, Massimiliano Spotti, & Jan Blommaert (eds.), Engaging superdiversity: Recombining spaces, times and language practices, 277–302. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781783096800-014Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Luke. 2018. Grounded high-flyers: How academically elite students are en-territorialised in Singapore. King’s College London Unpublished PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Lu, Luke. 2020. Singapore’s nation branding through language policy: ‘Commercial nationalism’ and internal tensions. In IIrene Theodoropoulou & Johanna Tovar (eds.), Research companion to language and country branding. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429325250-ch07Search in Google Scholar

Noble, Greg. 2013. ‘It is home but it is not home’: Habitus, field and the migrant. Journal of Sociology 49(2–3). 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783313481532.Search in Google Scholar

Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible citizenship: The cultural logics of transnationalism. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pakir, Anne. 1991. The range and depth of English-knowing bilinguals in Singapore. World Englishes 10(2). 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.1991.tb00149.x.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Joseph & Sohee H. Bae. 2009. Language ideologies in educational migration: Korean jogi yuhak families in Singapore. Linguistics and Education 20. 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.09.001.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Joseph & Lione Wee. 2012. Markets of English: Linguistic capital and language policy in a globalising world. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Milans, Miguel. 2013. Urban schools and english language education in late modern China: A critical sociolinguistic ethnography. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203366189Search in Google Scholar

Singapore Department of Statistics. 2019. Population and population structure. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/find-data/search-by-theme/population/population-and-population-structure/latest-data (accessed 20 April 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2018. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. Language in Society 47. 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404518000970.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, Eugene. 2003. Re-engaging Chineseness: Political, economic and cultural imperatives of nation-building in Singapore. The China Quarterly 175. 751–774.10.1017/S0305741003000432Search in Google Scholar

Tan, Peter & Daniel Tan. 2008. Attitudes towards non-standard English in Singapore. World Englishes 27(3–4). 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2008.00578.x.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Jane. 1991. Editor’s introduction. In Pierre Bourdieu (ed.), Language and symbolic power, 1–31. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tupas, Ruanni & Rani Rubdy. 2015. Introduction: From world Englishes to unequal Englishes. In Ruanni Tupas (ed.), Unequal Englishes: The politics of Englishes today, 1–17. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137461223_1Search in Google Scholar

Vaish, Viniti & Mardiana Roslan. 2011. ‘Crossing’ in Singapore. World Englishes 30(3). 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2011.01700.x.Search in Google Scholar

Vertovec, Steven. 2001. Transnational social formations: Towards conceptual cross-fertilisation. Paper presented at Workshop on “Transnational Migration: Comparative Perspectives”, June 30-July 1, 2001, Princeton University. http://www.transcomm.ox.ac.uk/working%20papers/Vertovec2.pdf (accessed 24 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Warde, Alan. 2004. Practice and field: Revising Bourdieusian concepts. Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester. Discussion Paper no 65.10.1057/978-1-137-55682-0_6Search in Google Scholar

Wee, Lionel. 2003. Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 24(3). 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630308666499.Search in Google Scholar

Wee, Lionel. 2005. Intra-language discrimination and linguistic human rights: The case of inglish. Applied Linguistics 26(1). 48–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh038.Search in Google Scholar

Wee, Lionel. 2011. Metadiscursive convergence in the Singlish debate. Language & Communication 31. 75–85.10.1016/j.langcom.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Wee, Lionel. 2018. The Singlish controversy: Language, culture and identity in a globalizing world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316855331Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Peidong D. 2014. Privilege, prejudice, predicament: “PRC scholars” in Singapore. Frontiers of Education in China 9(3). 350–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03397027.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Peidong D. 2016. International mobility and educational desire: Chinese foreign talent students in Singapore. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-59143-2Search in Google Scholar

Yeoh, Brenda. 2007. Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Migration Information Source. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/singapore-hungry-foreign-workers-all-skill-levels (accessed 24 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Yeoh, Brenda & Weiqiang Lin. 2013. Chinese migration to Singapore: Discourses and discontents in a globalising nation-state. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 22(1). 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719681302200103.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-06-29
Accepted: 2020-08-19
Published Online: 2021-09-15
Published in Print: 2021-09-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0039/html
Scroll to top button