Startseite YouTube-based accent challenge narratives: Web 2.0 as a context for studying the social value of accent
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

YouTube-based accent challenge narratives: Web 2.0 as a context for studying the social value of accent

  • Betsy Rymes EMAIL logo und Andrea Leone-Pizzighella
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. März 2018

Abstract

This article illustrates how, in a Web 2.0 environment, narrative ways of knowing circulate and disseminate indexical value associated with performances of accent. We compare the information-storing and -sharing functions of Web 1.0 and Web 2.0, making an analogy between these two conceptualizations of the Internet and Jerome Bruner’s two different modes of knowing in his (1986) book Actual minds, possible worlds: logico-scientific and narrative. Just as analyses of Web 2.0 discourse highlight collaborative construction, dissemination, and uptake of information, analysis of narrative illuminates the accrual of sociocultural meaning in collaboratively constructed stories. We use discourse and narrative analytic methods to investigate the social indexicality of “accent” in a corpus of Philadelphia Accent Challenge YouTube videos (and the associated comment sections), and we illustrate how indexical value accrues via the snowballing of reflexive metacommentary in the form of narratives about these accent performances. We argue that discourse in Web 2.0 affords narrative ways of recirculating certain emblematic features of accent. This perspective on analyzing YouTube video-based accent data illuminates the value of YouTube accent performances as a source of linguistic anthropological and narrative insight, and narrative modes of knowing as a means of circulating language ideological discourse via Internet-based participatory culture.

References

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: Performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube. In Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0.: Language and new media, 47–71. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bamberg, Michael. 2012. Narrative analysis. In Harris Cooper (ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, vol. 3. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/13620-006Suche in Google Scholar

Bamberg, Michael & Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk 28(3). 377–396.10.1515/TEXT.2008.018Suche in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan & Ad Backus. 2013. Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In Ingrid de Saint-Georges and Jean Jacques Weber (eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality, 11–32. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_2Suche in Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome. 1986. Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674029019Suche in Google Scholar

Bruner, Jerome. 2003. Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Burgess, Jean & Joshua Green. 2009. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. New York: Polity Press.Suche in Google Scholar

De Fina, Anna & Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139051255Suche in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.xSuche in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100.10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828Suche in Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.Suche in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan C. 2013. Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds.), 1–25, Discourse 2.0.: Language and new media, 47–71. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2004. Place, globalization and linguistic variation. In Carmen Fought (ed.). Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Katz, Josh & Wilson Andrews. 2013. How y’all, youse and you guys talk: What does the way you speak say about where you’re from? Answer all the questions below to see your personal dialect map. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/12/20/sunday-review/dialect-quiz-map.html?_r=0 (accessed 2 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2013. The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139519632Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg. 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change (package edition). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110167467Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative analysis. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Suche in Google Scholar

LifeTracking. 2012. Philly Accent Challenge. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_LTYGx_2fE (accessed 6 September 2013).Suche in Google Scholar

Mishler, Elliot G. 1999. Storylines: Craftartists’ narratives of identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Moore, Robert. 2011. “If I actually talked like that, I’d pull a gun on myself”: Accent, avoidance, and moral panic in Irish English. Anthropological Quarterly 84(1). 41–64.10.1353/anq.2011.0014Suche in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Tim. 2005. What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 29 January 2018).Suche in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Lisa Capps. 2001. Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674041592Suche in Google Scholar

Rymes, Betsy. 2014. Communicating beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203129616Suche in Google Scholar

Rymes, Betsy & Andrea R. Leone. 2014. Citizen sociolinguistics: A new media methodology for understanding language and social life. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 29(2). 25–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In Richard Bauman & Joel F. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 337–353. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2008. Stylistic variation and the sociolinguistic interview: A reconsideration. In Rafael Monroy & Aquilino Sánchez (eds.). 25 Años de Lingüística Aplicada en España: Hitos y Retos (25 Years of Applied Linguistics in Spain: Milestones and Challenges; proceedings from AESLA 25). Murcia, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia.Suche in Google Scholar

Stein, Nancy L. & Margaret Policastro. 1984. The concept of a story: A comparison between children’s and teachers’ viewpoints. In Heinz Mandl, Nancy L. Stein & Tom Trabasso (eds.), Learning and comprehension of text, 113–155. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah & Anna Marie Trester (eds.). 2013. Discourse 2.0.: Language and new media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Thethugyone. 2015. South Philly Accent Challenge! New 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXt1fHZIHtk (accessed 3 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Vaux, Bert & Scott Golder. 2003. Welcome to the dialect survey. http://dialect.redlog.net/ (accessed 3 November 2015).Suche in Google Scholar

Wortham, Stanton. 2001. Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wortham, Stanton. 2005. Socialization beyond the speech event. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 95–112.10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.95Suche in Google Scholar

Appendix. Publicly available YouTube video information

Published Online: 2018-3-2
Published in Print: 2018-3-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijsl-2017-0058/html?srsltid=AfmBOopylJ7829xVpj_cOZeGoFRPRt3JEWbTYSFMrhKxr9QeSSg10N3R
Button zum nach oben scrollen