Home Effect of shielding gas composition and pulsed current frequency on geometry and nitrogen content of 304L austenitic stainless-steel welds
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of shielding gas composition and pulsed current frequency on geometry and nitrogen content of 304L austenitic stainless-steel welds

  • Saeed Hosseinzadeh ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Massoud Goodarzi ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: June 26, 2024
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of pulsed current frequency and shielding gas composition on the weld metal geometry and nitrogen content. Austenitic stainless-steel sheets were welded by gas tungsten arc welding using 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 vol.% of nitrogen gas in argon shielding gas and pulse frequencies of 40, 80, 120, 160, and 200 Hz. Weld sections were recorded using a stereomicroscope. Weld depth and cross-section of the weld metal were measured by ImageJ® software and their changes were recorded. Nitrogen analysis tests were performed on the weld metal and, the results were analyzed. Investigations revealed that by increasing the nitrogen content of the shielding gas up to 10 vol.%, the nitrogen content of the weld metal almost doubles at the maximum nitrogen level. This increase was more considerable at higher current frequencies. Also, by increasing the pulsed current frequency, the weld pool and the weld metal depth-to-width ratio increased to 37 % and 44 %, respectively, at the maximum level of shielding gas nitrogen. In addition, at the frequency of 200 Hz, increasing nitrogen led to an 86 % and 72 % increase in the weld pool and the weld aspect ratio, respectively.


Corresponding author: Saeed Hosseinzadeh, School of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran, E-mail: 

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission. Both authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Saeed Hosseinzadeh, under the supervision of Massoud Goodarzi. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Saeed Hosseinzadeh, and both authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to time limitations. However, some of the raw data will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. Rani Indira, M.; Marpu, R. N. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2012, 1, 1–5.Search in Google Scholar

2. Tseng, K. H.; Chou, C. P. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2001, 6, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217101101538686.Search in Google Scholar

3. Qi, B. J.; Yang, M. X.; Cong, B. Q.; Liu, F. J. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 66, 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4438-z.Search in Google Scholar

4. Galloway, A. M.; McPherson, N. A.; Baker, T. N. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part L 2011, 225, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954420711398608.Search in Google Scholar

5. Shankar, V.; Gill, T. P. S.; Mannan, S. L.; Sundaresan, S. Sadhana 2003, 28, 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706438.Search in Google Scholar

6. Du Toit, M.; Pistorius, P. C. Weld. J. 2003, 82, 219–224.Search in Google Scholar

7. Woo, I.; Kikuchi, Y. ISIJ Int. 2002, 42, 1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.42.1334.Search in Google Scholar

8. Mudali, U. K.; Dayal, R. K.; Gill, T. P. S.; Gnanamoorthy, J. B. Mater. Corros. 1986, 37, 637–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.19860371206.Search in Google Scholar

9. Tseng, K. H.; Chou, C. P. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 142, 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00593-4.Search in Google Scholar

10. Zhao, L.; Tian, Z. L.; Peng, Y. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 2009, 14, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1179/136217108X343939.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lin, Y. C.; Chen, P. Y. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2001, 307, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01821-9.Search in Google Scholar

12. Banerjee, A.; Onneby, C.; Debroy, T.; Small, M. International Trends in Welding Science and Technology; ASM International: Materials Park, OH, 1992; pp. 39–44.Search in Google Scholar

13. Lakomskii, V. I.; Torkhov, G. F. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 1969, 13, 1159.Search in Google Scholar

14. Wang, D.; Lu, J.; Tang, S.; Yu, L.; Fan, H.; Ji, L.; Liu, C. Materials 2018, 11, 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081344.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Kah, P.; Martikainen, J. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 64, 1411–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4111-6.Search in Google Scholar

16. Boulos, M. I.; Fauchais, P.; Pfender, E. Thermal Plasmas Fundamentals and Applications, Vol. 1; Plenum Press: New York, 2013.10.1007/978-3-319-12183-3_12-1Search in Google Scholar

17. Murphy, A. B.; Arundell, C. J. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 1994, 14, 451–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570207.Search in Google Scholar

18. Lu, S.; Dong, W.; Li, D.; Li, Y. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2009, 45, 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.10.010.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hsu, K. C.; Etemadi, K.; Pfender, E. J. Appl. Phys. 1983, 54, 1293–1301. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.332195.Search in Google Scholar

20. Haidar, J.; Farmer, A. J. D. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1993, 26, 1224–1229. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/26/8/011.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-20
Accepted: 2024-02-29
Published Online: 2024-06-26
Published in Print: 2024-07-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijmr-2021-8524/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button