Ethical considerations related to personal data collection and reuse: trust and transparency in language and speech technologies
-
Le Cheng
Le Cheng is Chair Professor of Law, and Professor of Cyber Studies at Zhejiang University. He serves as the Executive Vice Dean of Zhejiang University’s Academy of International Strategy and Law, Acting Head of International Institute of Cyberspace Governance, Editor-in-Chief of International Journal of Legal Discourse, Editor-in-Chief of International Journal of Digital Law and Governance, Co-Editor of Comparative Legilinguistics (International Journal for Legal Communication), Associate Editor of Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, former Co-Editor of Social Semiotics, and editorial member of Semiotica, Pragmatics and Society, and International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. As a highly-cited scholar, he has published widely in the areas of international law, digital law and governance, cyber law, semiotics, discourse studies, terminology, and legal discourse.
Jing Han is a research fellow in Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University. Her research field include international law, digital law, security studies, and criminology.
Jahongir Nasirov is a SJD fellow in Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University. His research fields include civil law, private law, digital law, digital governance, cybersecurity and International Law.
Abstract
Amid rapid technological advancements in the contemporary digital landscape, the integrity of data management significantly influences organizational trustworthiness. Compliance with ethical norms and concepts is critical for maintaining confidentiality in language and speech technologies, emphasizing ethical considerations in the collection and use of personal data. Building trust in new technologies, including language and speech technologies, requires timely and responsible handling of personal data. This study aims to evaluate the ethical norms and associated risks involved in the process of collecting personal data. It includes an examination of core ethical principles, such as consent, transparency, fairness, and accountability, and how compliance with these principles can be ensured. The research employs a mixed methodology, incorporating literature review and ethical analysis. Ethical considerations are a significant part of the development and deployment of language and speech technologies. This includes respecting user privacy and transparency, eliminating algorithmic bias to enhance trust, and encouraging responsible innovation. Additionally, adherence to regulations such as the GDPR and CCPA is essential for protecting user rights. This study provides an overview of the ethical benefits and decisions associated with data management practices within speech technologies. It highlights the relevance of ethical principles in the development of language and speech technologies. By recognizing the importance of confidentiality, responsibility, and justice, this approach fosters trust and contributes to the responsible development and proper use of these transformative technologies. The findings emphasize the need for further research, regulatory supervision, and proactive ethical practices to navigate the digital era.
About the authors
Le Cheng is Chair Professor of Law, and Professor of Cyber Studies at Zhejiang University. He serves as the Executive Vice Dean of Zhejiang University’s Academy of International Strategy and Law, Acting Head of International Institute of Cyberspace Governance, Editor-in-Chief of International Journal of Legal Discourse, Editor-in-Chief of International Journal of Digital Law and Governance, Co-Editor of Comparative Legilinguistics (International Journal for Legal Communication), Associate Editor of Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, former Co-Editor of Social Semiotics, and editorial member of Semiotica, Pragmatics and Society, and International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. As a highly-cited scholar, he has published widely in the areas of international law, digital law and governance, cyber law, semiotics, discourse studies, terminology, and legal discourse.
Jing Han is a research fellow in Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University. Her research field include international law, digital law, security studies, and criminology.
Jahongir Nasirov is a SJD fellow in Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University. His research fields include civil law, private law, digital law, digital governance, cybersecurity and International Law.
-
Research funding: This work was supported by the project of National Social Science Foundation (Grant No. 24BYY151).
References
Aggarwal, Nikita. 2021. The norms of algorithmic credit scoring. The Cambridge Law Journal 80(1). 42–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197321000015.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, Josephine. 2018. Data protection in UK library and information services: Are we ready for GDPR? Legal Information Management 18(1). 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669618000063.Search in Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2023. Free speech versus the first amendment. UCLA Law Review 70(5). 1206–1273.Search in Google Scholar
Baschenhof, Philipp. 2022. The digital markets act (DMA): A procompetitive recalibration of data relations? Journal of Law, Technology and Policy 1. 101–154.Search in Google Scholar
Bernaerts, Jonathan. 2022. A socio-legal approach to language use in administrative settings in Belgium’s Dutch-language area. German Law Journal 23(7). 960–975. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.63.Search in Google Scholar
Bousquet, Chris. 2022. Words that harm: Defending the dignity approach to hate speech regulation. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 35(1). 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2021.18.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le & Xiuli Liu. 2023. From principles to practices: The intertextual interaction between AI ethical and legal discourses. International Journal of Legal Discourse 8(1). 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2001.Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, Le, Jiaxuan Qiu & Yi Yang. 2023. Constructing cybersecurity discourse via deconstructing legislation. International Journal of Legal Discourse 8(2). 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2014.Search in Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary & David Lehr. 2019. Transparency and algorithmic governance. Administrative Law Review 71(1). 1–56.Search in Google Scholar
Custers, Bart & Helena Uršič. 2016. Big data and data reuse: A taxonomy of data reuse for balancing big data benefits and personal data protection. International Data Privacy Law 6(1). 4–15.10.1093/idpl/ipv028Search in Google Scholar
Custers, Bart, Helena U. Vrabec & Michael Friedewald. 2019. Assessing the legal and ethical impact of data reuse: Developing a tool for data reuse impact assessments (DRIA). European Data Protection Law Review 5(3). 317–337.10.21552/edpl/2019/3/7Search in Google Scholar
Delacroix, Sylvie & Neil David Lawrence. 2019. Bottom-up data trusts: Disturbing the ‘one size fits all’ approach to data governance. International Data Privacy Law 9(4). 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz014.Search in Google Scholar
Doe, Susan. 2018. Practical privacy: Report from the GDPR world. Legal Information Management 18(2). 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669618000178.Search in Google Scholar
Dove, Edward S. 2018. The EU general data protection regulation: Implications for international scientific research in the digital era. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 46(4). 1013–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518822003.Search in Google Scholar
Ervo, Laura. 2016. Facing people through language use – linguistic tools to make proceedings fair. International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(2). 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0015.Search in Google Scholar
Fischman-Afori, Orit. 2022. Global digital governance through the back door of corporate regulation. Fordham Intellectual Property Media & Entertainment Law Journal 33(4). 720–787.10.2139/ssrn.4215774Search in Google Scholar
Frommelt, Elisabeth. 2020. Liability challenges in the blockchain ecosystem. UC Davis Business Law Journal 21(2). 165–224.Search in Google Scholar
Garry, Patrick M. 2019. The erosion of common law privacy and defamation: Reconsidering the law’s balancing of speech, privacy, and reputation. Wayne Law Review 65(2). 279–324.Search in Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Maria Eduarda. 2017. The EU data protection reform and the challenges of big data: Remaining uncertainties and ways forward. Information & Communications Technology Law 26(2). 90–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2017.1295838.Search in Google Scholar
Graef, Inge, Martin Husovec & Nadezhda Purtova. 2018. Data portability and data control: Lessons for an emerging concept in EU law. German Law Journal 19(6). 1359–1398. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200023075.Search in Google Scholar
Hacker, Philipp, Johann Cordes & Janina Rochon. 2024. Regulating gatekeeper artificial intelligence and data: Transparency, access and fairness under the digital markets act, the general data protection regulation and beyond. European Journal of Risk Regulation 15(1). 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.81.Search in Google Scholar
Han, David. 2020. Constitutional rights and technological change. UC Davis Law Review 54(1). 71–132.Search in Google Scholar
Hondius, Frits W. 1983. A decade of international data protection. Netherlands International Law Review 30(2). 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0165070x00012298.Search in Google Scholar
Hooper, Hayley J. 2022. Trust as a core principle of the Constitution. The Cambridge Law Journal 81(2). 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197322000290.Search in Google Scholar
Israel, Maria Joseph & Ahmed Amer. 2023. Rethinking data infrastructure and its ethical implications in the face of automated digital content generation. AI Ethics 3. 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00169-1.Search in Google Scholar
Ioriatti Ferrari, Elena. 2016. Formulation of rights and European legal discourse: Any theory behind it? International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(2). 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0013.Search in Google Scholar
Janssen, Heleen, Jennifer Cobbe, Chris Norval & Jatinder Singh. 2020. Decentralized data processing: Personal data stores and the GDPR. International Data Privacy Law 10(4). 356–384. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipaa016.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Meg Leta & Margot E. Kaminski. 2020. An American’s Guide to the GDPR. Denver Law Review 98(1). 93–128.10.54648/GPLR2020081Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Lindsay Sain & Tim R. Samples. 2023. On the systemic importance of digital platforms. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law 25(1). 141–208.Search in Google Scholar
Kaminski, Margot E. 2018. Binary governance: Lessons from the GDPR’s approach to algorithmic accountability. Southern California Law Review 92(6). 1529–1616.Search in Google Scholar
Keller, Daphne. 2022. Lawful but awful? Control over legal speech by platforms, governments, and internet users. University of Chicago law review Online. Available at: https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/online-archive/lawful-awful-control-over-legal-speech-platforms-governments-and-internet-users.Search in Google Scholar
Kohl, Uta. 2023. The Right to be forgotten in Data Protection Law and two western cultures of privacy. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 72(3). 737–769. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589323000258.Search in Google Scholar
Li, Jian, Xintong Cai & Le Cheng. 2023. Legal regulation of generative AI: A multidimensional construction. International Journal of Legal Discourse 8(2). 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2023-2017.Search in Google Scholar
Luttermann, Claus & Karin Luttermann. 2021. Towards peace in Europe: On legal linguistics, prosperity and European identity – the European reference language system for the European Union. International Journal of Legal Discourse 6(1). 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2021-2044.Search in Google Scholar
Magrath, Pau. 2018. Transparency, data protection and the law courts of the future. Legal Information Management 18(2). 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1472669618000166.Search in Google Scholar
McCarty-Snead, Steven S. & Anne Titus Hilby. 2014. Research guide to European data protection law. International Journal of Legal Information 42(2). 348–417. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0731126500012087.Search in Google Scholar
Mulders, Stephen. 2022. Collective damages for GDPR breaches: A feasible solution for the GDPR enforcement deficit? European Data Protection Law Review 8(4). 493–506. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2022/4/8.Search in Google Scholar
Murchison, Brian C. 2015. Speech and the truth-seeking value. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 39(1). 55–117.Search in Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Rostam J. 2024. The global institutional governance of AI: A four-dimensional perspective. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance 1(1). 113–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0004.Search in Google Scholar
Ng, Yee-Fui, Maria O’Sullivan, Moira Paterson & Normann Witzleb. 2020. Revitalising public law in a technological era: Rights, transparency and administrative justice. University of New South Wales Law Journal 43(3). 1041–1077. https://doi.org/10.53637/ygts5583.Search in Google Scholar
Plott, Caroline F. & Joshua M. Sharfstein. 2021. Global regulatory agencies and data transparency. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 49(3). 486–488. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2021.68.Search in Google Scholar
Quinn, Paul & Gianclaudio Malgieri. 2021. The difficulty of defining sensitive data—the concept of sensitive data in the EU data protection framework. German Law Journal 22(8). 1583–1612. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.79.Search in Google Scholar
Quinn, Paul & Gianclaudio Malgieri. 2022. The difficulty of defining sensitive data—The concept of sensitive data in the EU data protection framework – CORRIGENDUM. German Law Journal 23(4). 688. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.11.Search in Google Scholar
Reyes, Carla L. 2023. Emerging technology’s language wars: AI and criminal justice. Journal of Law & Innovation 5(1). 1–37.Search in Google Scholar
Ringrose, Katelyn & Divya Ramjee. 2020. Watch where you walk: Law enforcement surveillance and protester privacy. California Law Review Online 11. 349–366.Search in Google Scholar
Rinik, Christine. 2020. Data trusts: More data than trust? The perspective of the data subject in the face of a growing problem. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 34(3). 342–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1594621.Search in Google Scholar
Rizcallah, Cecilia & Victor Davio. 2021. The requirement that tribunals be established by law: A valuable principle safeguarding the rule of law and the separation of powers in a context of trust. European Constitutional Law Review 17(1). 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019621000432.Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, Arianna & Gabriele Lenzini. 2020. Transparency by design in data-informed research: A collection of information design patterns. Computer Law & Security Review 37. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105402.Search in Google Scholar
Sandeen, Sharon K. & Ulla-Maija Mylly. 2019. Trade secrets and the right to information: A comparative analysis of EU and us approaches to freedom of expression and whistleblowing. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 21(3). 1–62.Search in Google Scholar
Sears, Alan M. 2020. Algorithmic speech and freedom of expression. Vanderbilt Journal Transnational Law 53(4). 1327–1376.Search in Google Scholar
Sharpston, Eleanor. 2010. Transparency and clear legal language in the European Union: Ambiguous legislative texts, laconic pronouncements and the credibility of the judicial system. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 12. 409–423. https://doi.org/10.5235/152888712802636148.Search in Google Scholar
Shyy, Sarah. 2019. The GDPR’s lose-lose dilemma: Minimal benefits to data privacy & significant burdens on business. UC Davis Business Law Journal 20(2). 137–164.Search in Google Scholar
Siebecker, Michael R. 2022. The incompatibility of artificial intelligence and citizens united. Ohio State Law Journal 83(6). 1211–1274.Search in Google Scholar
Song, Lijue & Changshan Ma. 2022. Identifying the fourth generation of human rights in digital era. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7(1). 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2065.Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2020. Free speech on social media: How to protect our freedoms from social media that are funded by trade in our personal data. Social Philosophy and Policy 37(2). 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052521000121.Search in Google Scholar
Soyer, Βarış. 2022. Use of big data analytics and sensor technology in consumer insurance context: Legal and practical challenges. The Cambridge Law Journal 81(1). 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197322000010.Search in Google Scholar
Solaiman, Barry, Abeer Malik & Suhaila Ghuloum. 2023. Monitoring mental health: Legal and ethical considerations of using artificial intelligence in psychiatric wards. American Journal of Law & Medicine 49(2-3). 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2023.30.Search in Google Scholar
Steffek, Ana Keglevic. 2022. Trust and transparency in insurance contract law: European regulation and comparison of laws. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 24. 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2022.12.Search in Google Scholar
Strycharz, Joanna, Jef Ausloos & Natali Helberger. 2020. Data protection or data frustration? Individual perceptions and attitudes towards the GDPR. European Data Protection Law Review 6(3). 407–421. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/3/10.Search in Google Scholar
Taeihagh, Araz. 2021. Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society 40(2). 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377.Search in Google Scholar
Veale, Michael & Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius. 2022. Adtech and real-time bidding under European data protection law. German Law Journal 23(2). 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.18.Search in Google Scholar
Verhenneman, Griet, Kathleen Claes, Jean-Jacques Derèze, Paul Herijgers, Christine Mathieu, Frank E. Rademakers, Roxane Reyda & Mark Vanautgaerden. 2020. How GDPR enhances transparency and fosters pseudonymisation in academic medical research. European Journal of Health Law 27(1). 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-12251009.Search in Google Scholar
Verhulst, Stefaan G. 2021. Reimagining data responsibility: 10 new approaches toward a culture of trust in re-using data to address critical public needs. Data & Policy 3. e6–e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.4.Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, Anne. 2024. Rhizomatic healthcare: The digital transformation of France’s medical landscape. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance 1(1). 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0006.Search in Google Scholar
Wong, Janis, Tristan Henderson & Kirstie Ball. 2022. Data protection for the common good: Developing a framework for a data protection-focused data commons. Data & Policy 4. e1–e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.40.Search in Google Scholar
Zopf, Felix. 2022. Two Worlds Colliding-The GDPR in between public and private law. European Data Protection Law review 8(2). 210–220. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2022/2/8.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Ethical considerations related to personal data collection and reuse: trust and transparency in language and speech technologies
- Human dignity and patient’s interests above all: assisted dying in Switzerland and the UK
- Unveiling human rights protection in China from the perspective of criminal procedure law
- Navigating power and impoliteness in criminal court discourse
- Liability regulation on short video platforms: balancing freedom of expression and copyright protection
- Judging creativity in AI-generated art: Chinese and Western perspectives on originality in copyright law
- Stance expressions in legal academic discourse: A corpus-based analysis of legal journals
- Discoursing Chinese Maritime Law’s structure and reform
- Toward “climate-driven”: innovation on legislation of modern marine fisheries law under era of blue carbon
- Book Reviews
- Jean-Claude Gémar: The Pioneer and Vanguard of Jurilinguistics
- The Search Between Ideal and Reality: A Review of Professor Pinghua Sun’s Historic Achievement of a Common Standard: Pengchun Chang and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Ethical considerations related to personal data collection and reuse: trust and transparency in language and speech technologies
- Human dignity and patient’s interests above all: assisted dying in Switzerland and the UK
- Unveiling human rights protection in China from the perspective of criminal procedure law
- Navigating power and impoliteness in criminal court discourse
- Liability regulation on short video platforms: balancing freedom of expression and copyright protection
- Judging creativity in AI-generated art: Chinese and Western perspectives on originality in copyright law
- Stance expressions in legal academic discourse: A corpus-based analysis of legal journals
- Discoursing Chinese Maritime Law’s structure and reform
- Toward “climate-driven”: innovation on legislation of modern marine fisheries law under era of blue carbon
- Book Reviews
- Jean-Claude Gémar: The Pioneer and Vanguard of Jurilinguistics
- The Search Between Ideal and Reality: A Review of Professor Pinghua Sun’s Historic Achievement of a Common Standard: Pengchun Chang and The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
