Unveiling human rights protection in China from the perspective of criminal procedure law

References

Bartels, Lorana, Karen Gelb, Caroline Spiranovic, Rick Sarre & Dodd Shannon. 2018. Bail, risk and law reform: A review of bail legislation across Australia. Criminal Law Journal 42(2). 91–107.Search in Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 1992. Human rights in the context of criminal justice: Identifying international procedural protections and equivalent protections in national constitutions. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 8(3). 235–298.Search in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Alice. 2016. Alternatives to detention at a crossroads: Humanisation or criminalisation? Refugee Survey Quarterly 35(1). 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdv018.Search in Google Scholar

Buyun, Li. 1991. On three forms of human rights existence. Chinese Journal of Law 38(4). 11–17.Search in Google Scholar

Call, Jack E. 2000. The United States Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment: Evolution from warren to post-warren perspectives. Criminal Justice Review 25(1). 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680002500106.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Guangzhong. 2023. Discussion on several issues of reforming the arrest and detention system in China. China Legal Science 40(5). 5–26.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ruihua. 2021. Comparative criminal procedure law. Beijing: Peking University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ruihua. 2012. Several theoretical issues of criminal defense. Contemporary Law Review 26(1). 3–11.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ruihua. 2024. Some thoughts on the fundamental theory research of criminal procedure. Journal of Comparative Law 38(1). 91–105.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Weidong. 2017. Several issues in the pilot of plea and penalty leniency system. Journal of National Prosecutors College 25(1). 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Weidong. 2018a. Pilot study report on the necessity review of detention system. Chinese Journal of Law 40(2). 175–194.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Yujie. 2018b. China’s challenge to the international human rights regime. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics(51). 1179–1221.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Xiuli Liu. 2024. Unravelling power of the unseen: Towards an interdisciplinary synthesis of generative AI regulation. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance 1(1). 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2024-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lei. 2021. Secret surveillance and protection of citizens’ personal information in the context of big data. Legal Forum 36(3). 15–26.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Lei. 2023a. Research on relevant issues of applying the personal information protection law in criminal proceedings. Modern Law Review 45(1). 90–102.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Yan. 2017. On the value and improvement of the duty lawyer system. Law Science Magazine 38(4). 116–124.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Yan. 2023b. On the publicization of duty counsel. Criminal Science 33(3). 159–176.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Roberta. 1987. People’s Republic of China: The human rights exception. Human Rights Quartery(9). 447–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/761910.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Thomas H. & Christopher T. Lowenkamp. 2019. Revalidation of the federal PTRA: Testing the PTRA for predictive biases. Criminal Justice and Behavior 46(2). 234–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818810315.Search in Google Scholar

Dabney, Dean A., Joshua Page & Volkan Topalli. 2017. American bail and the tinting of criminal justice. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 56(4). 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12212.Search in Google Scholar

Dong, Kun. 2023. Commentary on article one of the criminal procedure law. Seeking Truth 50(5). 86–96.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Joshua & Alan C. Michael. 2010. Understanding criminal procedure, volumel: Investigation. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fan, Chongyi. 2018. The local narrative of duty lawyer system: Review, positioning and improvement. Law Science Magazine 39(9). 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Fan, Yuting Li & Le Cheng. 2024. Public order, human dignity, and the child’s best interests: The legal dilemma of surrogacy in Mo Yan’s Frog. Law & Literature 36(3). 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685x.2024.2392458.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, David. 1999. The human rights act 1998 and constitutional principles. Legal Studies 19(2). 165–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1999.tb00091.x.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, Mary. R. 2005. Your rights if arrested in England. Mount Saint Marys University Law Review 32(2). 205–224.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yongzhong. 2008. Reform and further improvement of China’s criminal defense system. People’s Procuratorial Semimonthly 53(1). 55–59.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yongzhong. 2016. Research on prominent issues of criminal defense in the context of trial-centeredness. China Legal Science 33(2). 65–85.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Yongzhong. 2018. Tracing the roots: Revisiting the contingent positioning of duty lawyers. Law Science Magazine 39(9). 13–24.Search in Google Scholar

Gould, Jon B. & Stephen D. Mastrofski. 2004. Suspect searches: Assessing police behavior under the US Constitution. Criminology & Public Policy 3(3). 315–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2004.tb00046.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Ming. 2020. Comprehensive coverage of criminal defense and the positioning and improvement of the duty lawyer system. Research on Rule of Law 14(3). 60–70.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Ming, Xitao Hu & Le Cheng. 2021. Exploring digital economy: A sociosemiotic perspective. International Journal of Legal Discourse 6(2). 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2021-2053.Search in Google Scholar

Hou, Shumei & Ronald Colin Keith. 2011. The defense lawyer in the scales of Chinese criminal justice. Journal of Contemporary China 20(70). 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2011.565172.Search in Google Scholar

Jia, Zhiqiang. 2022. Returning to legal norms: Reconsidering the issues in the application of the criminal duty lawyer system. Chinese Journal of Law 44(1). 120–134.Search in Google Scholar

Kinzelbach, Katrin. 2012. An analysis of China’s statements on human rights at the United Nations (2000–2010). Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30(3). 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411203000304.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Élisabeth & Jan Smolinski. 2024. Governing consumer information in the digital age: Lessons from a controversy between a food rating App and processed meat manufacturers. International Journal of Digital Law and Governance 2024;1:245–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdlg-2023-0005.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yuzhi. 2021. Reducing unnecessary arrests and reasonably lowering the detention rate. Procuratorial Daily. https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/zdgz/202103/t20210307_511081.shtml (accessed 27 October 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Boning. 2021. Inquiry into the effective legal assistance system for duty lawyers in cases of confession and punishment. Studies in Law and Business 38(3). 188–200.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Jihua. 2024. Interpretation of the regulations on the review and assessment of the necessity of detention from four aspects. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/XmjmDlUn44TfYDL9TfmBSA (accessed 11 October 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Jinyou & Hua Guo. 2004. Comparative study on search justification and its standards of proof. Legal Forum 19(4). 9–20.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Mingliang. 2022. Big data investigation based on Blockchain: Value, scenarios, and collaborative regulation. Journal of Public Security Science 5(4). 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Marks, Stephen P. 1998. From the ‘single confused page’ to the ‘decalogue for five billion persons’: The roots of the universal declaration of human rights in the French revolution. Human Rights Quarterly 20(3). 459–514. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1998.0030.Search in Google Scholar

Mazzeschi, Riccardo Pisillo. 2021. The Impact of human Rights on international law. International human rights law: Theory and practice, 17. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-77032-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Min, Chunlei. 2017. Effective defense in plea bargaining cases. Contemporary Law Review 31(4). 27–37.Search in Google Scholar

Nicolson, Donald & Julian Webb. 2004. Lawyers’ duties, adversarialism and partisanship in UK legal ethics. Legal Ethics 7(2). 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2004.11424203.Search in Google Scholar

Qian, Cheng. 2024. Model selection and institutional perfection for personal information protection in criminal proceedings. Law-Based Society 9(4). 91–103.Search in Google Scholar

Raday, Frances. 2000. Privatising human rights and the abuse of power. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 13(1). 103–136. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0841820900002320.Search in Google Scholar

Risse, Mathias. 2021. The fourth generation of human rights: Epistemic rights in digital lifeworlds. Moral Philosophy and Politics 8(2). 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0039.Search in Google Scholar

Roth, Klaus. 2003. Criminal procedure law, 24th edn. Liqi Wu, Beijing: Law Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shytov, Alexander & Peter Duff. 2019. Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 23(3). 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712719830704.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Lijue & Changshan Ma. 2022. Identifying the fourth generation of human rights in digital era. International Journal of Legal Discourse 7(1). 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2022-2065.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Pinghua. 2020. Duansheng Qian’s thoughts on human rights. International Journal of Legal Discourse 5(1). 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2020-2027.Search in Google Scholar

Tao, Zeyu. 2024. Analysis of changes in China’s arrest rates over the past two decades. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/CMp9_bvs2WJ3JMo7Aqdv5A (accessed 11 October 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Tong, Zhiwei. 2004. The value of incorporating human rights into the Constitution. The Jurist 16(4). 25–28.Search in Google Scholar

Vasak, Karel. 1977. Human rights: A 30-year struggle: The sustained efforts to give force of law to the universal declaration of human rights. UNESCO Courier 30(11). 29–32.Search in Google Scholar

Wan, Yi. 2023. Reflection and reconstruction of the statutory arrest criteria model. The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute 23(6). 124–132.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Haiyan. 2019. Triple dilemma: The predicament of the duty lawyer system in the leniency program for confessing and waiving rights. Law Science Magazine 40(12). 12–23.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Yanxue. 2010. On Misidentification in Online Warrants. Journal of China University of Police (Social Science Edition) 26(6). 90–98.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Liming. 2012. Reconceptualization of the right to privacy. The Jurist 24(1). 108–120.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Minyuan & Ming Hu. 2022. Report on the implementation of the criminal defense system in recent years in our country. Journal of Law Application 37(1). 37–50.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Minyuan. 2023. Criminal procedure law. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press.Search in Google Scholar

Warren, Samuel. D. & Louis D. Brandeis. 1890. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5). 193–220. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321160.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Xiaona. 2024. From tool law to guarantee law: The functional transformation of criminal procedure law. Hebei Academic Journal 44(3). 9–15.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Jikui. 2010. Study on the right of the prosecuted person to read documents. Criminal Science 10(8). 19–27.Search in Google Scholar

Xiao, Peiquan. 2021. On the legal position of duty lawyer in our country and its rights guarantee. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University 35(4). 144–152.Search in Google Scholar

Xiong, Qiuhong. 2017. New developments in human rights protection within China’s criminal justice system. Guangming Daily. http://iolaw.cssn.cn/yw/2017/201703/t20170315_4648521.shtml (accessed 27 October 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Xue, Yongkui. 2024. Challenges, opportunities, and dilemmas facing the review and assessment of the necessity of detention. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_z0fR1laZJWn78cDSvTL9A (accessed 11 October 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Bo. 2012. Exploration on the right of the prosecuted person to read the file-Expanding with the right of the right to read the file as the base point. Contemporary Law Review 26(1). 24–29.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Fangquan & Haiyun Zhu. 2012. The new theory of lawyer perjury. Journal of Law Application 27(10). 47–52.Search in Google Scholar

Yao, Li. 2017. The role and function of duty lawyers in the Plea Bargaining procedure. Studies in Law and Business 34(6). 42–49.Search in Google Scholar

Yi, Yanyou. 2008. Arrest as punishment: The abuse of arrest in the People’s Republic of China. Punishment & Society 10(1). 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474507084195.Search in Google Scholar

Zhan, Jianhong. 2022. Realization model of full coverage of lawyer defense in criminal cases. Criminal Science 12(4). 129–144.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Zetao. 2018. Origin, present situation and difference clarification of duty lawyer system. Law Review 36(3). 70–78.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, Xi. 2020. Beyond the reading of documents: A study of criminal defendants’ data access rights in the context of judicial informatization. Journal of Henan University (Social Science Edition) 60(2). 59–65.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, Xi. 2024. Limitations and norms of personal information rights in criminal proceedings. Research on Rule of Law 18(5). 30–41.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Xin. 2019. Study on the hearing procedure for arrest review. Peking University Law Journal 31(4). 1025–1049.Search in Google Scholar

Zi, Zhengfa. 2020. Viewing human rights protection in criminal justice of the new Era from a procedural perspective. People’s Courts Daily June 25.Search in Google Scholar