Visualizing international studies on cyberspace sovereignty: concept, rationality, and legitimacy

References

Barcomb, Kris, Dennis Krill, Robert Mills & Michael Saville. 2012. Establishing cyberspace sovereignty. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism 3. 26–28.10.4018/ijcwt.2012070103Suche in Google Scholar

Bobbitt, Philip. 2008. Terror and consent: The wars for the twenty-first century. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Suche in Google Scholar

Bodenheimer, Edgar. 1962. Jurisprudence: The philosophy and method of the law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674733107Suche in Google Scholar

Bomse, Amy L. 2001. The dependence of cyberspace. Duke Law Journal 50(6). 1717–1749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373046.Suche in Google Scholar

Cattaruzza, Amael, Didier Danet, Stephane Taillat & Arthur Laudrain. 2016. Sovereignty in cyberspace: Balkanization or democratization. Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Cyber Conflict, NATO Cooperat Cyber Def Ctr Excellence, 21–23 October.10.1109/CYCONUS.2016.7836628Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2006. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(3). 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Jiamin Pei. 2018. Interpreting cybersecurity law: A semiotic perspective. Journal of Zhejiang University 48(6). 135–139.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Xin Wang. 2018. Cyber asset in judicial discourses: A socio-semiotic interpretation. Social Semiotics 29(4). 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1487110.Suche in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Jiamin Pei & Marcel Danesi. 2019. A sociosemiotic interpretation of cybersecurity in U.S. legislative discourse. Social Semiotics 29(3). 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587843.Suche in Google Scholar

Czosseck, Christian & Katharina Ziolkowski. 2013. State actors and their proxies in cyberspace. Peacetime Regime for State Activities in Cyberspace 1. 1–3.Suche in Google Scholar

Czosseck, Christian & Kenneth Geers. 2009. Borders in cyberspace: Can sovereignty adapt to the challenges of cyber security? The Virtual Battlefield: Perspectives on Cyber Warfare 3. 88.Suche in Google Scholar

Deibert, Ronald J. 2018. Toward a human-centric approach to cybersecurity. Ethics and International Affairs 32(4). 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0892679418000618.Suche in Google Scholar

Efremov, Aleksei A. 2017. The formation of the concept of national information sovereignty. Journal of Higher School of Economics 1. 201–205. https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2017.1.201.215.Suche in Google Scholar

Egbert, Jesse. 2015. Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(1). 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb.Suche in Google Scholar

Eichensehr, Kristen E. 2015. The cyber-law of nations. The Georgetown Law Journal 103(2). 317–380.Suche in Google Scholar

Eldem, Tuba. 2021. International cybersecurity norms and responsible cyber sovereignty. Istanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi 79(1). 347–378. https://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2021.79.1.0010.Suche in Google Scholar

Fang, Binxing. 2018. Cyberspace sovereignty. Beijing: Science Press.10.1007/978-981-13-0320-3Suche in Google Scholar

Federico, Paolo, Florian Heimerl, Steffen Koch & Silvia Miksch. 2017. A survey on visual approaches for analyzing scientific literature and patents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23(9). 2179–2198. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2016.2610422.Suche in Google Scholar

Godwin III, James B., Andrey Kulpim, Karl F. Rauscher & Valery Yaschenko (eds.). 2014. Critical terminology foundations 2: Russia-U.S. bilateral on cybersecurity. Moscow: East-West Institute.Suche in Google Scholar

Hare, Forrest. 2009. Borders in cyberspace: Can sovereignty adapt to the challenges of cyber security? The Virtual Battlefield: Perspectives on Cyber Warfare 3. 88–105.Suche in Google Scholar

Herzog, Stephen. 2011. Revisiting the Estonian cyberattacks: Digital threats and multinational responses. Journal of Strategic Security 4(2). 4. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.2.3.Suche in Google Scholar

Hou, Jianhua, Yang Xiucai & Chen Chaomei. 2018. Emerging trends and new developments in information science: A document co-citation analysis (2009–2016). Scientometrics 115(2). 869–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2695-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Hunter, Dan. 2003. Cyberspace as place and the tragedy of the digital anticommons. California Law Review 92(2). 439–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481336.Suche in Google Scholar

Jensen, Eric T. 2012. Sovereignty and neutrality in cyber conflict. Fordham International Law Journal 35(3). 815–841.Suche in Google Scholar

Jensen, Eric T. 2015. Cyber sovereignty: The way ahead. Texas International Law Journal 50. 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Jensen, Eric. T. 2017. The Tallinn manual 2.0: Highlights and insights. Georgetown Journal of International Law 48. 735–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2017.1328927.Suche in Google Scholar

Kukkola, Juha. 2018. Russian cyber power and structural asymmetry. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security. National Defence University: Washington DC, 8–9 March.Suche in Google Scholar

Lantis, Jeffrey S. & Daniel J. Bloomberg. 2018. Changing the code? Norm contestation and US antipreneurism in cyberspace. International Relations 32(2). 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818763006.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Lessig, Lawrence. 2000. Cyberspace and privacy: A new legal paradigm? Foreword. Stanford Law Review 52(5). 987–1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229508.Suche in Google Scholar

Libicki, Martin C. 2007. Conquest in cyberspace: National security and information warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804250Suche in Google Scholar

Lyon, David. 2015. The snowden stakes: Challenges for understanding surveillance today. Surveillance and Society 13(2). 139–152. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i2.5363.Suche in Google Scholar

Marusek, Sarah & Anne Wager (eds.). 2021. Law and visual jurisprudence. Switzerland: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. 2017. Discourse, interests, and the law: Some pragma-legal reflections. International Journal of Legal Discourse 2(1). 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0004.Suche in Google Scholar

Mingers, John & Loet Leydesdorff. 2015. A review of theory and practice in scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research 246(1). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Mueller, Milton L. 2020. Against sovereignty in cyberspace. International Studies Review 22(4). 779–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz044.Suche in Google Scholar

Nalimov, Vasily V. & Zinaida M. Mul’chenko. 1971. Measurement of science: Study of the development of science as an information process. Washington DC: Foreign Technology Division.Suche in Google Scholar

Nugraha, Yudhistira, KautsarinaKautsarina & Ashwin, S. Sastrosubroto. 2015. Towards data sovereignty in cyberspace. In 2015 3rd international conference on information and communication technology (ICoICT), 465–471. IEEE.10.1109/ICoICT.2015.7231469Suche in Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. 2011. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs.Suche in Google Scholar

Park, Gwijeong, Fangxin Chen & Le Cheng. 2021. A study on the millennials usage behavior of social network services: Effects of motivation, density, and centrality on continuous intention to use. Sustainability 13(5). 2071–1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052680.Suche in Google Scholar

Šarčević, Susan. 1985. Translation of culture-bound terms in law. Multilingua 4(3). 127–133.10.1515/mult.1985.4.3.127Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N. (ed.). 2013. Tallinn manual on the international law applicable to cyber warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139169288Suche in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N (ed.). 2017. Tallinn manual 2.0 on the international law applicable to cyber operations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316822524Suche in Google Scholar

Shen, Yi. 2016. Cyber sovereignty and the governance of global cyberspace. Chinese Political Science Review 1. 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0002-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Siedler, Endresen R. 2016. Hard power in cyberspace: CNA as a political means. In 2016 8th international conference on cyber conflict (CyCon), 23–36. IEEE.10.1109/CYCON.2016.7529424Suche in Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne M. 2004. A new world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stevens, Tim. 2016. Cyber security and the politics of time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316271636Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Anne & Aleksandra Matulewska. 2020. Instrumentalization of law as a socially constituted sign-system. International Journal of Legal Discourse 5(2). 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2020-2041.Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Anne, Aleksandra Matulewska & Le Cheng. 2020. Law as a culturally constituted sign-system: A space for interpretation. International Journal of Legal Discourse 5(2). 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2020-2041.Suche in Google Scholar

Weber, Rolf H. 2015. Realizing a new global cyberspace framework. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-662-44677-5Suche in Google Scholar

Wu, Timothy S. 1996. Cyberspace sovereignty: The internet and the international system. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 10. 647–648.Suche in Google Scholar