A science mapping of studies on courtroom discourse with CiteSpace

References

Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Paul Drew. 1979. Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings (Oxford Socio-Legal Studies). London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5Suche in Google Scholar

Beach, Wayne A. & Terrir Metzger. 1997. Claiming insufficient knowledge. Human Communication Research 23(4). 562–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Catalano, Theresa & Linda R. Waugh. 2020. Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies and beyond (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology). Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-49379-0Suche in Google Scholar

Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2012. Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness testimony. Discourse & Society 23(5). 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926512441111.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2014. Interactive patterns of the opening statement in criminal trials: A historical perspective. Discourse Studies 16(3). 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613508900.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2019. Person reference, identity, and linguistic violence in capital trials. Journal of Pragmatics 142. 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Chaemsaithong, Krisda & Yoonjeong Kim. 2021. “Let’s kill him”: Self-reference pronouns and speaking roles in capital trials. Social Semiotics 31(4). 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1661484.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2003. Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization, 1st edn. London: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.10.1007/978-1-4471-0051-5Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2004. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(Supplement 1). 5303–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2005. The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, San Diego, 9–12 January.10.1145/1040830.1040859Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2006. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(3). 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2013. Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization, 2nd edn. London: London: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.10.1007/978-1-4471-5128-9Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2016. CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei. 2017. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science 2(2). 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, Chaomei, Fidelia Ibekwe-San Juan & Jianhua Hou. 2010. The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(7). 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309.Suche in Google Scholar

Conley, John M., William M. O’Barr & E. Allan Lind. 1979. The power of language: Presentational style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal 1978(6). 1375–1399. https://doi.org/10.2307/1372218.Suche in Google Scholar

Cotterill, Janet. 2003. Language and power in court. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230006010Suche in Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm. 1994. On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 1(1). 27–43.10.1558/ijsll.v1i1.27Suche in Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm, Alison Johnson & David Wright. 2017a. Critical, theoretical, and methodological approaches to language in legal settings. In Malcolm Coulthard, Alison Johnson & David Wright (eds.), An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence, 2nd edn., 9–30. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm, Alison Johnson & David Wright. 2017b. An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence, 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

D’hondt, Sigurd. 2010. The cultural defense as courtroom drama: The enactment of identity, sameness, and difference in criminal trial discourse. Law & Social Inquiry 35(1). 67–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01178.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Eades, Diana. 2008. Courtroom talk and neocolonial control (Language, Power and Social Process 22). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208320Suche in Google Scholar

Eades, Diana. 2010. Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692559Suche in Google Scholar

Egghe, Leo. 2006. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69(1). 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Susan. 2001. Representing rape: Language and sexual consent. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Felton Rosulek, Laura. 2009. The sociolinguistic creation of opposing representations of defendants and victims. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 16(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v16i1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Felton Rosulek, Laura. 2015. Dueling discourses: The construction of reality in closing arguments (Oxford Studies in Language and Law). New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337613.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Freeman, Linton C. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3). 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system, 1st edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Sandra. 2010. Court interpreting: The need to raise the bar: Court interpreters as specialized experts. In Malcolm Coulthard & Alison Johnson (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics), 1st edn., 440–454. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Sandra Beatriz. 2004. The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness, and the interpreter. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/btl.52Suche in Google Scholar

Hale, Sandra Beatriz. 2008. Controversies over the role of the court interpreter. In Carmen Valero Garcés & Anne Martin (eds.), Crossing borders in community interpreting: Definitions and dilemmas, 99–121. Netherlands: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.76.06halSuche in Google Scholar

Heffer, Chris. 2005. The language of jury trial: A corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230502888Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufman, Leonard & Peter J. Rousseeuw. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis (Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics). Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9780470316801Suche in Google Scholar

Kleinberg, Jon. 2003. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 7(4). 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024940629314.10.1145/775047.775061Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Jian & Yuxiu Sun. 2018. Presuppositions as discourse strategies in court examinations. International Journal of Legal Discourse 3(2). 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2018-2008.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Jian, Ning Ye & Anne Wagner. 2019. A memetic exploration of court interpretation. International Journal of Legal Discourse 4(2). 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2019-2022.Suche in Google Scholar

Malcolm Coulthard, Alison May & Rui Sousa-Silva (eds.). 2020. The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics), 2nd edn. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429030581Suche in Google Scholar

Matoesian, Gregory M. 1999. The grammaticalization of participant roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society 28(4). 491–521. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404599004017.Suche in Google Scholar

Michael, C. Ogwezzy. 2016. Communication of an interpreter and fair trial under Nigerian criminal justice system. International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(1). 213–233.10.1515/ijld-2016-0006Suche in Google Scholar

Ng, Kwai Hang. 2009. The common law in two voices: Language, law, and the postcolonial dilemma in Hong Kong. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804772358Suche in Google Scholar

O’Barr, William M. 1982. Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 1989. Language has a heart. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 9(1). 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7.Suche in Google Scholar

Pascual, Esther. 2006. Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 26(3). 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2006.014a.Suche in Google Scholar

Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68(6). 939–967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752.Suche in Google Scholar

Rickford, John R. & Sharese King. 2016. Language and linguistics on trial: Hearing rachel jeantel (and other vernacular speakers) in the courtroom and beyond. Language 92(4). 948–988. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0078.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmid, Jeannette & Klaus Fiedler. 1998. The backbone of closing speeches: The impact of prosecution versus defense language on judicial attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28(13). 1140–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01672.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Small, Henry. 1973. Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4). 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406.Suche in Google Scholar

Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2016. Say and stance taking in courtroom talk: A corpus-assisted study. Corpora 11(2). 143–168. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0090.Suche in Google Scholar

Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2019. But, you see, the problem is…perception verbs in courtroom talk: Focus on you see. Topics in Linguistics 20(1). 24–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0002.Suche in Google Scholar

Szczyrbak, Magdalena. 2021. I’m thinking and you’re saying: Speaker stance and the progressive of mental verbs in courtroom interaction. Text & Talk 41(2). 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0145.Suche in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 2007. Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618987Suche in Google Scholar

Tiersma, Peter. 1999. Legal language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Wagner, Anne & Le Cheng. 2011. Exploring courtroom discourse: The language of power and control (Law, Language and Communication). Farnham & Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar