Investigative interviewing: Assessing questioning strategies employed to children in conflict with the law

Via Allison B. Del Rosario; Rachelle Ballesteros-Lintao

doi:10.1515/ijld-2018-2004

Article

Investigative interviewing: Assessing questioning strategies employed to children in conflict with the law

Published/Copyright: June 9, 2018

Published by

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Author Information Explore this Subject

From the journal International Journal of Legal Discourse Volume 3 Issue 1

Abstract

As majority of criminal cases in the Philippines are often challenged by the plight to obtain voluntary narratives from Children who are in Conflict with the Law (CICL) (National Police Commission, Department of the Interior and Local Government, Republic of the Philippines 2009. Adoption of the police manual on the management of cases of children in conflict with the law (CICL) and the simplified rules in the apprehension and investigation of CICL, Resolution No. 415.), and Forensic Linguistics being a relatively new field in the local setting, it is timely to assess the questioning strategies heavily relied upon by law enforcement officers in the investigative process. However, questioning strategies geared to address purely the investigations of children in conflict with the law has so far been hardly formally investigated. This study was aimed at examining the questioning strategies used in by the authorities in investigating adolescents accused of crime against property. Fifteen transcripts of audio-recorded investigative interviews from selected law enforcement authorities in Manila and Quezon City were analyzed vis-à-vis (Shepherd, Eric. 2007. Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press). Forms of Questions and (Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing) Cognitive Interview (CI) frameworks. Based on (Shepherd, Eric. 2007. Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press) Shepherd’s framework, results yielded reveal that most officers employed counter-productive questions, i.e. abusive, intimidating, and aggressive techniques to prompt controlled confession from alleged youth offenders. The study also found that the investigative officers did not follow a specific interviewing structure in handling cases of alleged youth offenders. As the use of appropriate questioning techniques have been presented in the study, it is recommended that a pivotal redraft be made in police CICL interviewing manuals.

Keywords: forensic linguistics; investigative interviewing; questioning strategies; cognitive interview (CI); law enforcement authorities; children in conflict with the law (CICL)

References

Benneworth, Kelly. 2004. A discursive analysis of police interviews with suspected paedophiles: The implications of ‘open’ and ‘closed’ interviewing for admission and denial. A doctoral thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University. http://creative.commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5 (accessed 20 August 2016).10.1177/0957926509106410Search in Google Scholar

Berk-Seligson, Susan. 2009. Coerced confessions: The discourse of bilingual police interrogations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213492Search in Google Scholar

Caparas, Donna. 2007. An analysis of police management of cases of Children in Conflict with the Law in Metro Manila from 2005 to the 1st semester of 2007 (Master's thesis). In Philippine National Police Commission's 2009 police manual on the management of cases of children in conflict with the law Master thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Convention Against Torture Initiative (CTI). 2017. Investigative Interviewing from Criminal Cases. Norway: Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, University of Oslo. https://cti2024.org/content/docs/CTI-Training_Tool_1-Final.pdf (accessed 22 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Coulthard, Malcolm & Alison Johnson. 2010. The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203855607Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald & Edward Geiselman. 1992. Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing. The Cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, Ronald & Edward Geiselman. 2014. Interviewing witnesses and victims. In St Yves Michael (ed.), Investigative interviewing: Handbook of best practices, Toronto: Thomson Reuters Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Freed, Alice & Susan Ehrlich (eds.). 2010. Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195306897.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Andy & Becky Milne. 2006. Will it all end in tiers? Police interviews with suspects in Britain. In Tom Williamson (ed.), Investigative Interviewing: Rights, research, regulation, 167–189. Devon: Willan.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Phil. 2003. In Gibbons John & Teresa Turrell (eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics, 67–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Haney, Christopher & Andrea Roller. 2012. Investigative Interview Techniques. United States: Duff & Phelps.Search in Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, Irit et al. 2004. Interviewing youthful suspects in alleged sex cries: A descriptive analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect 28. 423–438.10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.021Search in Google Scholar

Heydon, Georgina. 2005. The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230502932Search in Google Scholar

Heydon, Georgina. 2012. Helping the police with their enquiries: Enhancing the investigative interview with linguistic research. Police Journal 85(2)10.1350/pojo.2012.85.2.581Search in Google Scholar

Ingalls, Jennifer & Vlanett Rodriguez. 2011. Forensic interviewing: The basics. Retrieved from: www.jingalls@childhelp.org (accessed 20 August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Juvenile and Justice Welfare Act of 2006, Republic Act No. 9344 (2005).Search in Google Scholar

Luther, Kirk et al. 2015. Child Interviewing Practices in Canada: A Box Score from Field Observations. Journal Police Crime Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y (accessed 30 April 2018)Search in Google Scholar

Martin, Gus. 2005. Juvenile justice: Process and systems. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Milne, Becky & Ray Bull. 1999. Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Chichester: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Nakane, Ikuko. 2014. Interpreter-mediated police interviews: A discourse-pragmatic approach. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137443199Search in Google Scholar

National Police Commission, Department of the Interior and Local Government, Republic of the Philippines (2009). Adoption of the police manual on the management of cases of children in conflict with the law (CICL) and the simplified rules in the apprehension and investigation of CICL, Resolution No. 415.Search in Google Scholar

Newlin, Chris et al. 2015. Child forensic interviewing best practices. In Robert Listenbee (ed.), Working for youth justice and safety: Juvenile justice bulletin, USA: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Search in Google Scholar

Oxburgh, Gavin, Trond Myklebust & Tim Grant. 2010a. The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. The International Journal of Speech, Language, and the Law. 45–66. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gavin_Oxburgh2/publication/doi/40764681.pdf (accessed 5 September 2016).10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.45Search in Google Scholar

Oxburgh, Gavin, James Ost & Julie Cherryman. 2010b. Investigation relevant information obtained?http://hdl.handle.net/doi/pdf/10149/225556 (accessed 5 September 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Sanidad-Leones, Celina. 2003. Effective preventive measures for youth at risk in the Philippines. Circular on the 129th international seminar visiting experts' papers.Search in Google Scholar

Savino, John & Brent Turvey. 2011. Interviewing suspects and victims. Rape investigation handbook, (2nd edn). 175–206.10.1016/B978-0-12-386029-3.00007-3Search in Google Scholar

Schollum, Mary. 2005. Investigative interviewing: The literature. Wellington, New Zealand: Office of the Commissioner Police.Search in Google Scholar

Shepherd, Eric. 2007. Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shuy, Robert. 1998. The language of confession, interrogation, and deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781452229133Search in Google Scholar

Strengthening the Juvenile Justice System of 2013, Republic Act No. 10630 (2012).Search in Google Scholar

St-Yves, Michel & Christian Meissner. 2014. Interviewing Suspects. 6:145–172. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/280297952 (accessed 21 April 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Swerdlow-Freed, Dan. 2009. Questioning strategies for forensic interviews of children. Child forensic interview structure. Hunstville, Alabama: National Children's Advocacy Center. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dhs/DHS-PUB-0779_211637_7.pdf (accessed 8 September 2016)Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-04-02

Accepted: 2018-04-15

Published Online: 2018-06-09

Published in Print: 2018-08-28

You are currently not able to access this content.

Articles in the same Issue

https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2018-2004

Keywords for this article

forensic linguistics; investigative interviewing; questioning strategies; cognitive interview (CI); law enforcement authorities; children in conflict with the law (CICL)