Startseite Naturwissenschaften Optimization of slicing sugar beet for improving the purity of diffusion juice using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Optimization of slicing sugar beet for improving the purity of diffusion juice using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm

  • Maryam Naghipour Zade , Mohammad Hossein Aghkhani , Abbas Rohani EMAIL logo , Khalil Behzad und Armaghan Kosari-Moghaddam
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. September 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The purity is accounted for one of the main characteristics of sugar beet juice in the sugar production process. In this regard, in the paper, the impact of slicing parameters including blade type, slicing angle from 0 to 90°, slicing thickness from 3 to 6 mm, and preheating duration from 3 to 15 min was studied on juice purity using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The Genetic Algorithm (GA) technique was also employed to find the optimum values of variables to reach the highest juice purity. The results indicated that the quadratic model was the best model to predict juice purity. The Findings presented that as cossette thickness and slicing angle increased, the juice purity was improved. Optimization of the quadratic model by GA showed the best cossette thickness was 6 mm for both blades. The results of optimization indicated that 92.25 and 94.45% juice purities could be obtained from optimum conditions.


Corresponding author: Abbas Rohani, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was funded by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Asadi, M. Beet-sugar handbook. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.10.1002/0471790990Suche in Google Scholar

2. Poel, PW, Schiweck, H, Schwartz, TK. Sugar technology: beet and cane sugar manufacture. Berlin: Verlag Dr Albert Bartens KG; 1998.10.36961/stSuche in Google Scholar

3. Nakthong, N, Eshtiaghi, M. Pulsed electric field treatment of sugar beet. In: Paper presented at the IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. Hanoi, Vietnam: IOP Publishing; 2020.10.1088/1755-1315/505/1/012055Suche in Google Scholar

4. Eshtiaghi, M, Knorr, D. High electric field pulse pretreatment: potential for sugar beet processing. J Food Eng 2002;52:265–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-8774(01)00114-5.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Lebovka, N, Shynkaryk, M, El-Belghiti, K, Benjelloun, H, Vorobiev, E. Plasmolysis of sugarbeet: pulsed electric fields and thermal treatment. J Food Eng 2007;80:639–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.06.020.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Loginova, K, Vorobiev, E, Bals, O, Lebovka, N. Pilot study of countercurrent cold and mild heat extraction of sugar from sugar beets, assisted by pulsed electric fields. J Food Eng 2011;102:340–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.09.010.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Loginova, K, Loginov, M, Vorobiev, E, Lebovka, N. Better lime purification of sugar beet juice obtained by low temperature aqueous extraction assisted by pulsed electric field. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2012;46:371–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2011.10.005.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Elsyiad, SI. Minimizing the milk of lime and steam consumption during sugar beet processing in delta sugar factories. In: Paper presented at the world economics for sugar industry towards food and energy in a changed economic environment. Aswan, Egypt: Assiut University; 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Wu, X-F, Zhang, M, Mujumdar, AS, Yang, C-H. Effect of ultrasound-assisted osmotic dehydration pretreatment on the infrared drying of Pakchoi stems. Dry Technol 2020;38:2015–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1608232.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Yolmeh, M, Jafari, SM. Applications of response surface methodology in the food industry processes. Food Bioprocess Technol 2017;10:413–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-016-1855-2.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Ghorbannezhad, P, Bay, A, Yolmeh, M, Yadollahi, R, Moghadam, JY. Optimization of coagulation–flocculation process for medium density fiberboard (MDF) wastewater through response surface methodology. Desalination Water Treat 2016;57:26916–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1170636.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Kaushik, R, Saran, S, Isar, J, Saxena, R. Statistical optimization of medium components and growth conditions by response surface methodology to enhance lipase production by Aspergillus carneus. J Mol Catal B Enzym 2006;40:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.02.019.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Aydar, A. Statistical methods in optimization of food materials. Eur Int J Sci Technol 2019;8:33–40.10.1002/fsat.3302_10.xSuche in Google Scholar

14. Pratihar, DK. Soft computing: fundamentals and applications. Oxford, UK: Alpha Science International, Ltd; 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Mukhopadhyay, A, Duari, S, Barman, TK, Sahoo, P. Optimization of wear behavior of electroless Ni-PW coating under dry and lubricated conditions using genetic algorithm (GA). J Tribol 2016;11:24–48.10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012004Suche in Google Scholar

16. Mohebbi, M, Shahidi, F, Fathi, M, Ehtiati, A, Noshad, M. Prediction of moisture content in pre-osmosed and ultrasounded dried banana using genetic algorithm and neural network. Food Bioprod Process 2011;89:362–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2010.08.001.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Fathi, M, Mohebbi, M, Razavi, SM. Application of fractal theory for prediction of shrinkage of dried kiwifruit using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Dry Technol 2011;29:918–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2011.553755.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Mohsenin, NN. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Pennsylvania: Department of Agricultural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University; 1986.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Khazaei, J, Rabbani, H, Golbabaei, F. Determining the shear strength and picking force for Pyrethrum flower. Iran J Agric Sci 2002;33:433–44.Suche in Google Scholar

20. ICUMSA. Methods books. USA: ICUMSA; 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Weiner, E. Zuckertechniker-Taschenbuch. Berlin: Bartens; 1966.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Myers, RH, Montgomery, DC, Anderson-Cook, CM. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Teranishi, R, Patterson, RL, Owens, HS. Sampling of sugar beets for the processing laboratory. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 1956;9:74–7. https://doi.org/10.5274/jsbr.9.1.74.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Autorenkollektiv. Die Zuckerherstellung. VEB Fachbuchverlag: Leipzig; 1984.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Naghipour Zade Mahani, M, Aghkhani, MH, Behzad, K, Rohani, A. Study of effect of blade edge on sucrose extraction of sugar beet and quality of raw juice. Iran J Food Sci Technol Res 2017;13:191–201.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-09-24
Accepted: 2021-09-03
Published Online: 2021-09-22

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2020-0242/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen