Home Optimization of foaming process: drying behaviour, physicochemical, and powder properties of hot air-assisted foam-mat dried nectarine
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of foaming process: drying behaviour, physicochemical, and powder properties of hot air-assisted foam-mat dried nectarine

  • Yeliz Tekgül ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 24, 2021

Abstract

Nectarine powder is widely used in the industries of baking and confectionery. The production of nectarine powder can be made by several drying techniques such as spray, tray, drum, freeze, and foam mat. This study was aimed to optimize the parameters of the nectarine foaming process. Besides, hot air-assisted foam-mat drying of nectarine was carried out to evaluate the effect of different temperatures (50, 60, and 70 °C) on drying kinetics, physicochemical and powder properties of nectarine powder. Factors studied were egg albumin concentration, carboxymethyl cellulose concentration, and whipping time that varied between 10 and 30% (by weight), 0.2–0.8% (by weight), and 3–5 min, respectively. Optimum conditions were determined as 30% of egg albumin, 0.8% carboxymethyl cellulose, and a whipping time of 5 min to get maximum foam expansion, high foam stability, and minimum foam density. The drying rate and effective moisture diffusivity of nectarine foam powder increased with increasing drying temperature. Carr Index and Hauser Ratio values were in the range of 32.31–47.00 and 1.48–2.00, respectively. Foamed nectarine powder dried at 70 °C had the lowest hygroscopicity value and the highest wettability value. No significant difference was found between the powders’ porosity (p > 0.05). The powders produced at 50 °C resulted in higher total phenolic, vitamin C, and carotenoid content.


Corresponding author: Yeliz Tekgül, Food Processing Department, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Köşk Vocational School, Aydın, 09100, Turkey, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. FAO; 2020. 12:00. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize [Accessed 01 10 2020].Search in Google Scholar

2. Byrne, DH, Noratto, G, Cisneros-Zevallos, L, Porter, W, Vizzotto, M. Health benefits of peach, nectarine and plums. Acta Hortic 2009;841:267–74, https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2009.841.32.Search in Google Scholar

3. Xie, J, Zheng, Y, Liu, X, Dong, F, Xu, J, Wu, X, et al.. Human health safety studies of a new insecticide: dissipation kinetics and dietary risk assessment of afidopyropen and one of its metabolites in cucumber and nectarine. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2019;103:150–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.01.025.Search in Google Scholar

4. Çalışkan Koç, G, Yüksel, AN. The foam-mat convective and microwave dried avocado powder: physical, functional, and powder properties. Lat Am Appl Res 2020;50:291–7.10.52292/j.laar.2020.486Search in Google Scholar

5. Abd El-Salam, EAES, Ali, AM, Hammad, KS. Foaming process optimization, drying kinetics and quality of foam mat dried papaya pulp. J Food Sci Technol 2021;58:1449–61, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04657-2.Search in Google Scholar

6. Varhan, E, Elmas, F, Koç, M. Foam mat drying of fig fruit: optimization of foam composition and physicochemical properties of fig powder. J Food Process Eng 2019;42: e13022, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13022.Search in Google Scholar

7. Balasubramanian, S, Paridhi, G, Bosco, JD, Kadam, DM. Optimization of process conditions for the development of tomato foam by box-Behnken design. Food Nutr Sci 2012;3:925–30, https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2012.37122.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ratti, C. Hot air and freeze-drying of high-value foods: a review. J Food Eng 2001;49:311–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0260-8774(00)00228-4.Search in Google Scholar

9. Onwude, DI, Hashim, N, Janius, RB, Nawi, NB, Abdan, K. Modeling the thin-layer drying of fruits and vegetables: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2016;15:599–618, https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12196.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Türkan, B, Etemoğlu, AB. Experimental and theoretical investigation of drying kinetics of banana slices. Pamukkale Univer J Eng Sci 2020;26:643–53, https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2019.84484.Search in Google Scholar

11. Asokapandian, S, Venkatachalam, S, Swamy, GJ, Kuppusam, K. Optimization of foaming properties and foam mat drying of muskmelon using soy protein. J Food Process Eng 2016;39:692–701, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12261.Search in Google Scholar

12. Hossain, MA, Mitra, S, Belal, M, Zzaman, W. Effect of foaming agent concentration and drying temperature on biochemical properties of foam mat dried tomato powder. Food Res 2021;5:291–7, https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.5(1).372.Search in Google Scholar

13. Brar, AS, Kaur, P, Kaur, G, Subramanian, J, Kumar, D, Singh, A. Optimization of process parameters for foam-mat drying of peaches. Int J Fruit Sci 2020;20:1495–518, https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1812017.Search in Google Scholar

14. Aktas, RN, Tontul, I. Usability of soapwort and horse chestnutsaponin extracts as foaming agents in foammat drying of pomegranate juice. J Sci Food Agric 2021;101:786–93, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10770.Search in Google Scholar

15. Doymaz, I. Thin-layer drying of spinach leaves in a convective dryer. J Food Process Eng 2009;32:112–25, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00205.x.Search in Google Scholar

16. Geankoplis, CJ. Transport processes and separation process principles (includes unit operations), 4th ed.; 2003. 576–7pp.Search in Google Scholar

17. Crank, J, Gupta, R. Isothermal migration in two dimensions. Int J Heat Mass Tran 1975;18:1101–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(75)90228-8.Search in Google Scholar

18. Bozkir, H, Rayman Ergün, A, Tekgül, Y, Baysal, T. Ultrasound as pretreatment for drying garlic slices in microwave and convective dryer. Food Sci Biotechnol 2019;28:347–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0483-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Ng, ML, Sulaiman, R. Development of beetroot (Beta vulgaris) powder using foam mat drying. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2018;88:80–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.032.Search in Google Scholar

20. Marinova, KG, Basheva, ES, Nenova, B, Temelska, M, Mirarefi, AY, Campbell, B, et al.. Physico-chemical factors controlling the foamability and foam stability of milk proteins: sodium caseinate and whey protein concentrates. Food Hydrocolloids 2009;23:1864–76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.03.003.Search in Google Scholar

21. Jinapong, N, Suphantharika, M, Jamnong, P. Production of instant soymilk powders by ultrafiltration, spray drying and fluidized bed agglomeration. J Food Eng 2008;84:194–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.032.Search in Google Scholar

22. Barbosa-Canovas, GV, Ortega-Rivas, E, Juliano, P, Yan, H. Food powder: physical properties, processing, and functionality. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenu; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

23. Carr, RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng 1965;72:163–8.Search in Google Scholar

24. Lozano, JE, Rotstein, E, Urbicain, MJ. Total porosity andopen-pore porosity in the drying of fruits. J Food Sci 1980;45:403–1407, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb06564.x.Search in Google Scholar

25. Cai, YZ, Corke, H. Production and properties of spray-dried Amaranthus betacyanin pigments. J Food Sci 2000;65:1248–52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10273.x.Search in Google Scholar

26. Gong, Z, Zhang, M, Mujumdar, AS, Sun, J. Spray drying and agglomeration of instant bayberry powder. Dry Technol 2008;26:116–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930802142390.Search in Google Scholar

27. Singleton, VL, Rossi, JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 1965;16:144–58.10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144Search in Google Scholar

28. Hışıl, Y Ege University Engineering Faculty books, 359. İzmir, Turkey: Ege University Press; 2004. 45–6 pp.Search in Google Scholar

29. Lee, HS. Characterization of carotenoids in juice of red navel orange (Cara Cara). J Agric Food Chem 2001;49:2563–8, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf001313g.Search in Google Scholar

30. Auisakchaiyoung, T, Rojanakorn, T. Effect of foam-mat drying conditions on quality of dried Gac fruit (Momordica cochinchinensis) aril. Int Food Res J 2015;22:2025–31.Search in Google Scholar

31. Abbasi, E, Azizpour, M. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of foam mat dried sour cherry powder. LWT—Food Sci Technol 2016;68:105–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

32. Kanha, N, Regenstein, JM, Laokuldilok, T. Optimization of process parameters for foam mat drying of black rice bran anthocyanin and comparison with spray- and freeze-dried powders. Dry Technol 2020; in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1819824.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bag, SK, Srivastav, PP, Mishra, HN. Optimization of process parameters for foaming of bael (Aegle marmelos L.) fruit pulp. Food Bioprocess Technol 2011;4:1450–8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0243-6.Search in Google Scholar

34. Rajkumar, P, Kailappan, R, Viswanathan, R, Raghavan, GSV, Ratti, C. Foam mat drying of Alphonso mango pulp. Dry Technol 2007;25:357–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930601120126.Search in Google Scholar

35. Derikvand, Z, Riaz, M. Experimental investigation of a novel foam formulation to improve foam quality. J Mol Liq 2016;224:1311–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.10.119.Search in Google Scholar

36. Franco, TS, Perussello, CA, Ellendersen, LN, Masson, ML. Effects of foam mat drying on physicochemical and microstructural properties of yacon juice powder. LWT—Food Sci Technol 2016;66:503–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.009.Search in Google Scholar

37. Karim, A, Wai, C. Characteristics of foam prepared from starfruit (Averrhoa carambola L.) puree by using methyl cellulose. Food Hydrocolloids 1999;13:203–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-005x(98)00086-1.Search in Google Scholar

38. Souza da Silva, E, Rupert Brandão, SC, Lopes da Silva, A, Fernandes da Silva, JH, Duarte Coêlho, AC, Azoubel, PM. Ultrasound-assisted vacuum drying of nectarine. J Food Eng 2019;246:119–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.11.013.Search in Google Scholar

39. Jahanbakhshi, A, Yeganeh, R, Momeny, M. Assessment of kinetics, effective moisture diffusivity, specific energy consumption, shrinkage, and color in the pistachio kernel drying process in microwave drying with ultrasonic pretreatment. J Food Process Preserv 2020;44: e14449, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.14449.Search in Google Scholar

40. Dehghannya, J, Pourahmad, M, Ghanbarzadeh, B, Ghaffari, H. Heat and mass transfer enhancement during foam-mat drying process of lime juice: impact of convective hot air temperature. Int J Therm Sci 2019;135:30–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.07.023.Search in Google Scholar

41. Miraei Ashtiani, SH, Sturm, B, Nasirahmadi, A. Effects of hot-air and hybrid hot air-microwave drying on drying kinetics and textural quality of nectarine slices. Heat Mass Tran 2018;54:915–27, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2187-0.Search in Google Scholar

42. Hart, MR, Graham, RP, Ginnette, LF, Morgan, AI. Foams for foam-mat drying. Food Technol 1963;17:90–2.Search in Google Scholar

43. Moreira, GEG, Costa, MGM, Rodrigues de Souza, AC, Sousa de Brito, E, Dantas de Medeiros, MF, Cordeiro de Azeredo, HM. Physical properties of spray dried acerola pomace extract as affected by temperature and drying aids. LWT—Food Sci Technol 2009;42:641–5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.07.008.Search in Google Scholar

44. Teng, X, Zhang, M, Bhandari, B, Xu, J, Liu, Y. A comparative study on hygroscopic and physiochemical properties of chicken powders obtained by different drying methods. Dry Technol 2020;38:1929–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1679831.Search in Google Scholar

45. Gil, MI, Tomás-Barberán, FA, Hess-Pierce, B, Kader, AA. Antioxidant capacities, phenolic compounds, carotenoids, and vitamin C contents of nectarine, peach, and plum cultivars from California. J Agric Food Chem 2002;50:4976–82, https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020136b.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

46. Vega-Gálvez, A, Ah-Hen, K, Chacana, M, Vergara, J, Martínez-Monzó, J, García-Segovia, P, et al.. Effect of temperature and air velocity on drying kinetics, antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content, colour, texture and microstructure of apple (var. Granny Smith) slices. Food Chem 2012;132:51–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-05-06
Accepted: 2021-08-09
Published Online: 2021-08-24

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2021-0134/html
Scroll to top button