Home Effect of Different Drying Techniques on Physicochemical, Micro-structural and Bioactive Characteristics of Barberry Milk Smoothie Powder
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effect of Different Drying Techniques on Physicochemical, Micro-structural and Bioactive Characteristics of Barberry Milk Smoothie Powder

  • Zahra Tahsiri , Mehrdad Niakousari EMAIL logo and Gholam Reza Mesbahi
Published/Copyright: January 24, 2017

Abstract

In this study, new smoothies were formulated based on low fat milk and barberry concentrate, and their physicochemical and bioactive properties were investigated. Physicochemical parameters of functional smoothie powders were obtained by applying low and high temperature drying methods, and by a combination of procedures programmed to process smoothie powders. The effect of spray drying (SP), refractance window (RW), foam mat drying (FM), spouted bed drying (SB) and a combination of spouted bed drying were studied herein, while the infrared lamp system (SBIR) shows how these methods affect the smoothie’s physical properties (such as bulk density, porosity, color) and its chemical properties (such as total anthocyanin content and antioxidant capacity measured by the DPPH method). The study also proved that an increase in the speed of rotation from 10 rpm to 100 rpm would lead to a diminished apparent viscosity from 642.39 mPas to 381.98 mPas regarding all reconstituted dried powders, which thus verifies their shear thinning behavior. The work highlighted that this new approach to combining the drying methods for the production of functional smoothie powders at an inlet temperature of 80 °C can result in the best maintenance of antioxidant activity (11.67 %) with the least moisture content (3.19 %).

References

1. Harborne JB. The flavonoids: advances in research since 1980 Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

2. Moghaddam PR, Huda A, Parvez Q, Koocheki A.2007 World Association for Sustainable Development, Indigenous knowledge in agriculture with particular reference to medicinal crop production in Khorasan, Iran.Search in Google Scholar

3. Sharifi A, Mortazavi S, Maskooki A, Niakousari M, Elhamirad A. Optimization of subcritical water extraction of bioactive compounds from barberry fruit (Berberis vulgaris) by using response surface methodology. Int J Agric Crop Sci 2013;6(2):89.Search in Google Scholar

4. Fazaeli M, Emam-Djomeh Z, Ashtari AK, Omid M. Effect of spray drying conditions and feed composition on the physical properties of black mulberry juice powder. Food Bioprod Process 2012;90(4):667–675.10.1016/j.fbp.2012.04.006Search in Google Scholar

5. Caliskan G, Dirim SN. The effects of the different drying conditions and the amounts of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of sumac extract. Food Bioprod Process 2013;91(4):539–548.10.1016/j.fbp.2013.06.004Search in Google Scholar

6. Baeghbali V, Niakousari M, Farahnaky A. Refractance window drying of pomegranate juice: quality retention and energy efficiency. LWT Food Sci Technol 2016;66:34–40.10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.017Search in Google Scholar

7. Borges KC. (2011). Estudo das características físico-químicas e funcionalidade de bagaços de frutas tropicais desidratados em leito de jorro.Search in Google Scholar

8. Fujita A, Borges K, Correia R, de Melo Franco BD, Genovese MI. Impact of spouted bed drying on bioactive compounds, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of commercial frozen pulp of camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia Mc. Vaugh). Food Res Int 2013;54(1):495–500.10.1016/j.foodres.2013.07.025Search in Google Scholar

9. Pan Z, Atungulu GG. Infrared heating for food and agricultural processing Boca Raton CRC Press, 2010.10.1201/9781420090994Search in Google Scholar

10. Kadam DM, Wilson RA, Kaur S. Determination of biochemical properties of foam‐mat dried mango powder. Int J Food Sci Technol 2010;45(8):1626–1632.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02308.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Abbasi E, Azizpour M. Evaluation of physicochemical properties of foam mat dried sour cherry powder. LWT Food Sci Technol 2016;68:105–110.10.1016/j.lwt.2015.12.004Search in Google Scholar

12. Neto PS, Cunha F, Freire J. Effect of the presence of paste in a conical spouted bed dryer with continuous feeding. Drying Technol 2002;20(4–5):789–811.10.1081/DRT-120003758Search in Google Scholar

13. Boland F. (1998). AOAC official method 934.06. Moisture in dried fruitsOfficial Methods of Analysis of AOAC International 16th Edn, 4th revision 24.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jangam SV, Thorat BN. Optimization of spray drying of ginger extract. Drying Technol 2010;28(12):1426–1434.10.1080/07373937.2010.482699Search in Google Scholar

15. Jinapong N, Suphantharika M, Jamnong P. Production of instant soymilk powders by ultrafiltration, spray drying and fluidized bed agglomeration. J Food Eng 2008;84(2):194–205.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.032Search in Google Scholar

16. Santhalakshmy S, Bosco SJ, Francis S, Sabeena M. Effect of inlet temperature on physicochemical properties of spray-dried jamun fruit juice powder. Powder Technol 2015;274: 37–43.10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.016Search in Google Scholar

17. Caparino O, Tang J, Nindo C, Sablani S, Powers J, Fellman J. Effect of drying methods on the physical properties and microstructures of mango (Philippine ‘Carabao’var.) powder. J Food Eng 2012;111(1):135–148.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.01.010Search in Google Scholar

18. Redeuil K, Bertholet R, Kussmann M, Steiling H, Rezzi S, Nagy K. Quantification of flavan-3-ols and phenolic acids in milk-based food products by reversed-phase liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2009;1216(47):8362–8370.10.1016/j.chroma.2009.09.056Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Çam M, Hışıl Y, Durmaz G. Classification of eight pomegranate juices based on antioxidant capacity measured by four methods. Food Chem 2009;112(3):721–726.10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.009Search in Google Scholar

20. Zare D, Salehi A, Niakousari M.2012 Determination of physical properties of sour orange juice powder produced by a spray dryer. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Dallas, Texas. July 29–August 1, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

21. Patwa A, Malcolm B, Wilson J, Ambrose KR. Particle size analysis of two distinct classes of wheat flour by sieving. Trans ASABE 2014;57(1):151–159.10.13031/trans.57.10388Search in Google Scholar

22. Afshari-Jouybari H, Farahnaky A. Evaluation of Photoshop software potential for food colorimetry. J Food Eng 2011;106(2):170–175.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.02.034Search in Google Scholar

23. Sahin H, Ozdemir F. Effect of some hydrocolloids on the rheological properties of different formulated ketchups. Food Hydrocoll 2004;18(6):1015–1022.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2004.04.006Search in Google Scholar

24. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II. The effect on powder properties. J Food Eng 2005;66(1):35–42.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.031Search in Google Scholar

25. Akkaya Z, Schröder J, Tavman S, Kumcuoglu S, Schuchmann HP, Gaukel V. Effects of spray drying on physical properties, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of carob molasses. Int J Food Eng 2012;8(4):1–13.10.1515/1556-3758.2593Search in Google Scholar

26. Roustapour O, Hosseinalipour M, Ghobadian B. An experimental investigation of lime juice drying in a pilot plant spray dryer. Drying technology 2006;24(2):181–188.10.1080/07373930600559035Search in Google Scholar

27. Franco TS, Perussello CA, Ellendersen LN, Masson ML. Effects of foam mat drying on physicochemical and microstructural properties of yacon juice powder. LWT Food Sci Technol 2016;66:503–513.10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.009Search in Google Scholar

28. Jacquot M, De Donato P, Barres O, Pons M, Scher J, Miclo A, et al. Physicochemical characterisation of the lactoperoxidase system powders: Comparison of two drying techniques. Powder Technol 2002;128(2):205–212.10.1016/S0032-5910(02)00198-5Search in Google Scholar

29. Chegini G, Ghobadian B. Effect of spray-drying conditions on physical properties of orange juice powder. Drying Technol 2005;23(3):657–668.10.1081/DRT-200054161Search in Google Scholar

30. Knowlton TM, Klinzing G, Yang W, Carson J. The importance of storage, transfer, and collection. Chem Eng Prog;(United States) 1994;90(4).Search in Google Scholar

31. Liu L, Marziano I, Bentham A, Litster J, White E, Howes T. Effect of particle properties on the flowability of ibuprofen powders. Int J Pharm 2008;362(1):109–117.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.06.023Search in Google Scholar

32. Kim EH, Chen XD, Pearce D. Effect of surface composition on the flowability of industrial spray-dried dairy powders. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005;46(3):182–187.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.11.005Search in Google Scholar

33. Geldart D, Harnby N, Wong A. Fluidization of cohesive powders. Powder Technol 1984;37(1):25–37.10.1016/0032-5910(84)80003-0Search in Google Scholar

34. Khalilian Movahhed M, Mohebbi M. Spray drying and process optimization of carrot–celery juice. J Food Process Preserv 2016;40:212–225.10.1111/jfpp.12598Search in Google Scholar

35. Adak N, Heybeli N, Ertekin C. Infrared drying of strawberry. Food Chem 2017;219:109–116.10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.103Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Celli GB, Khattab R, Ghanem A, Brooks MS-L. Refractance Window™ drying of haskap berry–Preliminary results on anthocyanin retention and physicochemical properties. Food Chem 2016;194:218–221.10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Effect of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II. Powder properties. Drying Technol 2008;26(6):726–737.10.1080/07373930802046377Search in Google Scholar

38. Jumah R, Tashtoush B, Shaker R, Zraiy A. Manufacturing parameters and quality characteristics of spray dried jameed. Drying Technol 2000;18(4–5):967–984.10.1080/07373930008917747Search in Google Scholar

39. Karazhiyan H, Razavi SM, Phillips GO, Fang Y, Al-Assaf S, Nishinari K, et al. Rheological properties of Lepidium sativum seed extract as a function of concentration, temperature and time. Food Hydrocoll 2009;23(8):2062– 2068.10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.03.019Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-1-24
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2016-0323/html
Scroll to top button