Home Optimization of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin (TMA) and Total Phenolic Content (TPC) Extractions from Red Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra): Response Surface Methodology versus Artificial Neural Network
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of Total Monomeric Anthocyanin (TMA) and Total Phenolic Content (TPC) Extractions from Red Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra): Response Surface Methodology versus Artificial Neural Network

  • Mircea Oroian EMAIL logo , Ana Leahu , Anamaria Dutuc and Adriana Dabija
Published/Copyright: January 26, 2017

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of solvent type, ultrasonic frequency, extraction time and temperature on the total phenolic content (TPC) and total monomeric anthocyanin (TMA) extraction from red cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata f. rubra) using the response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network. The red cabbage has been used as TPC and TMA sources due to its low cost and highly availability during all the year. The experimental data for the extraction of TPC and TMA were fitted to second-order polynomial models with higher regression coefficients than 0.902. The optimal conditions (in dry matter) for highest TPC extraction (7,049.5 mg gallic acid equivalent/kg) are: methanol as solvent, 3.60 kHz ultrasonic frequency at 67.6 °C for 59.6 min, while for TMA optimal extraction (0.3 mg/g) 2-propanol was used as solvent, 45 kHz ultrasonic frequency at 69.2 °C for 20.80 min. The artificial neural network (ANN) is better than RSM to predict the TPC and TMA extraction from red cabbage.

References

1. Arapitsa P, Turner C. Pressurized solvent extraction and monolithic column-HPLC/DAD analysis of anthocyanins in red cabbage. Talanta. 2008;74:1218–1223.10.1016/j.talanta.2007.08.029Search in Google Scholar

2. McDougall GJ, Fyffe S, Dobson P, Stewart D. Anthocyanins from red cabbage – stability to simulated gastrointestinal digestion. Phytochemistry. 2007;68:1285–1294.10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.02.004Search in Google Scholar

3. Cavalcanti RN, Santos DT, Meireles MA. Non-thermal stabilization mechanisms of anthocyanins in model and food systems – an overview. Food Res Int. 2011;44:499–509.10.1016/j.foodres.2010.12.007Search in Google Scholar

4. Pascual-Teresa S, Sanchez-Ballesta M. Anthocyanins: from plant to health. Phytochem Rev. 2008;7:281–299.10.1007/s11101-007-9074-0Search in Google Scholar

5. Giusti MM, Wolstad RE. Acylatedanthocyanins from edible sources and their application in food systems. Biochem Eng J. 2003;14:217–225.10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00221-8Search in Google Scholar

6. Lee ISL, Boyce MC, Breadmore MC. A rapid quantitative determination of phenolic acids in Brassica oleracea by capillary zone electrophoresis. Food Chem. 2011;127:797–801.10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Tsuda T. Dietary anthocyanin-rich plants: biochemical basis and recent progress in health benefits studies. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012;56:159–170.10.1002/mnfr.201100526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Box GE, Behnken DW. Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics. 1960;2:455–475.10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912Search in Google Scholar

9. Myers RH. DC process and product optimization using designed experiments. New York: Montgomery Wiley; 2002.Search in Google Scholar

10. Karvela E, Makris DP, Kalogeropoulos N, Karathanos VT. Deployment of response surface methodology to optimise recovery of grape (Vitis vinifera) stem polyphenols. Talanta. 2009;79:1311–1321.10.1016/j.talanta.2009.05.042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Dominguez-Perles R, Teixeira AI, Rosa E, Barros AE. Assessment of (poly)phenols in grape (Vitis vinifera L.) stems by using food/pharma industry compatible solvents and response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2014;164:339–346.10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Bishop CM. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1995.10.1201/9781420050646.ptb6Search in Google Scholar

13. Jain AK. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2010;31:651–666.10.1007/978-3-540-87479-9_3Search in Google Scholar

14. Fan FH, Ma Q, Peng QY, Riley WW, Tang SZ. Prediction of texture characteristics from extrusion food surface images using a computer vision system and artificial neural networks. J Food Eng. 2013;118:426–433.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.04.015Search in Google Scholar

15. Tulbek MC, Panigrahi S, Borhan S, Boyacioglu MH, Boyacioglu D, Clifford H. Prediction of alkaline noodle, sensory attributes by multiple regression and neural network models. In: Proceedings of the IFT Annual Meetings, Chicago, USA.2003.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ko SH, Park EY, Han KY, Noh BS, Kim SS. Development of neural network analysis program to predict shelf life of soya milk by using 3 electronic nose. Food Eng Prog. 2000;4:193–198.10.13050/foodengprog.2000.4.3.193Search in Google Scholar

17. Fathi M, Mohebbi M, Ali Razavi SM. Application of image analysis and artificial neural network to predict mass transfer kinetics and color changes of osmotically dehydrated kiwifruit. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011;4(8):1357–1366.10.1007/s11947-009-0222-ySearch in Google Scholar

18. Rabino I, Mancinelli A. Light, temperature and anthocyanin production. Plant Phys. 1986;81:922–924.10.1104/pp.81.3.922Search in Google Scholar

19. Cheok CY, Chin NL, Yusof YA, Law CL. Extraction of total phenolic content of Garcinia mangostana Linn. Hull I. Relationship between direct UV–vis spectrophotometer absorbance and Folin-Ciocalteu measurement method. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012;5:2928–2933.10.1007/s11947-011-0627-2Search in Google Scholar

20. Cheok CY, Chin NL, Yusof YA, Talib RA, Law CL. Optimization of total monomeric anthocyanin (TMA) and totalphenolic content (TPC) extractions from mangosteen (Garciniamangostana Linn.) hull using ultrasonic treatments. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;50:1–7.10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.024Search in Google Scholar

21. Singleton VL, Rossi JA. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic. 1965;16:144–158.10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144Search in Google Scholar

22. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

23. Madadlou A, Emam-Djomeh Z, Mousavi ME, Ehsani M, Javanmard M, Sheehan D. Response surface optimization of an artificial neural network for predicting the size of re-assembled casein micelles. Comput Electron Agr. 2009;68:216–221.10.1016/j.compag.2009.06.005Search in Google Scholar

24. Rai P, Majumdar GC, DasGupta S, De S. Prediction of the viscosity of clarified fruit juice using artificial neural network: a combined effect of concentration and temperature. J Food Eng. 2005;68:527–533.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.07.003Search in Google Scholar

25. Torrecilla JS, Otero L, Sanz PD. A neural network approach for thermal/pressure food processing. J Food Eng. 2004;62:89–95.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00174-2Search in Google Scholar

26. Cheok CY, Chin NL, Yusof YA, Talib RA, Law CL. Optimization of total phenolic content extracted from Garcinia mangostana Linn. hull using response surface methodology versus artificial neural network. Ind Crops Prod. 2012;40:247–253.10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.03.019Search in Google Scholar

27. Neural SS. Networks for applied sciences and engineering –from fundamentals to complex pattern recognition. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

28. Bas D, Boyacı IH. Modeling and optimization II: comparison of estimation capabilities of response surface methodology with artificial neural networks in a biochemical reaction. J Food Eng. 2007;78:846–854.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.025Search in Google Scholar

29. D’Allesandro LG, Kriaa K, Nikov I, Dimitrov K. Ultrasound assisted extraction of polypenols from black chokeberry. Sep Purif Technol. 2012;93:42–47.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.03.024Search in Google Scholar

30. Rostango MA, Palma M, Barr CG. Short-term stability of soy isoflavones extracts: sample conservation aspects. Food Chem. 2005;93:557–564.10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.035Search in Google Scholar

31. Prasad KN, Yang E, Yi C, Zhao M, Jiang Y. Effects of high pressure extraction on the extraction yield, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of longan fruit pericarp. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2009;10:155–159.10.1016/j.ifset.2008.11.007Search in Google Scholar

32. Giusti MM, Jing P. Analysis of anthocyanins. In: Socaciu C, editors. Food colorants: chemical and functional properties. Florida, USA: Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press; 2008 .Search in Google Scholar

33. EPA (United States Environment Protection Agency). Toxicological review of methanol (noncancer), (CAS No. 67-56-1). 2013. National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP). EPA/635/R-11/001Fa.Search in Google Scholar

34. Hsu B, Coupar IM, Ng K. Antioxidant activity of hot water extract from the fruit of the Doum palm, Hyphaenethebaica. Food Chem. 2006;98:317–328.10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.077Search in Google Scholar

35. Siddhuraju P, Becker K. Antioxidant properties of various extracts of total phenolic constituents from three different agroclimatic origins of drumstick tree (Moringaoleifera lam.) leaves. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:2144–2155.10.1021/jf020444+Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Sultana B, Anwar F, Ashraf M. Effect of extraction solvent/technique on the antioxidant activity of selected medicinal plant extracts. Molecules. 2009;14:2167–2180.10.3390/molecules14062167Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Sultana B, Anwar F, Przybylski R. Antioxidant activity of phenolic components present in barks of barks of Azadirachtaindica, Terminaliaarjuna, Acacia nilotica, and Eugenia jambolanaLam. trees. Food Chem. 2007;104:1106–1114.10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.019Search in Google Scholar

38. Cheng VJ, Bekhit AE-DA, McConnell M, Mros S, Zhao J. Effect of extraction solvent, waste fraction and grape variety on the antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of extracts from wine residue from cool climate. Food Chem. 2012;134:474–482.10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.02.103Search in Google Scholar

39. Bart JCJ. Additives in polymers industrial analysis and applications. England: Wiley; 2005.10.1002/0470012064Search in Google Scholar

40. Julkunen-Tiito R. Phenolic constituents in the leaves of northern willows, methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. J Agric Food Chem. 1985;33(2):213–217.10.1021/jf00062a013Search in Google Scholar

41. Marinova EM, Yanishlieva N. Antioxidative activity of extracts from selected species of the family Lamiaceae in sunflower oil. Food Chem. 1997;58(3):245–248.10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00223-3Search in Google Scholar

42. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(10):4290–4302.10.1021/jf0502698Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Mohammedi Z. Impact of solvent extraction type on total polyphenols content and biological activity from Tamarix Aphylla (L.) Karst. Int J Pharma Biol Sci. 2011;2(1):609–615.Search in Google Scholar

44. Ghoreishi SM, Heidari E. Extraction of epigallocatechin-3-gallate from green tea via supercritical fluid technology: neural network modeling and response surface optimization. J Supercrit Fluids. 2013;740:128–136.10.1016/j.supflu.2012.12.009Search in Google Scholar

45. Zheng N, Chen F, Wang Z, Lin J. Modeling and optimization of artificial neural network and response surface methodology in ultra-high-pressure extraction of Artemisia argyi Levl. et Vant and its antifungal activity. Food Anal Methods. 2013;6:421–431.10.1007/s12161-012-9439-xSearch in Google Scholar

46. Youssefi S, Emam-Djomeh Z, Mousavi SM. Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) in the prediction of quality parameters of spray-dried pomegranate juice. Drying Technol. 2009;27:910–917.10.1080/07373930902988247Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-1-26
Published in Print: 2017-3-1

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2016-0036/html
Scroll to top button