Startseite Effect of Pulsed Vacuum Treatment on Mass Transfer and Mechanical Properties during Osmotic Dehydration of Pineapple Slices
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Effect of Pulsed Vacuum Treatment on Mass Transfer and Mechanical Properties during Osmotic Dehydration of Pineapple Slices

  • Laura A. Ramallo EMAIL logo , Miriam D. Hubinger und Rodolfo H. Mascheroni
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. November 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The influence of operating pressure during osmotic dehydration on mass transfer and mechanical properties in pineapple fruits was analyzed. Dehydration trials were performed at atmospheric pressure (OD) and by applying a vacuum pulse (VPOD), in sucrose solution at 60°Brix and 40°C for 300 min. Seven operation conditions were implemented with a vacuum pulse of 100 mbar or 250 mbar for 0, 5, 15 or 25 min at the beginning of the process. The decrease of pressure favored the solute uptake, but the water loss has not been significantly affected. No significant effect of vacuum time was observed. However, solute uptake in trials with vacuum pulse of 100 mbar was significantly higher than in OD process. In general, mechanical properties and shrinkage were not affected by operation conditions. Osmotic dehydration process (both OD and VPOD) originates a more resistant tissue structure than the one in fresh pineapple fruit.

References

1. BaratJ, TalensP, BarreraC, ChiraltA, FitoP. Pineapple candying at mild temperature by applying vacuum impregnation. J Food Sci2002;67:304652.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08857.xSuche in Google Scholar

2. ChiraltA, FitoP, BaratJ, AndrésA, González-MartínezC, EscricheI, et al. Use of vacuum impregnation in food salting process. J Food Eng2001;49:14151.10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00219-3Suche in Google Scholar

3. CorzoO, BrachoN, RodriguezJ, GonzalezM. Predicting the moisture and salt contents of sardine sheets during vacuum pulse osmotic dehydration. J Food Eng2007;80:78190.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.007Suche in Google Scholar

4. DerossiA, De PilliT, SeveriniC. Reduction in the pH of vegetables by vacuum impregnation: a study on pepper. J Food Eng2010;99:915.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.019Suche in Google Scholar

5. FitoP, ChiraltA, BaratJ, AndrésA, Martinez-MonzóJ, Martinez-NavarreteN. Vacuum impregnation for development of new dehydrated product. J Food Eng2001;49:297302.10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00226-0Suche in Google Scholar

6. CháferM, González-MartínezC, OrtoláMD, ChiraltA, FitoP. Kinetics of osmotic dehydration in orange and mandarin peels. J Food Process Eng2001;24:27389.10.1111/j.1745-4530.2001.tb00544.xSuche in Google Scholar

7. LombardGE, OliveiraJC, FitoP, AndrésA. Osmotic dehydration of pineapple as a pre-treatment for further drying. J Food Eng2008;85:27784.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.07.009Suche in Google Scholar

8. PanadesG, CastroD, ChiraltA, FitoP, NuñezM, JimenezR. Mass transfer mechanisms occurring in osmotic dehydration of guava. J Food Eng2008;87:38690.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.12.021Suche in Google Scholar

9. ShiX, FitoP, ChiraltA. Influence of vacuum treatment on mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of fruits. Food Res Int1995;28:44554.10.1016/0963-9969(96)81391-3Suche in Google Scholar

10. CastroD, FitoP, TretoO, BoysT, Nuñez de VillavicencioM. Influencia de la presión y otras variables de proceso en la transferencia de masa de piña deshidratada osmóticamente. Evaluación energética y estimación de costos. II parte. La Alimentación Latinoam1998;225:339.Suche in Google Scholar

11. CastroD, FitoP, TretoO, BoysT, Nuñez de VillavicencioM. Influencia de la presión y otras variables de proceso en la transferencia de masa de piña deshidratada osmóticamente. Evaluación energética y estimación de costos. La Alimentación Latinoam1998;224:504.Suche in Google Scholar

12. PanadésG, FitoP, AguiarY, NuñezM, AcostaV. Osmotic dehydration of guava: influence of operating parameters on process kinetics. J Food Eng2006;72:3839.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.12.020Suche in Google Scholar

13. EscricheI, García-PinchiR, AndrésA, FitoP. Osmotic dehydration of kiwi fruit (Actinidia chinensis): fluxes and mass transfer kinetics. J Food Process Eng2000;23:191205.10.1111/j.1745-4530.2000.tb00511.xSuche in Google Scholar

14. MorenoJ, BugueñoG, VelascoV, PetzoldV, Tabilo-MunizagaG. Osmotic dehydration and vacuum impregnation on physicochemical properties of Chilean papaya (Carica candamarcensis). J Food Sci2004;69:1026.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb13361.xSuche in Google Scholar

15. ItoAP. 2007. Estudo do processo de desidratação osmotica a pulso de vacuo (PVOD) para manga. PhD Thesis, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.Suche in Google Scholar

16. ChinprahastN, SiripatrawanU, LeerahawongA, TraiananwuttikulK. Effects of blanching and vacuum impregnation on physicochemical and sensory properties of Indian gooseberry (Phyllanthus emblica L). J Food Process Pres2013;37:5765.10.1111/j.1745-4549.2011.00613.xSuche in Google Scholar

17. MavroudisN, GekasV, SjöholmI. Osmotic dehydration of apples. Shrinkage phenomena and the significance of initial structure on mass transfer rates. J Food Eng1998;38:10123.10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00090-9Suche in Google Scholar

18. RamalloLA, SchvezovC, MascheroniRH. Mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of pineapple. Food Sci Technol Int2004;10:32332.10.1177/1082013204047904Suche in Google Scholar

19. ReppaA, MandalaJ, KostaropoulosA, SaravacosG. Influence of solute temperature and concentration on the combined osmotic and air drying. Drying Technol1999;17:144958.10.1080/07373939908917627Suche in Google Scholar

20. SpiazziEA, MascheroniRH. Mass transfer model for osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables. I. Development of the simulation model. J Food Eng1997;34:387410.10.1016/S0260-8774(97)00102-7Suche in Google Scholar

21. LozanoJ, RotsteinE, UrbicaínM. Shrinkage, porosity and bulk density of foodstuffs at changing moisture content. J Food Sci1983;48:1497502.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb03524.xSuche in Google Scholar

22. MayorL, SerenoAM. Modelling shrinkage during convective drying of food materials: a review. J Food Eng2004;61:37383.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00144-4Suche in Google Scholar

23. RamalloLA, MascheroniRH. Effect of shrinkage on prediction accuracy of the water diffusion model for pineapple drying. J Food Process Eng2011;36:6676.10.1111/j.1745-4530.2011.00654.xSuche in Google Scholar

24. KatekawaME, SilvaMA. A review of drying models including shrinkage effects. Drying Technol2006;24:520.10.1080/07373930500538519Suche in Google Scholar

25. AllaliH, MarchalL, VorobievE. Effects of vacuum impregnation and ohmic heating with citric acid on the behaviour of osmotic dehydration and structural changes of apple fruit. Biosyst Eng2010;106:613.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.08.005Suche in Google Scholar

26. ChiraltA, TalensP. Physical and chemical changes induced by osmotic dehydration in plant tissues. J. Food Eng2005;67:16777.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.055Suche in Google Scholar

27. FitoP, ChiraltA. Vacuum impregnation of plant tissues. In: AlzamoraSM, TapiaM, Lopez-MaloA, editors. Minimally processed fruits and vegetables, fundamental aspects and applications. Gaithersburg, MD: An Aspen Publication. Aspen Publishers, 2000.Suche in Google Scholar

28. ChiraltA, Martínez-NavarreteN, Martínez-MonzóJ, TalensP, MoragaG, AyalaA, et al. Changes in mechanical properties throughout osmotic processes: cryoprotectant effect. J Food Eng2001;49:12935.10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00203-XSuche in Google Scholar

29. MorenoJ, ChiraltA, EscricheI, SerraJA. Effect of blanching/osmotic dehydration combined methods on quality and stability of minimally processed strawberries. Food Res Int2000;33:60916.10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00097-1Suche in Google Scholar

30. MillerE, HallG. Distribution of total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total acid, and bromelin activity in the fruit of the natal pineapple (Ananas comosus L). Merr Plant Physiol1953;28:5324.10.1104/pp.28.3.532Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. FerrariCC, ArballoJR, MascheroniRH, HubingerMD. Modelling of mass transfer and texture evaluation during osmotic dehydration of melon under vacuum. Int J Food Sci Technol2011;46:43643.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02510.xSuche in Google Scholar

32. Vivanco-PezantesD, SobralPJA, HubingerMD. Mass transfer in osmotic dehydration of Atlantic bonito (Sarda sarda) fillets under vacuum and atmospheric pressure. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Drying Symposium, São Paulo, Brazil, 2004:210512.Suche in Google Scholar

33. AchariyaviriyaS, SoponronnaritS, TerdyothinA. Diffusion model of papaya and mango glase drying. Drying Technol2000;18:160515.10.1080/07373930008917796Suche in Google Scholar

34. JohnsonEA, SegarsRA, KapsalisJG, NormandMD, PelegM. Evaluation of the compressive deformability modulus of fresh and cooked fish flesh. J Food Sci1980;45:13181320 & 1326.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1980.tb06545.xSuche in Google Scholar

35. MayorL, CunhaRL, SerenoAM. Relation between mechanical properties and structural changes during osmotic dehydration of pumpkin. Food Res Int2007;40:44860.10.1016/j.foodres.2007.02.004Suche in Google Scholar

36. SteffeJF. Rheological methods in food process engineering, 2nd ed. Freeman Press, East Lansing, MI, USA, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

37. RenkemaJ, KnabbenJ, Van VlietT. Gel formation by β-conglycinin and glycinin and their mixtures. Foods Hydrocolloids2001;15:40714.10.1016/S0268-005X(01)00051-0Suche in Google Scholar

38. RibeiroKO, RodriguesMI, SabadiniE, CunhaRL. Mechanical properties of acid sodium caseinate-k-carrageenan gels: effect of co-solute addition. Food Hydrocolloids2003;18:719.10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00043-2Suche in Google Scholar

39. Statgraphics. Centurion XV. Warrenton VA: Statpoint Technologies, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

40. ChaferM, PerezS, ChiraltA. Kinetics of solute gain and water loss during osmotic dehydration of orange slices. Food Sci Technol Int2003;9:38996.10.1177/1082013203040545Suche in Google Scholar

41. TalensP, Martínez-NavarreteN, FitoP, ChiraltA. Changes in optical and mechanical properties during osmodehydrofreezing of kiwi fruit. Innovative Food Sci Emerging Technol2002;3:1919.10.1016/S1466-8564(02)00027-9Suche in Google Scholar

42. BrandaoMC, MaiaGA, LimaDP, ParenteEJ, CampelloC. Analise fisico-quimica, microbiológica e sensorial de frutos de manga submetidos a desidratacao osmotic-solar. Rev Bras Frutic2003;25:3841.10.1590/S0100-29452003000100012Suche in Google Scholar

43. GasparetoO, OliveiraE, Da SilvaP. Influencia del tratamiento osmótico en el secado de la banana “nanica” (Musa cavendishii, L.) En secador de lecho fijo. Inf Technol2004;15:916.10.4067/S0718-07642004000600002Suche in Google Scholar

44. GoularteVD, AntunesEC, AntunesPL. Qualidade de maçã fuji osmoticamente concentrada e desidratada. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment2000;20:1603.10.1590/S0101-20612000000200006Suche in Google Scholar

45. RamalloLA, MascheroniRH. Rate of water loss and sugar uptake during the osmotic dehydration of pineapple. Braz Arch Biol Technol2005;48:76170.10.1590/S1516-89132005000600012Suche in Google Scholar

46. TorresJ, TalensP, EscricheI, ChiraltA. Influence of process conditions on mechanical properties of osmotically dehydrated mango. J Food Eng2006;74:2406.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.017Suche in Google Scholar

47. RodriguesA, CunhaR, HubingerM. Rheological properties and colour evaluation of papaya during osmotic dehydration processing. J Food Eng2003;59:12935.10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00442-9Suche in Google Scholar

48. MorenoJ, SimpsonR, SayasM, SeguraI, AldanaO, AlmonacidS. Influence of ohmic heating and vacuum impregnation on the osmotic dehydration kinetics and microstructure of pears (cv. Packham’S triumph). J Food Eng2011;104:6217.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.01.029Suche in Google Scholar

49. CastellóML, IgualM, FitoPJ, ChiraltA. Influence of osmotic dehydration on texture, respiration and microbial stability of apple slices (var. Granny smith). J Food Eng2009;91:19.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.07.025Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-11-19

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Drying Kinetics, Biochemical and Functional Properties of Products in Convective Drying ofAnchovy (Engraulis anchoita) Fillets
  4. A Rheological Model for Cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) Pulp at Different Concentrations and Temperatures
  5. Pear Drying: Thermodynamics Studies and Coefficients of Convective Heat and Mass Transfer
  6. Evaluation of Thin-Layer Drying Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Describing Drying Kinetics of Canola Seed in a Heat Pump Assisted Fluidized Bed Dryer
  7. Relating Rice Grain Quality to Conditions during Sun Drying
  8. Modeling of Basil Leaves Drying by GA–ANN
  9. Effect of Pulsed Vacuum Treatment on Mass Transfer and Mechanical Properties during Osmotic Dehydration of Pineapple Slices
  10. Raw Glycerol as Substrate for the Production of Yeast Biomass
  11. Effect of Aminoethoxyvinylglycine and Methyl Jasmonate on Individual Phenolics and Post-harvest Fruit Quality of Three Different Japanese Plums (Prunussalicina Lindell)
  12. Process Optimization for Foam Mat-Tray Drying of Passiflora edulis Flavicarpa Pulp and Characterization of the Dried Powder
  13. Evaluation of the Freezing and Thawing Cryoconcentration Process on Bioactive Compounds Present in Banana Juice from Three Different Cultivars
  14. Effects of Defatted Flaxseed Addition on Rheological Properties of Wheat Flour Slurry
  15. Disease Identification and Grading of Pomegranate Leaves Using Image Processing and Fuzzy Logic
  16. Calculation of the Effective Diffusion Coefficients in Drying of Chemical and Mechanical Pretreated Rosehip Fruits (Rosa eglanteria L.) with Selected Mass Transfer Models
  17. Assessment of the Physico-mechanical, Chemical and Colour Characteristics of Potatoes Depending on Tuber Size and Cultivar
  18. Moisture Sorption Characteristics of Dakuwa (Nigerian Cereal/Groundnut Snack)
  19. A New Alternative Real-Time Method to Monitoring Dough Behavior during Processing Using Wireless Sensor Technology
Heruntergeladen am 2.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2012-0059/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen