Home Stochastic uncertainty management in electricity markets with high renewable energy penetration
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Stochastic uncertainty management in electricity markets with high renewable energy penetration

  • Shady M. Sadek ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Ahmed K. Ryad and Mostafa H. Mostafa
Published/Copyright: October 9, 2023

Abstract

The high penetration of renewable energy sources (RESs) in modern power systems poses two conflicting issues. First one is the reduction in the operation costs resulted from RESs utilization instead of the expensive fossil fuel thermal generating units. However, the RESs are characterized by its uncertain and intermittent behavior that their output power is not dispatchable and not known exactly due to forecast errors. Therefore, reserves are scheduled in the day-ahead market to meet the uncertain supply from RESs which add some costs to the system. The decision maker should be aware of those two conflicting objectives in order to operate the system in the optimal way with minimum operation costs. The problem of the market clearing is formulated as Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem using GAMS software. It is considered a two stage stochastic programming with the objective of minimizing the expected total operation energy and reserve costs while satisfying the various operational constraints. The results show the effectiveness of the RESs integration in different cases with the consideration of load shedding, RESs curtailment and transmission congestion. As shown from the results, when the network is congested, the operation costs are increased due to the load shedding and RESs curtailment events occur. Moreover, scheduled reserves are increased to face the uncertainty of RESs. As the RESs power penetration increases with no network congestion, a decreasing trend in the operation cost can be seen. However, this trend is less marked as the uncertainty of RESs generation increases. For the network congested case, the reduction rate of the operation cost is decreased for increasing RESs power penetration levels.


Corresponding author: Shady M. Sadek, Faculty of Engineering, Electrical Power and Machines Department, International Academy for Engineering and Media Science, Cairo, Egypt, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Peng, C, Lei, S, Hou, Y, Wu, F. Uncertainty management in power system operation. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 2015;1:28–35. https://doi.org/10.17775/cseejpes.2015.00004.Search in Google Scholar

2. Marquez, JLA, Mokryani, G, Duque, C. A multiagent stochastic bi-level model for optimal integration of distributed generators. Elec Power Syst Res 2022;213:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108707.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chen, H, Huang, J, Lin, Z, Huang, F, Li, M, Wu, Q. Stochastic economic dispatch based optimal market clearing strategy considering flexible ramping products under wind power uncertainties. CSEE J Power Energy Syst 2023:1–12. https://doi.org/10.17775/CSEEJPES.2021.06340.Search in Google Scholar

4. Silva, AR, Pousinho, HMI, Estanqueiro, A. A multistage stochastic approach for the optimal bidding of variable renewable energy in the day-ahead, intraday and balancing markets. Energy 2022;258:124856. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.124856.Search in Google Scholar

5. Abujarad, SY, Mustafa, MW, Jamian, JJ. Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;70:215–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.246.Search in Google Scholar

6. Mohseni, S, Brent, AC, Kelly, S, Browne, WN. Demand response-integrated investment and operational planning of renewable and sustainable energy systems considering forecast uncertainties: a systematic review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2022;158:112095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112095.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ruiz, PA, Philbrick, C, Zak, E, Cheung, K, Sauer, P. Uncertainty management in the unit commitment problem. Commitment Probl 2009;24:642–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2012180.Search in Google Scholar

8. Pourghasem, P, Sohrabi, F, Abapour, M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. Stochastic multi-objective dynamic dispatch of renewable and CHP-based islanded microgrids. Elec Power Syst Res 2019;173:193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.04.021.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B, Soroudi, A. Chapter 2 - Uncertainty management in decision-making in power system operation. In: Shady, HE, Abdel, A, Almoataz, YA, Ahmed, FZ, Ramesh, B, editors. Decision making applications in modern power systems. Academic Press; 2020:41–62 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-816445-7.00002-5Search in Google Scholar

10. Rezaee Jordehi, A. Economic dispatch in grid-connected and heat network-connected CHP microgrids with storage systems and responsive loads considering reliability and uncertainties. Sustain Cities Soc 2021;73:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103101.Search in Google Scholar

11. Silva-Rodriguez, L, Sanjab, A, Fumagalli, E, Virag, A, Gibescu, M. A light robust optimization approach for uncertainty-based day-ahead electricity markets. Elec Power Syst Res 2022;212:108281. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EPSR.2022.108281.Search in Google Scholar

12. Soroudi, A, Amraee, T. Decision making under uncertainty in energy systems: state of the art. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;28:376–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.039.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kumar, KP, Saravanan, B. Recent techniques to model uncertainties in power generation from renewable energy sources and loads in microgrids – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;71:348–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.063.Search in Google Scholar

14. Zubo, RHA, Mokryani, G, Rajamani, HS, Aghaei, J, Niknam, T, Pillai, P. Operation and planning of distribution networks with integration of renewable distributed generators considering uncertainties: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2017;72:1177–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.10.036.Search in Google Scholar

15. Parisio, A, Rikos, E, Glielmo, L. Stochastic model predictive control for economic/environmental operation management of microgrids: an experimental case study. J Process Control 2016;43:24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.04.008.Search in Google Scholar

16. Lubin, M, Dvorkin, Y, Roald, L. Chance constraints for improving the security of ac optimal power flow. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2019;34:1908–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2890732.Search in Google Scholar

17. Zhao, C, Guan, Y. Unified stochastic and robust unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2013;28:3353–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2251916.Search in Google Scholar

18. Olivares, DE, Lara, JD, Canizares, CA, Kazerani, M. Stochastic-predictive energy management system for isolated microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2015;6:2681–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2015.2469631.Search in Google Scholar

19. Faulwasser, T, Engelmann, A, Mühlpfordt, T, Hagenmeyer, V. Optimal power flow: an introduction to predictive, distributed and stochastic control challenges. At-Automatisierungstechnik 2018;66:573–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2018-0040.Search in Google Scholar

20. Meibom, P, Barth, R, Hasche, B, Brand, H, Weber, C, O’Malley, M. Stochastic optimization model to study the operational impacts of high wind penetrations in Ireland. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011;26:1367–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2070848.Search in Google Scholar

21. Denny, E, O’Malley, M. Wind generation, power system operation, and emissions reduction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2006;21:341–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2005.857845.Search in Google Scholar

22. Solanki, BV, Bhattacharya, K, Canizares, CA. A sustainable energy management system for isolated microgrids. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2017;8:1507–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2692754.Search in Google Scholar

23. Olivares, DE, Canizares, CA, Kazerani, M. A centralized energy management system for isolated microgrids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2014;5:1864–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2294187.Search in Google Scholar

24. GAMS – Documentation. GAMS Development Corporation; 2020. [Online]. Available from: http://www.gams.com.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-03-24
Accepted: 2023-08-18
Published Online: 2023-10-09

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2023-0102/pdf
Scroll to top button