Home Use of waste activated carbon and wood ash mixture as an electrical grounding enhancement material
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Use of waste activated carbon and wood ash mixture as an electrical grounding enhancement material

  • Mahmoud Wahba ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Mazen Abdel-Salam , Mohamed Nayel and Hamdy A. Ziedan
Published/Copyright: September 25, 2023

Abstract

The grounding scheme is one of the main elements for protection system to mitigate the effect of unwanted lightning strikes or operational failures due to faults in generation, transmission and distribution systems. Desert sand soil has a very low electric conductivity, causing weakness in grounding system. To mitigate problems, the soil is supported with a high conductivity agent to adjust the soil conductivity to acceptable levels. A high-cost and non-renewable commercial product can be added to soils to increase their conductivity. This study brings innovation to conventional soil-enhancement materials. A newly developed mixture is proposed, which is composed of waste-activated carbon received from water purification industries and wood ash from agricultural wastes. First, mixture samples with different compositions of available waste materials were prepared. Then, experimental tests were performed and optimized with a combined genetic algorithm (GA) and fuzzy ranking method to estimate the optimal percentage volume value of each material involved in the developed mixture. To validate the effectiveness of the developed mixture, the results were compared with a commercial product available in the market. Also, the obtained results using GA are compared with those obtained by particle swarm optimization (PSO) to appreciate the best GA solutions. The effectiveness of using the developed mixture and the commercial product in reducing the resistance-to-ground of a rod driven in high and low resistivity soils is evaluated. Finally, a sample of the developed mixture was checked to be non-corrosive material for copper grounding rods.


Corresponding author: Mahmoud Wahba, Aqua Paris for Natural Water Company, New-Valley, Egypt, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the reviewers for their valuable comments which enhanced the clarity of the paper.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commerical, or not-for-profit sectors.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

Appendix A

The cost coefficients that used in equation (5) can be summarized in the following Table A as:

Table A:

Cost values in USD of waste materials.

Symbol Value (USD) Reference
Cost of commercial product/kg GEM-25A 5.8 [85]
Cost of excavation per m3 C 1 40 [86]
Cost of WAC/kg C 2 1.5 Locally
Cost of WA/kg C 3 0.75 Estimated
Appendix B
Figure B: 
Flow chart of genetic algorithm.
Figure B:

Flow chart of genetic algorithm.

The steps procedure of genetic algorithm optimizer in the flow chart in Figure B.

Appendix C

The step procedure of the GA and pareto-fuzzy ranking are listed in following as:

  1. Define the multi-objective functions MOF (tri-objective function), variables and parameters of the GA.

  2. Generate initial populations.

  3. Applied the main operator of the GA as:

    1. Generation

    2. Selection

    3. Cross over

    4. Mutation

  4. Convergence check and stop iterations according to the stoppage criteria.

  5. Generate pareto-front figure and Sort the pareto optimal solutions according to the GR (R g) values.

  6. Find fuzzy ranking of each one solution of the pareto set solutions in the following expression as [74]:

(10) μ ( F i ) = { F i F i min 1 F i max F i F i max F i min F i min F i F i max F i F i max 0

where F min and F=max are expected maximum and minimum values of each objective function (R g, PH and cost)and ith is the number of objective function.

  1. Generate µ (R g), µ (PH) and µ (cost) for each solution of the pareto set.

  2. Compute the minimum value for each solution according to [74]:

(11) F MIN = { min [ μ ( F j ) k ] }

  1. Select the more unique optimal solution as:

(12) μ best solution = Max . ( F MIN )

where j is number of objectives to be minimized and k are number of pareto-optimal solutions obtained

  1. Display the more optimal solution with corresponding values of generations and values of functions.

References

1. Pandey, SK, Mohanty, SR, Kishor, N. A literature survey on load-frequency control for conventional and distribution generation power systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;25:318–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.029.Search in Google Scholar

2. He, Z, Yang, M, Wang, Z, Chen, H, Zhang, X, Jiang, Q, et al.. Optimization of segmented thermoelectric devices composed of high-temperature thermoelectric material La2 Te3. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:2884–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00471- w.10.1007/s42114-022-00471-wSearch in Google Scholar

3. Zhu, X, Yang, M, Wang, Z, He, B, Chen, H, Zhang, X, et al.. Remarkable thermoelectric performance of carbon- based schwarzites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2023;6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00595-z.Search in Google Scholar

4. Guo, Y, Liu, T, He, H, Wang, N. Bifunctional interface modification for efficient and UV- robust α-Fe2 O3-based planar organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:3212–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022- 00484-5.10.1007/s42114-022-00484-5Search in Google Scholar

5. Li, G, Shen, R, Hu, S, Wang, B, Algadi, H, Wang, C. Norbornene-Based acid–base blended polymer membranes with low ion exchange capacity for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022 5:2131–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114- 022-00559-3.10.1007/s42114-022-00559-3Search in Google Scholar

6. Sun, C, Zou, Y, Qin, C, Zhang, B, Wu, X. Temperature effect of photovoltaic cells: a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:2675–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00533-z.Search in Google Scholar

7. Tian, T, Cheng, Y, Sun, Z, Huang, K, Lei, M, Tang, H. Carbon nanotubes supported oxygen reduction reaction catalysts: role of inner tubes. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2023;6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00592-2.Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang, Z, Yang, M, Xie, X, Yu, C, Jiang, Q, Huang, M, et al.. Applications of machine learning in perovskite. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:2700–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00560-w.Search in Google Scholar

9. Zeng, X, Luo, Q, Li, J, Li, Y, Wang, W, Li, Y, et al.. A multifunctional pentlandite counter electrode toward efficient and stable sensitized solar cells. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2021;4:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00233-0.Search in Google Scholar

10. Afroze, JD, Tong, L, Abden, MJ, Chen, Y. Multifunctional hierarchical graphene-carbon fiber hybrid aerogels for strain sensing and energy storage. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2023;6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00594-0.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dang, C, Mu, Q, Xie, X, Sun, X, Yang, X, Zhang, Y, et al.. Recent progress in cathode catalyst for nonaqueous lithium oxygen batteries: a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:606–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00500-8.Search in Google Scholar

12. Lai, C, Guo, Y, Zhao, H, Song, H, Qu, X, Huang, M, et al.. High-performance double ‘ion-buffering reservoirs’ of asymmetric supercapacitors enabled by battery-type hierarchical porous sandwich- like Co3 O4 and 3D graphene aerogels. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:2557–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00532-0.Search in Google Scholar

13. Yuan, G, Tong, W, Amal, BQ, Mu, Y, Cui, D, Amin, MA, et al.. Boron and fluorine Co-doped laser-induced graphene towards high-performance micro-supercapacitors. Carbon 2023;212:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.118101.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ghania, SM. Grounding systems under lightning surges with soil ionization for high voltage Substations by using two layer capacitors (TLC) model. Elec Power Syst Res 2019;174:105871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2019.105871.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ullah, I, Baharom, MNR, Ahmad, H, Luqman, HM, Zainal, Z. Lightning effect on scaled protected and un-protected building structures; a simulation approach. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 2016;2:401–8. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v2.i2.Search in Google Scholar

16. Bierer, A, Götze, U. Energy cost accounting: conventional and flow-oriented approaches. J Compet 2012;4:128–44. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2012.02.09.Search in Google Scholar

17. Kumar, A, Seedhar, HR. Grounding system for high resistivity limited area Substations in hilly region of Himachal Pradesh. In: 16th national power systems conference, 15th-17th december; 2010:516–22 pp.Search in Google Scholar

18. Committee of the IEEE Power, Substations, and Energy Society. IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding. In: IEEE Std 80-2013 (Revision of IEEE Std 80-2000/ Incorporates IEEE Std 80-2013/Cor 1-2015) 2015, vol 2015:1–226 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2015.7109078.Search in Google Scholar

19. Nayel, M, Zhao, J, He, J, Cai, Z, Wang, Q. Study of lightning stroke to grounded and free horizontal conductor. In: Environmental electromagnetics, the 2006 4th asia-pacific conference on; 2006:49–55 pp.10.1109/CEEM.2006.257905Search in Google Scholar

20. Azmi, A, Ahmad, NA, Kwan, LY, Abdul-Malek, Z. The use of enhancement material in grounding system: a review. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 2019;13:453–60. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v13.i2.pp453-460.Search in Google Scholar

21. Coelho, VL, Alexandre, P, Hugo, A, Almaguer, D, Coelho, RA, Boaventura, WDC, et al.. The influence of seasonal soil moisture on the behavior of soil resistivity and power distribution grounding systems. Elec Power Syst Res 2015;118:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2014.07.027.Search in Google Scholar

22. Nayel, M. Study apparent grounding resistivity in vertical-layer soil. Elec Power Compon Syst 2014;42:845–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2014.896432.Search in Google Scholar

23. Abdel-Salam, M, Anis, H, El-Morshedy, A and Radwan, R 2021. High voltage engineering. Chapter 13, Marcel Dekker Inc., USA, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

24. Abdel-Salam, M, Ahmed, A, Nayel, M, Zidan, A. Surface potential and resistance of grounding grid systems in homogeneous soil. Elec Power Compon Syst 2007;35:1093–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325000701297109.Search in Google Scholar

25. Dawalibi, F, Barbeito, N. Measurements and computations of the performance of grounding systems buried in multilayer soils. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 1991;6:1483–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.97681.Search in Google Scholar

26. Rousseau, A. High frequency behavior of soil improver compounds. In: 30th international conference on lightning protection – ICLP 2010 (Cagliari, Italy – september 13th – 17th, 2010) D; 2010:1–5 pp.10.1109/ICLP.2010.7845968Search in Google Scholar

27. Androvitsaneas, VP, Gonos, IF, Stathopulos, IA. Experimental study on transient impedance of grounding rods encased in ground enhancing compounds. Elec Power Syst Res 2016;139:109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.11.032.Search in Google Scholar

28. Al-ammar, E, khan, Y, Malik, N, Wani, N. Development of low resistivity material for grounding resistance reduction. In: 2010 IEEE International Energy Conference. Manama, Bahrain; 2010, vol 35:700–3 pp.10.1109/ENERGYCON.2010.5771771Search in Google Scholar

29. Huai-Liang, Y. Research on the mechanism of grounding resistance-reducing agent and the used quantity. Int Conf Prop Appl Dielectr Mater 1991;2:3–6.10.1109/ICPADM.1991.172302Search in Google Scholar

30. Lee, HS, Kwon, SJ, Karthick, S, Saraswathy, V, Muralidharan, S. Studies on the development of activated binary clay and corrosion monitoring using embedded sensor. Arab J Chem 2020;13:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.07.003.Search in Google Scholar

31. Chung, CC, Lin, CP, Yang, SH, Lin, JY, Lin, CH. Investigation of non-unique relationship between soil electrical conductivity and water content due to drying-wetting rate using TDR. Eng Geol 2019;252:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.02.025.Search in Google Scholar

32. Eduful, G, Cole, JE, Tetteh, FM. Palm kernel oil cake as an alternative to earth resistance-reducing agent. In: 2009 IEEE/PES power systems conference and exposition, PSCE; 2009, 1–43 pp.10.1109/PSCE.2009.4840017Search in Google Scholar

33. Kulor, F, Dzah, C, Markus, ED, Apprey, MW, Kagbetor, P. Comparative study of tyre ash and palm kernel oil cake as back-filling agents for effective grounding. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 2021;1088:012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1088/1/012054.Search in Google Scholar

34. Abdullah, A, Mazelan, N, Tadza, MYM, Abd Rahman, R. The Use of Gypsum and Waste Gypsum for Electrical Grounding Backfill. In: Proceedings of the 11th National Technical Seminar on Unmanned System Technology 2019. Malaysia: Springer Singapore; 2021, 666:1213–26 pp.10.1007/978-981-15-5281-6_86Search in Google Scholar

35. Chen, LH, Chen, JF, Liang, TJ, Wang, WI. A study of grounding resistance reduction agent using granulated blast furanace slag. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2004;19:973–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2004.829127.Search in Google Scholar

36. Tadza, M, Yuhyi, M, Mazelan, N, Yusri, NF, Abdullah, A. Some geotechnical properties of pure and waste gypsum for geoelectrical grounding applications. Civ Environ Eng Rep 2019;29:97–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/ceer-2019-0027.Search in Google Scholar

37. Al-Arainy, Ali, A, Malik, NH, Qureshi, MI, Khan, Y. Grounding pit optimization using low resistivity materials for applications in high resistivity soils. Int J Emerg Elec Power Syst 2011;12:1–20. https://doi.org/10.2202/1553-779X.2591.Search in Google Scholar

38. Khan, Y, Pazheri, FR, Malik, NH, Al-Arainy, AA, Qureshi, MI. Novel approach of estimating grounding pit optimum dimensions in high resistivity soils. Elec Power Syst Res 2012;92:145–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2012.06.003.Search in Google Scholar

39. Pedroza, MG, Melo, AP, Mohand, B, Santos, VA, Sarubbo, LA, Couto, GP, et al.. The use of coal ash and plaster waste to improve grounding system. J Clean Prod 2020;264:121504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121504.Search in Google Scholar

40. Kennedy, LJ, Judith Vijaya, J, Sekaran, G. Electrical conductivity study of porous carbons derived from rice husk. Mater Chem Phys 2005;91:471–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.12.013.Search in Google Scholar

41. Choi, S, Raja, IS, Selvaraj, AR, Kang, MS, Park, TE, Kim, KS, et al.. Activated carbon nanofiber nanoparticles incorporated electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds to promote fibroblast behaviors for application to skin tissue engineering. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2023;6:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00608-x.Search in Google Scholar

42. Deng, Z, Zhang, Q, Deng, Q, Guo, Z, Seok, I. Modification of coconut shell activated carbon and purification of volatile organic waste gas acetone. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:491–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00345-7.Search in Google Scholar

43. Wang, P, Song, T, Abo-Dief, HM, Song, J, Alanazi, AK, Fan, B, et al.. Effect of carbon nanotubes on the interface evolution and dielectric properties of polylactic acid/ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer nanocomposites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:1100–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00489-0.Search in Google Scholar

44. Osman, A, Elhakeem, A, Kaytbay, S, Ahmed, A. A comprehensive review on the thermal, electrical, and mechanical properties of graphene-based multi-functional epoxy composites. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:547–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00423-4.Search in Google Scholar

45. Zhang, Z, Liu, M, Ibrahim, MM, Wu, H, Wu, Y, Li, Y, et al.. Flexible polystyrene/graphene composites with epsilon-near-zero properties. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:1054–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00486-3.Search in Google Scholar

46. Zhao, Y, Liu, F, Zhao, Z, Bai, P, Ma, Y, Alhadhrami, A, et al.. Direct ink printing reduced graphene oxide/KCu7S4 electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:1516–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00488-1.Search in Google Scholar

47. Bogeat, AB. Understanding and tuning the electrical conductivity of activated carbon: a state-of-the-art review understanding and tuning the electrical conductivity of activated carbon: a. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 2019;46:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2019.1671800.Search in Google Scholar

48. Konstantinos Azis, Mavriou, Z, Karpouzas, DG, Ntougias, S, Melidis, P. Evaluation of sand filtration and activated carbon adsorption fruit-packing industries. Processes 2021;9:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr907122.Search in Google Scholar

49. Sharma, D, Kharkar, P, Mehta, D. Application of activated carbon in waste water treatment. Int J Eng Technol Appl Sci 2019;3:63–6. https://doi.org/10.33564/ijeast.2019.v03i12.010.Search in Google Scholar

50. Judith, TAJ, John, VL, Kennedy, LJ. Comparative study of electrical conductivity on activated carbons prepared from various cellulose materials. Arabian J Sci Eng 2014;41:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1516-6.Search in Google Scholar

51. Tadza, MYM, Anuar, THHT, Yahaya, FM, Abd Rahman, R. Performance of graphite and activated carbon as electrical grounding enhancement material. Lect Notes Electr Eng 2021;666:1139–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5281-6_81.Search in Google Scholar

52. Pereira, MTJ, Tonny José Araújo Da Silva, EMBS, Mazzini-Guedes, RB, Mazzini-Guedes, RB. Applying wood ash and soil moisture on gladiolus (gladiolus grandiflorus) cultivation. Aust J Crop Sci 2016;10:393–401. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.03.p7236.Search in Google Scholar

53. Laohaprapanon, S, Marques, M, Hogland, W. Removal of organic pollutants from wastewater using wood fly ash as a low-cost sorbent. Clean 2010;38:1055–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000105.Search in Google Scholar

54. Nabeela, F, Murad, W, Khan, I, Ahmad Mian, I, Rehman, H, Adnan, M, et al.. Effect of wood ash application on the morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters of Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol Biochem 2015;95:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.06.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

55. Wan Ahmad, WFH, Voon, YJ, Jasni, J, Ab-Kadir, MZA, Gomes, C. Performance of bentonite, fly ash and wood ash mixtures as grounding enhancement materials. In: 2018 IEEE 7th international conference on power and energy, PECon; 2018:203–8 pp.10.1109/PECON.2018.8684104Search in Google Scholar

56. Chu, T, Gao, Y, Yi, L, Fan, C, Yan, L, Ding, C, et al.. Highly fire-retardant optical wood enabled by transparent fireproof coatings. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:1812–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00440-3.Search in Google Scholar

57. Gao, T, Ma, Y, Ji, L, Zheng, Y, Yan, S, Li, Y, et al.. Nickel-coated wood-derived porous carbon (Ni/WPC) for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00420-7.Search in Google Scholar

58. Lian, M, Huang, Y, Liu, Y, Jiang, D, Wu, Z, Li, B, et al.. An overview of regenerable wood-based composites: preparation and applications for flame retardancy, enhanced mechanical properties, biomimicry, and transparency energy saving. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:1612–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00475-6.Search in Google Scholar

59. Liang, C, Du, Y, Wang, Y, Ma, A, Huang, S, Ma, Z. Intumescent fire-retardant coatings for ancient wooden architectures with ideal electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2021;4:979–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00274-5.Search in Google Scholar

60. Maddodi, BS, Lathashri, UA, Devesh, S, Udaya Rao, A, Shenoy, BG, Jayawardane, HTW, et al.. Repurposing plastic wastes in non-conventional engineered wood building bricks for constructional application – a mechanical characterization using experimental and statistical Analysis. Eng Sci 2022;18:329–36. https://doi.org/10.30919/es8d696.Search in Google Scholar

61. Sema, AI, Khatri, J, Dhar, BB, Kulsi, G, Bhattacharyya, J. On the utility of teakwood biochar for iron contaminants removal from water. ES Mater Manuf 2023;21:1–24. https://doi.org/10.30919/esmm5f871.Search in Google Scholar

62. Wang, Z, Yin, K, Zhang, Y, Sun, K, Xie, L, Cong, M, et al.. Two-dimensional Ti3C2tx/carbonized wood metacomposites with weakly negative permittivity. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:2369–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00442-1.Search in Google Scholar

63. Yuan, B, Guo, M, Murugadoss, V, Song, G, Guo, Z. Immobilization of graphitic carbon nitride on wood surface via chemical crosslinking method for UV resistance and self- cleaning. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2021;4:286–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00235-y.Search in Google Scholar

64. Zhang, H, Li, S, Hang, H, Wang, R, Cheng, C, Fedorovich, KV, et al.. Mildew-resistant wood building materials with titanium oxide nanosheet. Eng Sci 2023;21:1–7. https://doi.org/10.30919/es8e816.Search in Google Scholar

65. Zhang, H, Wang, R, Wang, L, Li, S, Yuan, Y, Wang, N, et al.. Super-hydrophobic wood composite with plexiglass coating. Eng Sci 2023;23:1–6. https://doi.org/10.30919/es8d865.Search in Google Scholar

66. Hach Company: U.S.A.. Hach SensIon5 conductivity meter manual, vol 64; 2000. Available from: http://www.pollardwater.com/pdf/pdf_web_manuals/sensION5_Meter_Manual.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

67. Xu, S, Wu, X, Cai, Y, Ding, Y, Wang, Z. Strength and leaching characteristics of magnesium phosphate cement-solidified zinc- contaminated soil under the effect of acid rain. Soil Sediment Contam 2018;27:161–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2018.1438364.Search in Google Scholar

68. Product, C, Jenway. PH meters PH only meters. England: Keison products; 2013:45–60 pp.Search in Google Scholar

69. Herschy, RW. Water quality for drinking: WHO guidelines. Encycl Earth Sci Ser 2012;2012:876–83.10.1007/978-1-4020-4410-6_184Search in Google Scholar

70. Hussein, M, Mohammed, M, Hussein, O. A novel truss formwork made from Casuarina wood. Master od science thesis. The American University in Cairo; 2020.Search in Google Scholar

71. El-Lakany, MH. Contribution of Casuarina to Soi1 fertility in Egypt. In: Nitrogen fixing trees workshop, biological Improvement of soil march; 1986:287–93 pp.Search in Google Scholar

72. Khan, Y, Malik, NH, Al-Arainy, AA, Qureshi, MI, Pazheri, FR. Efficient use of low resistivity material for grounding resistance reduction in high soil resistivity areas. IEEE Reg 10 Annu Int Conf Proc/TENCON 2010;10:620–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2010.5686761.Search in Google Scholar

73. Perng, JW, Chang, YK, ShihLu, P. Grounding system cost Analysis using optimization algorithms. Energies 2018;11:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123484.Search in Google Scholar

74. Parihar, SS, Pandit, M. Fuzzy ranking based real coded genetic algorithm for combined economic emission dispatch with loss minimization. Int J Eng Innov Technol 2012;1:82–90.Search in Google Scholar

75. Aghajani, G, Ghadimi, N. Multi-objective energy management in a micro-grid. Energy Rep 2018;4:218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2017.10.002.Search in Google Scholar

76. Gharavi, H, Mohammadi, F, Gharoei, H, Ghanbari-Tichi, S, Salehi, R. Optimal fuzzy multi-objective design of a renewable energy system with economics, reliability, and environmental emissions considerations. J Renew Sustain Energy 2014;6:0–21. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4898634.Search in Google Scholar

77. Mukhtaruddin, RNSR, Rahman, HA, Hassan, MY, Jamian, JJ. Optimal hybrid renewable energy design in autonomous system using iterative-pareto-fuzzy technique. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;64:242–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.030.Search in Google Scholar

78. Beverskog, B. Revised pourbaix diagrams for copper at 5-150 °C. SKI Report, No. 27; 1995.Search in Google Scholar

79. He, Y, Zhou, M, Mahmoud, MHH, Lu, X, He, G, Zhang, L, et al.. Multifunctional wearable strain/pressure sensor based on conductive carbon nanotubes/silk nonwoven fabric with high durability and low detection limit. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:1939–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00525-z.Search in Google Scholar

80. Kuang, T, Zhang, M, Chen, F, Fei, Y, Yang, J, Zhong, M, et al.. Creating poly(lactic acid)/carbon nanotubes/carbon black nanocomposites with high electrical conductivity and good mechanical properties by constructing a segregated double network with a low content of hybrid nanofiller. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2023;6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-022-00622-z.Search in Google Scholar

81. Luo, X, Yang, G, Schubert, DW. Electrically conductive polymer composite containing hybrid graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes: synergistic effect and tunable conductivity anisotropy. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2022;5:250–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-021-00332-y.Search in Google Scholar

82. Datsios, ZG, Mikropoulos, PN, Karakousis, I. Laboratory characterization and modeling of DC electrical resistivity of sandy soil with variable water resistivity and content. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 2017;24:3063–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2017.006583.Search in Google Scholar

83. Pandey, LMS, Shukla, SK, Habibi, D. Electrical resistivity of sandy soil. Géotech Lett 2015;5:178–85. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.15.00066.Search in Google Scholar

84. Zhou, M, Wang, J, Cai, L, Fan, Y, Zheng, Z. Laboratory investigations on factors affecting soil electrical resistivity and the measurement. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2015;2015:5358–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2015.2465931.Search in Google Scholar

85. Google; n.d. Elliott Electric supply. Available from: https://www.Elliottelectric.Com/P/Item/CDW/GEM25A/.Search in Google Scholar

86. Google; 2022. Localsearch. Available from: https://www.localsearch.com.au/guides/excavating-earthmoving-equipment/excavation-cost-per-m3.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-08
Accepted: 2023-09-06
Published Online: 2023-09-25

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2023-0120/html
Scroll to top button