Home California’s electric grid nexus with the environment
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

California’s electric grid nexus with the environment

  • Geoffrey Niswander and George Xydis ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 29, 2023
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Submit Manuscript Author Information
International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems
From the journal International Journal of Emerging Electric Power Systems Volume 25 Issue 6

Abstract

California’s electric grid has established and allowed for a large swathe of land with varying topography, geology, and biota to become inhabited and maintained at a level of modernization that most Americans have become accustomed to in the 21st century. However, while the residents, commerce, and overall populations of both have increased and progressed, the energy infrastructure that supports them has not. Instead, in some instances, the transmission infrastructure has ignited fires in the state’s wildlands – some with devastating effects – the point sources of power production have aged and not necessarily kept up with a shifting climate or demanded load, and new sources of power generation and energy storage have not penetrated the energy marketplace fast enough or to great effect. This paper delineates just a portion of some of California’s trials in the coming years as it transitions to a decarbonized electric grid and light-duty fleet. Most calculations were carried out using data prior to December 31, 2019 and generically treats succeeding data (2020–2021) as unrepresentative of former years or unlikely to be accurate of the years succeeding the Corona Virus Outbreak of 2020.

Keywords: decarbonization; nexus; grid upgrade cost; environment
Corresponding author: George Xydis, Energy Policy and Climate Program, Krieger School of Arts & Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; and Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Birk Centerpark 15, 7400 Herning, Denmark, E-mail:

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Research funding: None declared.

  5. Data availability: The raw data can be obtained on request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Cappers, P, MacDonald, J, Page, J, Potter, J, Stewart, E. Future opportunities and challenges with using demand response as a resource in distribution system operation and planning activities. 2015. Ernest orlando lawrence berkeley National Laboratory; 2016, 1–26pp. Report No. LBNL-1003951.10.2172/1333622Search in Google Scholar

2. Zheng, Y, Sahraei-Ardakani, M. Leveraging existing water and wastewater infrastructure to develop distributed pumped storage hydropower in California. J Energy Storage 2021;34:102204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.102204.Search in Google Scholar

3. Larson-Praplan, S. History of rangeland management in California. Rangelands 2014;36:11–7. https://doi.org/10.2111/rangelands-d-14-00020.1.Search in Google Scholar

4. Leochico, CFD, Di Giusto, ML, Mitre, R. Impact of scientific conferences on climate change and how to make them eco-friendly and inclusive: a scoping review. J Clim Change Health 2021;4:100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100042.Search in Google Scholar

5. Goss, M, Swain, DL, Abatzoglou, JT, Sarhadi, A, Kolden, CA, Williams, AP, et al.. Climate change is increasing the likelihood of extreme autumn wildfire conditions across California. Environ Res Lett 2020;15:094016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab83a7.Search in Google Scholar

6. Lund, J, Medellin-Azuara, J, Durand, J, Stone, K. Lessons from California’s 2012–2016 drought. J Water Resour Plann Manag 2018;144:04018067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000984.Search in Google Scholar

7. Anderson, L, Wahl, DB, Bhattacharya, T. Understanding rates of change: a case study using fossil pollen records from California to assess the potential for and challenges to a regional data synthesis. Quat Int 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.04.044.Search in Google Scholar

8. Debayle, E, Bodin, T, Durand, S, Ricard, Y. Seismic evidence for partial melt below tectonic plates. Nature 2020;586:555–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2809-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Schmidt, WL, Platt, JP. Stress, microstructure, and deformation mechanisms during subduction underplating at the depth of tremor and slow slip, Franciscan Complex, northern California. J Struct Geol 2022;154:104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104469.Search in Google Scholar

10. Xu, X, Sandwell, DT, Klein, E, Bock, Y. Integrated sentinel‐1 InSAR and GNSS time‐series along the san Andreas fault system. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 2021;126:e2021JB022579. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jb022579.Search in Google Scholar

11. Gupta, HK. Artificial water reservoir-triggered seismicity (RTS): most prominent anthropogenic seismicity. Surv Geophys 2022;43:1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09675-z.Search in Google Scholar

12. Malagnini, L, Parsons, T. Seismic attenuation monitoring of a critically stressed San Andreas fault. Geophys Res Lett 2020;47:e2020GL089201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl089201.Search in Google Scholar

13. California Department of Water Resources. Division of safety of dams; 2022. Available from: https://water.ca.gov/programs/all-programs/division-of-safety-of-dams [Accessed 20 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

14. Markonis, Y, Koutsoyiannis, D. Climatic variability over time scales spanning nine orders of magnitude: connecting Milankovitch cycles with Hurst–Kolmogorov dynamics. Surv Geophys 2013;34:181–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-012-9208-9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Somawardhana, RP. Surface water ocean topography Ka-band radar Interferometer payload thermal design challenges. 44th Int Conf Environ Syst 2014.Search in Google Scholar

16. Johnson, DL, Erhardt, RJ. Projected impacts of climate change on wind energy density in the United States. Renew Energy 2016;85:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

17. NASA Climate Science Investigations. Global wind patterns; 2016. Available from: http://www.ces.fau.edu/nasa/content/resources/global-wind-patterns.php [Accessed 10 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

18. Stone, BJr, Rodgers, MO. Urban form and thermal efficiency: how the design of cities influences the urban heat island effect. American Planning Association. J Am Plann Assoc 2001;67:186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976228.Search in Google Scholar

19. Escriva-Bou, A, Lund, JR, Pulido-Velazquez, M, Hui, R, Medellín-Azuara, J. Developing a water-energy-GHG emissions modeling framework: insights from an application to California’s water system. Environ Model Software 2018;109:54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.011.Search in Google Scholar

20. Ray, P, Wi, S, Schwarz, A, Correa, M, He, M, Brown, C. Vulnerability and risk: climate change and water supply from California’s central valley water system. Climatic Change 2020;161:177–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02655-z.Search in Google Scholar

21. Tarroja, B, AghaKouchak, A, Samuelsen, S. Quantifying climate change impacts on hydropower generation and implications on electric grid greenhouse gas emissions and operation. Energy 2016;111:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.131.Search in Google Scholar

22. Sugihara, NG, Van Wagtendonk, JW, Fites-Kaufman, J. Fire as an ecological process. Fire California Ecosyst 2006:58–74.10.1525/california/9780520246058.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

23. Noss, RF, Platt, WJ, Sorrie, BA, Weakley, AS, Means, DB, Costanza, J, et al.. How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American Coastal Plain. Divers Distrib 2015;21:236–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12278.Search in Google Scholar

24. Brewer, MJ, Clements, CB. The 2018 Camp Fire: meteorological analysis using in situ observations and numerical simulations. Atmosphere 2019;11:47. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11010047.Search in Google Scholar

25. Penn, I, Eavis, P. PG&E pleads guilty to 84 counts of manslaughter in camp fire case; 2020. New York Times Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/business/energy-environment/pge-camp-fire-california-wildfires.html [Accessed 1 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

26. Guliasi, L. Toward a political economy of public safety power shutoff: politics, ideology, and the limits of regulatory choice in California. Energy Res Social Sci 2021;71:101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101842.Search in Google Scholar

27. Lilly, P, Simons, G. California’s self-generation incentive program nonresidential PV systems: measured system performance and actual costs. ASME Power Conf 2006;42053:667–73.10.1115/POWER2006-88228Search in Google Scholar

28. 2019 SGIP energy storage market assessment and COST-EFFECTIVENESS report, 2019, pacific gas and electric SGIP working group, Available from: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/-/media/cpuc-website/files/legacyfiles/2/6442463457-2019-sgip-energy-storage-market-assesssment-ce-report-2019.pdf [Accessed 21 Jan 2022].Search in Google Scholar

29. Niswander, G, Xydis, G. Wind microgeneration strategy for meeting California’s carbon neutral grid goal. Appl Sci 2022;12:2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042187.Search in Google Scholar

30. Varghese, S, Sioshansi, R. The price is right? How pricing and incentive mechanisms in California incentivize building distributed hybrid solar and energy-storage systems. Energy Pol 2020;138:111242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111242.Search in Google Scholar

31. Xydis, G. Wind energy to thermal and cold storage—a systems approach. Energy Build 2013;56:41–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

32. Xydis, G. Exergy analysis in low carbon technologies—the case of renewable energy in the building sector. Indoor Built Environ 2009;18:396–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x09344280.Search in Google Scholar

33. Chang, MK, Eichman, JD, Mueller, F, Samuelsen, S. Buffering intermittent renewable power with hydroelectric generation: a case study in California. Appl Energy 2013;112:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.092.Search in Google Scholar

34. California ISO. Managing oversupply; 2022.Available from: http://www.caiso.com/informed/Pages/ManagingOversupply.aspx [Accessed 1 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

35. Nanaki, EA, Xydis, G. Exergetic aspects of renewable energy systems: insights to transportation and energy sector for intelligent communities. Abingdon-on-Thames: CRC Press; 2019.10.1201/b22277Search in Google Scholar

36. Wall, G. Exergetics; 1998. Available from: http://exergy.se.Search in Google Scholar

37. Stylos, N, Koroneos, C, Roset, J, González-Sánchez, C, Xydis, G, Muñoz, FS. Exergy as an indicator for enhancing evaluation of environmental management performance in the hospitality industry. J Clean Prod 2018;198:1503–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.107.Search in Google Scholar

38. Huokuna, M, Morris, M, Beltaos, S, Burrell, BC. Ice in reservoirs and regulated rivers. Int J River Basin Manag 2020:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2020.1719120.Search in Google Scholar

39. Powell, KM, Edgar, TF. Modeling and control of a solar thermal power plant with thermal energy storage. Chem Eng Sci 2012;71:138–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2011.12.009.Search in Google Scholar

40. Wang, F, Rappe, AM. First-principles calculation of the bulk photovoltaic effect in KNbO 3 and (K, Ba)(Ni, Nb) O 3− δ. Phys Rev B 2015;91:165124. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.91.165124.Search in Google Scholar

41. Hirth, BD, Schroeder, JL. Documenting wind speed and power deficits behind a utility-scale wind turbine. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 2013;52:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-12-0145.1.Search in Google Scholar

42. Mathew, S, Philip, GS, editors. Advances in wind energy and conversion technology, 20. Berlin: Springer; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

43. Liu, K, Yu, M, Zhu, W. Enhancing wind energy harvesting performance of vertical axis wind turbines with a new hybrid design: a fluid-structure interaction study. Renew Energy 2019;140:912–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.120.Search in Google Scholar

44. Kocsis, G, Xydis, G. Repair process analysis for wind turbines equipped with hydraulic pitch mechanism on the US market in focus of cost optimization. Appl Sci 2019;9:3230. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163230.Search in Google Scholar

45. Papadopoulou, K, Alasis, C, Xydis, GA. On the wind blade’s surface roughness due to dust accumulation and its impact on the wind turbine’s performance: a heuristic QBlade‐based modeling assessment. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 2020;39:13296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13296.Search in Google Scholar

46. Abushamah, HAS, Haghifam, MR, Bolandi, TG. A novel approach for distributed generation expansion planning considering its added value compared with centralized generation expansion. Sustain Energy Grids Netw 2021;25:100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2020.100417.Search in Google Scholar

47. California energy commission 2020, 2020 total system electric generation, Available from: https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2020-total-system-electric-generation [Accessed 22 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

48. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. All-transactions House price index for California; 2022. Available from: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ [Accessed 27 Feb 2022].Search in Google Scholar

49. California Department of Water Resources. Below average precipitation for water year 2018. The public record (palm Desert, calif.); 2018. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/2135509972 [Accessed 6 Dec 2021].Search in Google Scholar

50. Altay, A, Şahin, C, Iskender, I, Gezer, D, Çakır, C. A compensator design for the aged hydro electric power plant speed governors. Elec Power Syst Res 2016;133:257–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2015.12.016.Search in Google Scholar

51. Voisin, N, Kintner-Meyer, M, Skaggs, R, Nguyen, T, Wu, D, Dirks, J, et al.. Vulnerability of the US western electric grid to hydro-climatological conditions: how bad can it get? Energy 2016;115:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.059.Search in Google Scholar

52. Kendall, A, Slattery, M, Dunn, J. Lithium-ion car battery recycling advisory group DRAFT report; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

53. Harper, G, Sommerville, R, Kendrick, E, Driscoll, L, Slater, P, Stolkin, R, et al.. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 2019;575:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

54. Velenturf, AP, Purnell, P, Jensen, PD. Reducing material criticality through circular business models: challenges in renewable energy. One Earth 2021;4:350–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

55. Ebrahimi, S, Mac Kinnon, M, Brouwer, J. California end-use electrification impacts on carbon neutrality and clean air. Appl Energy 2018;213:435–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.050.Search in Google Scholar

56. Simshauser, P. Merchant renewables and the valuation of peaking plant in energy-only markets. Energy Econ 2020;91:104888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104888.Search in Google Scholar

57. Colbertaldo, P, Agustin, SB, Campanari, S, Brouwer, J. Impact of hydrogen energy storage on California electric power system: towards 100 % renewable electricity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2019;44:9558–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.062.Search in Google Scholar

58. CALFIRE stats and events; 2021. Available from: https://www.fire.ca.gov/stats-events/ [Accessed 15 Jan 2022].Search in Google Scholar

59. Hook, A, Sovacool, BK, Sorrell, S. A systematic review of the energy and climate impacts of teleworking. Environ Res Lett 2020;15:093003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8a84.Search in Google Scholar

60. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Form EIA-63B, Annual and monthly photovoltaic module shipments report table 4; 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Received: 2023-04-03
Accepted: 2023-08-18
Published Online: 2023-09-29

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. California’s electric grid nexus with the environment
  4. Research Articles
  5. Adaptive centralized energy management algorithm for islanded bipolar DC microgrid
  6. Distributed new energy information acquisition model of distribution network based on Beidou communication
  7. A single phase modified Y-source inverter with high voltage gains and reduced switch stresses
  8. Technical assessment of power interface to utilize untapped power of decentralized solar pumps for positive impact in livelihoods
  9. An improved method for monitoring the junction temperature of 1200V / 50A IGBT modules used in power conversion systems
  10. Stochastic uncertainty management in electricity markets with high renewable energy penetration
  11. Power quality disturbances classification using autoencoder and radial basis function neural network
  12. Use of waste activated carbon and wood ash mixture as an electrical grounding enhancement material
  13. Double-layer optimal energy management of smart grid incorporating P2P energy trading with smart traction system
  14. Performance analysis of SRFT based D-STATCOM for power quality improvement in distribution system under different loading conditions
  15. Power quality improvement of utility-distribution system using reduced-switch DSTATCOM in grid-tied solar-PV system based on modified SRF strategy
https://doi.org/10.1515/ijeeps-2023-0117
Keywords for this article
decarbonization; nexus; grid upgrade cost; environment

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. California’s electric grid nexus with the environment
  4. Research Articles
  5. Adaptive centralized energy management algorithm for islanded bipolar DC microgrid
  6. Distributed new energy information acquisition model of distribution network based on Beidou communication
  7. A single phase modified Y-source inverter with high voltage gains and reduced switch stresses
  8. Technical assessment of power interface to utilize untapped power of decentralized solar pumps for positive impact in livelihoods
  9. An improved method for monitoring the junction temperature of 1200V / 50A IGBT modules used in power conversion systems
  10. Stochastic uncertainty management in electricity markets with high renewable energy penetration
  11. Power quality disturbances classification using autoencoder and radial basis function neural network
  12. Use of waste activated carbon and wood ash mixture as an electrical grounding enhancement material
  13. Double-layer optimal energy management of smart grid incorporating P2P energy trading with smart traction system
  14. Performance analysis of SRFT based D-STATCOM for power quality improvement in distribution system under different loading conditions
  15. Power quality improvement of utility-distribution system using reduced-switch DSTATCOM in grid-tied solar-PV system based on modified SRF strategy
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2023-0117/html
Scroll to top button