Startseite Torque ripple minimization of multi-level inverter fed PMSM drive using modified MPTC
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Torque ripple minimization of multi-level inverter fed PMSM drive using modified MPTC

  • Poondla Dharmendra Kumar und Tejavathu Ramesh ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. November 2021

Abstract

This paper focuses on investigating the steady-state and dynamic performance of the permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drive using modified model predictive torque control (MPTC) method with multi-level inverters (MLIs). The MPTC method is simple and easy to implement for motor control as they don’t involve cascaded PI controllers unlike required the conventional controllers, such as field oriented control (FOC) and direct torque and flux control (DTFC). The proposed modified MPTC method eliminates the use of weighing factors and it is a fusion of model predictive current control (MPCC) and MPTC. Initially, the proposed modified MPTC fed PMSM drive is implemented using two-level inverter. It provides better steady-state and dynamic performance, but the ripple contents of torque, flux, and currents are high. In order to reduce the ripple contents and improve the performance of the PMSM drive, a modified MPTC is implemented using three-level inverter. The proposed modified MPTC fed PMSM drive using two-level and three-level inverters are simulated in MATLAB/SIMULINK environment under different operating conditions, such as no-load, loading, speed reversal, step change in speed operations. In order to show the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method, it is also validated with the experimental results.


Corresponding author: Tejavathu Ramesh, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh, India, E-mail:

Funding source: Science and Engineering Research Board

Award Identifier / Grant number: EEQ/2018/001067

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was financially supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) (project file no. EEQ/2018/001067), a statutory body of the Department of Science & Technology (DST), Govt. of India.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

Appendix A

Ratings and parameters of PMSM Delta company model number LA1845RS:

rated power of 4500 W, stator winding resistance (R s ) = 0.09 Ω, no of pole pairs = 5, L d  = 2.36 mH, L q  = 2.36 mH, rotor flux linkage = 0.130108wb; moment of inertia of rotor (J) = 7.775e-3 Kg m2, rated speed = 1500 rpm, rated torque = 23.56 N m, DC bus voltage = 400 V, speed PI controller proportional gain K p  = 1, integral gain K i  = 38.5.

Inverter specifications

Rating: 10 KVA, IGBT model-SKM100GB12T4, gate driver board model-Skyper32R, voltage sensor-LEM-25 V, current sensor-LEM-55P, incremental encoder HEDS-5645-I13.

References

1. Souad, R, Zeroug, H. Comparison between direct torque control and vector control of a permanent magnet synchronous motor drive. In: 2008 13th international power electronics and motion control conference. Poznan, Poland: IEEE; 2008:1209–14 pp.10.1109/EPEPEMC.2008.4635433Suche in Google Scholar

2. Casadei, D, Profumo, F, Serra, G, Tani, A. FOC and DTC: two viable schemes for induction motors torque control. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2002;17:779–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2002.802183.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Inoue, Y, Morimoto, S, Sanada, M. Comparative study of PMSM drive systems based on current control and direct torque control in flux-weakening control region. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2012;48:2382–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2012.2227134.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Mohan, D, Zhang, X, Foo, GHB. Three-level inverter-fed direct torque control of IPMSM with constant switching frequency and torque ripple reduction. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2016;63:7908–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2547907.Suche in Google Scholar

5. R. Pothuraju, T. Ramesh and P. D. Kumar, “DTFC-SVM based Five-level cascaded Inverter with reduced switches fed Interior Type Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive,” 2020 IEEE 9th Power India International Conference (PIICON), 2020, Sonepat, India pp. 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/PIICON49524.2020.9113067.10.1109/PIICON49524.2020.9113067Suche in Google Scholar

6. Foo, GHB, Ngo, T, Zhang, X, Rahman, MF. SVM direct torque and flux control of three-level simplified neutral point clamped inverter fed interior pm synchronous motor drives. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron 2019;24:1376–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2912641.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Ramesh, T, Pothuraju, R. DTFC-SVM for five-Level Cascaded Inverter Fed IM Drive with reduced switches. In: 2018 IEEE international students’ conference on electrical, electronics and computer science (SCEECS). Bhopal, India: IEEE; 2018:1–6 pp.10.1109/SCEECS.2018.8546866Suche in Google Scholar

8. Kazmierkowski, MP, Franquelo, LG, Rodriguez, J, Perez, MA, Leon, JI. High-performance motor drives. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 2011;5:6–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2011.942173.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Rodriguez, J, Kazmierkowski, MP, Espinoza, JR, Zanchetta, P, Abu-Rub, H, Young, HA, et al.. State of the art of finite control set model predictive control in power electronics. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 2012;9:1003–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2012.2221469.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Rodriguez, J, Cortes, P. Predictive control of power converters and electrical drives. UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2012, 40. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119941446 p.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Karamanakos, P, Geyer, T. Model predictive torque and flux control minimizing current distortions. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2018;34:2007–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2018.2862253.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Geyer, T, Papafotiou, G, Morari, M. Model predictive direct torque control—Part I: concept, algorithm, and analysis. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2008;56:1894–905. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2007030.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Karamanakos, P, Geyer, T. Guidelines for the design of finite control set model predictive controllers. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2019;35:7434–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2019.2954357.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Geyer, T. Model predictive control of high-power converters and industrial drives. UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119010883 p.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Kusuma, E, Eswar, KMR, Kumar, TV. An effective predictive torque control scheme for PMSM drive without involvement of weighting factors. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 2020;9:2685–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2989429.10.1109/JESTPE.2020.2989429Suche in Google Scholar

16. Rodriguez, J, Lai, JS, Peng, FZ. Multilevel inverters: a survey of topologies, controls, and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2002;49:724–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2002.801052.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Nandhini, E, Sivaprakasam, A. A review of various control strategies based on space vector pulse width modulation for the voltage source inverter. IETE J Res 2020;1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2020.1754935.10.1080/03772063.2020.1754935Suche in Google Scholar

18. Zhu, H, Xiao, X, Li, Y. Torque ripple reduction of the torque predictive control scheme for permanent-magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2011;59:871–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2011.2157278.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Zeng, Z, Zhu, C, Jin, X, Shi, W, Zhao, R. Hybrid space vector modulation strategy for torque ripple minimization in three-phase four-switch inverter-fed PMSM drives. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2016;64:2122–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2625768.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Krishnan, R. Permanent magnet synchronous and brushless DC motor drives. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017:ISBN: 9780824753849 p.10.1201/9781420014235Suche in Google Scholar

21. Cortés, P, Kouro, S, La Rocca, B, Vargas, R, Rodríguez, J, León, JI, et al.. Guidelines for weighting factors design in model predictive control of power converters and drives. In: 2009 IEEE international conference on industrial technology. Churchill, VIC, Australia: IEEE; 2009:1–7 pp.10.1109/ICIT.2009.4939742Suche in Google Scholar

22. Devanshu, A, Singh, M, Kumar, N. Adaptive predictive current control of field-oriented controlled induction motor drive. IETE J Res 2020:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2020.1775502.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Jayal, P, Bhuvaneswari, G. A novel space vector modulation‐based transistor‐clamped H bridge inverter‐fed permanent magnet synchronous motor drive for electric vehicle applications. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 2021;31:e12789. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12789.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Kouro, S, Malinowski, M, Gopakumar, K, Pou, J, Franquelo, LG, Wu, B, et al.. Recent advances and industrial applications of multilevel converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2010;57:2553–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2049719.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Aberkane, H, Sakri, D, Rahem, D. Improvement of direct torque control performances using FCS-MPC and SVM applied to PMSM: study and comparison. In: 2018 international conference on electrical sciences and technologies in Maghreb (CISTEM). Algiers, Algeria: IEEE; 2018:1–6 pp.10.1109/CISTEM.2018.8613340Suche in Google Scholar

26. Singh, B, Singh, BP, Dwivedi, S. DSP based implementation of vector control scheme for permanent magnet synchronous motor drive. IETE J Res 2007;53:153–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2007.10876131.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-16
Accepted: 2021-10-25
Published Online: 2021-11-10

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0269/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen