Home A techno-economic analysis of the roof top off-grid solar PV system for Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A techno-economic analysis of the roof top off-grid solar PV system for Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India

  • Mantosh Kumar ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Kumari Namrata ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Akshit Samadhiya
Published/Copyright: August 2, 2021

Abstract

As the exhaust rate of the conventional sources has geared up already, this is compelling the power industries to install the power plants based on the non-conventional sources so that future demand of the energy supply can be fulfilled. Among the various sources of renewable energy like wind, hydro, tidal etc., solar energy is the most easily accessible and available renewable energy source. Ensuring the feasibility of any energy source not only technical but also the economical perspective is the most important criteria. This paper has incorporated both the perspective and has done the techno-economic analysis to determine the optimum combination of the PV array size and battery size to minimize the overall electricity generation per unit. In this paper, a standalone solar PV system has been analyzed for the location of Jamshedpur, where an effort has been done to choose the optimum combination of the solar array and battery size within the desired range of LLP so that the electricity generation cost per unit can be minimized. The overall duration of the analysis has been done for a year and the outcome of the research has been verified with the help of MATLAB software.


Corresponding author: Kumari Namrata and Mantosh Kumar, Electrical Engineering Department, NIT Jamshedpur, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India, E-mail: ,

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Global energy and CO2 emissions in 2020 – Global Energy Review 2020 – analysis. IEA.Search in Google Scholar

2. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2020: outlook for electricity. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2020/outlook-for-electricity#abstract.Search in Google Scholar

3. USGBC. Top four benefits of installing solar panels on your home; 2017. https://www.usgbc.org/articles/top-four-benefits-installing-solar-panels-your-home.Search in Google Scholar

4. Rahnama, E, Aghbashlo, M, Tabatabaei, M, Khanali, M, Rosen, MA. Spatio-temporal solar exergo economic and exergo environmental maps for photovoltaic systems. Energy Convers Manag 2019;195:701–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.051.Search in Google Scholar

5. Yudelson, J. Reinventing green building: why certification systems aren’t working and what we can do about it. New York: New Society Publishers; 2016.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dixit, S. Solar technologies and their implementations: a review. Mater Today Proc 2020;28:2137–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.134.Search in Google Scholar

7. Sakthivadivel, D, Balaji, K, Dsilva Winfred Rufuss, D, Iniyan, S, Suganthi, L. Solar energy technologies: principles and applications. In: Ren J, editor. Renewable-energy-driven future. Academic Press; 2021:3–42 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820539-6.00001-7.Search in Google Scholar

8. Saidur, R, BoroumandJazi, G, Mekhlif, S, Jameel, M. Exergy analysis of solar energy applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012;16:350–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.162.Search in Google Scholar

9. Numbi, BP, Malinga, SJ. Optimal energy cost and economic analysis of a residential grid-interactive solar PV system-case of eThekwini municipality in South Africa. Appl Energy 2017;186:28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.048.Search in Google Scholar

10. Gürtürk, M. Economic feasibility of solar power plants based on PV module with levelized cost analysis. Energy 2019;171:866–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.090.Search in Google Scholar

11. Liu, X, O’Rear, EG, Tyner, WE, Pekny, JF. Purchasing vs. leasing: a benefit-cost analysis of residential solar PV panel use in California. Renew Energy 2014;66:770–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.01.026.Search in Google Scholar

12. Jung, J, Tyner, WE. Economic and policy analysis for solar PV systems in Indiana. Energy Pol 2014;74:123–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.027.Search in Google Scholar

13. Aguilar-Jiménez, JA, Hernández-Callejo, L, Alonso-Gómez, V, Velázquez, N, López-Zavala, R, Acuña, A, et al.. Techno-economic analysis of hybrid PV/T systems under different climate scenarios and energy tariffs. Sol Energy 2020;212:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.079.Search in Google Scholar

14. Qiu, S, Wang, K, Lin, B, Lin, P. Economic analysis of residential solar photovoltaic systems in China. J Clean Prod 2021;282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125297.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gu, Y, Zhang, X, Are Myhren, J, Han, M, Chen, X, Yuan, Y. Techno-economic analysis of a solar photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) concentrator for building application in Sweden using Monte Carlo method. Energy Convers Manag 2018;165:8–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.043.Search in Google Scholar

16. Namrata, K, Sharma, SP, Seksena, SBL. Comparison of different models for estimation of diffuse solar radiation in Jharkhand (India) region. Appl Sol Energy 2015;51:219–24. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0003701x15030081.Search in Google Scholar

17. Khajepour, S, Ameri, M. Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid solar thermal-PV power plant. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2020;42:100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100857.Search in Google Scholar

18. Mirzania, P, Balta-Ozkan, N, Ford, A. An innovative viable model for community-owned solar PV projects without FIT: comprehensive techno-economic assessment. Energy Pol 2020;146:111727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111727.Search in Google Scholar

19. Vaziri Rad, MA, Toopshekan, A, Rahdan, P, Kasaeian, A, Mahian, O. A comprehensive study of techno-economic and environmental features of different solar tracking systems for residential photovoltaic installations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2020;129:109923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109923.Search in Google Scholar

20. Govender, I, Thopil, GA, Inglesi-Lotz, R. Financial and economic appraisal of a biogas to electricity project. J Clean Prod 2019;214:154–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.290.Search in Google Scholar

21. Naiker, P, Thopil, GA. A framework for sustainable utility-scale renewable energy selection in South Africa. J Clean Prod 2019;224:637–50.10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.257Search in Google Scholar

22. Perez, M, Perez, R, Rábago, KR, Putnam, M. Overbuilding & curtailment: the cost-effective enablers of firm PV generation. Sol Energy 2019;180:412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.074.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kazem, HA, Albadi, MH, Al-Waeli, AHA, Al-Busaidi, AH, Chaichan, MT. Techno-economic feasibility analysis of 1MW photovoltaic grid-connected system in Oman. Case Stud Thermal Eng 2017;10:131–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2017.05.008.Search in Google Scholar

24. Aziz, AS, Tajuddin, MFN, Adzman, MR, Mohammed, MF, Ramli, MAM. Feasibility analysis of grid-connected and islanded operation of a solar PV microgrid system: a case study of Iraq. Energy 2020;191:116591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116591.Search in Google Scholar

25. Foles, A, Fialho, L, Collares-Pereira, M. Techno-economic evaluation of the Portuguese PV and energy storage residential applications. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 2020;39:100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2020.100686.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zou, H, Du, H, Brown, MA, Mao, G. Large-scale PV power generation in China: a grid parity and techno-economic analysis. Energy 2017;134:256–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.192.Search in Google Scholar

27. D’Adamo, I, Falcone, PM, Gastaldi, M, Morone, P. The economic viability of photovoltaic systems in public buildings: evidence from Italy. Energy 2020;207:118316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118316.Search in Google Scholar

28. Johannsen, RM, Østergaard, PA, Hanlin, R. Hybrid photovoltaic and wind mini-grids in Kenya: techno-economic assessment and barriers to diffusion. Energy Sustain Dev 2020;54:111–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

29. Namrata, K, Sharma, SP, Seksena, SBL. Empirical models for the estimation of global solar radiation with sunshine hours on horizontal surface for Jharkhand (India). Appl Sol Energy 2016;52:164–72. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0003701x16030099.Search in Google Scholar

30. Jharkhand Solar Rooftop Power Policy 2018kvit131.pdf (jreda.com).Search in Google Scholar

31. “Station: Jamshedpur Climatological Table 1981–2010” (PDF). Climatological Normals 1981–2010. India Meteorological Department; 2015:355–6 pp. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 February 2020 (Accessed 28 Sept 2020).Search in Google Scholar

32. Liu, YH, Jiang, YN, Chen, XX. Evaluation of three models for calculating daily global solar radiation at Yushu, Tibet. In: 2011 International conference on consumer electronics, communications and networks (CECNet), Xianning, 16–18 April; 2011:1252–5 pp.10.1109/CECNET.2011.5769043Search in Google Scholar

33. Yang, H, Wei, Z, Chengzhi, L. Optimal design and techno-economic analysis of a hybrid solar-wind power generation system. Appl Energy 2009;86:163–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

34. Vo, TT, Chen, X, Shen, W, Kapoor, A. New charging strategy for lithium-ion batteries based on the integration of Taguchi method and state of charge estimation. J Power Sources 2015;273:413–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.108.Search in Google Scholar

35. Mu, H, Xiong, R. Chapter 1 – Modeling, evaluation, and state estimation for batteries; 2018:1–38 pp.10.1016/B978-0-12-812786-5.00001-XSearch in Google Scholar

36. Luoma, J, Kleissl, J, Murray, K. Optimal inverter sizing considering cloud enhancement. Sol Energy 2012;86:421–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.10.012.Search in Google Scholar

37. Lokesh Reddy, M, Kumar, PJRP, Chandra, SAM, Babu, TS, Rajasekar, N. Comparative study on charge controller techniques for solar PV system. Energy Procedia 2017;117:1070–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.230.Search in Google Scholar

38. Husain Saleh, MJA, Abbas Hasan Abdulla, SA, Aziz Altaweel, AMA, Qamber, IS. LOLP and LOLE calculation for smart cities power plants. In: 2019 International conference on innovation and intelligence for informatics, computing, and technologies (3ICT); 2019.10.1109/3ICT.2019.8910296Search in Google Scholar

39. Lucio, JH, Valdés, R, Rodríguez, LR. Loss-of-load probability model for stand-alone photovoltaic systems in Europe. Sol Energy 2012;86:2515–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.05.021.Search in Google Scholar

40. Okoye, CO, Oranekwu-Okoye, BC. Economic feasibility of solar PV system for rural electrification in Sub-Sahara Africa. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;82:2537–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.054.Search in Google Scholar

41. Sinha, S, Chandel, S. Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for solar photovoltaics wind-based hybrid energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;50:755–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.040.Search in Google Scholar

42. El Shenawy, E, Hegazy, A, Abdellatef, M. Design and optimization of standalone. PV system for Egyptian rural communities. Int J Appl Eng Res 2017;12:10433–46.Search in Google Scholar

43. Kaabeche, A, Ibtiouen, R. Techno-economic optimization of hybrid photovoltaic/wind/diesel/battery generation in a stand-alone power system. Sol Energy 2014;103:171–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.017.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-02-15
Accepted: 2021-07-09
Published Online: 2021-08-02

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2021-0084/html
Scroll to top button