Startseite Optimal Switching Angle Scheme for a Cascaded H Bridge Inverter using Pigeon Inspired Optimization
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Optimal Switching Angle Scheme for a Cascaded H Bridge Inverter using Pigeon Inspired Optimization

  • Aeidapu Mahesh EMAIL logo und Kanwarjit Singh Sandhu
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. März 2019

Abstract

This paper presents an approach using Pigeon Inspired Optimization (PIO) for selective harmonic elimination in a cascaded H-bridge (CHB) multilevel inverter fed with unequal dc sources. The aim of this work is to find the optimal combination of switching angles, such that the lower order harmonics are eliminated and the output voltage is constant irrespective of voltage change in the input side. This paper the PIO has been used to find the optimal angles for a 7-level inverter and the method can be scaled to any number of levels. To show the effectiveness of PIO the results have been compared with other evolutionary algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO). An adaptive switching angle strategy has also been developed using ANN to make the proposed strategy suitable to the real-time applications. In order to verify the results, an experimental prototype of 7 level CHB has been developed in the laboratory using dSPACE ds1104 R&D controller board. The results show that the PIO is the most accurate and fastest evolutionary algorithm for switching angle optimization and the experimental results are in close agreement with the simulation results.

References

[1] Portillo R, Franquelo LG, Napoles J, Leon JI, Aguirre MA. Selective harmonic elimination technique for high power converters. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2010;57:2315–23.10.1109/TIE.2009.2026759Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Kumar J. Thd analysis for different levels of cascade multilevel inverters for industrial applications. Int J Emerging Technol Adv Eng. 2012;2:237–44.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Tolbert LM, Peng FZ, Habetler TG. Multilevel converters for large electric drives. IEEE Trans Indus Appl. 1999;35:36–44.10.1109/28.740843Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Chiasson JN, Tolbert LM, McKenzie KJ, Du Z. Elimination of harmonics in a multilevel converter using the theory of symmetric polynomials and resultants. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2005;13:216–23.10.1109/TCST.2004.839556Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Vesapogu JM, Peddakotla S, Kuppa SRA. Harmonic analysis and fpga implementation of she controlled three phase chb 11-level inverter in mv drives using deterministic and stochastic optimization techniques. Springer Plus. 2013;2:370.10.1186/2193-1801-2-370Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[6] Aleenejad M, Ahmadi R, Moamaei P. Selective harmonic elimination for cascaded multicell multilevel power converters with higher number of h-bridge modules. In: 2014 Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), Feb 2014:1–5.10.1109/PECI.2014.6804555Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Ozpineci B, Tolbert LM, Chiasson JN. Harmonic optimization of multilevel converters using genetic algorithms. In: Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2004. PESC 04. 2004 IEEE 35th Annual, volume 5. IEEE, 2004:3911–6.10.1109/PESC.2004.1355167Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Haghdar K, Shayanfar HA, Shahidi Alavi MH. Selective harmonics elimination of multi level inverters via methods of gps, sa and ga. In: Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2011 Asia-Pacific. IEEE, 2011:1–5.10.1109/APPEEC.2011.5749056Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Kavousi A, Vahidi B, Salehi R, Bakhshizadeh MK, Farokhnia N, Hamid Fathi S. Application of the bee algorithm for selective harmonic elimination strategy in multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2012;27:1689–96.10.1109/TPEL.2011.2166124Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Taghizadeh H, Tarafdar Hagh M. Harmonic elimination of cascade multilevel inverters with nonequal dc sources using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Indus Electron. 2010;57:3678–84.10.1109/TIE.2010.2041736Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Gaur P, Verma YP, Singh P. A particle Swarm optimization based switching scheme for seven-level cascaded hybrid bridge inverter, 2017:609–15.10.1007/978-981-10-1708-7_69Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Debnath S, Ray RN, Ghosh T.. Comparison of different soft techniques applicable to multilevel inverter for harmonic elimination. Int J Comput Appl. 2012;6:94–104Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Bouhali O, Bouaziz F, Rizoug N, Talha A. Solving harmonic elimination equations in multi-levelinverters by using neural networks. Int J Inf Electron Eng. 2013;3:191.10.7763/IJIEE.2013.V3.296Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Kumar J, Gambhir J, Kumar A. Control of switching angles for a cmli using ann. In: Engineering and Computational Sciences (RAECS), 2014 Recent Advances in. IEEE, 2014:1–6.10.1109/RAECS.2014.6799596Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Buccella C, Cimoroni MG, Latafat H, Graditi G, Yang R. Selective harmonic elimination in a seven level cascaded multilevel inverter based on graphical analysis. In: IECON 2016-42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Oct 2016:2563–8.10.1109/IECON.2016.7793099Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Yang K, Tang X, Zhang Q, Yu W. Unified selective harmonic elimination for fundamental frequency modulated multilevel converter with unequal dc levels. In: IECON 2016-42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Oct 2016:3623–8.10.1109/IECON.2016.7793598Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Hajizadeh M, Fathi SH. Selective harmonic elimination strategy for cascaded h-bridge five-level inverter with arbitrary power sharing among the cells. IET Power Electron. 2016;9:95–101.10.1049/iet-pel.2014.0966Suche in Google Scholar

[18] Dahidah MSA, Konstantinou G, Agelidis VG. A review of multilevel selective harmonic elimination pwm: Formulations, solving algorithms, implementation and applications. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2015 Aug;30:4091–106.10.1109/TPEL.2014.2355226Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Jacob T, Suresh LP. A review paper on the elimination of harmonics in multilevel inverters using bioinspired algorithms. In: 2016 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), March 2016:1–8.10.1109/ICCPCT.2016.7530273Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Sushnigdha G, Joshi A. Evolutionary method based hybrid entry guidance strategy for reentry vehicles. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2016;49:339–44.10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.136Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Duan H, Qiao P. Pigeon-inspired optimization: a new swarm intelligence optimizer for air robot path planning. Int J Intell Comput Cybern. 2014;7:24–37.10.1108/IJICC-02-2014-0005Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-18
Revised: 2018-12-05
Accepted: 2018-12-10
Published Online: 2019-03-29

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2017-0205/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen