Startseite Development of V2G and G2V Power Profiles and Their Implications on Grid Under Varying Equilibrium of Aggregated Electric Vehicles
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Development of V2G and G2V Power Profiles and Their Implications on Grid Under Varying Equilibrium of Aggregated Electric Vehicles

  • Prateek Jain

    Prateek Jain received the B.E. degree in Electrical Engineering in 2008 and the M.Tech. degree with specialization in Power Systems in 2010. Presently, he is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India, where he is working on the theme of integration of electric vehicle into power grid. His main research interests include power engineering, covering smart grid, interaction between electric vehicles and power grid, deregulated power system, and power system protection and security.

    EMAIL logo
    und Trapti Jain

    Trapti Jain received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India, in 2008. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India. Her research interests include power systems security, artificial-intelligence applications to power systems, power system dynamics, power quality and grid interface technologies for electric vehicles.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. März 2016

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) power capability of aggregated electric vehicles (EV) in the manner that they are being adopted by the consumers with their growing infiltration in the vehicles market. The proposed modeling of V2G and grid-to-vehicle (G2V) energy profiles blends the heterogeneous attributes namely, driven mileages, arrival and departure times, travel and parking durations, and speed dependent energy consumption of mobility trends. Three penetration percentages of 25 %, 50 % and 100 % resulting in varied compositions of battery electric vehicle (BEV) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) in the system, as determined by the consumers’ acceptance, have been considered to evaluate the grid capacity for V2G. Distinct charge-discharge powers have been selected as per charging standards to match contemporary vehicles and infrastructure requirements. Charging and discharging approaches have been devised to replicate non-linear characteristics of Li-ion battery. Effects of simultaneous conjunction of V2G and G2V power curves with daily conventional load profile are quantified drawn upon workplace-discharging home-charging scheme. Results demonstrated a marked drop in load and hence in market price during morning hours which is hurriedly overcompensated by the hike during evening hours with rising penetration level and charge-discharge power.

About the authors

Prateek Jain

Prateek Jain received the B.E. degree in Electrical Engineering in 2008 and the M.Tech. degree with specialization in Power Systems in 2010. Presently, he is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India, where he is working on the theme of integration of electric vehicle into power grid. His main research interests include power engineering, covering smart grid, interaction between electric vehicles and power grid, deregulated power system, and power system protection and security.

Trapti Jain

Trapti Jain received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India, in 2008. Currently, she is an Assistant Professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India. Her research interests include power systems security, artificial-intelligence applications to power systems, power system dynamics, power quality and grid interface technologies for electric vehicles.

References

1. Kempton W, Tomić J. Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: Calculating capacity and net revenue. J Power Sources 2005;144:268–79.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.025Suche in Google Scholar

2. Kempton W, Tomić J. Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. J Power Sources 2005;144:280–94.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022Suche in Google Scholar

3. Hu W, Su C, Chen Z, Bak-Jensen B. Optimal operation of plug-in electric vehicles in power systems with high wind power penetrations. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2013;4:577–85.10.1109/TSTE.2012.2229304Suche in Google Scholar

4. Ma Y, Houghton T, Cruden A, Infield D. Modeling the benefits of vehicle-to-grid technology to a power system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012;27:1012–20.10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2178043Suche in Google Scholar

5. Pillai J, Bak-Jensen B. Integration of vehicle-to-grid in the Western Danish power system. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2011;2:12–19.10.1109/TSTE.2010.2072938Suche in Google Scholar

6. Sortomme E, El-Sharkawi MA. Optimal scheduling of vehicle-to-grid energy and ancillary services. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2012;3:351–9.10.1109/TSG.2011.2164099Suche in Google Scholar

7. Tomić J, Kempton W. Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support. J Power Sources 2007;168:459–68.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.03.010Suche in Google Scholar

8. Kadurek P, Ioakimidis C, Ferrao P. Electric vehicles and their impact to the electric grid in isolated systems. In Proc. 2009 Int. Conf. on Power Eng., Energy and Elect. Drives, Lisbon, Portugal, 2009:49–54.10.1109/POWERENG.2009.4915218Suche in Google Scholar

9. Saber AY, Venayagamoorthy GK. Intelligent unit commitment with vehicle-to-grid – A cost-emission optimization. J Power Sources 2010;195:898–911.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.035Suche in Google Scholar

10. Almeida PMR, Soares FJ, Lopes JAP. Electric vehicles contribution for frequency control with inertial emulation. Electric Power Syst Res 2015;127:141–50.10.1016/j.epsr.2015.05.026Suche in Google Scholar

11. Foley A, Tyther B, Calnan P, Gallachóir BÓ. Impacts of electric vehicle charging under electricity market operations. Appl Energy 2013;101:93–102.10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.052Suche in Google Scholar

12. Lopes JAP, Soares FJ, Almeida PM, da Silva MM. Smart charging strategies for electric vehicles: Enhancing grid performance and maximizing the use of variable renewable energy resources. In Proc. EVS24 International Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium, Stavanger, Norveška, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Zhang L, Jabbari F, Brown T, Samuelsen S. Coordinating plug-in electric vehicle charging with electric grid: Valley filling and target load following. J Power Sources 2014;267:584–97.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.078Suche in Google Scholar

14. O’Connell N, Wu Q, Østergaard J, Nielsen AH, Cha ST, Din Y. Day-ahead tariffs for the alleviation of distribution grid congestion from electric vehicles. Electric Power Syst Res 2012;92:106–14.10.1016/j.epsr.2012.05.018Suche in Google Scholar

15. Liu Z, Wang D, Jia H, Djilali N, Zhang W. Aggregation and bidirectional charging power control of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: Generation system adequacy analysis. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2015;6:325–35.10.1109/TSTE.2014.2372044Suche in Google Scholar

16. Lopes JAP, Soares FJ, Almeida PMR. Integration of electric vehicles in the electric power system. Proc IEEE 2011;99:168–83.10.1109/JPROC.2010.2066250Suche in Google Scholar

17. Shao S, Pipattanasomporn M, Rahman S. Grid integration of electric vehicles and demand response with customer choice. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2012;3:543–50.10.1109/TSG.2011.2164949Suche in Google Scholar

18. Li C-T, Ahn C, Peng H, Sun J. Integration of plug-in electric vehicle charging and wind energy scheduling on electricity grid. In Proc. 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, Washington, DC, 2012:1–7.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Luo X, Xia S, Chan KW. A decentralized charging control strategy for plug-in electric vehicles to mitigate wind farm intermittency and enhance frequency regulation. J Power Sources 2014;248:604–14.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.116Suche in Google Scholar

20. Fernández LP, Román TGS, Cossent R, Domingo CM, Frías P. Assessment of the impact of plug-in electric vehicles on distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2011;26:206–13.10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2049133Suche in Google Scholar

21. Verzijlbergh RA, Lukszo Z, Slootweg JG, Ilic MD. The impact of controlled electric vehicle charging on residential low voltage networks. In Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Networking, Sensing and Control, Delft, 2011:14–19.10.1109/ICNSC.2011.5874933Suche in Google Scholar

22. Green RC, Wang L, Alam M. The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distribution networks: A review and outlook. In Proc. 2010 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Minneapolis, MN, 2010: 1–8.10.1109/PES.2010.5589654Suche in Google Scholar

23. Habib S, Kamran M, Rashid U. Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networks – A review. J Power Sources 2015;277:205–14.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.020Suche in Google Scholar

24. RWTH. WP:1.3 Parameter Manual, V05 ed., Grid for Vehicles (G4V), RWTH Aachen, (2010), [online]. Available at: http://www.g4v.eu/. Accessed: May 2014Suche in Google Scholar

25. Pasaoglu GK, Fiorello D, Martino A, Scarcella G, Alemanno A, Zubaryeva A, et al. Driving and parking patterns of European car drivers – a mobility survey, Technical Report JRC77079, EUR – Scientific and Technical Research Reports, Institute for Energy and Transport, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2012), [Online]. Available: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC77079.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Kalhammer FR, Kamath H, Duvall M, Alexander M, Jungers B. Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles: promise, issues and prospects. In Proc. EVS24 Int. battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symp., Stavanger, Norway, 2009:1–11.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Duvall M, et al. Transportation electrification: A technology overview, Tech. Rep., CA: 2011.1021334, Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94304–1338, USA. 2011:3.1–3.2, 5.10.Suche in Google Scholar

28. ElectrificationCoalition. State of the plug-in electric vehicle market, EV market outlook, Policy Rep., Electrification Coalition (2013), [Online]. Available at http://www.electrificationcoalition.org/StateEVMarket.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Smith K, Earleywine M, Wood E, Neubauer J, Pesaran A. Comparison of plug-in hybrid electric vehicle battery life across geographies and drive cycles, SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0666, 2012.10.4271/2012-01-0666Suche in Google Scholar

30. Alexander M, Davis M. Transportation statistics analysis for electric transportation, Tech. Update, CA: 2011.1021848, Electrical Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA 94034, USA, Dec. 2011:1.1–1.2.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Darabi Z, Ferdowsi M. Aggregated impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on electricity demand profile. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2011;2:501–8.10.1109/TSTE.2011.2158123Suche in Google Scholar

32. NHTS. National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), U.S. Department of Transportation (2001), [Online]. Available at: http://nhts.ornl.gov.Suche in Google Scholar

33. SONY. Lithium Ion Rechargeable Batteries – Technical Handbook, Sony Corp, Tokyo, Osaki Shinagawa-ku (2012), [Online]. Available at: http://www.sony.com.cn/products/ed/battery/download.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

34. Chen M, Rincon-Mora GA. Accurate, compact, and power-efficient li-Ion battery charger circuit. IEEE Trans Circuits Sys II Express Briefs 2006;53:1180–4.10.1109/TCSII.2006.883220Suche in Google Scholar

35. Simpson C. Battery charging, Litrature No. SNVA557, National Semiconductor, Texas Instrument (2011), [Online]. Available at: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/snva557/snva557.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Sexton T. Understanding electric vehicle charging, Plug In America (2011), [Online]. Available: http://www.pluginamerica.org/drivers-seat/how-do-ev-driverschoose-charge-their-cars. Accessed: Feb. 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Jain P, Jain T. Impacts of G2V and V2G power on electricity demand profile. In Proc. IEEE Int. Electric Vehicle Conf., Florence, Italy, Dec. 2014.10.1109/IEVC.2014.7056148Suche in Google Scholar

38. Jain P, Jain T. Assessment of electric vehicle charging load and its impacts on electricity market price, in Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. on Connected Vehicles and Expo, Vienna, Austria, Nov. 2014:70–5.10.1109/ICCVE.2014.7297648Suche in Google Scholar

39. Gutierrez G, Quinonez J, Sheble GB. Market clearing price discovery in a single and double-side auction market mechanisms: Linear programming solution, in Proc. 2005 IEEE Russia Power Tech., St. Petersburg, 2005.10.1109/PTC.2005.4524694Suche in Google Scholar

40. Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z. Example systems data. In Market operations in electric power systems: Forecasting, scheduling, and risk management, New York, IEEE, John Wiley & Sons, appx. D, sec. D.4, 2002:477.10.1002/047122412XSuche in Google Scholar

41. Djurovic MZ, Milacic A, Krsulja M. A simplified model of quadratic cost function for thermal generators. In Annals and Proc. of DAAAM International, volume 23, No. 1, Vienna, Austria, EU, 2012.10.2507/23rd.daaam.proceedings.006Suche in Google Scholar

42. Qiaozhu Zhai Q, Guan X, Yang J. Fast unit commitment based on optimal linear approximation to nonlinear fuel cost: Error analysis and applications. Electric Power Syst Res 2009;79:1604–13.10.1016/j.epsr.2009.06.005Suche in Google Scholar

43. Wong P, Albrecht P, Allan R, Billinton R, Chen Q, Fong C, et al. The IEEE reliability test system-1996. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1999;14:1010–20.10.1109/59.780914Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-11-30
Accepted: 2016-2-5
Published Online: 2016-3-3
Published in Print: 2016-4-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2015-0201/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen