Home Perceived parental differential treatment, cognition, behaviour and family cohesiveness among siblings of children with cerebral palsy? A family-mediated intervention to understand “displaced” children
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Perceived parental differential treatment, cognition, behaviour and family cohesiveness among siblings of children with cerebral palsy? A family-mediated intervention to understand “displaced” children

  • Preeti Tabitha Louis EMAIL logo and Navin Kumar
Published/Copyright: December 7, 2015

Abstract

The present study adopts a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the impact of perceived parental differential treatment towards 30 non-disabled siblings of children with cerebral palsy 7–10 years of age. Standardised inventories such as, the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test (SBIT), the Connors Parent Rating Scale-Revised (CPRS) and the Draw-a-Family test were used pre and post intervention. Scheduled interviews were used for parents and children to obtain information regarding family cohesiveness. A special program was designed to structure the home environment and to maximise parental involvement that catered to the “needy child” and this was implemented for 6 months after which the children were reassessed. Prior to the intervention, we observed deficits in cognitive skills and siblings had concerns in hyperactivity and oppositional behaviour. Scheduled interviews with siblings elicited responses that represented neglect, perceived differential treatment and negative emotional well-being. Projective tests revealed that family dynamics were disturbed and chaotic. Post intervention, we observed significant differences in the cognitive orientation, behavioural engagement and also in the interpersonal relationship within the family. We may conclude therefore, that parental involvement significantly predicts academic and psychosocial adjustment of siblings and this is an important implication for practitioners in developing early intervention programs.


Corresponding author: Preeti Tabitha Louis, Assistant Professor Jr., School of Social Sciences and Languages, VIT University, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the Paediatrician, Dr. Beena Koshi working at The Developmental Paediatrics Department for providing me valuable suggestions and for helping me in designing the intervention strategies. I also thank the Christian Medical College and Hospital Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India, for providing me the opportunity to conduct the study. I am grateful to VIT University, Vellore, for providing me the infrastructure and facilities to conduct the study and for providing me encouragement and support thus far in pursuing my research interests. I would like to thank my guide Dr. Navin Kumar, Assistant professor (Senior), School of Social Sciences and Languages for being a mentor and for providing me encouragement at all times.

References

1. Cerebral Palsy: Hope Through Research. http://www.ninds.nih.gov. February 2, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

2. Cerebral Palsy: Overview. http://www.nichd.nih.gov/. September 5, 2014. Retrieved 4 March 2015.Search in Google Scholar

3. Harland P, Cuskelly M. The responsibilities of adult siblings of adults with dual sensory impairments. Int J Disabil Dev Ed 2000;47:293–307.10.1080/713671116Search in Google Scholar

4. Rossiter L, Sharpe D. The siblings of individuals with mental retardation: a quantitative integration of the literature. J Child Fam Stud 2001;10:65–84.10.1023/A:1016629500708Search in Google Scholar

5. Orsmond GI, Seltzer MM. Siblings of individuals with autism spectrum disorders across the life course. Ment Retard Dev D R 2007;13:313–20.10.1002/mrdd.20171Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Minuchin P. Relationships within the family: a systems perspective on development. In: Hinde RA, Stevenson-Hinde J, editors. Relationships within families: mutual influences. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988:7–26.Search in Google Scholar

7. Feinberg ME, Neiderhiser JM, Simmens S, Reiss D, Hetherington EM. Sibling comparison of differential parental treatment in adolescence: gender, self-esteem, and emotionality as mediators of the parenting-adjustment association. Child Dev 2000;71:1611–28.10.1111/1467-8624.00252Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Turkheimer E, Waldron M. Nonshared environment: a theoretical, methodological and quantitative review. Psychol Bull 2000;126:78–108.10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.78Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Plomin R, Asbury K, Dunn J. Why are children in the same family so different? Non-shared environment a decade later. Can J Psychiatry 2001;46:225–33.10.1177/070674370104600302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Neiderhiser JM, Reiss D, Hetherington EM, Plomin R. Relationships between parenting and adolescent adjustment over time: genetic and environmental contributions. Dev Psychol 1999;35:680–92.10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.680Search in Google Scholar

11. Thorndike RL, Hagen EP, Sattler M. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, 4th ed. Chicago: Riverside, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

12. Conners CK. Conners’ Rating Scales – Revised: Short Form. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Heath Systems, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

13. Burns CR, Kaufman S. Actions, styles and symbols in kinetic family drawings. New York: Bruner/Mazel, 1972.Search in Google Scholar

14. Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage publications, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

15. Fletcher J, Nicole LH, Barbara LW. Am I my brother’s keeper? sibling spillover effects: the case of developmental disabilities and externalizing behavior. NBER working paper series, working paper 18279. Cambridge, MA, USA: National bureau of economic research, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

16. Eisenberg L, Bruce B, Jan Blacher. Siblings of children with mental retardation living at home or in residential placement.” J Child Psychol Psyc 1998;39:355–63.10.1017/S0021963097002084Search in Google Scholar

17. Meyer KA, Brooke I, Hambrick DZ. Factors influencing adjustment in siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2011;5:1413–20.10.1016/j.rasd.2011.01.027Search in Google Scholar

18. Goudie A, Susan H, Barry J, Timothy S. Assessing functional impairment in siblings living with children with disability. Paediatrics 2013;132:e476–83.10.1542/peds.2013-0644Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Opperman S, Alant E. The coping responses of the adolescent siblings of children with severe disabilities. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:441–54.10.1080/0963828031000069735Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Dew A, Balandin S, Llewellyn G. The psychosocial impact on siblings of people with lifelong physical disability: a review of the literature. J Dev Phys Disabil 2008;20:485–507.10.1007/s10882-008-9109-5Search in Google Scholar

21. Breslau N. Siblings of disabled children: Birth order and age-spacing effects. J Abnorm Child Psych 1982;10:85–96.10.1007/BF00915953Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Benson P, Karlof KL. Anger, stress proliferation, and depressed mood among parents of children with ASD: a longitudinal replication. J Autism Dev Disord 2009;39:350–62.10.1007/s10803-008-0632-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2015-5-13
Accepted: 2015-8-18
Published Online: 2015-12-7
Published in Print: 2016-8-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0008/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button