Interventions to improve access to fresh food in vulnerable communities: a review of the literature
-
Denise Smith
,
Stephanie Miles-Richardson
Abstract
Background: “Food desert” is a term used to describe low-income communities without access to healthy, fresh food within a one-mile radius of their residence. The limited access to healthy foods in urban African-American communities may be a critical factor in the development of nutritional disorders and associated chronic disease in this vulnerable population. Research has shown that community gardens are a promising intervention for addressing food quality and access issues. This study aimed to assess whether improving the local food environment through community gardens can increase accessibility to healthy foods in Metropolitan Atlanta communities assumed to be food deserts.
Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify best practices of community garden projects in order to address food deserts in metropolitan cities. Next, a windshield survey was conducted in the Adamsville community in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia to determine if a food desert was present, and to provide an analysis of the local food environment.
Results: Twenty-nine articles were reviewed and eight best practices were identified as effective strategies in metropolitan cities. We found that community gardens had only minimal impact on food access issues in urban communities due to seasonal accessibility and low yield. The windshield survey revealed that the Adamsville community was not a food desert because it had access to healthy foods within a half-mile radius.
Conclusion: While the literature review revealed that community gardens had a minimal impact on food access in urban communities, food policy advocacy and supermarket tax incentives were identified as effective ways to promote healthy community development.
Appendix
Windshield survey
A windshield survey is a method of collecting data by simply observing the community. While driving a car or riding public transportation, one can observe many dimensions of a community’s life and environment through the windshield. Through this method, common characteristics of people on the street, neighborhood gathering places, the rhythm of community life, housing quality, and geographic boundaries can be observed.
Directions: Based on your visual observation as you walk or drive through your community, complete as many of the following questions as possible.
| Environment |
|---|
| Physical environment |
| Community location (boundaries, urban/rural): |
| Prominent topographical features (green space/parks): |
| Housing (type, condition, adequacy, number of persons per dwelling, sanitation): |
| Businesses (nonprofit and for profit): |
| Safety hazards present in the environment (lack of speed bumps): |
| Day care facilities: |
| Sewage and waste disposal: |
| Nuisance factors (loud music, airports, waste water plant): |
| Potential for disaster: |
| Psychological environment |
| Future prospects for the community: |
| Significant events in community history (dismantling of public housing): |
| Interaction of groups within the community (racial tension, etc): |
| Protective services (adequacy, local crime rates, insurance rates): |
| Communication network (media, informal channels, and links to outside world): |
| Sources of stress in the community: |
| Extent of mental illness in the community: |
| Social environment |
| Race and ethnicity: |
| Education (prevailing levels, attitudes, facilities): |
| Government (type, effectiveness, and community officials): |
| Unofficial leaders (significant informants): |
| Political affiliations of community members: |
| Status of minority groups (influence, length of residence): |
| Language spoken by community members: |
| Community income levels (poverty, coverage by assistance programs): |
| Religion (major affiliations, programs and services, influence on health): |
| Culture (affiliation, influence on health): |
| Employment level: |
| Transportation (type, availability, cost, use): |
| Social service (type, availability, adequacy, use): |
| Lifestyle |
| Consumption patterns |
| Nutrition (general levels, preference, special needs, prevalence of obesity): |
| Alcohol (consumption patterns, extent of abuse, advertisement): |
| Drug use (legal and illegal): |
| Smoking (consumption patterns, advertisements): |
| Exercise (extent, type): |
| Occupational |
| Primary occupations of community members |
| Major employers: |
| Occupational hazards: |
| Leisure pursuits |
| Primary leisure pursuits of community members: |
| Recreational facilities (availability, adequacy, cost): |
| Health hazards posed by recreation (unsafe parks) |
| Other behaviors |
| Safety (use of cross walks, jaywalking) |
| Use of safety devices (seat belts, car seats, helmets): |
| Contraceptive use: |
| Health System |
| Community attitudes towards health (definitions, support of services): |
| Health services and resources (type, availability, cost, adequacy, utilization): |
| Personal care (availability: clinic, WIC, Planned Parenthood offices): |
| Emergency services (availability, adequacy): |
| Health education services (availability, adequacy): |
| Health-care financing (extent of insurance coverage, Medicaid, Medicare, tax support): |
References
1. Reisig V, Hobbiss A. Food desert and how to tackle item: a study of one city’s approach. Health Educ J 2000;59:137–49.10.1177/001789690005900203Suche in Google Scholar
2. Beaumont J, Lang T, Leather S, Mucklow C. Report form the policy sub-group to the nutrition task force low-income project team of the Department of Health. Radlett, Hertfordshire: Institute Grocery Distribution, 1995.Suche in Google Scholar
3. Food environment resources. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/healthtopics/healthyfood/general/htm.Suche in Google Scholar
4. Environmental hazards and health effects. URL: http://www.cdc.goc/nceh/ehhe.Suche in Google Scholar
5. Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K. Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 2008;29:253–272.10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Food deserts. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/features/fooddeserts/.Suche in Google Scholar
7. Food desert locator. URL: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/fooddesert/about.html.Suche in Google Scholar
8. Lavioe D. Obama’s budget funds national healthy food financing initiative. URL: http://www.policylink.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?b=5156723&c=lkIXLbMNJrE&ct=7976291.Suche in Google Scholar
9. Heimendinger J, Van Duyn MA, Chapelsky D, Foerster S, Stables G. The National 5 a day for better health program: a large-scale nutrition intervention. Public Health Manage Pract 1996;2: 27–35.10.1097/00124784-199621000-00006Suche in Google Scholar
10. Robinson-O’Brien R, Story M, Heim S. Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: A review. J Am Diet Assoc 2009;109:273–80.10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.051Suche in Google Scholar
11. Colasanti K, Litjens C, Hamm M. Growing food in the city: the production potential of Detroit’s vacant land. Detroit: CS Mott Group Sustainable Food Systems, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar
12. Sims-Muhammad TY. After the storms: South Louisianan sustainable food system assessment in light of environmental natural disasters hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Int J Human Soc Sci 2012;2:129–35.Suche in Google Scholar
13. Wakefield S, Yeudall F, Taron C, Reynolds J, Skinner A. Growing urban health: community gardening in South-east Toronto. Health Promot Int 2007;22:92–101.10.1093/heapro/dam001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Beaulac J, Kristjansson E, Cummins S. A systematic review of food deserts 1966–2007. Prev Chronic Dis 2009;6:1–9.Suche in Google Scholar
15. McKelvey B. Community gardening toolkit. URL: http://extension.missouri.edu/p/MP906.Suche in Google Scholar
16. Victory Gardens. URL: http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe40s/crops_02.html.Suche in Google Scholar
17. Ratcliffe MM, Merrigan KA, Rogers BL, Goldberg JP. The effects of school garden experiences on middle school-aged students knowledege, attitudes, behaviors associated with vegetable consumption. Health Promot Pract 2011;12: 36–43.10.1177/1524839909349182Suche in Google Scholar
18. O’Brien SA, Shoemaker CA. An afterschool gardening club to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among fourth grade students: the assessment of social cognitive theory constructs. HortTechnol 2006;16:24–9.10.21273/HORTTECH.16.1.0024Suche in Google Scholar
19. Libman K. Growing youth growing food: how vegetable gardening influences young people’s food consciousness and eating habits. J Appl Environ Educ Commun 2007;6:87–95.10.1080/15330150701319388Suche in Google Scholar
20. Burros M. Obamas to plant vegetable garden at White House. New York Times 2009 Mar.Suche in Google Scholar
21. Koch S, Waliczek TM, Zajizek JM. The effect of a summer garden program on the nutritional knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of children. HortTechnol 2006;16:620–5.10.21273/HORTTECH.16.4.0620Suche in Google Scholar
22. Van Duyn M, Pivonka E. Overview of the health benefits of fruits and vegetables consumption for the dietetics professional: Selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;100:1511–21.10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00420-XSuche in Google Scholar
23. American Community Gardening Association. URL: http://www.communitygarden.org/about-acga.Suche in Google Scholar
24. Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, French S. Individual and environmental influences and adolescents eating habits. J Am Diet Assoc 2002;102:S40–51.10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90421-9Suche in Google Scholar
25. Social Determinants of Health. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/definitions.html.Suche in Google Scholar
26. Chronic disease. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/AAG/chronic.htm.Suche in Google Scholar
27. Department of Health and Human Services. Report of the Secretary’s Task Force Black and Minority Health. Washington, DC: DHHS, 1985.Suche in Google Scholar
28. Georgia. URL: http://www.healthykidshealthycommunities.org/communities/philadelphia-pa.Suche in Google Scholar
29. Lingholm, D. Detroit’s metro foodland is no mirage. Detroit Hub. The Detroit Regional News Hub, 2011. http://blog.thedetroithub.com/2011/01/18/detroit%E2%80%99s-metro-foodland-is-no-mirage/.Suche in Google Scholar
30. Harper A, Shattuck A, Holt-Giménez E, Alkon A, Lambrick F. Food Policy Councils: lessons learned. Oakland, CA: Food First Institute Food and Development Policy, 2009.Suche in Google Scholar
31. Rose D, Bodor JN, Swalm CM, Rice JC, Farley TA, Hutchinson PL. Deserts in New Orleans? Illustrations of urban food access and implications for policy. J Food Distribut Res 2009;41:101–7.Suche in Google Scholar
32. Nuckols B. Food policy coordinator, among nation’s first, faces challenges to bring healthy food to poor. URL: http://www.startribune.com/templates/Print_This_Story?sid=97957784.Suche in Google Scholar
33. Corrigan M. Growing what you eat: developing community gardens in Baltimore Maryland. J Appl Geography 2011;31:1232–41.10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.017Suche in Google Scholar
34. Bass A, Oakland North. URL: http://oaklandnorth.net/few-food-choices/.Suche in Google Scholar
35. McClintock N. From industrial garden to food desert: demarcated devaluation in the Flatlands of Oakland, California. Cultivating Food Justice 2011:89–120.Suche in Google Scholar
36. Molinari J. California Freshworks Fund. URL: http://www.ncbcapitalimpact.org/dafault.aspx?id=2301.Suche in Google Scholar
37. Oakland Local. Two big firsts at oakland community farmers market. http://live.oaklandlocal.com/article/two-big-firsts-oakland-community-farmers-market-saturday.Suche in Google Scholar
38. Farm Bill 2012. URL: http://www.farmbillfacts.org/farm-bill-facts.Suche in Google Scholar
©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Editorial
- Break the cycle of environmental health disparities in vulnerable children
- Reviews
- Effectiveness of foreign food aid initiatives at addressing child malnutrition and the future of United States food aid policy
- Interventions to improve access to fresh food in vulnerable communities: a review of the literature
- Original Articles
- Disparities in arsenic exposure among children and adolescents in the United States
- The use of home-based caregiver assessment to improve children’s health: a pilot project
- There’s a hole in the bucket: rethinking the role of community collected data in environmental justice movements
- Multilevel analysis of small area violent crime and preterm birth in a racially diverse urban area
- Cyclopedia: sustaining a positive youth development program through community partnership
- Traffic-related air pollution and pediatric asthma in Durham County, North Carolina
- Breaking the cycle through better school siting: a collaborative project to facilitate the effective use of EPA’s guidelines with Georgia’s educational leaders
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Masthead
- Masthead
- Editorial
- Break the cycle of environmental health disparities in vulnerable children
- Reviews
- Effectiveness of foreign food aid initiatives at addressing child malnutrition and the future of United States food aid policy
- Interventions to improve access to fresh food in vulnerable communities: a review of the literature
- Original Articles
- Disparities in arsenic exposure among children and adolescents in the United States
- The use of home-based caregiver assessment to improve children’s health: a pilot project
- There’s a hole in the bucket: rethinking the role of community collected data in environmental justice movements
- Multilevel analysis of small area violent crime and preterm birth in a racially diverse urban area
- Cyclopedia: sustaining a positive youth development program through community partnership
- Traffic-related air pollution and pediatric asthma in Durham County, North Carolina
- Breaking the cycle through better school siting: a collaborative project to facilitate the effective use of EPA’s guidelines with Georgia’s educational leaders
