Startseite Experimental and kinetic studies of biogas production from petroleum oily sludge by anaerobic co-digestion with animals’ dung at thermophilic conditions
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Experimental and kinetic studies of biogas production from petroleum oily sludge by anaerobic co-digestion with animals’ dung at thermophilic conditions

  • Hassan S. Jasim und Zainab Z. Ismail EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Oktober 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion technology is widely used for biogas generation from organic wastes. In this study, co-digestion of petroleum oily sludge (POS) for biogas production in bench-scale anaerobic digesters at thermophilic conditions was investigated. The effects of inoculum type on the biogas production were considered. Three types of inoculums were examined individually for the co-digestion of POS which were; poultry manure, cattle manure, and cow dung. The results revealed that the biogas production from poultry manure, cattle manure, and cow dung exceeded its production from uninoculated POS by 64.6, 20.94 and 6.1% respectively. Effect of C/N on the co-digestion process was also considered in this study. Modified Gompertz model was applied to describe the kinetic of the co-digestion process. The predicted and experimental results of biogas generation were fitted well with coefficients of determination > 0.96 indicating appropriate conditions of the co-digestion process. Statistical analysis was performed to estimate if there were significant differences in terms of cumulative biogas yield. A significance level value of < 0.05 was obtained.


Corresponding author: Zainab Z. Ismail, Department of Environmental Engineering, Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq, E-mail:

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Midland Refineries Company- Al- Daura Refineries for continuous providing of the petroleum oily sludge fresh samples. Also, the authors would like to extend their appreciation to the staff of the environmental Lab at Oil Exploration Company for the technical support. Kind appreciation to the Dept. of Environmental Engineering, University of Baghdad for the technical support.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Abid, M. F., L. H. Mahmod, S. T. Breesam, and W. Samie. 2018. “Experimental Study and Analysis on Degradation of Oily Sludge from Process Equipment by Continuous Hybrid Treatment.” Journal of Engineering 24: 35–49, https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2018.07.03.Suche in Google Scholar

Abdulkarim, B. I., and A. M. Evuti. 2010. “Effect of Buffer (NaHCO3) and Waste Type in High Solid Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion.” International Journal of Chemical Technology Research 2: 980–4.Suche in Google Scholar

American Public Health Association (APHA). 2005. Standard Methods of the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington: American Public Health Association,American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation.Suche in Google Scholar

Almomani, F. 2020. “Prediction of Biogas Production from Chemically Treated Co-digested Agricultural Waste Using Artificial Neural Network.” Fuel 280: 118573, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118573.Suche in Google Scholar

Baitha, R., and R. Kaushal. 2019. “Experimental and Numerical Study of Biogas, Methane and Carbon Dioxide Produced by Pre-treated Wheat Straw and Pre-digested Cow Dung.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 12: 240–7, https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2019.1605548.Suche in Google Scholar

Browne, J. D., S. R. Gilkinson, and J. P. Frost. 2015. “The Effects of Storage Time and Temperature on Biogas Production from Dairy Cow Slurry.” Biosystems Engineering 129: 48–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.09.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ejimofor, M. I., I. G. Ezemagu, and M. C. Menkiti. 2020. “Biogas Production Using Coagulation Sludge Obtained from Paint Wastewater Decontamination Characterization and Anaerobic Digestion Kinetics.” Current Opinion og Green Sustainability 3: 100024–36, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100024.Suche in Google Scholar

Ghaleb, A. S., S. R. M. Kutty, G. H. A. Salih, A. H. Jagaba, A. Noor, V. Kumar, N. M. Y. Almahbashi, A. A. S. Hezam, and B. N. S. Al-dhawi. 2021. “Sugarcane Bagasse as a Co-substrate with Oil-Refinery Biological Sludge for Biogas Production Using Batch Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-digestion Technology: Effect of Carbon/nitrogen Ratio.” Water 13: 590–613, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050590.Suche in Google Scholar

Hu, G., J. Li, and G. Zeng. 2013. “Recent Development in the Treatment of Oily Sludge from Petroleum Industry: A Review.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 261: 470–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.069.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Isa, M. H., L. P. Wong, M. J. K. Bashir, N. Shafiq, S. R. M. Kutty, I. H. Farooqi, and H. C. Lee. 2020. “Improved Anaerobic Digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent and Biogas Production by Ultrasonication Pretreatment.” Science of the Total Environment 722: 137833–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137833.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Ismail, Z. Z., and A. R. Talib. 2016. “Recycled Medical Cotton Industry Waste as a Source of Biogas Recovery.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 4413–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.069.Suche in Google Scholar

Ismail, Z. Z., and N. A. Noori. 2018. “Anaerobic Co-digestion of Giant Reed for Biogas Recovery.” Journal of Engineering 24: 68–83, https://doi.org/10.31026/j.eng.2018.03.06.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, O. A., and A. C. Affam. 2019. “Petroleum Sludge Treatment and Disposal: A Review.” Environmental Engineering Research 24: 191–201, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.134.Suche in Google Scholar

Kafle, G. K., and L. Chen. 2016. “Comparison on Batch Anaerobic Digestion of Five Different Livestock Manures and Prediction of Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Using Different Statistical Models.” Waste Management 48: 492–502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.021.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Kaushal, R., S. Sandhu, and M. K. Soni. 2022. “Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste, Algae, and Cow Dung for Biogas Yield Enhancement as a Prospective Approach for Environmental Sustainability.” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments 52: 102236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102236.Suche in Google Scholar

Kiani, M. K. D., M. Parsaee, S. M. S. Ardebili, I. P. Reyes, L. T. Fuess, and K. Karimi. 2022. “Different Bioreactor Configurations for Biogas Production from Sugarcane Vinasse: A Comprehensive Review.” Biomass and Bioenergy 161: 106446, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106446.Suche in Google Scholar

Muhammad, M. B., and R. Chandrab. 2021. “Enhancing Biogas and Methane Production from Leaf Litter of Neem by Co-digestion with Vegetable Waste: Focus on the Effect of Tannin.” Biomass and Bioenergy 147: 106007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106007.Suche in Google Scholar

Nahm, K. H. 2007. “Evaluation of the Nitrogen Content in Poultry Manure.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 59: 77–88, https://doi.org/10.1079/wps20030004.Suche in Google Scholar

Orhorhoro, O. W., E. K. Orhorhoro, O. Patrick, and P. O. Ebunilo. 2016. “Analysis of the Effect of Carbon/nitrogen (C/N) Ratio on the Performance of Biogas Yields for Non-uniform Multiple Feed Stock Availability and Composition in Nigeria.” International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology 3: 119–26.Suche in Google Scholar

Perman, E., A. Schnürer, A. Björn, and J. Moested. 2022. “Serial Anaerobic Digestion Improves Protein Degradation and Biogas Production from Mixed Food Waste.” Biomass and Bioenergy 161: 106478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106478.Suche in Google Scholar

Praseto, T., S. Sumardiono, H. A. Aji, and A. Y. Pratama. 2017. “Effect of C/N Ratio and pH on Biogas Production from Industrial Cassava Starch Wastewater through Anaerobic Process.” Advanced Science Letters 23: 5810–4, https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8839.Suche in Google Scholar

Rynk, R. 1992. On-farm Composting Handbook. Ithaca: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service.Suche in Google Scholar

Sampsom, I. E. 2020. “Anaerobic Digestion Technology for the Treatment of Petroleum Sludge.” International Journal of Advanced Academic Research 6: 2488–9849.Suche in Google Scholar

Sandhu, S., and R. Kaushal. 2022a. “Optimisation of Anaerobic Digestion of Layer Manure, Breeding Manure and Cow Dung Using Grey Relational Analysis.” Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02677-w (Epub ahead of print).Suche in Google Scholar

Sandhu, S., and R. Kaushal. 2022b. “Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Wastes, Algae, Pond Sludge and Cow Dung for Biogas Yield Enhancement as a Potent Approach to Reduce Carbon Footprints.” Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2021.2005865 (Epub ahead of print).Suche in Google Scholar

Sherry, A., R. J. Grant, C. M. Aitken, M. Jones, B. F. J. Bowler, S. R. Larter, I. M. Head, and N. D. Gray. 2020. “Methanogenic Crude Oil-Degrading Microbial Consortia Are Not Universally Abundant in Anoxic Environments.” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 155: 105085.10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105085Suche in Google Scholar

Strömberg, S., M. Nistor, and J. Liu. 2014. “Towards Eliminating Systematic Errors Caused by the Experimental Conditions in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Tests.” Waste Management 34: 1939–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.018.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Shi, Y., M. Liu, J. Li, Y. Yao, J. Tang, and Q. Niu. 2022. “The Dosage-Effect of Biochar on Anaerobic Digestion under the Suppression of Oily Sludge: Performance Variation, Microbial Community Succession and Potential Detoxification Mechanisms.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 421: 126819–30, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126819.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Soltaninejad, A., M. H. Jazini, and K. Karimi. 2022. “Biorefinery for Efficient Xanthan Gum, Ethanol, and Biogas Production from Potato Crop Residues.” Biomass and Bioenergy 158: 106354, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106354.Suche in Google Scholar

Veroneze, M. L., D. Schwantes, A. C. Gonçalves Jr, A. Richart, J. Manfrin, A. d. P. Schiller, and T. B. Schub. 2019. “Production of Biogas and Biofertilizer Using Anaerobic Reactors with Swine Manure and Glycerin Doses.” Journal of Cleaner Production 213: 176–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.181.Suche in Google Scholar

Vu, P. T., R. W. Melse, G. Zeeman, W. G. Peter, and G. Koerkamp. 2016. “Composition and Biogas Yield of a Novel Source Segregation System for Pig Excreta.” Biosystems Engineering 145: 29–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.02.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Wandera, S. M., W. Qiao, D. E. Algapani, S. Bi, D. Yin, X. Qi, Y. Liu, J. Dach, and R. Dong. 2018. “Searching for Possibilities to Improve the Performance of Full-Scale Agricultural Biogas Plants.” Renewable Energy 116: 720–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.087.Suche in Google Scholar

Ware, A., and N. Power. 2015. “What Is the Effect of Mandatory Pasteurization on the Biogas Transformation of Solid Slaughterhouse Wastes?” Waste Management 48: 503–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.10.013.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Yang, Q., C. Zhang, L. Li, and W. Xu. 2020. “Anaerobic Co-digestion of Oil Sludge with Corn Stover for Efficient Biogas Production.” Sustainability 12: 1861–70, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051861.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, G., D. Chen, U. Arena, Z. Huang, and X. Dai. 2018. “Reforming Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis Volatile with Fe-Embedded Char: Minimization of Liquid Product Yield.” Waste Management 73: 464–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang, M., Z. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Qian, and G. Shen. 2020. “Biogas and Quality Fertilizer Production from Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Rice Straw with Nitrogen Addition.” Bioresource Technology Reports 11: 100509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100509.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-06-21
Accepted: 2022-10-02
Published Online: 2022-10-11

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0131/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen