Startseite Experimental Study of Batch Reactor Performance for Ethyl Acetate Saponification
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Experimental Study of Batch Reactor Performance for Ethyl Acetate Saponification

  • Mohammed K. Al Mesfer EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Januar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The objective of the current research work is to investigate the performance of batch reactor for saponification of ethyl acetate with sodium hydroxide. Temperature, volume of reaction mixture, rate of agitation, and initial concentration of reactants are the operating conditions considered for analysis. The NaOH concentration decreases from 1.13 × 10−2 mol/L to 0.57 × 10−2 mol/L when reaction temperature increases from 293 K to 313 K after the completion of the reaction. The conversion of NaOH increases with increased reaction temperature under the studied range of reaction temperatures until the stable condition is achieved. Reactant concentration declines with increased volume of reaction mixture from 1.2 L to 1.8 L. Sodium acetate concentration and reaction conversion decrease with increased volume of reaction mixture within the studied range. Concentration of sodium acetate decreases with increased rate of agitation. The conversion of sodium hydroxide declines with increased agitation rate from 70 rpm to 150 rpm. Higher initial reactant concentration leads to decreased reaction conversion. The results obtained may be used to optimize the production of ethanol and sodium acetate using saponification reaction.

Acknowledgement

The author is thankful to the laboratory staff members of the Chemical Engineering Department of King Khalid University for their valuable Support.

Notations

T

Temperature of reaction mixture, K

t

Time of reaction, sec.

S

Agitation rate, rpm

X

Reaction conversion

V

Volume of reaction mixture, liter, L

C

Concentration, mol/L

Subscripts

Na

Sodium hydroxide

ac

Sodium acetate

o

Initial

References

Ahmad, A., M.I. Ahmad, M. Younas, H. Khan, and M.H. Shah. 2013. “A Comparative Study of Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate Using Design of Experiments.” Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 32 (4): 33–44.Suche in Google Scholar

Bursali, N., S. Ertunc, and B. Akay. 2006. “Process Improvement Approach to Saponification Reaction Using Statistical Experimental Design.” Chem. Eng. Process 45 : 980–989.10.1016/j.cep.2006.02.010Suche in Google Scholar

Daniels, F., J. Mattews, and J. Williams. 1941. Experimental Physical Chemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Danish, M., M.K. Al Mesfer, and M.M. Rashid. 2015. “Effect of Operating Conditions on CSTR Performance: An Experimental Study.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 5 (2): 74–78.Suche in Google Scholar

Fogler, H.S.. 2006. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Fourth edition. India: Prentice Hall.Suche in Google Scholar

Garu, M.G., J.M. Nougues, and L. Puigjaner. 2002. “Comparative Study of Two Chemical Reactions with Different Behavior in Batch and Semibatch Reactors.” Chem. Eng. J 88 : 225–232.10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00027-XSuche in Google Scholar

Kapoor, K.L.. 2004. A Textbook of Physical Chemistry. New Delhi: McMillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuheli, D., P. Sahoo, M. Saibaba, N. Murali, and P. Swaminthan. 2011. “Kinetic Studies on Saponification of Ethyl Acetate Using an Innovative Conductivity - Monitoring Instrument with a Pulsating Sensor.” Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 43 : 648–656.10.1002/kin.20597Suche in Google Scholar

Levenspiel, O.. 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering, Third edition. NewYork: John Wiley and Sons.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, H., Y. Meng, X. Li, and X. Gao. 2016. “A Fixed Point Methodology for the Design of Reactive Distillation Column.” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 111 : 479–491.10.1016/j.cherd.2016.05.015Suche in Google Scholar

Mata-Segreda, J.F.. 2002. “Hydroxide as General Base in the Saponification of Ethyl Acetate.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (10): 2259–2262.10.1021/ja011931tSuche in Google Scholar

Mukhtar, A., U. Shafiq, A.F. Khan, H.A. Qadir, and M. Qizilbash. 2015. “Estimation of Parameters of Arrhenius Equation for Ethyl Acetate Saponification Reaction.” Res. J. Chem. Sci. 5 (11): 46–50.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortiz, M.I., A. Romero, and A. Irabien. 1989. “Integral Kinetic Analysis from Temperature Programmed Reaction Data: Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate as Test Reaction.” Thermochim. Acta 141 : 169–180.10.1016/0040-6031(89)87052-2Suche in Google Scholar

Schneider, M.A., and F. Stoessel. 2005. “Determination of Kinetic Parameters Fast Chemical Reactions.” Chem. Eng. J. 115 : 73–83.10.1016/j.cej.2005.09.019Suche in Google Scholar

Theodorou, V., K. Skobridis, A.G. Tzakos, and V. Ragoussis. 2007. “A Simple Method for the Alkaline Hydrolusis of Esters.” Tetrahedron Lett 48 : 8230–8233.10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.09.074Suche in Google Scholar

Tsujikawa, H., and H. Inoue. 1966. “The Reaction Rate of the Alkaline Hydrolysis of Ethyl Acetate.” Bull.Chem. Soc. Jpn. 39 : 1837–1842.10.1246/bcsj.39.1837Suche in Google Scholar

Ullah, I., M.I. Ahmad, and M. Younas. 2015. “Optimization of Saponification Reaction in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor Using Design of Experiments.” Pak. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 16 : 84–92.Suche in Google Scholar

Walker, J.. 1906. “A Method of Determining Velocities of Saponification.” Proc. R. Soc. A78 : 157–160.10.1098/rspa.1906.0067Suche in Google Scholar

Wijayarathne, U.P.L., and K.C. Wasalathilake. 2014. “Aspen Plus Simulation of Saponification of Ethyl Actate in the Presence of Sodium Hydroxide in a Plug Flow Reactor.” J. Chem. Eng. Process Technol. 5 (6): 1–8.10.4172/2157-7048.1000205Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-1-28

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 4.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0174/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen