Startseite High Efficiency CeCu Composite Oxide Catalysts Improved via Preparation Methods for Propyl Acetate Catalytic Combustion in Air
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

High Efficiency CeCu Composite Oxide Catalysts Improved via Preparation Methods for Propyl Acetate Catalytic Combustion in Air

  • Hai Lan , Guilin Zhou EMAIL logo , Cuijuan Luo , Yinrong Yu , Hongmei Xie und Guizhi Zhang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. März 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

A famous hard-template method (HT), coprecipitation method (PC), and complex method (CA) were used to prepare CeCu composite oxide catalysts. The prepared catalysts were characterized via XRD, BET, Raman, XPS, FI–IR, and O2–TPD, and their catalytic activity and stability were evaluated for the propyl acetate catalytic combustion. The results showed that the CeCu oxide solid solution and oxygen vacancies were formed in the prepared CeCu oxide catalysts, even for CeCu–PC and CeCu–CA having a specific amount of isolated crystalline or amorphous CuO species. Comparing with the CeCu–PC and CeCu–CA of low porosity, CeCu–HT developed a mesoporous structure with a much larger specific surface area through a negative replica on the structure of KIT-6, and in it, CuO was completely dissolved in the CeO2 lattice to form more CeCu oxide solid solution and a large amount of oxygen vacancies. As a result, the CeCu–HT catalyst has more surface-adsorbed oxygen species, more –OH group which can also change into surface-adsorbed oxygen species at relatively high temperatures, higher oxygen desorption ability, and higher oxygen mobility than CeCu–PC and CeCu–CA. The CeCu–HT catalyst shows high and stable propyl acetate catalytic combustion performance at 190 °C. The propyl acetate catalytic combustion activity on the prepared CeCu oxide catalysts can be ranked as: CeCu–HT > CeCu–PC > CeCu–CA, which follows the orders of CeCu oxide solid solution content, surface-active oxygen content, and oxygen desorption and mobility of the CeCu composite oxide catalysts.

Acknowledgements

The work was financially supported by Engineering Research Center for Waste Oil Recovery Technology and Equipment,Ministry of Education (Chongqing Technology and Business University) “New technology and new product development” (fykf201507); Science and Technology of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission funded research projects (KJ1400610).

References

1. Binet, C., Daturi, M., Lavalley, J.C., 1999. IR Study of Polycrystalline Ceria Properties in Oxidized and Reduced States. Catal. Today 50, 207–225.10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00504-5Suche in Google Scholar

2. Dickinson, C., Zhou, W.Z., Hodgkins, R.P., Shi, Y.F., Zhao, D.Y., He, H.Y., 2006. Formation Mechanism of Porous Single–Crystal Cr2O3 and Co3O4 Templated by Mesoporous Silica. Chem. Mater. 18, 3088–3095.10.1021/cm060014pSuche in Google Scholar

3. Fu, M.L., Yue, X.H., Ye, D.Q., Ouyang, J.H., Huang, B.C., Wu, J.L., Liang, H., 2010. Soot Oxidation via CuO Doped CeO2 Catalysts Prepared Using Coprecipitation and Citrate Acid Complex–Combustion Synthesis. Catal. Today 153, 125–132.10.1016/j.cattod.2010.03.017Suche in Google Scholar

4. He, C., Yu, Y.K., Chen, C.W., Yue, L., Qiao, N.L., Shen, Q., Chen, J.S., Hao, Z.P., 2013. Facile Preparation of 3D Ordered Mesoporous CuOx–CeO2 with Notably Enhanced Efficiency for the Low Temperature Oxidation of Heteroatom–Containing Volatile Organic Compounds. RSC Adv. 3, 19639–19656.10.1039/c3ra42566eSuche in Google Scholar

5. Jia, A.P., Hu, G.S., Meng, L., Xie, Y.L., Lu, J.Q., Luo, M.F., 2012. Cubic CO Oxidation Over CuO/Ce1–xCuxO2–δ and Ce1–xCuxO2–δ Catalysts: Synergetic Effects and Kinetic Study. J. Catal. 289, 199–209.10.1016/j.jcat.2012.02.010Suche in Google Scholar

6. Kleitz, F., Choi, S.H., Ryoo, R., 2003. Ia3d Large Mesoporous Silica: Synthesis and Replication to Platinum Nanowires, Carbon Nanorods and Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Commun. 17, 2136–2137.10.1039/b306504aSuche in Google Scholar

7. Li, X.B., Quek, X.Y., Michel Ligthart, D.A.J., Guo, M.L., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Yang, Q.H., Hensen, E.J.M., 2012. CO–PROX Reactions on Copper Cerium Oxide Catalysts Prepared by Melt Infiltration. Appl. Catal. B 123–124, 424–432.10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.009Suche in Google Scholar

8. Li, X.S., Wang, J.L., Liao, C.W., Cao, H.Y., Chen, Y.Q., Gong, M.C., 2011. Catalytic Combustion of Ethyl Acetate Over CeMnOx and CeMnZrOx Compounds Synthesized by Coprecipitation Method. J. Nat. Gas. Chem. 20, 623–628.10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60249-6Suche in Google Scholar

9. Liu, Y., Shao, M., Fu, L.L., Lu, S.H., Zeng, L.M., Tang, D.G., 2008. Source Profiles of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Measured in China: Part I. Atmos. Environ. 42, 6247–6260.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.070Suche in Google Scholar

10. Nicolae, R., Elena, R., Paul, D.P., Corneliu, D., Maria, I., 2014. Characterization and Catalytic Properties of Some Perovskites. Composites Part B 60, 515–522.10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.006Suche in Google Scholar

11. Shan, W.J., Feng, Z.C., Li, Z.L., Zhang, J., Shen, W.J., Li, C., 2004. Oxidative Steam Reforming of Methanol on Ce0.9Cu0.1OY Catalysts Prepared by Deposition–Precipitation, Coprecipitation, and Complexation–Combustion meThods. J. Catal. 228: 206–217.10.1016/j.jcat.2004.07.010Suche in Google Scholar

12. Shrestha, K.M., Sorensen, C.M., Klabunde, K.J., 2010. Synthesis of CuO Nanorods, Reduction of CuO into Cu Nanorods, and Diffuse Reflectance Measurements of CuO and Cu Nanomaterials in the Near Infrared Region. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 14368–14376.10.1021/jp103761hSuche in Google Scholar

13. Sing, K.S.W., Everett, D.H., Haul, R.A.W., Moscou, L., Rouquerol, R.A.P.J., 1985. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid System with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 57, 603–619.10.1351/pac198254112201Suche in Google Scholar

14. Spanier, J.E., Robinson, R.D., Zhang, F., Chan, S.W., Herman, I.P., 2001. Size–Dependent Properties of CeO2–y Nanoparticles as Studied by Raman Scattering. Phys. Rev. B 64: 245407.10.1103/PhysRevB.64.245407Suche in Google Scholar

15. Tsoncheva, T., Linden, M., Areva, S., Minchev, C., 2006. Copper Oxide Modified Large Pore Ordered Mesoporous Silicas for Ethyl Acetate Combustion. Catal. Commun. 7, 357–361.10.1016/j.catcom.2005.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

16. Wang, P.P., Li, C.H., Gong, H.Y., Wang, H.Q., Liu, J.R., 2011. Morphology Control and Growth Mechanism of Magnesium Hydroxide Nanoparticles via a Simple Wet Precipitation Method. Ceram. Intern. 37, 3365–3370.10.1016/j.ceramint.2011.05.138Suche in Google Scholar

17. Yao, X.J., Gao, F., Yu, Q., Qi, L., Tang, C.J., Dong, L., Chen, Y., 2013. NO Reduction by CO over CuO–CeO2 Catalysts: Effect of Preparation Methods. Catal. Sci. Technol. 3, 1355–1366.10.1039/c3cy20805bSuche in Google Scholar

18. Zhang, R.D., Shi, D.J., Liu, N., Cao, Y., Chen, B.H., 2014. Mesoporous SBA–15 Promoted by 3D–Transition and Noble Metals for Catalytic Combustion of Acetonitrile. Appl. Catal. B 146, 79–93.10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.03.028Suche in Google Scholar

19. Zhou, G.L., He, X.L., Liu, S., Xie, H.M., Fu M., 2015. Phenyl VOCs Catalytic Combustion on Supported CoMn/AC Oxide Catalyst. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21, 932–941.10.1016/j.jiec.2014.04.035Suche in Google Scholar

20. Zhou, G.L., Lan, H., Gao, T.T., Xie, H.M., 2014. Influence of Ce/Cu Ratio on the Performance of Ordered mesoporous CeCu Composite Oxide Catalysts. Chem. Eng. J. 246, 53–63.10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.059Suche in Google Scholar

21. Zhou, G.L., Lan, H., Song, R.Y., Xie, H.M., Du, Q.X., 2014. Effects of Preparation Method on CeCu Oxide Catalyst Performance. RSC Adv. 4, 50840–50850.10.1039/C4RA05431HSuche in Google Scholar

22. Zhou, G.L., Lan, H., Wang, H., Xie, H.M., Zhang, G.Z., Zheng, X.X., 2014. Catalytic Combustion of PVOCs on MnOx Catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A 393, 279–288.10.1016/j.molcata.2014.06.028Suche in Google Scholar

23. Zhou, G.L., Lan, H., Yang, X.Q., Du, Q.X., Xie, H.M., Fu, M., 2013. Effects of the Structure of Ce–Cu Catalysts on the Catalytic Combustion of Toluene in Air. Ceram. Int. 39, 3677–3683.10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.10.199Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-3-1
Published in Print: 2016-6-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 16.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2015-0085/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen