Abstract
Objectives
Adolescents with life-limiting conditions are distinct from children or older adults in their palliative needs and developmental stage, yet, there is limited literature addressing this population. Our aim was to describe the characteristics of the adolescent population, aged 13–18, who have received specialist palliative care in the Republic of Ireland, from 2019 to 2022 inclusive.
Methods
This study examined medical records from the national paediatric palliative care centre and a radiation oncology network. These two centres hold medical records for all adolescents linked to paediatric specialist palliative care nationally.
Results
Of the 145 patients identified 58 (40.0 %) had cancer and 87 (60.0 %) a non-cancer diagnosis. Those with a non-cancer diagnosis were subdivided into those with severe neurological impairment (n=56, 38.6 %) and those without (n=31, 21.4 %). All groups had a high prevalence of physical symptoms. Just under half of those with cancer had psychological symptoms (n=26, 44.8 %). The majority of those with severe neurological impairment required medical devices/technology in the home, with 48 (85.7 %) requiring feeding devices and 33 (58.9 %) requiring respiratory support devices. Nearly a half of the adolescents had died at the time of the study (n=69, 47.6 %). Of these, the majority (n=44, 63.8 %) died at home and 9 (13.0 %) were referred less than one month before their death.
Conclusions
The high symptom burden of these young people highlights the need for early access to palliative care professionals with an appropriate skillset and access to quality, equitable psychological supports for this group.
Introduction
Palliative care is an approach that aims to improve the quality of life of patients who are facing challenges associated with a life-limiting condition, as well as to support their families and caregivers [1]. Palliative care is offered to patients with a wide range of medical conditions, often with complex multimorbidity, across all age ranges. The importance and benefits of palliative care when introduced in the early stages of a potentially life-limiting condition are described in the literature [2], [3], [4]. Early introduction of such care has been shown to improve quality of life, symptom burden and healthcare service use [3], 5], 6]. Specialist palliative care services are those in which core activity is limited to the provision of palliative care. As these services are involved in the care of patients with more complex and demanding care needs they require a greater degree of training, staff and other resources [7].
The term “adolescence” is used to describe a critical period of development for which unmet health needs and disparities in access to appropriate healthcare are becoming increasingly recognised [8], 9]. There is variability in the terms and age criteria used for this group between organisations internationally. The World Health Organization defines “adolescents” as persons aged between 10 and 19 years, “youth” as between 15 and 24 years, and combines this into “young people” aged 10–24 years of age [10]. Sawyer et al. [11] proposes that the term “adolescence” should encompass the broader age definition of 10–24 years. Research on this group is challenging, not only due to the varying age definitions but also due to the current configuration of healthcare structures which divides the group into those accessing paediatric and adult healthcare services. Despite the need to explore the palliative care needs of broader age definition of “adolescents and young adults” (13–24 years in keeping with current practice of the adolescent and young adult cancer services in the Republic of Ireland [12]), this paper only focuses on those aged 13–18 who are still under specialist paediatric palliative care and the term(s) “adolescent/adolescence” will be used.
Adolescence is a period characterised by intense biological, psychological and social change, which impacts on behaviour, communication style and decision making [13]. A diagnosis of a life-limiting condition adds complexity to this already challenging period of growth and development. Medical advances are impacting on the prognosis of children with life-limiting conditions, with many now surviving into adulthood. This is partly due the use of medical devices that support organ function in life-limiting conditions. Some adolescents with a life-limiting conditions will require access to specialist palliative care services and require a service that encompasses particular skills, training and infrastructure to best serve their needs [14]. Further research is required to ascertain the palliative needs of this group and to identify the gaps in current knowledge and skills so as to best facilitate development of knowledge and services in the area. Literature to date suggests a need for an adapted approach to communication and decision making [15], [16], [17], a need to support normalcy [15], [18], [19], [20] and a need for consistency and continuity in the provision of healthcare [15], 16], 21] for adolescents with life-limiting conditions (both cancer and non-cancer conditions).
Much of the existing literature on palliative care for adolescents is focused on those with a cancer diagnosis [13]. Adolescents with non-cancer life-limiting condition have both overlapping and different requirements from a specialist palliative care service. They represent a group with complex, multidisciplinary needs and include those with congenital cardiac conditions, neuromuscular conditions and those who have severe neurological impairment. Severe neurological impairment describes “disorders of the central nervous system which arise in childhood, resulting in motor impairment, cognitive impairment and medical complexity, where much assistance is required with activities of daily living” and for which “the impairment is permanent but can be progressive or static” [22]. These adolescents are susceptible to pain and discomfort, gastrointestinal symptoms, respiratory symptoms, impaired sleep and neurological symptoms such as dystonia and autonomic dysfunction [23]. Physicians can find it challenging to identify pain and other symptoms in those who are non-verbal with severe neurological impairment [23].
Aims
Our aim was to describe the characteristics of the adolescent population, aged 13–18, who have received specialist palliative care in the Republic of Ireland, from 2019 to 2022 inclusive.
Methodology
Design
This retrospective, quantitative, observational study collected data from the paper and electronic records of patients known to specialist palliative care services in Children’s Health Ireland and St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network from February to May 2023. These two centres encompass adolescents attending paediatric specialist palliative care nationally. Patients were included if they were aged 13–18 years and were reviewed by the specialist palliative care team between the years 2019 and 2022 inclusive. Data collected included demographic data, data on the diagnosis, age at diagnosis, gender, documented physical symptoms and psychological symptoms, outcome, duration of specialist palliative care involvement and medical technology/devices required by the adolescent at home to support care/organ function. Inconsistencies and incomplete entries into the medical record may have had an impact on the completeness of the data that were extracted.
Data collection
Data were managed in line with European legislation on data protection. The first twenty patient records were reviewed and utilised to form the initial categories for the data collection. Each symptom was recorded, with the results analysed and categorised into symptom groups (physical, psychological) and further subcategorised into organ systems as appropriate. The data from the rest of the records were collected and the results were analysed to condense/expand categories as required. In some cases, this necessitated extra categories to be added or for categories to be adjusted to ensure all data were accurately categorised. Regular meetings with the research team during the study aimed to reduce the risk of data collection and analysis bias by discussing methods, analysis and results. Ethical approval was granted by the research ethics committees in Children’s Health Ireland (REC-252-23, 23/2/23) and St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network (28/2/23).
Analysis
Excel Version 16.74 was used for data management and data analysis. Once data from the two centres were collected, the data were merged for analysis. Adolescents who attended both centres were identified to avoid duplication of patients and data were collected from both sets of records to ensure comprehensive capture of data. The cases were divided into those with a cancer diagnosis and those with a non-cancer diagnosis. The adolescents with a non-cancer diagnosis were further sub-categorised into those whose condition caused severe neurological impairment and those that did not. Descriptive statistics were utilised to summarise and categorise the dataset. Where data were incomplete (n=3) cases were excluded from the relevant analysis. Due to the small sample size and rarity of some of the diagnoses, any diagnoses that could not be categorised into a number greater than 5 were described as “other” to protect anonymity.
Results
Primary diagnosis/condition causing a life-limiting condition
There were 145 adolescents in this study and of these 58 (40 %) had a primary life-limiting condition of a cancer diagnosis and 87 (60 %) a non-cancer diagnosis (Table 1).
Demographic data and diagnoses.
| All | Female | Male | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic data and diagnoses, n (%) | |||
|
|
|||
| All cases | 145 (100 %) | 65 (44.8 %) | 80 (55.2 %) |
|
|
|||
| Age at referral to specialist palliative care services | |||
|
|
|||
| </=13 years | 41 (28.3 %) | 20 (48.8 %) | 21 (51.2 %) |
| >13 years | 104 (71.7 %) | 43 (41.3 %) | 61 (58.7 %) |
|
|
|||
| Primary diagnosis/condition causing life-limiting condition, n (%) | |||
|
|
|||
| Cancer | 58 (40 %) | 26 (44.8 %) | 32 (55.2 %) |
| Solid tumour | 53 (36.5 %) | ||
|
19 (13.1 %) | ||
|
19 (13.1 %) | ||
| Haematological cancer | 5 (3.4 %) | ||
| Non-cancer | 87 (60 %) | 39 (44.8 %) | 48 (55.2 %) |
| Non cancer with condition causing severe neurological impairment | 56 (38.6 %) | 25 (44.6 %) | 31 (55.4 %) |
|
28 (19.3 %) | ||
|
10 (6.9 %) | ||
|
18 (12.4 %) | ||
| Other non-cancer | 31 (21.4 %) | 14 (45.2 %) | 17 (54.8 %) |
|
10 (6.9 %) | ||
|
9 (6.2 %) | ||
|
12 (8.3 %) | ||
Clinical characteristics of adolescents with a cancer diagnosis
Amongst adolescents with cancer (n=58, 40 %) there was a high prevalence of physical symptoms, with pain documented in 49 (84.5 %), gastroenterological symptoms in 43 (74.1 %), and fatigue/somnolence in 27 (46.5 %). Psychological symptoms were present in nearly a half of cases (n=26, 44.8 %). Data on the outcomes of these young people are displayed in Table 3. Most of the young people had died at the time of this study (n=38, 65.5 %). The majority of those that died, did so at home with support from community services (n=27, 71.0 %), with 9 (23.7 %) dying in the hospital setting and the remainder in an adult-focused hospice (n=2, 5.3 %). Nearly a third of those who died (n=12, 31.6 %) were referred to specialist palliative care services less than three months before they died, with 3 (7.9 %) referred less than two weeks before their death.
Clinical characteristics of adolescents with a non-cancer condition leading to severe neurological impairment
Of the total 145 adolescents included in this study, 80 (60.0 %) had a non-cancer condition, and of them, 56 (70.0 %) had a non-cancer condition leading to severe neurological impairment. For those with a non-cancer condition leading to severe neurological impairment, pain was documented in 35 (62.5 %) and the presence of irritability/agitation in 16 (28.6 %). The other two most prominent physical symptoms were neurological (n=46, 82.1 %) and gastrointestinal symptoms (n=43, 76.8 %). The most common comorbid conditions were seizure disorders (n=41, 73.2 %) and respiratory conditions (n=39, 69.6 %) as outlined in Table 2. Medical device/technology use in the home was particularly high for this group (Table 2). A large proportion of these adolescents (n=26, 46.4 %) had greater than four medical specialties involved in their care. Outcomes for this group are outlined in Table 3. Over a third had died at the time of this study (n=21, 37.5 %). The majority of those who died, did so at home (n=13, 61.9 %), 6 (28.6 %) died in the hospital setting and 1 (4.8 %) in a paediatric-focused hospice. The location of death for one was not documented. The adolescents who died within three months of their referral to specialist palliative care services (n=3, 14.3 %) were entirely made up of adolescents who were referred less than two weeks before their death.
Comorbidities, symptoms, medical device use and medical specialty involvement in adolescents with life limiting conditions known to specialist palliative care.
| Cancer diagnosis | Non-cancer diagnosis with severe neurological impairment | Non cancer diagnosis without severe neurological impairment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58 (100 %) | 56 (100 %) | 31 (100 %) | |
| Comorbidities, n (%) | |||
| Cognitive developmental delay: | 5 (8.6 %) | 56 (100 %) | 9 (29.0 %) |
| Respiratory conditions: (recurrent lower respiratory tract infections/chronic respiratory failure/obstructive sleep apnoea) | n<5 | 39 (69.6 %) | 20 (64.5 %) |
| Sensory impairments (visual/hearing): | 12 (20.7 %) | 20 (35.7 %) | 4 (12.9 %) |
| Seizure disorder: | 15 (25.9 %) | 41 (73.2 %) | 2 (6.4 %) |
| Scoliosis: | n<5 | 28 (50.0 %) | 12 (38.7 %) |
| Others | |||
|
6 (10.3 %) | n<5 | n<5 |
|
7 (12.1 %) | n<5 | n<5 |
|
n<5 | 9 (16.1 %) | 6 (19.3 %) |
| Symptoms, n (%) | |||
| Pain: | 49 (84.5 %) | 35 (62.5 %) | 20 (64.5 %) |
| Gastroenterological symptoms: | 43 (74.1 %) | 43 (76.8 %) | 20 (64.5 %) |
| Neurological symptoms (seizures, dystonia, distressing altered sensation including itch, confusion): | 20 (34.5 %) | 46 (82.1 %) | 5 (16.1 %) |
| Respiratory symptoms: | 10 (17.2 %) | 32 (57.1 %) | 16 (51.6 %) |
| Fatigue/somnolence: | 27 (46.5 %) | 13 (23.2 %) | 13 (41.9 %) |
| Poor/disturbed sleep: | 13 (23.2 %) | 13 (23.2 %) | n<5 |
| Psychological symptoms: | 26 (44.8 %) | n<5 | 11 (35.5 %) |
| Irritability/agitation: | 6 (10.3 %) | 16 (28.6 %) | n<5 |
| Medical devices/technology at home, n (%) | |||
| Mobility aids: | 14 (24.1 %) | 51 (91.1 %) | 18 (58.1 %) |
| Enteral feeding devices: | n<5 | 48 (85.7 %) | 11 (35.5 %) |
| Respiratory support devices: | 7 (12.1 %) | 33 (58.9 %) | 19 (61.3 %) |
Outcome and mortality data.
| Cancer diagnosis | Non-cancer diagnosis with severe neurological impairment | Non cancer diagnosis without severe neurological impairment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58 (100 %) | 56 (100 %) | 31 (100 %) | |
| Outcomes, n (%) | |||
| Died: | 38 (65.5 %) | 21 (37.5 %) | 10 (32.3 %) |
| Input is ongoing in paediatric services: | 15 (25.8 %) | 25 (44.6 %) | 12 (38.7 %) |
| Care transferred to adult heatlhcare services: | n<5 | 6 (10.7 %) | 8 (25.8 %) |
| Discharged from specialist palliative care service: | n<5 | n<5 | n<5 |
Clinical characteristics of adolescents with other non-cancer conditions
Those cases without cancer or severe neurological impairment made up the final proportion of patients (n=31, 21.4 %). The two most common conditions in this group were congenital cardiac conditions and neuromuscular conditions. Pain (n=20, 64.5 %), gastrointestinal symptoms (n=20, 64.5 %) and respiratory symptoms (n=16, 51.6 %) were the most prevalent physical symptoms and over a third had psychological symptoms (n=11, 35.5 %). In this group, 13 (41.9 %) had greater that four medical specialties involved in their care. An equal number of these adolescents died at home (n=4, 40.0 %) and in the hospital setting (n=4, 40.0 %). One (10 %) died in a paeditric focused hospice and the location of death for one was not documented. One (10.0 %) was referred to specialist palliative services less than three months before their death.
Discussion
This study has shown the clinical heterogeneity of adolescents being referred to paediatric specialist palliative care services. The physical symptom burden was high amongst adolescents with both cancer and non-cancer conditions. Just under half of those with a cancer diagnosis had psychological symptoms documented. Over a third of adolescents in this study who had a non-cancer condition, without associated severe neurological impairment, had documented psychological symptoms. The documented psychological symptom burden was low in the adolescents with severe neurological impairment. This may be due to the challenges in assessment of symptoms in non-verbal adolescents with severe neurological impairment, in particular, differentiating physical and psychological distress. Adolescents share core palliative care need domains with people of all ages, including physical, emotional, psychosocial and spiritual support [15], [16], [17, 20], 24]. Meeting spiritual needs is a core pillar of palliative care provision, however, there is often a lack of agreement on the conceptualisation of spirituality [25], [26], [27]. This can make it difficult to research and in clinical practice often results in a non-systematic and intuitive approach to patients’ spiritual needs [25], [26], [27]. Spiritual concerns were not routinely documented in the clinical notes and therefore this data on this were not collected. This is a point for reflection on clinical practice and an area for future research. Symptom burden is a modifiable determinant of health related quality of life [28], 29] and standardization of palliative care assessments and interventions has the potential to improve quality of life [30], 31]. In an adult population, the palliative care needs, levels of anxiety and depression, and health related quality of life of patients with non-cancer conditions has been shown to be similar to those of patients with cancer [32]. The high proportion of those with non-cancer life-limiting conditions in this study, alongside the relatively sparse literature on this group, indicates a need for further research which characterises this group and explores their palliative care needs.
Good communication with the patient, family and health professionals remains crucial to good quality patient care [33]. Healthcare professionals need to be equipped with the communication skills to deliver person-centred care for adolescents with a life-limiting condition. Over a third of the adolescents in this study had severe neurological impairment. Members of this group may be non-verbal and require an adapted approach to communication, alongside a strategy to promote their involvement in care and decision making. Often the adolescent’s parent/caregiver can assist in the decision making process but it is key to remember to involve the adolescents much as is possible, with the level of participation being tailored to their condition, preference and circumstance. A large number of medical specialties can be involved in the care of these adolescents. This necessitates streamlined communication and information transfer between professionals to enhance optimal care.
Some referrals to specialist palliative care for these adolescents occurred very close to their deaths, sometimes in their final weeks of life. In this study, 13 % (n=9) of those that died were referred less than 1 month before their death. Other studies have found that referral of adolescents to specialist palliative care services in the last month of life varied from 7 % [34] to 17 % [35].Whilst these results may seem favourable in their timeliness, when compared to studies of an older adult cohort [36], the adolescent and young adult group have been identified as a group that are vulnerable to psychosocial complexities, particularly in the context of a potentially life-limiting condition [37]. In practice, there is a need for a period to build a rapport with their healthcare providers, to nurture trusting relationships and open communication with healthcare providers [38]. Further research is required to explore how early referral to specialist palliative care may be supported and achieved for adolescents and young adults and their families, with an identified need.
A 2020 study by Fraser et al. which assessed trends in place of death for children with a life-limiting condition in England, demonstrated that only 27 % of young people between 16 and 20 years old died at home [39]. By comparison, the majority of the adolescents in our study died in the home setting. This may be due to the differences in the models of provision of palliative care and funding of healthcare systems [39]. A national study from England and Wales demonstrated that palliative care input was associated with more children and adolescents (under 16) dying outside of the hospital setting [40]. In the Republic of Ireland, planned end of life care for adolescents who wish to die at home, takes place with collaborative care between the general practitioner, public health nursing, community allied health professionals and community specialist palliative care services. This approach is reflective of the anticipated complexities (physical, psychosocial, spiritual/existential) that may arise at the end of life for this age group. For this reason (with only very rare exceptions), adolescents die with community specialist palliative care support in the home setting in the Republic of Ireland. The high proportion of adolescents who die in at home as opposed to other care settings, necessitates planning and appropriate resource allocation.
The use of medical devices/technology in the home (which is particularly high in those with severe neurological impairment) impacts on caring for these adolescents in the community. Advances in medical technologies and medical interventions such as artificial nutrition and respiratory support can impact on prognosis [41]. The use of these secondary supports has changed the norms of death and can pose ethical challenges when deciding about commencing or discontinuing such supports [42], 43]. Consideration needs to be given to the education and training of healthcare professionals in the use of these technologies in inpatient and community settings.
The effectiveness of provision of specialist palliative care to this population may be demonstrated through outcome measurement. It is hoped that the findings will facilitate a better understanding of the conditions and needs of this group and will inform service development and healthcare professional training in this area. The Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) is an example of an initiative which aims to record and improve palliative outcomes in an adult population [44]. A better understanding of the characteristics and needs of this group may contribute to development and use of a multidimensional outcomes measures based on the particular palliative needs of adolescents with life limiting conditions [45].
Strengths and limitations
Strengths
This is the first study of this nature examining the adolescent population, referred to a national paediatric specialist palliative care service. It is comprehensive in its capturing of adolescents aged 13–18 years referred to paediatric specialist palliative care in the Republic of Ireland.
Limitations
For a retrospective review, the validity of the results depends on accurate medical records. Inconsistencies and incomplete entry into the medical record can affect the data that are extracted [46]. This paper only focused on adolescents referred to specialist palliative care and does not capture those with palliative care needs that could be managed by their primary medical teams nor those who may have required referral to specialist palliative care and were not referred. The barriers to referral to specialist palliative care were not explored (including individual, interpersonal, organisational, community and societal level barriers [47]). The recording of symptoms was not based on a standardised assessment but rather reflect the questions favoured by the physician carrying out the assessment on a given day. This paper examined the symptoms that were documented by the clinician and it is not known whether this was based on symptoms reported by the young person, family or ward staff. There is a risk of bias due to the fact that recorded symptoms are based on the assessment and documentation style of the individual clinician. Whist the number is estimated to be small, in the Republic of Ireland, young people who are aged 16 and above who are not already known to paediatric services, may be referred directly to adult services and will not have been captured in this study. In non-verbal young people with severe neurological impairment, pain and discomfort can manifest as irritability and/or distress [23]. The prevalence of pain may be underrepresented in cases where documented irritability/distress may have represented a pain behaviour. For this reason, the prevalence of pain in this group may be underrepresented. Accessing records from the psychology and medical social work services, may have enhanced the data on psychological needs, however, this was beyond the scope of this study.
Conclusions
To develop specialist palliative care services that cater to the needs of adolescents with life-limiting conditions, it is important to characterise the clinical characteristics and explore the palliative needs of this group. To date, our knowledge of this area has been limited, particularly for young people with non-cancer life-limiting conditions. This study demonstrates a high burden of physical and psychological symptoms in the adolescents in this study across both cancer and non-cancer groups. Some referrals to specialist palliative care for these adolescents occurred very close to their deaths which prompts reflection on how earlier referral to specialist palliative care services may facilitated. There is a need for professionals with an age and developmentally appropriate skill set, in order to provide services that understand and meet the needs of this group and can deliver coordinated services during this period of life, defined by multidomain transitions. Overall, this paper signals an opportunity to improve symptom management and quality of life for these adolescents and their families.
Implications for policy, services and future research
This work forms a platform for further work on community, hospital and hospice service gaps for this population. Further research is required to understand the unmet needs of those who could potentially benefit from specialist palliative care but who are not known to services.
Funding source: Royal City of Dublin Hospital Trust
Award Identifier / Grant number: Grant number 213
Acknowledgments
Palliative Medicine Departments in Children’s Health Ireland and St Lukes Radiation Oncology Centre.
-
Research ethics: Ethical approval was granted by the research ethics committees in Children’s Health Ireland (REC-252-23, 23/2/23) and St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network (28/2/23).
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: The Royal City of Dublin Hospital Trust (Grant number 213).
-
Data availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, [HL]. The data are not publicly available due to privacy/ethical/legal restrictions.
References
1. Committee on the Future of Healthcare HSE. Sláintecare Report; 2017.Search in Google Scholar
2. Ferrell, B, Sun, V, Hurria, A, Cristea, M, Raz, DJ, Kim, JY, et al.. Interdisciplinary palliative care for patients with lung cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 2015;50:758–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.07.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Bakitas, M, Lyons, KD, Hegel, MT, Balan, S, Brokaw, FC, Seville, J, et al.. Effects of a palliative care intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. JAMA 2009;302:741. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1198.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
4. Ferrell, BR, Temel, JS, Temin, S, Alesi, ER, Balboni, TA, Basch, EM, et al.. Integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:96–112. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.70.1474.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Palliative Care Australia. The economic value of palliative care and end-of-life care, Economic research note 1; 2017. Available from: https://palliativecare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2017/07/PCA019_Economic-Research-Sheet_1a_General.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
6. Temel, JS, Greer, JA, Muzikansky, A, Gallagher, ER, Admane, S, Jackson, VA, et al.. Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;363:733–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1000678.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. The National Clinical Programme for Palliative Care HSE. Adult Palliative Care Services Model of Care; 2019.Search in Google Scholar
8. Ferrari, A, Stark, D, Peccatori, FA, Fern, L, Laurence, V, Gaspar, N, et al.. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer: a position paper from the AYA Working Group of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE). ESMO Open 2021;6:100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100096.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. American Academy of Pediatrics. National Center for Adolescent and Young Adult Health and Well-Being; 2025. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en/patient-care/national-center-for-adolescent-and-young-adult-health-and-wellbeing/.Search in Google Scholar
10. World health Organization. Adolescent health in the South-East Asia Region; 2025. Available from: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/health-topics/adolescent-health#:∼:text=WHO%20defines%20’Adolescents’%20as%20individuals,15%2D24%20year%20age%20group.Search in Google Scholar
11. Sawyer, SM, Azzopardi, PS, Wickremarathne, D, Patton, GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018;2:223–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30022-1.Search in Google Scholar
12. National Cancer Care Programme. Framework for care and support of AYA with cancer in Ireland 2021–2026; 2021.Search in Google Scholar
13. Sansom-Daly, UM, Wakefield, CE. Distress and adjustment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: an empirical and conceptual review. Transl Paediatr 2013;2:167–97. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2013.10.06.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Jones, R, On behalf of The Joint Working Party on Palliative Care for Adolescents and Young Adults. Palliative care for young people aged 13–24. Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions & their Families, National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services, Scottish Partnership Agency for Palliative and Cancer Care; 2001.Search in Google Scholar
15. Mack, JW, Fisher, L, Kushi, L, Chao, CR, Vega, B, Rodrigues, G, et al.. Patient, family, and clinician perspectives on end-of-life care quality domains and candidate indicators for adolescents and young adults with cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2121888. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21888.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Jones, BL. Companionship, control, and compassion: a social work perspective on the needs of children with cancer and their families at the end of life. J Palliat Med 2006;9:774–88. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2006.9.774.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Mack, JW, Currie, ER, Martello, V, Gittzus, J, Isack, A, Fisher, L, et al.. Barriers to optimal end-of-life care for adolescents and young adults with cancer: bereaved caregiver perspectives. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2021;19:528–33. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.7645.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Guimarães, TM, Pacheco, ST de A, Nunes, MDR, Silva, LFda. Perceptions of adolescents with cancer undergoing palliative care about their illness process. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2020;41. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190223.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Kubiak, N, Fehrenbach, C, Prüfe, J, Thumfart, J. Do we need palliative care in pediatric nephrology? Patients’ and caregivers’ disease experience. Children 2023;10:324. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020324.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Umaretiya, PJ, Fisher, L, Altschuler, A, Kushi, LH, Chao, CR, Vega, B, et al.. “The simple life experiences that every other human gets”: desire for normalcy among adolescents and young adults with advanced cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023;70. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.30035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Cook, KA, Bergeron, K. Palliative care for young adults with life-limiting conditions: public health recommendations. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022;12:e256–63. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002042.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
22. Allen, J, Brenner, M, Hauer, J, Molloy, E, McDonald, D. Severe neurological impairment: a delphi consensus-based definition. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2020;29:81–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.09.001.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Hauer, JM. Caring for children who have severe neurological impairment: a life with grace. Baltimore, MD, US: Johns Hopkins University; 2013.10.1353/book.49268Search in Google Scholar
24. Bell, CJ, Skiles, J, Pradhan, K, Champion, VL. End-of-life experiences in adolescents dying with cancer. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:827–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0716-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Rego, F, Gonçalves, F, Moutinho, S, Castro, L, Nunes, R. The influence of spirituality on decision-making in palliative care outpatients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care 2020;19:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0525-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
26. Asgeirsdottir, GH, Sigurbjörnsson, E, Traustadottir, R, Sigurdardottir, V, Gunnarsdottir, S, Kelly, E. In the shadow of death: existential and spiritual concerns among persons receiving palliative care. J Pastor Care Counsel 2014;68:4.10.1177/154230501406800104Search in Google Scholar
27. Lucette, A, Brédart, A, Vivat, B, Young, T. Pilot-testing the French version of a provisional European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) measure of spiritual well-being for people receiving palliative care for cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 2014;23:221–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12107.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
28. Wilson, IB, Cleary, PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995;273:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520250075037.Search in Google Scholar
29. Collins, JJ, Byrnes, ME, Dunkel, IJ, Lapin, J, Nadel, T, Thaler, HT, et al.. The measurement of symptoms in children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 2000;19:363–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00127-5.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
30. Weaver, MS, Heinze, KE, Kelly, KP, Wiener, L, Casey, RL, Bell, CJ, et al.. Palliative care as a standard of care in pediatric oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.25695.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
31. Steineck, A, Bradford, MC, O’Daffer, A, Fladeboe, KM, O’Donnell, MB, Scott, S, et al.. Quality of life in adolescents and young adults: the role of symptom burden. J Pain Symptom Manag 2022;64:244–53.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.05.017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
32. Jang, H, Lee, K, Kim, S, Kim, S. Unmet needs in palliative care for patients with common non-cancer diseases: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care 2022;21:151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01040-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
33. Silverman, J, Kurtz, S, Draper, J. Skills for communicating with patients, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2013.Search in Google Scholar
34. Mark, MSJ, Yang, G, Ding, L, Norris, RE, Thienprayoon, R. Location of death and end-of-life characteristics of young adults with cancer treated at a pediatric hospital. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019;8:417–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0123.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Poort, H, Zupanc, SN, Leiter, RE, Wright, AA, Lindvall, C. Documentation of palliative and end-of-life care process measures among young adults who died of cancer: a natural language processing approach. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020;9:100–4. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2019.0040.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
36. O’Leary, MJ, O’Brien, AC, Murphy, M, Crowley, CM, Leahy, HM, McCarthy, JM, et al.. Place of care: from referral to specialist palliative care until death. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017;7:53–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000696.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
37. Zebrack, BJ. Psychological, social, and behavioral issues for young adults with cancer. Cancer 2011;117:2289–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26056.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
38. Sansom-Daly, UM, Wakefield, CE, Patterson, P, Cohn, RJ, Rosenberg, AR, Wiener, L, et al.. End-of-Life communication needs for adolescents and young adults with cancer: recommendations for research and practice. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020;9:157–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2019.0084.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
39. Gibson-Smith, D, Jarvis, SW, Fraser, LK. Place of death of children and young adults with a life-limiting condition in England: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Dis Child 2021;106:780–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-319700.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
40. Fraser, LK, Fleming, S, Parslow, R. Changing place of death in children who died after discharge from paediatric intensive care units: a national, data linkage study. Palliat Med 2018;32:337–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317709711.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
41. Karnik, S, Kanekar, A. Ethical issues surrounding end-of-life care: a narrative review. Healthcare 2016;4:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4020024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
42. American Medical Association. AMA code of medical ethics Chapter 5: Caring for patients at the end of life. Opinion 5.3 withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment [Internet]. https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/index.php/chapters/caring-patients-end-life [Accessed 1 Feb 2025].Search in Google Scholar
43. Akdeniz, M, Yardımcı, B, Kavukcu, E. Ethical considerations at the end-of-life care. SAGE Open Medicine 2021;9:205031212110009. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211000918.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
44. Eagar, K, Watters, P, Currow, DC, Aoun, SM, Yates, P. The Australian Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) – measuring the quality and outcomes of palliative care on a routine basis. Aust Health Rev. 2010;34:186, https://doi.org/10.1071/ah08718.Search in Google Scholar
45. Holmen, H, Winger, A, Steindal, SA, Riiser, K, Castor, C, Kvarme, LG, et al.. Patient-reported outcome measures in children, adolescents, and young adults with palliative care needs – a scoping review. BMC Palliat Care 2023;22:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01271-9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
46. Columbia University. Best practices for creating a chart review form for retrospective analyses; 2024. Available from: https://research.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/RCT%20content/ReaDI%20Program/Creating_CRF_V7.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
47. Holder, P, Coombes, L, Chudleigh, J, Harding, R, Fraser, LK. Barriers and facilitators influencing referral and access to palliative care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a scoping review of the evidence. Palliat Med 2024;38:981–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241271010.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Effects of anti-obesity drugs on cardiometabolic risk factors in pediatric population with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Physical Activity, Sleep, and Lifestyle Behaviours
- Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases and its association with hypertension among young adults in urban Meghalaya: a cross sectional study
- Mental Health and Well-being
- Psychosocial predictors of adolescent stress: insights from a school-going cohort
- Chronic Illness and Transition to Adult Care
- Barriers and facilitators in the transition from pediatric to adult care in people with cystic fibrosis in Europe – a qualitative systematized review
- Substance Use and Risk Behaviours
- Self-care or self-risk? examining self-medication behaviors and influencing factors among young adults in Bengaluru
- Health Equity and Access to Care
- Clinical heterogeneity of adolescents referred to paediatric palliative care; a quantitative observational study
- Adolescent Rights, Participation, and Health Advocacy
- ‘We need transparency and communication to build trust’: exploring access to primary care services for young adults through community-based youth participatory action research and group concept mapping
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Review
- Effects of anti-obesity drugs on cardiometabolic risk factors in pediatric population with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Physical Activity, Sleep, and Lifestyle Behaviours
- Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases and its association with hypertension among young adults in urban Meghalaya: a cross sectional study
- Mental Health and Well-being
- Psychosocial predictors of adolescent stress: insights from a school-going cohort
- Chronic Illness and Transition to Adult Care
- Barriers and facilitators in the transition from pediatric to adult care in people with cystic fibrosis in Europe – a qualitative systematized review
- Substance Use and Risk Behaviours
- Self-care or self-risk? examining self-medication behaviors and influencing factors among young adults in Bengaluru
- Health Equity and Access to Care
- Clinical heterogeneity of adolescents referred to paediatric palliative care; a quantitative observational study
- Adolescent Rights, Participation, and Health Advocacy
- ‘We need transparency and communication to build trust’: exploring access to primary care services for young adults through community-based youth participatory action research and group concept mapping