Startseite Medizin Service evaluation and retrospective audit of electronic HEEADSSS (e-HEEADSSS) screening device in paediatric inpatient service in Western Australia
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Service evaluation and retrospective audit of electronic HEEADSSS (e-HEEADSSS) screening device in paediatric inpatient service in Western Australia

  • Chia Saw EMAIL logo , Alide Smit , Desiree Silva , Max K. Bulsara und Edward Tam Thuong Tran Nguyen
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. September 2020

Abstract

Objectives

The top causes of adolescents’ mortality in Australia and worldwide are mostly preventable and many stem from psychosocial difficulties. The HEEADSSS screening is a widely accepted screening tool in assessing young people’s psychosocial wellbeing. This retrospective audit was done to evaluate the service implementation of an electronic-HEEADSSS (e-HEEADSSS) screening system in a regional hospital’s paediatric in-patient setting in Western Australia. The aim is to examine and compare the uptake rate of conventional HEEADSSS screening in 2018 and e-HEEADSSS screening in 2019, and to examine the relevant outcome and disclosure rate by the young person.

Methods

This retrospective audit (pre-post cross sectional study) is reported using the STROBE guideline. It was done over two different time frames: Pre e-HEEADSSS implementation (September–December 2018) and Post e-HEEADSSS implementation (September–December 2019). Inclusion criteria includes: All paediatric inpatients aged 12–16 years old. Exclusion criteria includes: Admission under other disciplines or clinically unstable/unsuitable patients. The uptake rate of conventional-HEEADSSS (2018) in comparison to e-HEEADSSS screening (2019) was examined. Other relevant data was extracted and analysed.

Results

The sample size pre-implementation was 26 while post-implementation was 24. The uptake rate increased from 12% (conventional-HEEADSSS) to 54% (e-HEEADSSS), a 450% increment with the e-HEEADSSS system implementation (Fisher Exact Test, p=0.005). More than half of young people who completed their e-HEEADSSS screening had concerns/flags which required management by the clinicians. 86% of patients in the e-HEEADSSS group with concerns/flags were acted appropriately by the treating clinicians prior to discharge. The overall disclosure rate of e-HEEADSSS was 93% with highest disclosure rate for ‘Drugs’ domain.

Conclusions

There is significant increase in uptake rate with high disclosure rate using e-HEEADSSS screening device when compared to conventional HEEADSSS screening in the paediatric in-patient setting. The e-HEEADSSS is a better screening tool for in-patient setting and should be implemented widely.


Corresponding author: Dr Chia Saw, Joondalup Health Campus, Joondalup, Australia, Phone: +61416486787, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of Interest: None to Declare.

  4. Ethical Approval: This project was submitted for approval to the Ramsay Health Care WA/SA HREC committee and was considered to meet criteria for quality assurance and none research and did not require review by the WA/SA HREC committee. Letter of approval was granted on 10th January 2020.

References

1. Patton, GC, Sawyer, SM, Santelli, JS, Ross, DA, Afifi, R, Allen, NB, et al. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet 2016;387:2423–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00579-1.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Doukrou, M, Segal, TY. Fifteen-minute consultation: communicating with young people—how to use HEEADSSS, a psychosocial interview for adolescents. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2018;103:15–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311553.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Van Amstel, LL, Lafleur, DL, Blake, K. Raising our HEADSS: adolescent psychosocial documentation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11:648–55. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.022.Suche in Google Scholar

4. World Health Organization. WHO calls for stronger focus on adolescent health. Health for the world’s adolescents a second chance in the second decade. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, World Health Organization; 2014.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Yeo, M, Bond, L, Sawyer, S. The clinical utility of the adolescent screening questionnaire in a tertiary inpatient setting. J Adolesc Health 2007;40:S36–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.11.095.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Douglas Maurer, DMF. HEEADSSS up: the popular screening tool comes to mobile devices. iMed App J 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Health W.A.D.o. WA Youth Health Policy 2018–2023 companion resource: understanding young people in Western Australia. Health networks. Western Australia: Western Australian Department of Health; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Goldenring, JM, Cohen, E. Getting into adolescent heads. Contemp Pediatr 1988;5:75–90.Suche in Google Scholar

9. RACP Board, R.A.C.o.P. Routine adolescent psychosocial health assessment – position statement policy state. Australia: RACP Board; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Vandenbroucke, JP, von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Gøtzsche, PC, Mulrow, CD, Pocock, SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007;4:e297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Whitehouse, SR, Lam, PY, Balka, E, McLellan, S, Deevska, M, Penn, D, et al. Co-creation with TickiT: designing and evaluating a clinical eHealth platform for youth. JMIR Res Protoc 2013;2:e42. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.2865.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Ho, J, Fong, CK, Iskander, A, Towns, S, Steinbeck, K. Digital psychosocial assessment: An efficient and effective screening tool. J Paediatr Child Health 2019;56:521–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14675.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Bagshaw, DS. Report on the HEADSS assessment on yr 9 and yr 10 students at Linwood college. Linwood College, Christchurch, New Zealand: Collaborative for Research and Training in Youth Health and Development; 2013.Suche in Google Scholar

14. RCPCH Quality Standard Team. RCPCH progress domain resources: communication. United Kingdom: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-23
Accepted: 2020-07-05
Published Online: 2020-09-22

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Pooled prevalence estimates of malocclusion among Indian children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  4. Nutrition knowledge and its relation with dietary behaviour in children and adolescents: a systematic review
  5. Original Articles
  6. Water polo-related injuries among adolescents and young adults treated at emergency departments
  7. Service evaluation and retrospective audit of electronic HEEADSSS (e-HEEADSSS) screening device in paediatric inpatient service in Western Australia
  8. Association between intelligent quotient and oral health conditions among 13–15 year old intellectually disabled children
  9. To be or not to be in the social media arena? The perspective of healthcare providers working within adolescent and young adult oncology in Switzerland
  10. Human papillomavirus vaccine series follow-through: comparison of four clinics in an academic medical center
  11. Oral health knowledge, attitude and practice among adolescents in Kuwait
  12. Identifying challenges in promoting adolescent preventive health care in the primary care setting of urban Japan
  13. Health profile with body mass index and physical fitness in Swedish adolescents: a cross-sectional study
  14. Psychodermatologic pathology in adolescents: findings from the Colombian National Mental Health Survey
  15. Association between sitting posture on school furniture and spinal changes in adolescents
  16. Influence of dietary and activity patterns on weight status of Ukrainian school aged children
  17. A national guideline for youth-friendly health services developed by chronically ill young people and health care professionals – a Delphi study
Heruntergeladen am 8.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2020-0120/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen