The role of temperament in traumatic hearing loss: a single case study of a cochlear-implanted patient

References

1. Harris F. Same day assessment for adult cochlear implant candidates. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14 Suppl 4:S52–5.10.1179/1467010013Z.000000000136Suche in Google Scholar

2. Emond A, Moore M, Tjornby C, Kentish R. Factors associated with poor use of sequential bilateral cochlear implants in young people: a preliminary audit of poor users. Cochlear Implants Int 2013;14 Suppl 4:S40–3.10.1179/1467010013Z.000000000133Suche in Google Scholar

3. Linden M. Definition of compliance. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1981;19:86–90.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Shontz FC. Spread in response to imagined loss: an empirical analogue. Rehabil Psychol 1984;29:77–84.10.1037/h0090981Suche in Google Scholar

5. Geers AE, Sedey AL. Language and verbal reasoning skills in adolescents with 10 or more years of cochlear implant experience. Ear Hear 2011;32 Suppl 1:39S–48S.10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fa41dcSuche in Google Scholar

6. Grundfast KM, Siparsky N, Chuong D. Genetics and molecular biology of deafness: update. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2000;33:1367–94.10.1016/S0030-6665(05)70287-5Suche in Google Scholar

7. Ambrosetti U, Fagnani E. Le nuove prospettive nella diagnosi della sordità infantile grave e profonda. vol. XLI (2). Milan: La Ca’ Granda, 2000:21–4.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Myklebust HR. The psychology of deafness: sensory deprivation, learning, and adjustment. Oxford, UK: Grune & Stratton, 1960:xii 393 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Axia G, Condini A. Differenze individuali nella reattività biopsichica come fattore di rischio nel primo anno di vita. Imago 1998;5:35–47.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Horak FB, Shumway-Cook A, Crowe TK, Black FO. Vestibular function and motor proficiency of children with impaired hearing, or with learning disability and motor impairments. Dev Med Child Neurol 1988;30:64–79.10.1111/j.1469-8749.1988.tb04727.xSuche in Google Scholar

11. Levine ES. The psychology of deafness: techniques of appraisal for rehabilitation. Oxford, UK: Columbia University Press, 1960:xii 383 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Clymer EC. The psychology of deafness: enhancing self-concept in the deaf and hearing-impaired. Fam Ther 1995;22: 113–20.Suche in Google Scholar

13. McKenna L. The psychological assessment of cochlear implant patients. Br J Audiol 1986;20:29–34.10.3109/03005368609078995Suche in Google Scholar

14. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck, TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993;50:975–90.10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008Suche in Google Scholar

15. Cloninger CR, Przybeck TR. The Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): a guide to its development and use. St. Louis, MO: Center for Psychobiology of Personality. Washington University, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Cloninger CR, Zohar AH. Personality and the perception of health and happiness. J Affective Disord 2011;128:24–32.10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.012Suche in Google Scholar

17. Schwarz ED, Perry BD. The post-traumatic response in children and adolescents. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1994;17:311–26.10.1016/S0193-953X(18)30117-5Suche in Google Scholar

18. Auerbach SM. Trait-state anxiety and adjustment of surgery. J Consult Clin Psychol 1973;40:264–71.10.1037/h0034538Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Martinez-Urrutia A. Anxiety and pain in surgical patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1975;43:437.10.1037/h0076898Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery: perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol 1998;53:1209–18.10.1037/0003-066X.53.11.1209Suche in Google Scholar

21. Tomaka J, Blascovich J, Kelsey RM, Leitten CL. Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol 1993;65:248.10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.248Suche in Google Scholar

22. Rizzo A. Temperament and generativity during the life span. Mediter J Clin Psychol 2013;1.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:224–33.10.1159/000078392Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. House WF, Berliner KI. Cochlear implants: from idea to clinical practice. In: Cooper H, editor. Cochlear implants: a practical guide. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing, 1991: 9–33.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Clark GM, O’Loughlin BJ, Rickards FW, Tong YC, Williams AJ. The clinical assessment of cochlear implant patients. J Laryngol Otol 1977;91:697–708.10.1017/S0022215100084231Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Sebastiani S, Mastronino A. L’impianto colceare: la valutazione psicologica. Quad Audiol 1986;1:32–8.Suche in Google Scholar

27. Mento C, Di Rosa AE, Galletti F, La Barbera D. L’orecchio diventa bionico. Aspetti psicologico-clinici e riabilitativi dell’impianto cocleare in soggetti audiolesi affetti da ipoacusia neurosensoriale. Psichiatr Consult 2003;VI:89–93.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Mento C, Galletti F, Galletti B, Longo P, Bitto E, et al. Representation, projection and cochlear implant: a single case study. Mediter J Clin Psychol 2014;2.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Kvam MH, Loeb M, Tambs K. Mental health in deaf adults: symptoms of anxiety and depression among hearing and deaf individuals. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007;12:1–7.10.1093/deafed/enl015Suche in Google Scholar PubMed