Home Adolescent pesticide exposures reported to Texas poison centers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Adolescent pesticide exposures reported to Texas poison centers

  • Mathias B. Forrester EMAIL logo and Heidi Bojes
Published/Copyright: March 7, 2015

Abstract

Background: Pesticides, particularly when misused, can cause serious morbidity and mortality. There is limited literature on pesticide exposures among adolescents.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe adolescent pesticide exposures reported to poison centers and compare them to adult exposures.

Subjects: Pesticide exposures reported to Texas poison centers during 2000–2013 where the patient was age 13 years or greater.

Methods: Cases were divided into adolescents (13–19 years) and adults (20 years or more). The distribution of the cases was determined for various factors, and comparisons were made between the two age groups.

Results: There were 2772 adolescent and 33,573 adult pesticide exposures. The most common types of pesticide among adolescent and adult cases, respectively, were insecticides (71% vs. 76%), herbicides (6% vs. 9%), repellents (11% vs. 8%), and rodenticides (10% vs. 5%). Adolescent patients were 56% male and 43% female; adult patients were 45% male and 55% female. The most common exposure routes among adolescent and adult cases, respectively, were dermal (29% vs. 38%), inhalation (22% vs. 33%), ingestion (47% vs. 29%), and ocular (14% vs. 13%). The exposure reason for adolescent and adult exposures, respectively, were unintentional (82% vs. 89%), intentional (13% vs. 7%), adverse reaction (2% vs. 3%), and other/unknown (3% vs. 1%).

Conclusion: Compared to adult exposures, adolescent pesticide exposures were more likely to involve repellents and rodenticides, involve males, occur by ingestion, and be intentional.


Corresponding author: Mathias B. Forrester, Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance Unit, Texas Department of State Health Services, 1100 W 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, USA, Phone: +1-512-776-7111, Fax: +1-512-776-7689, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

There was no study sponsor or unique source of support.

Conflict of interest statement: The authors are aware of no conflict of interest.

References

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Pesticide illness & injury surveillance. September 11, 2013. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/pesticides/. Accessed 13 July, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

2. Grube A, Donaldson D, Kiely T, Wu L. Pesticide industry sales and usage. 2006 and 2007 market estimates. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2011. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/pestsales/07pestsales/market_estimates2007.pdf. Accessed 13 July, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

3. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Cantilena LR, Bailey JE, Ford M. 2012 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 30th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2013;51:949–1229.10.3109/15563650.2013.863906Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Environmental Protection Agency. Strategic and implementation plans for school integrated pest management. Federal fiscal years 2012–2014. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/pestwise/ipminschools/strategicplan.pdf. Accessed 13 July, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. Forrester MB. Patterns of exposures at school among children age 6–19 years reported to Texas poison centers, 1998–2002. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2006;69:263–8.10.1080/15287390500227464Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. American Association of Poison Control Centers National Poison Data System (NPDS)(C) Reference Manual Part 2 – System Information Manual. Alexandria: American Association of Poison Control Centers, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-10-20
Accepted: 2015-1-1
Published Online: 2015-3-7
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Smoking: do you really know the risk?
  4. Original Articles
  5. Practices and perceptions of adolescent girls regarding the impact of dysmenorrhea on their routine life: a comparative study in the urban, rural, and slum areas of Chandigarh
  6. Needs and expectations of adolescent in-patients: the experience of Gaslini Children’s Hospital
  7. Prevalence and determinants of cigarette smoking among adolescents in secondary schools in Port Harcourt, Southern Nigeria
  8. Comprehensive obesity evaluation and treatment of three adolescents: a case series
  9. Exercise, bodyweight perception and related weight loss behavior among adolescents in Trinidad and Tobago
  10. Oral health habits, attitudes and behaviors of Portuguese adolescents
  11. Using UV photoaged photography to better understand Western Australian teenagers’ attitudes towards adopting sun-protective behaviors
  12. Adolescent pesticide exposures reported to Texas poison centers
  13. Can a healthy youth development clinic serving latino families be youth friendly and family oriented? A mixed-methods evaluation
  14. Insights into Facebook Pages: an early adolescent health research study page targeted at parents
  15. Iranian adolescents’ insufficient physical activity: a mixed methods explanatory sequential study
  16. Sensation seeking indirectly affects perceptions of risk for co-occurrent substance use
  17. The understanding of risk factors for eating disorders in male adolescents
  18. Case Reports
  19. The role of temperament in traumatic hearing loss: a single case study of a cochlear-implanted patient
  20. Congenital megalourethra: a case report of an isolated delayed presentation
  21. Short Communication
  22. Problematic internet use and social networking site use among Dutch adolescents
  23. Letter to the Editor
  24. A teen’s perspective: adolescent access to their own electronic medical records
Downloaded on 6.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2014-0072/html
Scroll to top button