Startseite Medizin More than a break: the impact of a social-pedagogical intervention during young persons’ long-term hospital admission – a qualitative study
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

More than a break: the impact of a social-pedagogical intervention during young persons’ long-term hospital admission – a qualitative study

  • Katrine Weiersoe Villadsen , Charlotte Blix und Kirsten A. Boisen EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. Mai 2014

Abstract

Background: Critical illness and long-term or repeated hospitalization can affect normal adolescent development. As a result, adolescents may feel isolated and “misplaced” on both pediatric and adult departments. The mission of the Center of Adolescent Medicine is to improve conditions for adolescent patients. To achieve this, the social educator offers an individualized social-pedagogical intervention for young people during long-term or repeated hospitalization.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the impact of the social-pedagogical intervention using a qualitative approach.

Materials and methods: A trained anthropologist interviewed seven adolescents who had individual sessions with a social educator during their hospital stay. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the transcripts were coded and thematized continuously.

Results: Through qualitative analysis, the following themes emerged: Recreation; Structure, participation, and motivation; and Friends and social network. The social-pedagogical approach is a combination of interpersonal relationships and individually tailored recreational activities. Even small entertaining activities changed the focus from patient identity and contributed to the feeling of being “normal.” All young patients reported that the increased opportunities for decision-making and influence on the daily structure supported the feeling of being recognized and respected as an individual person as well as increased their motivation to go through their treatment. The interviewees emphasized the importance of experiencing something that was worth telling their friends about to help them stay in touch.

Conclusion: Although the young patients emphasized the recreational aspects, the time spent with the social educator facilitated training in social competencies as well as conversations about emotional and sensitive topics.


Corresponding author: Kirsten A. Boisen, Center of Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, Phone: +45 35451186, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We want to thank social educator Jakob Højer Larsen for his fantastic and inspirational social-pedagogical work with the young patients at Rigshospitalet. We are also grateful to the young interviewees and their invaluable reflections on their hospital admission.

Conflict of interest statement:

The authors declare no conflict of interests. The study has only received public funding from Rigshospitalet and the Egmont Foundation.

References

1. Smith S. Adolescent units – an evidence-based approach to quality nursing in adolescent care. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2004;8:20–9.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Suris JC, Michaud PA, Viner R. The adolescent with a chronic condition. Part I: developmental issues. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:938–42.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Denolm CJ. Hospitalization and the adolescent patient: a review and some critical questions. Child Health Care 1985;13:109–16.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Olsen PR, Harder I. Keeping their world together – meanings and actions created through network-focused nursing in teenager and young adult cancer care. Cancer Nurs 2009;32: 493–502.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Kari A, Donovan C, Li J, Taylor B. Teenagers in hospital: what do they want? Nurs Stand 1999;13:49–51.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Clift L, Dampier S, Timmons S. Adolescents’ experiences of emergency admission to children’s wards. J Child Health Care 2007;11:195–207.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Olsen PR, Harder I. Caring for teenagers and young adults with cancer: a grounded theory study of network-focused nursing. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2011;15:152–9.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Marris S, Morgan S, Stark D. Listening to patients: what is the value of age-appropriate care to teenagers and young adults with cancer? Eur J Cancer Care 2011;20:145–51.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Whelan J. Where should teenagers with cancer be treated? Eur J Cancer 2003;39:2573–8.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Yates S, Payne M, Dyson S. Children and young people in hospitals: doing youth work in medical settings. J Youth Stud 2009;12:77–92.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Hilton D, Jepson S. Evolution of a youth work service in hospital. Nurs Child Young People 2012;24:14–8.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Hilton D, Watson AR, Walmsley P, Jepson S. Youth work in hospital. Paediatr Nurs 2004;16:36–9.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Watson AR. Hospital youth work and adolescent support. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:440–2.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Kvale S. Interviews- an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. California: Sage Publications Inc, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Rivas C. Coding and analysing qualitative data. In: Seale C, editor. Researching society and culture. London: SAGE Publications Inc., 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Christie D, Viner R. Adolescent development. BMJ 2005;330:301–4.Suche in Google Scholar

17. Pinquart M, Shen Y. Behavior problems in children and adolescents with chronic physical illness: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol 2011;36:1003–16.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Pinquart M. Self-esteem of children and adolescents with chronic illness: a meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev 2013;39:153–61.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Morgan S, Davies S, Palmer S, Plaster M. Sex, drugs, and rock’n roll: caring for adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:4825–30.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Viner RM. Do adolescent inpatient wards make a difference? Findings from a national young patient survey. Pediatrics 2007;120:749–55.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Teilmann G, Hertz PG, Blix C, Boisen KA. [Young patients in hospitals are pinched into a corner]. Läkartidningen 2012;109:817–20.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Department of Health. You’re welcome: quality criteria for young people friendly health services, 2011. Available from URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/quality-criteria-for-young-people-friendly-health-services.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Di Risio M, Ballantyne PJ, Read SE, Bendayan R. «HIV isn’t me…»: HIV+ adolescents’ experiences in a positive context of support and treatment. AIDS Care 2011;23:694–9.Suche in Google Scholar

24. Mulhall A, Kelly D, Pearce S. A qualitative evaluation of an adolescent cancer unit. Eur J Cancer Care 2004;13:16–22.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Pearce S. Policy and practice in teenage and young adult cancer care in England: looking to the future. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2009;13:149–53.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Zebrack BJ, Landier W. The perceived impact of cancer on quality of life for post-treatment survivors of childhood cancer. Qual Life Res 2011;20:1595–608.Suche in Google Scholar

27. D’Agostino NM, Penney A, Zebrack B. Providing developmentally appropriate psychosocial care to adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 2011;117:2329–34.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Kyngäs H, Mikkonen R, Nousiainen EM, Rytilahti M, Seppanen P, et al. Coping with the onset of cancer: coping strategies and resources of young people with cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 2001;10:6–11.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Woodgate RL. The importance of being there: perspectives of social support by adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2006;23:122–34.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-2-14
Accepted: 2014-3-23
Published Online: 2014-5-8
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. 10.1515/ijamh-2015-frontmatter1
  2. Editorial
  3. Pregnant, even when you did not want to be pregnant
  4. Original articles
  5. How adolescents learn about risk perception and behavior in regards to alcohol use in light of social learning theory: a qualitative study in Bogotá, Colombia
  6. An assessment of basic nutrition knowledge of adolescents with eating disorders and their parents
  7. More than a break: the impact of a social-pedagogical intervention during young persons’ long-term hospital admission – a qualitative study
  8. Effect of external classroom noise on schoolchildren’s reading and mathematics performance: correlation of noise levels and gender
  9. Physical self-esteem – a ten-year follow-up study from early adolescence to early adulthood
  10. Street hawking among in-school adolescents in a south-western town in Nigeria: pattern, determinants and effects on school performance
  11. Outcome of adolescents with eating disorders from an adolescent medicine service at a large children’s hospital
  12. Female adolescents’ perspective about reproductive health education needs: a mixed methods study with explanatory sequential design
  13. Study of menstrual patterns in adolescent girls with disabilities in a residential institution
  14. Characteristics of hand sanitizer ingestions by adolescents reported to poison centers
  15. Health care providers and adolescents’ perspectives towards adolescents’ health education needs: a need assessment based on comparative approach
  16. Determinants of abortion decisions among Ghanaian university students
  17. Predictors of peer victimization among Peruvian adolescents in the young lives cohort
  18. Risk of eating disorders among university students in Bangladesh
  19. Short Communication
  20. Nutrition and physical activity during the transition from adolescence to adulthood: further research is warranted
  21. Letter
  22. Losing lives to the peril of ragging
Heruntergeladen am 2.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2014-0009/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen