Startseite Implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: findings from the extension phase
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: findings from the extension phase

  • Daniel T.L. Shek EMAIL logo und Ting Ting Liu
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. März 2013

Abstract

To evaluate the implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 1 to Secondary 3), a study based on classroom observations of 597 units in 207 schools was conducted under the Co-Walker Scheme. Results demonstrated that the implementation quality of the program was high in general, with a mean program adherence of 80.8%. The 13 aspects of program delivery under observation were significantly intercorrelated. Multiple regression analyses indicated that: (i) overall implementation quality was significantly predicted by classroom control, interactive delivery method, use of positive and supportive feedback, opportunity for reflection, degree of achievement of the objectives, time management, and lesson preparation; (ii) success of implementation was significantly predicted by student participation and involvement, opportunity for reflection, degree of achievement of the objectives, and time management.


Corresponding author: Professor Daniel T.L. Shek, PhD, FHKPS, BBS, JP, Chair Professor of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Applied Social Sciences, Room HJ407, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hunghom, Hong Kong, P.R. China, E-mail:

The preparation of this paper and the Project P.A.T.H.S. were financially supported by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust.

References

1. Pittman KJ. Promoting youth development: strengthening the role of youth-serving and community organizations. Report prepared for The U.S. Department of Agriculture Extension Services. Washington, DC: Center Youth Development Policy Research, 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Catalano RF, Hawkins JD, Berglund ML, Pollard JA, Arthur MW. Prevention science and positive youth competitive or cooperative frameworks? J Adolesc Health 2002;31:230–9.10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00496-2Suche in Google Scholar

3. Eccles JS, Gootman JA. Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Shek DTL. Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: relevance to positive youth development programs in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:341–54.10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.3.341Suche in Google Scholar

5. Ma HK, Sun RCF. Development of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong: overview of the proposed curriculum for the junior secondary school years. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:417–31.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Shek DTL, Sun RCF, Tang CYP. Experimental implementation of the Secondary 3 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S.: observations based on the Co-Walker Scheme. ScientificWorldJ 2009;9: 1003–11.10.1100/tsw.2009.118Suche in Google Scholar

7. Shek DTL. Conceptual framework underlying the development of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:303–14.10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.3.303Suche in Google Scholar

8. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Development, implementation and evaluation of a holistic positive youth development program: Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2009;8: 107–17.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Hunter L, Elias MJ, Norris J. School-based violence prevention: challenges and lessons learned from an action research project. J Sch Psychol 2001;39:161–75.10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00058-9Suche in Google Scholar

10. Ennett ST, Haws S, Ringwalt CL, Vincus AA, Hanley SJ, et al. Evidence-based practice in school substance use prevention: fidelity of implementation under real-world conditions. Health Educ Res 2011;26:361–71.10.1093/her/cyr013Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Shek DTL, Ng CSM, Toh LPF. Implementation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: observations based on the Co-Walker Scheme. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:357–63.10.1515/IJAMH.2011.033Suche in Google Scholar

12. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Commun Psychol 2008;41:327–50.10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1990.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, editors. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002:1–23.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract 2005;6:134–47.10.1177/1524839904273387Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Baranowski T, Stables G. Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Educ Behav 2000;27:157–66.10.1177/109019810002700202Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003;18:237–56.10.1093/her/18.2.237Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, et al. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007;2:40.10.1186/1748-5908-2-40Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Resnicow K, Davis M, Smith M, Lazarus-Yaroch A, Baranowski T, et al. How best to measure implementation of school health curricula: a comparison of three measures. Health Educ Res 1998;13:239–50.10.1093/her/13.2.239Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Shek DTL, Sun RCF, Kan VWM. Full implementation of the Secondary 1 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S.: observations based on the Co-Walker Scheme. ScientificWorldJ 2009;9: 982–91.10.1100/tsw.2009.116Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Shek DTL, Ng CSM. Secondary 1 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S.: process evaluation based on the Co-Walker Scheme. ScientificWorldJ 2009;9:704–14.10.1100/tsw.2009.60Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Shek DTL, Yu L, Ho VYT. Implementation of the Secondary 2 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: observations based on the Co-Walker Scheme. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2012;24:253–60.10.1515/ijamh-2012-0036Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Implementation of a positive youth development program in a Chinese context: the role of policy, program, people, process, and place. ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:980–96.10.1100/tsw.2008.120Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Lam CM, Shek DT. Training for program implementers of Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: Secondary 2 training program. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2010;22:385–99.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Law BMF, Shek DTL. Process evaluation of a positive youth development program: Project P.A.T.H.S.. Res Soc Work Pract 2011;21:539–48.10.1177/1049731511404436Suche in Google Scholar

26. Scott SG. Enhancing reflection skills through learning portfolios: an empirical test. J Manag Educ 2010;34:430–57.10.1177/1052562909351144Suche in Google Scholar

27. Boyd EM, Fales AW. Reflective learning: key to learning through experience. J Humanist Psychol 1983;23:99–117.10.1177/0022167883232011Suche in Google Scholar

28. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: qualitative findings based on the experiences of program implementers. ScientificWorldJ 2007;7:1024–35.10.1100/tsw.2007.161Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Shek DTL, Sun RCF, Siu AMH. Interim evaluation of the Secondary 2 Program of Project P.A.T.H.S.: insights based on the experimental implementation phase. ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:61–72.10.1100/tsw.2008.22Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Implementation of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: interim evaluation findings. ScientificWorldJ 2006;6:2274–84.Suche in Google Scholar

31. Fagan AA, Mihalic S. Strategies for enhancing the adoption of school-based prevention programs: lessons learned from the blueprints for violence prevention replications of the life skills training program. J Commun Psychol 2003;31:235–53.10.1002/jcop.10045Suche in Google Scholar

32. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Participants’ evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: are findings based on different datasets consistent? ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012:187450.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Shek DTL, Ma CMS. Program implementers’ evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets over time. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012:918437.10.1100/2012/132826Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Law BMF, Shek DTL. Process evaluation of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong based on different cohorts. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012:736730.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Shek DTL, Yu L. Interim evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012:132826.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-10-15
Accepted: 2012-12-15
Published Online: 2013-03-01
Published in Print: 2013-12-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Editorial
  4. Promotion of the holistic development of high school and university students in Hong Kong
  5. Reviews
  6. Confucian virtues and Chinese adolescent development: a conceptual review
  7. Developmental issues of university students in Hong Kong
  8. Development of a credit-bearing service leadership subject for university students in Hong Kong
  9. Original articles
  10. Factors influencing the quality of implementation of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong
  11. Impact of staff commitment and morale on the implementation of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong
  12. Service-learning from the views of university teachers: a qualitative study based on focus groups
  13. Developmental outcomes of economically disadvantaged adolescents in Hong Kong: a replication
  14. Evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. (extension phase) based on the perspective of the program participants
  15. Evaluation of project P.A.T.H.S. by the program implementers: findings based on the extension phase
  16. Helping adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: the extension phase of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong
  17. Transforming potential program implementers in professional development: the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong
  18. Development of an e-learning package on Service-Learning for university teachers: experience from Hong Kong
  19. Perception of collaborative learning in associate degree students in Hong Kong
  20. Implementation of the extension phase of the project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: observations based on the Co-Walker Scheme
  21. Implementation quality of the Tier 1 Program of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: findings from the extension phase
Heruntergeladen am 7.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0045/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen