Startseite The effect of instruction on L2 learners’ ability to use verbal irony online
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The effect of instruction on L2 learners’ ability to use verbal irony online

  • Caleb Prichard

    Caleb Prichard is an Associate Professor at Okayama University in Japan. In addition to publishing several studies on L2 humor competence instruction, he researches reading strategies through eye tracking.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    , John Rucynski

    John Rucynski is also an Associate Professor at Okayama University. He has edited two books and authored several articles on L2 humor.

    und Erin Gagatko

    Erin Gagatko is an instructor in the Global Teaching Institute at Tokyo International University.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. August 2024
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 37 Heft 4

Abstract

As verbal irony, including jocular irony, is common in many cultures and since language learners have difficulty with it in the target language, L2 educators have made efforts to help learners recognize irony. However, empirical research on using verbal irony online is lacking. Using a pre-posttest, control group design, this study aimed to fill the research gap by examining the efficacy of instruction on the ability of L2 learners to use verbal irony effectively (e.g., saliently, humorously) in response to social media posts. Japanese learners of English (N = 77) were involved. The instruction focused on sociopragmatics (e.g., appropriate usage) and pragmalinguistic aspects (e.g., non-verbal irony cues). Two instruments of 42 mock social media posts each were created (e.g., “My boss just yelled at me even though it was HIS fault.”), and the participants were asked to choose 12 of these to respond ironically to. Two independent raters judged all 1,848 blinded responses for their overall quality. The irony types and cues were also coded by researchers. The findings suggested that the experimental group significantly improved their ability to use verbal irony appropriately and saliently. Compared to the control group, in the posttest they more often used irony in more appropriate contexts (e.g., in response to funny posts as opposed to saddening news). Moreover, they used more irony cues, and their irony was more often rated as funny in the posttest. Implications for teachers and researchers are discussed.


Corresponding author: Caleb Prichard, Center for Language Education, Okayama University, 1-1 Naka 1-chome Tsushima, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan, E-mail:

About the authors

Caleb Prichard

Caleb Prichard is an Associate Professor at Okayama University in Japan. In addition to publishing several studies on L2 humor competence instruction, he researches reading strategies through eye tracking.

John Rucynski

John Rucynski is also an Associate Professor at Okayama University. He has edited two books and authored several articles on L2 humor.

Erin Gagatko

Erin Gagatko is an instructor in the Global Teaching Institute at Tokyo International University.

References

Akimoto, Yoritaka & Shiho Miyazawa. 2017. Individual differences in irony use depend on context. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36(6). 675–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x17706937.Suche in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 2002. Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. In Luigi Annolli, Rita Ciceri & Guiseppe Riva (eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication, 159–180. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Bamman, David & Noah A. Smith. 2015. Contextualized sarcasm detection on Twitter. In The Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, Nancy & Anne Pomerantz. 2015. Humor in the classroom: A guide for language teachers and educational researchers. New York & London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Bruntsch, Richard & Willibald Ruch. 2017. Studying irony detection beyond ironic criticism: let’s include ironic praise. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 606. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00606.Suche in Google Scholar

Coolidge, Andrew A., Carolyn Montagnolo & Attardo Salvatore. 2023. Comedic convergence: Humor responses to verbal irony in text messages. Language Sciences 99. e101566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101566.Suche in Google Scholar

Dayter, D. 2018. Self-praise online and offline: The hallmark speech act of social media? Internet Pragmatics 1(1). 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00009.day.Suche in Google Scholar

Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan & Ellen Winner. 1995. Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes 19(3). 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544922.Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2014. Linguistic approaches to (non) humorous irony. Humor 27(4). 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0097.Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2020. On being roasted, toasted and burned: (Meta) pragmatics of Wendy’s Twitter humour. Journal of Pragmatics 166. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Yan Zhu, Natsuko Shintani & Carsten Roever. 2021. A study of Chinese learners’ ability to comprehend irony. Journal of Pragmatics 172. 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Courtney. 2013. A qualitative analysis of irony as humor in Japanese conversation. Sendai: Tohoku University MA Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Ghosh, Debanjan & Smaranda Muresan. 2018. “With 1 follower I must be AWESOME: P.” Exploring the role of irony markers in irony recognition. In The Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.15080Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. 2000. Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol 15(1–2). 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2000.9678862.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W., Gregory A. Bryant & Herbert L. Colston. 2014. Where is the humor in verbal irony? Humor 27(4). 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0106.Suche in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Raymond W. & Herbert L. Colston. 2002. The risks and rewards of ironic communication. In Luigi Annolli, Rita Ciceri & Guiseppe Riva (eds.), Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Goddard, Cliff. 2006. “Lift your game, Martina!” – deadpan jocular irony and the ethnopragmatics of Australian English. In Cliff Goddard (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding discourse in cultural context, 65–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110911114.65Suche in Google Scholar

González-Ibánez, Roberto, Smaranda Muresan & Nina Wacholder. 2011. Identifying sarcasm in twitter: A closer look. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 581–586.Suche in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer. 2001. The pragmatics of humor support. Humor 14(1). 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.1.55.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidari-Shahreza, Mohammed A. 2020. Humor-integrated language learning (HILL): Teaching with and about humor. In John RucynskiJr. & Caleb Prichard (eds.), Bridging the humor barrier, 79–106. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Howman, Hannah E. & Ruth Filik. 2020. The role of emoticons in sarcasm comprehension in younger and older adults: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73(11). 1729–1744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820922804.Suche in Google Scholar

Hutcheon, Linda. 1992. The complex functions of irony. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos 17. 219–234.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Li, Francesca Gino & Adam D. Galinsky. 2015. The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 131. 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Kapogianni, Eleni. 2011. Irony via ‘surrealism’: The humorous side of irony. The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/pbns.210.05kapSuche in Google Scholar

Kapogianni, Eleni. 2014. Differences in use and function of verbal irony between real and fictional discourse:(mis) interpretation and irony blindness. Humor 27(4). 597–618. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0093.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Jiyun & James P. Lantolf. 2016. Developing conceptual understanding of sarcasm in L2 English through explicit instruction. Language Teaching Research 22(2). 208–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816675521.Suche in Google Scholar

Markman, Kris M. & Sae Oshima. 2007. Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse. In Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference.Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez-Flor, Alicia & Esther Usó-Juan. 2006. A comprehensive pedagogical framework to develop pragmatics in the foreign language classroom: The 6Rs approach. Applied Language Learning 16(2). 39–63.Suche in Google Scholar

Okamoto, Shinichiro. 2007. An analysis of the usage of Japanese hiniku: Based on the communicative insincerity theory of irony. Journal of Pragmatics 39(6). 1143–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.08.012.Suche in Google Scholar

Peng, Wei, Achini Adikari, Damminda Alahakoon & Gero John. 2019. Discovering the influence of sarcasm in social media responses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 9(6). e1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1331.Suche in Google Scholar

Pexman, Penny M. & Kara M. Olineck. 2002. Does sarcasm always sting? Investigating the impact of ironic insults and ironic compliments. Discourse Processes 33(3). 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3303_1.Suche in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Frederick L. Oswald. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64(4). 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.Suche in Google Scholar

Prichard, Caleb & John Rucynski. 2020. Humor competency training for sarcasm and jocularity. In John RucynskiJr. & Caleb Prichard (eds.), Bridging the humor barrier: Humor competency training in English language teaching, 165–192. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Prichard, Caleb & John Rucynski. 2022. L2 learners’ ability to recognize ironic online comments and the effect of instruction. System 105. 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102733.Suche in Google Scholar

Rucynski, John & Caleb Prichard. 2020. Bridging the humor barrier: Humor competency training in English language teaching. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.10.5771/9781498592017Suche in Google Scholar

Rucynski, John & Caleb Prichard. 2023. The impact of humor competency training on Japanese learners’ production of ironic statements in English on social media platforms. In Theron Muller, John Anderson, Steven Herder & Shigeo Brown Philip (eds.), Re-envisioning language teaching and learning in Asia. Sheridan, WY: iTDi Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Shively, Rachel L. 2013. Learning to be funny in Spanish during study abroad: L2 humor development. The Modern Language Journal 97. 930–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12043.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Shively, Rachel L. 2018. Learning and using conversational humor in a second language during study abroad. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614518617Suche in Google Scholar

Shively, Rachel L., Juan Acevedo, Rocio Cano & Izadi Etxeberria-Ortego. 2022. Teaching humorous irony to L2 and heritage speakers of Spanish. Language Teaching Research 26(2). 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211068087.Suche in Google Scholar

Smorenburg, Laura, Joe Rodd & Aoju Chen. 2015. The effect of explicit training on the prosodic production of L2 sarcasm by Dutch learners of English. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2015). University of Glasgow. http://www.icphs2015.info/pdfs/Papers/ICPHS0959.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko, Maria Pia Gomez-Laich & Maria-Jose Arrufat-Marques. 2016. Comprehension of indirect meaning in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals 49(4). 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12230.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Dominic & Ruth Filik. 2016. Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21(2). 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12156.Suche in Google Scholar

Utsumi, Akira. 2000. Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony. Journal of Pragmatics 32(12). 1777–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00116-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Whalen, Juanita, Penny M. Pexman, Alastair J. Gill & Nowson Scott. 2012. Verbal irony use in personal blogs. Behaviour & Information Technology 32. 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.630418.Suche in Google Scholar

Wulf, Douglas. 2010. A humor competence curriculum. TESOL Quarterly 44(1). 155–169. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.215250.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-19
Accepted: 2024-06-16
Published Online: 2024-08-14
Published in Print: 2024-10-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 22.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2024-0011/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen