Home Linguistics & Semiotics Banter as transformative practice: linguistic play and joking relationships in a UK swimming club
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Banter as transformative practice: linguistic play and joking relationships in a UK swimming club

  • Sean Heath

    Sean Heath is an anthropologist whose research is characterized by an examination of embodiment, sensory perception, and human-water relations. He has conducted research alongside youth, adult, recreational, and competitive swimmers in Canada, the UK, and Norway examining the politics of bodily knowledge, safeguarding, and wellbeing. His present work focuses on practices of water stewardship and processes of nation and identity construction through cold-water dipping and swimming.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 14, 2024

Abstract

This article investigates the multiple interpretations and uses of banter as an inclusive and exclusionary practice amongst competitive youth swimmers in the Southeast of England. As a metacommunicative act, banter is a form of linguistic play that focuses on the ways in which the words are delivered, and the social relationships involved between those engaged in banter. Through an immersive “apprenticeship” within a competitive swimming club from 2018 to 2022, I was party to particular forms of English “humorous” communication and invitations to join in banter with coaches and swimmers. As competitive swimming can be a monotonous activity, with long periods between competitions and nigh endless repetition of training drills, coaches encouraged swimmers’ engagement in banter as an inclusive strategy for squad cohesiveness and to stave off boredom throughout the swimming season. Playful teasing was used to invite engagement in banter from one or more people, helping to foster social bonds, develop joking relationships, and create a relaxed atmosphere within training spaces. Mockery and teasing used to initiate banter were also mobilized as exclusionary social positioning strategies to test the limits of social interaction and define oneself against others. This article asserts that despite the nearly-totalitarian position of the coach within high-performance swimming humorous or joking banter does not simply function as a morale-booting activity or as a substitute for active resistance against monotonous training requirements. By paying attention to the intersubjective processes within joking relationships, here through banter, we can see how youth actively navigate sociality and assert their agency within institutional training environments.


Corresponding author: Sean Heath, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45, Bus 3615, 3000, Leuven, Belgium, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: 752-2020-0175

About the author

Sean Heath

Sean Heath is an anthropologist whose research is characterized by an examination of embodiment, sensory perception, and human-water relations. He has conducted research alongside youth, adult, recreational, and competitive swimmers in Canada, the UK, and Norway examining the politics of bodily knowledge, safeguarding, and wellbeing. His present work focuses on practices of water stewardship and processes of nation and identity construction through cold-water dipping and swimming.

References

Abel, Millicent H. 2002. Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor 15(4). 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.15.4.365.Search in Google Scholar

Amit-Talai, Vered. 1995. The waltz of sociability: Intimacy, dislocation and friendship in a Quebec high school. In Vered Amit-Talai & Helena Wulff (eds.), Youth cultures: A cross-cultural perspective, 144–165. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003333487-7Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Sally. 2015. Sociability: The art form. In Vered Amit (ed.), Thinking through sociality: An anthropological Interrogation of key concepts, 97–127. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.10.1515/9781782385868-006Search in Google Scholar

Argenti-Pillen, Alexandra. 2007. Obvious pretence: for fun or for real? Cross-cousin and international relationships in Sri Lanka. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13(2). 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00430.x.Search in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1987. Speech genres and other late essays. (Ed.) Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. (Trans.) Vern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Basso, Keith H. 1979. Portraits of the “Whiteman”: Linguistic Play and cultural symbols Among the western Apache. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618147Search in Google Scholar

Bateson, Gregory. 2000. Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Besnier, Niko. 2016. Humour and humility: narratives of modernity on nukulaelae atoll. Etnofoor 28(1). 75–95.Search in Google Scholar

Besnier, Niko, Susan Brownell & Thomas F. Carter. 2018. The anthropology of sport: Bodies, borders, biopolitics. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520963818Search in Google Scholar

Burdsey, Daniel. 2010. British Muslim experiences in English first-class cricket. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 45(3). 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690210371041.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Thomas F., Sean Heath, Sarah Jacobs & Jasmijn Rana. 2022. Sensory ecologies: The refinement of movement and the senses in sport. The Senses and Society 17(3). 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2122693.Search in Google Scholar

Chambliss, Daniel F. 1989. The mundanity of excellence: An ethnographic report on stratification and olympic swimmers. Sociological Theory 7(1). 70–86. https://doi.org/10.2307/202063.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Amy. 2018. “I found that joking back actually made me not on edge, and I didn’t feel threatened”: Women’s embodied experiences of sexist humour (banter) in a UK gym. International Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies 6(1). 15–29. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v6n1a2.Search in Google Scholar

Csordas, Thomas J. 1993. Somatic modes of attention. Cultural Anthropology 8(2). 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1993.8.2.02a00010.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Jessica Milner & Jennifer Hofmann. 2023. The humor transaction schema: A conceptual framework for researching the nature and effects of humor. Humor 36(2). 323–353. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2020-0143.Search in Google Scholar

De Vienne, Emmanuel. 2012. “Make yourself uncomfortable”: Joking relationships as predictable uncertainty among the Trumai of Central Brazil. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2(2). 163–187. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau2.2.010.Search in Google Scholar

Downey, Greg, Monica Dalidowicz & Paul H. Mason. 2015. Apprenticeship as method: Embodied learning in ethnographic practice. Qualitative Research 15(2). 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114543400.Search in Google Scholar

Driessen, Henk. 2015. Humor, anthropology of. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. 416–419. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.12097-5Search in Google Scholar

Driessen, Henk. 2016. Afterword: Humour matters. Etnofoor 28(1). 141–146.10.4135/9781473983243.n23Search in Google Scholar

Driessen, Henk & Willy Jansen. 2013. The hard work of small talk in ethnographic fieldwork. Journal of Anthropological Research 69(2). 249–263. https://doi.org/10.3998/jar.0521004.0069.205.Search in Google Scholar

Duncan, Samuel. 2019. Sledging in sport – Playful banter, or mean-spirited insults? A study of sledging’s place in play. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 13(2). 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1432677.Search in Google Scholar

Dyck, Noel. 2012. Fields of play: An ethnography of children’s sports. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442686588Search in Google Scholar

Fox, Kate. 2004. Watching the English: The hidden rules of English behaviour. London: Hodder.Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, Sam. 2014. Comedy and distinction: The cultural currency of a ‘good’ sense of humour. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Gockel, Christine & Norbert L. Kerr. 2015. Put-down humor directed at outgroup members increases perceived – But not experienced – Cohesion in groups. Humor 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0020.Search in Google Scholar

Grahn, Karin. 2016. Gendered body ideals in Swedish competitive youth swimming: negotiating and shifting symbolic boundaries. Sport in Society 19(5). 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2015.1073947.Search in Google Scholar

Grainger, Karen. 2004. Verbal play on the hospital ward: Solidarity or power? Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 23(1–2). 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2004.007.Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael & Derek Bousfield. 2012. Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English. Journal of Pragmatics (Im/Politeness across Englishes) 44(9). 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Sean. 2020. Disjuncture as well-being in youth swimming: The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on everyday associations and routines. NEOS 12(2). 15–18.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Sean. 2021. Burnout and training maladaptation affect well-being: Strategies for wellness amongst young swimmers. In Jeanne Dekerle (ed.), High performance youth swimming (Routledge Research in Paediatric Sport and Exercise Science), 228–244. New York and London: Routledge.10.4324/9780429465598-19Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Sean. 2022a. Swimming in the deep end: Youths’ social, material, and bodily senses of immersion in an English competitive swimming club. PhD thesis. Brighton, UK: University of Brighton.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Sean. 2022b. The quality of water: Perception and senses of fluid movement. The Senses and Society 17(3). 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2022.2135358.Search in Google Scholar

Hernann, Andrew. 2016. Joking through hardship: Humor and truth-telling among displaced timbuktians. African Studies Review 59(1). 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2016.4.Search in Google Scholar

Hickey, Colm & Martin Roderick. 2022. When jokes aren’t funny: Banter and abuse in the everyday work environments of professional football. European Sport Management Quarterly. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2124299.Search in Google Scholar

Hildred, Benjamin. 2022. Safe enactments of difference: An ethnographic study of cricket and social change in post-war Sri Lanka. Durham, UK: Durham University.Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2(2) 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002.Search in Google Scholar

Howes, David. 2024. Sensorium: Contextualizing the senses and cognition in history and across cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009329668Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, Michael. 2017. How lifeworlds work: emotionality, sociality and the ambiguity of being. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226492018.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann M. Kring, Randall C. Young & Erin A. Heerey. 2001. Just teasing: a conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 127(2). 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.229.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Hee Sun & Barbara A. Plester. 2019. Harmony and distress: Humor, culture, and psychological well-being in South Korean organizations. Frontiers in Psychology 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02643.Search in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2008. The sociology of humor. In Victor Raskin (ed.), Primer of humor research, 361–398. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.361Search in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2016. Follow the joke: humour and ethnography. Etnofoor (In Conversation) 28(2). 125–129.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Heather K., Tara-Leigh F. McHugh, Bradley W. Young & Wendy M. Rodgers. 2019. Pathways from youth to masters swimming: Exploring long-term influences of youth swimming experiences. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 41. 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Lawless, William & Rory Magrath. 2021. Inclusionary and exclusionary banter: English club cricket, inclusive attitudes and male camaraderie. Sport in Society 24(8). 1493–1509. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2020.1819985.Search in Google Scholar

Mak, Bernie Chun Nam, Yiqi Liu & Christopher Charles. 2012. Humor in the workplace: a regulating and coping mechanism in socialization. Discourse & Communication 6(2). 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312437445.Search in Google Scholar

Malaby, Thomas M. 2009. Anthropology and play: The contours of playful experience. New Literary History 40(1). 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.0.0079.Search in Google Scholar

Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2010. Making knowledge: Explorations of the indissoluble relation between minds, bodies, and environment. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16. S1–S21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01607.x.Search in Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel. 2013. Joking relations. Translated and introduced by Jane I. Guyer. (Trans.) Jane I. Guyer. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(2). 321–334. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.2.023.Search in Google Scholar

McNarry, Gareth, Jacquelyn Allen-Collinson & Adam B Evans. 2021. Doing’ competitive swimming: exploring the skilled practices of the competitive swimming lifeworld. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 56(1). 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690219894939.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, James A., Stephen Eccles, James L. Rumbold & Daniel J. A. Rhind. 2022. When it is no longer a bit of banter: Coaches’ perspectives of bullying in professional soccer. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 20(6). 1576–1593. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2021.1987966.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, James A., Victoria E. Warburton & Kate Russell. 2021. Conceptualizing bullying in adult professional football: A phenomenological exploration. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 54. 101883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101883.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Kitty. 2018. Moving beyond ideas of laddism: Conceptualising ‘mischievous masculinities’ as a new way of understanding everyday sexism and gender relations. Journal of Gender Studies 27(1). 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1202815.Search in Google Scholar

Nichols, Kitty. 2020. I probably shouldn’t say this, should I…but…”: Mischievous masculinities as a way for men to convey reflexivity and make choices in sporting sites. In Rory Magrath, Jamie Cleland & Eric Anderson (eds.), The palgrave handbook of masculinity and sport, 151–169. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-19799-5_9Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational joking: humor in everyday talk. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

O’Dwyer, Fergus. 2023. Banter as a tactic of inclusion in sports organizations. In Stephanie Schnurr & Kieran File (eds.), The language of inclusion and exclusion in sports, 105–124. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110789829-006Search in Google Scholar

Oring, Elliott. 2016. Joking asides: the theory, analysis, and aesthetics of humor. Boulder, Colorado: Utah State University Press.10.7330/9781607324928Search in Google Scholar

Overing, Joanna. 2000. The efficacy of laughter: the ludic side of magic within amazonian society. In Joanna Overing & Alan Passes (eds.), The Anthropology of Love and anger: The Aesthetics of conviviality in native amazonia, 64–81. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203184653-3Search in Google Scholar

Plester, Barbara A. & Janet Sayers. 2007. “Taking the piss”: Functions of banter in the IT industry. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 20(2). 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor.2007.008.Search in Google Scholar

Priestley, J.B. 1976. English humour. London: William Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1940. On joking relationships. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 13(3). 195–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/1156093.Search in Google Scholar

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1952. Structure and function in primitive society. London: Cohen and West.Search in Google Scholar

Raedeke, Thomas D. & Alan L. Smith. 2004. Coping resources and athlete burnout: an examination of stress mediated and moderation hypotheses. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 26(4). 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.4.525.Search in Google Scholar

Rana, Jasmijn. 2023. Punching back: gender, religion and belonging in women-only kickboxing (New Anthropologies of Europe: Perspectives and Provocations). New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.10.3167/9781800736894Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Stefan & Eric Anderson. 2022. Bromance: male friendship, love and sport. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-98610-0Search in Google Scholar

Said, Maurice. 2016. Humour and lying: male sociality among coastal sinhalese. Etnofoor 28(1). 97–109.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. 1987. The Anthropology of performance. New York: PAJ Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Wacquant, Loїc. 2004. Body and soul: notebooks of an apprentice boxer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Watson, Tony James & Diane Heather Watson. 2012. Narratives in society, organizations and individual identities: An ethnographic study of pubs, identity work and the pursuit of ‘the real. Human Relations 65(6). 683–704. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712440586.Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Max. 1930. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. (Trans.) Talcott Parsons. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-01
Accepted: 2024-06-23
Published Online: 2024-08-14
Published in Print: 2024-10-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 15.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2024-0005/html
Scroll to top button