Oppositions, overlaps, and ontologies: The general theory of verbal humor revisited
-
Elliott Oring
Elliott Oring is Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at California State University, Los Angeles and Visiting Research Scholar in the Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology at Indiana University, Bloomington. He has written extensively on folklore, humor, and cultural symbolism. His most recent books are
Joking Asides: The Theory, Analysis, and Aesthetics of Humor; The First Books of Jewish Jokes: The Collection of L. M. Büschenthal; andJust Folklore: Analysis, Interpretation, Critique . He can be contacted at eoring@calstatela.edu.
Abstract
The General Theory of Verbal Humor (GTVH) has dominated the discussion of humor theory for the last quarter of a century. It generated a great deal of interest in humor studies by scholars both within and outside the discipline of linguistics. Problems are resident in GTVH, however, which have been inherited from its predecessor the Semantic Script Theory of Humor (SSTH). Script Opposition and Script Overlap are not adequately defined, nor are they sufficient for the identification of a joke-carrying text. The resource of the Logical Mechanism posited by GTVH may have complicated rather than simplified the matter as the list of proposed mechanisms are too loosely defined and woefully incomplete. The Ontological Semantics Theory of Humor (OSTH) has promised to demonstrate the adequacy of the linguistic theories of humor by the ability of computers to process natural language input to discriminate between joke-carrying and non-joke-carrying texts. That promise, also decades old, remains to be fulfilled, and it is questionable whether it can be fulfilled if based on SSTH and GTVH platforms.
About the author
Elliott Oring is Professor Emeritus of Anthropology at California State University, Los Angeles and Visiting Research Scholar in the Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology at Indiana University, Bloomington. He has written extensively on folklore, humor, and cultural symbolism. His most recent books are Joking Asides: The Theory, Analysis, and Aesthetics of Humor; The First Books of Jewish Jokes: The Collection of L. M. Büschenthal; and Just Folklore: Analysis, Interpretation, Critique. He can be contacted at eoring@calstatela.edu.
References
Attardo, Salvatore. 2001. Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110887969Suche in Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Christian F. Hempelmann & Sarah Di Maio. 2002. Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: Modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15(1). 3–46.10.1515/humr.2002.004Suche in Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore & Victor Raskin. 1991. Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4(3/4). 293–347.10.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293Suche in Google Scholar
Canestrari, Carla & Ivana Bianchi. 2013. From perception of contraries to humorous incongruities. In Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in linguistic humor theory, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.02canSuche in Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. 1960. The annotated Alice: Alice’s adventures in wonderland and through the looking glass, Introduction and Notes by Martin Gardner. New York: Wings.Suche in Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2012. Garden paths, red lights and crossroads: On finding our way to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying jokes. Israeli Journal of Humor Research 1(1). 6–28.Suche in Google Scholar
Forabosco, Giovannantonio. 1992. Cognitive aspects of the humor process: The concept of incongruity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 5(1/2). 45–68.10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.45Suche in Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1960. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: W. W. Norton.Suche in Google Scholar
Game Over: Kasparov and the Machine. 2005. Vikram Jayanti, dir. THINKFilm and Alliance Atlantic. DVD.Suche in Google Scholar
Heider, Karl. 1988. The Rashomon effect: When ethnographers disagree. American Anthropologist 90(1). 73–81.10.1525/aa.1988.90.1.02a00050Suche in Google Scholar
Hempelmann, Christian F. 2004. Script opposition and logical mechanism in punning. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 17(4). 381–392.10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.381Suche in Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas, Liane Gabor & Savatore Attardo. 1989. Synopsis of the workshop on humor and cognition. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 2(4). 417–440.Suche in Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Suche in Google Scholar
Keillor, Garrison. 2005. Pretty good joke book. 4th ed. Minneapolis, MN: Highbridge.Suche in Google Scholar
Lubatov, Igor & Hod Lipson. 2012. Humor as circuits in semantic networks. Proceedings of the 50th annual meeting of the association of computational linguistics. Pp. 150–155. Jeju, Republic of Korea, 8–14 July.Suche in Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Milner, G. B. 1972. Homo ridens: Towards a semiotic theory of humour and laughter. Semiotica 5(1). 1–30.10.1515/semi.1972.5.1.1Suche in Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. 1967 [1932]. Opposition, a linguistic and psychological analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 1973. “Hey, you’ve got no character”: Chizbat humor and the boundaries of Israeli identity. Journal of American Folklore 86(342). 358–366.10.2307/539359Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 1992. Jokes and their relations. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 1995. Appropriate incongruities: Genuine and spurious. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 8(3). 229–235.10.1515/humr.1995.8.3.229Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 2003. Engaging humor. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 2011a. Parsing the joke: The general theory of verbal humor and appropriate incongruity. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 24(2). 203–222.10.1515/HUMR.2011.013Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 2011b. Still further thoughts on logical mechanisms: A response to Christian F. Hemplmann and Salvatore Attardo. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 24(2). 151–158.10.1515/HUMR.2011.009Suche in Google Scholar
Oring, Elliott. 2016. Joking asides: The theory, analysis, and aesthetics of humor. Logan: Utah State University Press.10.7330/9781607324928Suche in Google Scholar
Paolillo, John C. 1998. Gary Larson’s Far Side: Nonsense? Nonsense!. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 11(3). 261–290.10.1515/humr.1998.11.3.261Suche in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1985. Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-6472-3Suche in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 1996. Computer implementation of the general theory of verbal humor. In J. Hulstijn & A. Nijholt (eds.), Automatic interpretation and generation of humor. Proceedings. twente workshop on language and technology, vol. 12, 9–19. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.Suche in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 2008. Theory of humor and practice of humor research: Editor’s notes. In Victor Raskin (ed.), The primer of humor research, 1–15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492Suche in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 2011. On Oring on GTVH. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 24(2). 223–231.10.1515/HUMR.2011.014Suche in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor. 2017. Humor theory: What is and what is not. In Waladisalw Chlopicki & Dorota Brzozowska (eds.), Humorous discourse, 11–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501507106-001Suche in Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor, Christian F. Hempelmann & Julia M. Taylor. 2009. How to understand and assess a theory: The evolution of the SSTH into the GTVH and now into the OSTH. Journal of Literary Theory 3(2). 285–311.10.1515/JLT.2009.016Suche in Google Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme. 2002. The structure of forced reinterpretation jokes. In O. Stock, C. Strapparava & A. Nijholt (eds.), April Fool’s day workshop on computational humor, 47–56. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.Suche in Google Scholar
Ritchie, Graeme. 2004. The linguistic analysis of jokes. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203406953Suche in Google Scholar
Taylor, Julia. 2010. Ontology-based view of natural language meaning: The case of humor detection. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 1(3). 221–234.10.1007/s12652-010-0014-2Suche in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Introduction: Special Issue dedicated to Christie Davies
- Oppositions, overlaps, and ontologies: The general theory of verbal humor revisited
- Tearing up the sanity clause: A class action
- Was it you who died, or your brother?
- Between cant and Kant: Christie Davies and the (im?)possibility of seriousness in humor studies
- Early Titanic Jokes: A disaster for the theory of disaster jokes?
- Christie Davies at the Humor Summer School
- The Chinese as targets in Polish humorous discourse
- Racism in recent Greek migrant jokes
- Lessons learned about humor from J.C.H. Davies and examples in his home collection
- America’s faith in the laugh resistance – popular beliefs about political humor in the 2016 presidential elections
- Select bibliography of Christie Davies’ works
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Introduction: Special Issue dedicated to Christie Davies
- Oppositions, overlaps, and ontologies: The general theory of verbal humor revisited
- Tearing up the sanity clause: A class action
- Was it you who died, or your brother?
- Between cant and Kant: Christie Davies and the (im?)possibility of seriousness in humor studies
- Early Titanic Jokes: A disaster for the theory of disaster jokes?
- Christie Davies at the Humor Summer School
- The Chinese as targets in Polish humorous discourse
- Racism in recent Greek migrant jokes
- Lessons learned about humor from J.C.H. Davies and examples in his home collection
- America’s faith in the laugh resistance – popular beliefs about political humor in the 2016 presidential elections
- Select bibliography of Christie Davies’ works
