Startseite Humor production in long-term romantic relationships: What the lack of moderation by sex reveals about humor’s role in mating
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Humor production in long-term romantic relationships: What the lack of moderation by sex reveals about humor’s role in mating

  • Jeffrey A. Hall

    Jeffrey A. Hall (PhD University of Southern California) is a professor in the Department of Communication Studies at The University of Kansas. He studies dating, flirting, and humor in romantic relationships. Email: hallj@ku.edu

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. Mai 2019
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 32 Heft 3

Abstract

This manuscript explores whether the associations between partner humor production and relationship satisfaction and humor’s importance in romantic relationships are moderated by sex. Study 1 reports a meta-analysis (k = 10; N = 2,167) of the association between partner humor production (i.e., perceived; partner effects) and relationship satisfaction, and whether associations were moderated by participant sex. Contrary to predictions, partner humor production was more strongly associated to men’s relationship satisfaction than women’s satisfaction. Study 2 surveyed pairs of romantic partners (N = 246) regarding their production of humor, their appreciation of partner humor, and the importance of humor in their relationship. Results indicated no moderations by sex in the association between partner humor production and humor’s importance in the relationship.

About the author

Jeffrey A. Hall

Jeffrey A. Hall (PhD University of Southern California) is a professor in the Department of Communication Studies at The University of Kansas. He studies dating, flirting, and humor in romantic relationships. Email: hallj@ku.edu

References

*Barelds, D. P. H. & P. Barelds-Dijkstra. 2010. Humor in intimate relationships: Ties among sense of humor, similarity in humor, and relationship quality. Humor 23. 447–465. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2010.021.Suche in Google Scholar

*Cann, A., M. A. Norman, J. L. Welbourne & L. G. Calhoun. 2008. Attachment styles, conflict styles and humor styles: Interrelationships and associations with relationship satisfaction. European Journal of Personality 22. 131–146. doi:10.1002/per.666.Suche in Google Scholar

*Cann, A., C. L. Zapata & H. B. Davis. 2009. Positive and negative styles of humor in communication. Evidence for the importance of considering both styles. Communication Quarterly 57. 452–468. doi:10.1080/01463370903313398.Suche in Google Scholar

*Cann, A., C. L. Zapata & H. B. Davis. 2011. Humor style and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor 24. 1–20. doi:10/1515/HUMR.2011.001.Suche in Google Scholar

*Hall, J. A. 2013. Humor in long-term romantic relationships: The association of general humor styles and relationship-specific functions with relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication 77. 272–292. doi:10.1080/10570314.2012.757796.Suche in Google Scholar

*Hall, J. A. & K. Sereno. 2010. Offensive jokes: How do they impact long-term relationships? Humor 23. 351–373. doi:10.1515/HUMR.2010.016.Suche in Google Scholar

*Johari, M. (2004). Humor and marital quality: Is humor style associated with marital success? (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Western Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University, London, Canada.Suche in Google Scholar

*Saroglou, V., C. Lacour & M-E. Demeure. 2010. Bad humor, bad marriage: Humor styles in divorced and married couples. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 6. 94–121. doi:10.5964/ejop.v6i3.210.Suche in Google Scholar

*Vela, L. E., M. Booth-Butterfield, M. B. Wanzer & J. I. Vallade. 2013. Relationships among humor, coping, relationship stress, and satisfaction in dating relationships: Replication and extension. Communication Research Reports 30. 67–75. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.746224.Suche in Google Scholar

*Ziv, A. & O. Gadish. 1989. Humor and marital satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology 129. 759–768. doi:10.1515/humr.1990.3.3.247.Suche in Google Scholar

Betcher, R. W. 1981. Intimate play and marital adaptation. Psychiatry 44. 13–33.10.1080/00332747.1981.11024088Suche in Google Scholar

Bressler, E. R. & S. Balshine. 2006. The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior 27. 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Bressler, E. R., R. A. Martin & S. Balshine. 2006. Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected trait. Evolution and Human Behavior 27. 121–130. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.09.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. & D. P. Schmitt. 1993. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review 100. 204–232. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204.Suche in Google Scholar

Caron, J. E. 2002. From ethology to aesthetics: Evolution as a theoretical paradigm for research on laughter, humor, and other comic phenomenon. Humor 15. 245–281. doi:10.1515/humr.2002.015.Suche in Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. London, UK: Murray.Suche in Google Scholar

Didonato, T. E., M. C. Bedminster & J. J. Machel. 2013. My funny valentine: How humor styles affect romantic interest. Personal Relationships 20. 374–390. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01410.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Eaton, A. A. & S. Rose. 2011. Has dating become more egalitarian? A 35-year review using sex roles. Sex Roles 64. 843–862. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9957-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, T. 1995. Female differences in creation of humor relating to work. Humor 8. 349–362.10.1515/humr.1995.8.4.349Suche in Google Scholar

Gagnon, J. H. 1990. The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research 1. 1–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Grammer, K. & I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt. 1990. The ritualization of laughter and humor. In W. A. Koch (ed.), Naturlichkeit der sprache und der kultur, 192–214. Bochum, DE: Brockmeyer.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. 2015. Sexual selection and humor in courtship: A case for warmth and extraversion. Evolutionary Psychology 13. 1–10. doi:10.1177/1474704915598918.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. 2017. Humor in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis. Personal Relationships 24(2). 306–322. doi:10.1111/pere.12183.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, J. A., S. Carter, M. J. Cody & J. M. Albright. 2010. Individual differences in the communication of romantic interest: Development of the flirting styles inventory. Communication Quarterly 58. 365–393. doi:10.1080/01463373.2010.524874.Suche in Google Scholar

Hone, L. S. E., W. Hurwitz & D. Lieberman. 2015. Sex differences in preferences for humor: A replication, modification, and extension. Evolutionary Psychology 13(1). 167–181.10.1177/147470491501300110Suche in Google Scholar

Honeycutt, J. M. & R. Brown. 1998. Did you hear the one about?: Typological and spousal differences in planning of jokes and sense of humor in marriage. Communication Quarterly 46. 342–352.10.1080/01463379809370106Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., A. Kozbelt, M. L. Bromley & G. R. Miller. 2008. The role of creativity and humor in mate selection. In G. Geher & G. Miller (eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system, 227–262. NYC, NY: Erlbaum.Suche in Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A., D. A. Kashy & W. L. Cook. 2006. Dyadic data analysis. NYC, NY: Guilford.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauer, R. H., J. C. Lauer & S. T. Kerr. 1990. The long-term marriage: Perception of stability and satisfaction. International Journal on Aging and Human Development 31. 189–195.10.2190/H4X7-9DVX-W2N1-D3BFSuche in Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W. & D. B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Suche in Google Scholar

Lundy, D. E., J. Tan & M. R. Cunningham. 1998. Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness. Personal Relationships 5. 311–325. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00174.Suche in Google Scholar

Mehu, M. & R. I. M. Dunbar. 2008. Naturalistic observations of smiling and laughter in human group interactions. Behavior 145. 1747–1780. doi:10/1163/156853908786279619.Suche in Google Scholar

Miller, G. 2000. The mating mind: How sexual choices shaped the evolution of human nature. London, UK: Heinemann press.Suche in Google Scholar

Muthen, L. K. & B. O. Muthen. 1998-2007. Mplus user’s guide. 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Suche in Google Scholar

Owren, M. J. & J-A. Bachorowski. 2003. Reconsidering the evolution of nonlinguistic communication: The case of laughter. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27. 183–200.10.1023/A:1025394015198Suche in Google Scholar

Provine, R. R. 2000. Laughter: A scientific investigation. NYC, NY: Viking.Suche in Google Scholar

Senko, C. & V. Fyffe. 2010. An evolutionary perspective on effective vs. ineffective pick-up lines. The Journal of Social Psychology 150. 648–667. doi:10.1080/0022454090336539.Suche in Google Scholar

Storey, R. 2003. Humor and sexual selection. Human Nature 14. 319–336. doi:10.1007/s12110-003-1009-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Tornquist, M. & D. Chiappe. 2015. Effects of humor production, humor receptivity, and physical attractiveness on partner desirability. Evolutionary Psychology 13(4). 1–13.10.1177/1474704915608744Suche in Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 136–179. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton.10.4324/9781315129266-7Suche in Google Scholar

Wilbur, C. J. & L. Campbell. 2011. Humor in romantic contexts: Do men participate and women evaluate? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37. 918–929. doi:10.1177/0146167211405343.Suche in Google Scholar

Yong, J. C. & N. P. Li. 2016. Sex differences versus gender symmetry. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes- Schackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_25-1Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-05-15
Published in Print: 2019-08-27

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2018-0005/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen