Abstract
The notion of trust has been discussed among several scientific fields, but it still lacks the joint theory. The goal was to analyze the trust associations of 600 participants and clarify how people associate the word “trust”. Overall, 600 participants produced 1800 associations which were sequentially divided into five domains and 14 categories. The findings imply, that when it comes to trust people tend to associate it mainly with relationships and positive emotions. The fact that associations involved mainly positive emotional states and significant others may show, that trust in itself is something emotional and obviously bound to people we have the strongest bonds with.
Funding source: Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠSR a SAV
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2/0035/20
Funding source: This work was supported by the project VEGA 2/0030/24: Nedôverčivá mentalita a nenormatívne správanie: Od vnímania sociálnej reality k porušovaniu sociálnych noriem
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2/0030/24
-
Research funding: Writing this work was supported by the Vedecká grantová agentúra VEGA under Grant 2/0035/20 and by the project VEGA 2/0030/24: Nedôverčivá mentalita a nenormatívne správanie: Od vnímania sociálnej reality k porušovaniu sociálnych noriem.
-
Compliance with ethical standards: Authors confirm, that the manuscript adheres to ethical guidlines of both national ethic guidelines and APA. The research was conducted ethically with the opportunity to suspend from it and it was also fully anonymous. The results are reported honestly and the study is not plagiarized.
-
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interests.
Appendix 1: Centrality values of each node in the network analysis
Closeness | Betweenness | Eigenvector | |
---|---|---|---|
Significant others | 1.0 | 6.69 | 1.0 |
Relationships | 1.0 | 6.69 | 1.0 |
Other relationships | 0.68 | 0.37 | 0.59 |
Prosocial behaviour | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.88 |
Science and education | 0.56 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
Government and politics | 0.68 | 0.24 | 0.59 |
Public and private services | 1.0 | 6.69 | 1.0 |
Positive affect | 0.94 | 2.69 | 0.98 |
Negative affect | 0.71 | 0.36 | 0.69 |
Cognition | 0.87 | 0.35 | 0.83 |
Traits | 0.87 | 0.35 | 0.83 |
Sanctity values | 0.83 | 1.51 | 0.66 |
Abstract values | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.83 |
Practical values | 0.75 | 1.29 | 0.71 |
Intention to trust | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.88 |
Uncertainty | 0.83 | 1.26 | 0.66 |
References
Baumeister, R. F., and M. R. Leary. 1995. “The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497.Suche in Google Scholar
Bean, C. 2003. “Citizen Confidence in Social and Political Institutions in a Changing World.” In Social Change in the 21st Century 2003 Conference Refereed Proceedings. Centre for Social Change Research, edited by L. Buys, J. Lyddon, J. Lon, and R. Bradley, 1–18. Australia: School of Humanities and Human Services QUT. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/114/.10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497Suche in Google Scholar
Belli, S., and F. Broncano. 2017. “Trust as a Meta-Emotion.” Metaphilosophy 48 (4): 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12255.Suche in Google Scholar
Bengoa, D. S., and H. R. Kaufmann. 2015. “The Influence of Trust on the Trilogy of Knowledge Creation, Sharing, and Transfer.” Thunderbird International Business Review 58 (3): 239–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21743.Suche in Google Scholar
Branzei, O., I. Vertinsky, and R. D. Camp. 2007. “Culture-Contingent Signs of Trust in Emergent Relationships.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104 (1): 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.11.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Bromiley, P., and J. Harris. 2006. “Chapter 7: Trust, Transaction Cost Economics, and Mechanisms.” In Handbook of Trust Research, edited by R. Bachmann and A. Zaheer. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.11.002Suche in Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., and R. M. Brown. 2009. “Selective Investment Theory: Recasting the Functional Significance of Close Relationships.” Psychological Inquiry 17: 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1701_01.Suche in Google Scholar
Carlsson, F., E. Demeke, P. Martinsson, and T. Tesemma. 2018. Measuring Trust in Institutions. Department of Economics. (Working Paper in Economics No. 730). http://hdl.handle.net/2077/56336.10.1207/s15327965pli1701_01Suche in Google Scholar
Clore, G. L. 1992. “Cognitive Phenomenology: Feelings and the Construction of Judgment.” In The Construction of Social Judgments, edited by L. L. Martin, and A. Tesser, 133–63. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.Suche in Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Damasio, A. 2008. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. Rochester: Vintage Digital.Suche in Google Scholar
Devos, T., D. Spini, and S. H. Schwartz. 2002. “Conflicts among Human Values and Trust in Institutions.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41 (4): 481–94. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602321149849.Suche in Google Scholar
Dunn, J. R., and M. E. Schweitzer. 2005. “Feeling and Believing: The Influence of Emotion on Trust.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (5): 736–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736.Suche in Google Scholar
Farr, R. M. 1996. The Roots of Modern Social Psychology: 1872–1954. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08228-000.10.1348/014466602321149849Suche in Google Scholar
Freitag, M., and P. C. Bauer. 2016. “Personality Traits and the Propensity to Trust Friends and Strangers.” The Social Science Journal 53 (4): 467–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 2000. “Can We Trust Trust?” In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relationships, edited by D. Gambetta, 213–37. Oxford, Great Britain: University of Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Greenberg, L. S. 2016. Emotion-Focused Therapy: Coaching Clients to Work through Their Feelings. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1016/j.soscij.2015.12.002Suche in Google Scholar
Haidt, J., and J. Graham. 2019. “Planet of Durkheimians, where Community, Authority, and Sacredness are Foundations of Morality.” In Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, edited by J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, and H. Thorisdottir, 371–401. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015Suche in Google Scholar
Halamová, J., M. Baránková, B. Strnádelová, and J. Koróniová. 2018. “Consensual Qualitative Research on Free Associations for Compassion and Self-Compassion.” Human Affairs 28 (3): 253–70, https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2018-0021.Suche in Google Scholar
Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015Suche in Google Scholar
Hays, R. B. 1989. “The Day-to-Day Functioning of Close versus Casual Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 6 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758900600102.Suche in Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. M. 2002. “A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 8: 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003003.Suche in Google Scholar
Höijer, B. 2011. “Social Representations Theory.” Nordicom Review 32 (2): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0109.Suche in Google Scholar
Issa, R. R. A., and J. Haddad. 2008. “Perceptions of the Impacts of Organizational Culture and Information Technology on Knowledge Sharing in Construction.” Construction Innovation 8 (3): 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170810888958.Suche in Google Scholar
Johnson, J. L., and J. B. Cullen. 2017. “Trust in Cross‐Cultural Relationships.” In The Blackwell Handbook of Cross‐Cultural Management, edited by M. J. Gannon, and K. L. Newman, 335–60. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164030.ch17.Suche in Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. 1992. “Common-Sense Psychology and Scientific Psychology.” Annual Review of Psychology 43 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000245.Suche in Google Scholar
Klein, E. 2020. Why We’re Polarized. New York: Simon & Schuster.10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000245Suche in Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M., (2006).“ Trust as Situated Cognition: An Ecological Perspective on Trust Decisions.” In Handbook of Trust Research, edited by R. Bachmann, and A. Zaheer, 68–83. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781847202819.00010Suche in Google Scholar
Lahno, B. 2001. “On the Emotional Character of Trust.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4: 171–89. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011425102875.10.4337/9781847202819.00010Suche in Google Scholar
Lewicki, R. J., E. C. Tomlinson, and N. Gillespie. 2006. “Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions.” Journal of Management 32 (6): 991–1022. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306294405.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D., and A. Weigert. 1985. “Trust as a Social Reality.” Social Forces 63 (4): 967. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578601.Suche in Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. New York: Wiley & Sons.10.2307/2578601Suche in Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 709–34. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.Suche in Google Scholar
McAllister, D. J.. 1995. “Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.” Academy of Management Journal 38 (1): 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727.Suche in Google Scholar
McKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings, and N. L. Chervany. 1998. “Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 473–90. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926622.Suche in Google Scholar
McLeod, J. 2013. “Consensual Qualitative Research: A Practical Resource for Investigating Social Science Phenomena.” Psychotherapy Research 23 (3): 366–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.725956.Suche in Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 1997. Introduction to Theory of Mind: Children, Autism, and Apes. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.10.1080/10503307.2012.725956Suche in Google Scholar
Piermattéo, A. 2022. “Social Representations and Emotions.” European Psychologist 27 (4): 302–19. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000459.Suche in Google Scholar
Poppo, L., K. Z. Zhou, and J. J. Li. 2015. “When Can you Trust “Trust”? Calculative Trust, Relational Trust, and Supplier Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 37 (4): 724–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2374.Suche in Google Scholar
Rahn, W. M., and J. E. Transue. 1998. “Social Trust and Value Change: The Decline of Social Capital in American Youth, 1976–1995.” Political Psychology 19 (3): 545–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00117.Suche in Google Scholar
Rompf, S. A. 2014. Trust and Rationality: An Integrative Framework for Trust Research. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.10.1111/0162-895X.00117Suche in Google Scholar
Rose, S., and F. C. Serafica. 1986. “Keeping and Ending Casual, Close and Best Friendships.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 3 (3): 275–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407586033002.Suche in Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. 1971. “Generalized Expectancies for Interpersonal Trust.” American Psychologist 26 (5): 443–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031464.Suche in Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. 1998. “Not So Different after All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.Suche in Google Scholar
Rus, A., and H. Iglič. 2005. “Trust, Governance and Performance: The Role of Institutional and Interpersonal Trust in SME Development.” International Sociology 20 (3): 371–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580905055481.Suche in Google Scholar
Sorrentino, R. M., J. G. Holmes, S. E. Hanna, and A. Sharp. 1995. “Uncertainty Orientation and Trust in Close Relationships: Individual Differences in Cognitive Styles.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68 (2): 314–27. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.2.314.Suche in Google Scholar
Storey, V. C. 1993. “Understanding semantic relationships.” The VLDB Journal 2: 455–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01263048.Suche in Google Scholar
Thanetsunthorn, N., and R. Wuthisatian. 2019. “Understanding Trust across Cultures: An Empirical Investigation.” Review of International Business and Strategy 29 (4): 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-12-2018-0103.Suche in Google Scholar
Thomas, T. D., K. Abts, K. Stroeken, and P. V. Weyden. 2015. “Measuring Institutional Trust: Evidence from Guyana.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 7 (3): 85–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1500700303.Suche in Google Scholar
Uslaner, E. M. 2016. “Who Do You Trust?” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust, edited by E. Shockley, T. Neal, L. Pytlik-Zillik, and B. Bornstein, 71–83. New York: Springer.10.1177/1866802X1500700303Suche in Google Scholar
Wagner, W., G. Duveen, R. M. Farr, S. Jovchelovitch, F. Lorenzi‐Cioldi, I. Marková, and D. Rose. 1999. “Theory and Method of Social Representations.” Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2 (1): 95–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00028.Suche in Google Scholar
Weber, L. R., and A. Carter. 1997. “On Reconstructing Trust: Time, Intention, and Forgiveness.” Clinical Sociology Review 15 (1): 24–39.10.1111/1467-839X.00028Suche in Google Scholar
Weber, L. R., and A. Carter. 1998. “On Constructing Trust: Temporality, Self‐Disclosure, and Perspective‐Taking.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 18 (1): 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443339810788290.Suche in Google Scholar
Zmerli, S., K. Newton, and J. R. Montero. 2007. “Trust in People, Confidence in Political Institutions, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, edited by J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, and A. Westholm, 35–65. London: Routledge.10.1108/01443339810788290Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Beyond Factories and Laboratories: Reflecting the Relationships Between Archivists and Historians
- The Subject of Black Subjectivity
- What Do You Mean by Trust? The Free Associations of the Word “Trust”
- Towards the Use of Social Robot Furhat and Generative AI in Testing Cognitive Abilities
- Differences in Indicators of Socio-Psychological Integration Between Refugees from Syria and Receiving Community in Croatia
- Promoting Science Communication for the Purpose of Pandemic Preparedness and Response: An Assessment of the Relevance of Pre-COVID Pandemic “early warnings”
- Exploring the Social Context of Self-directed Learning in the Contemporary Workplace
- Book Review
- Bianchi G:Figurations of Human Subjectivity. A Contribution to Second-Order Psychology
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Beyond Factories and Laboratories: Reflecting the Relationships Between Archivists and Historians
- The Subject of Black Subjectivity
- What Do You Mean by Trust? The Free Associations of the Word “Trust”
- Towards the Use of Social Robot Furhat and Generative AI in Testing Cognitive Abilities
- Differences in Indicators of Socio-Psychological Integration Between Refugees from Syria and Receiving Community in Croatia
- Promoting Science Communication for the Purpose of Pandemic Preparedness and Response: An Assessment of the Relevance of Pre-COVID Pandemic “early warnings”
- Exploring the Social Context of Self-directed Learning in the Contemporary Workplace
- Book Review
- Bianchi G:Figurations of Human Subjectivity. A Contribution to Second-Order Psychology