Abstract
Socio-psychological integration is a dimension of integration affecting refugees and receiving community members alike, and is related to those integration goals which promote positive intergroup attitudes, close social proximity, interrelation of social networks, low levels of perceived intergroup threat, positive intergroup contact, etc. The goal of this study was to explore the differences in the levels of indicators of socio-psychological integration in both groups. Six hundred receiving community members in Croatia, and 149 refugees from Syria in Croatia participated in the field study. The results generally show that the refugees have more positive attitudes towards receiving community members, a closer social proximity and lower levels of perception of symbolic and realistic intergroup threat than vice-versa. Intergroup contact in Croatia is very rare, posing an interesting setting for the integration process. Potential implications of these findings are discussed.
Funding source: European Commission
Award Identifier / Grant number: Horizon 2020 Programme for Research and Innovation
-
Research funding: This study was a part of the international, multidisciplinary research project Forced Displacement and Refugee-Host Community Solidarity (FOCUS) which focused on socio-economic and socio-psychological indicators of integration and the relationship between the dimensions of integration of refugees from Syria in Sweden, Germany, Croatia, and Jordan. It was financed by the European Commission from the Horizon 2020 Programme for Research and Innovation (Grant number 822401).
References
Ager, A., and A. Strang. 2008. “Understanding Integration: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Refugee Studies 21 (2): 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fen016.Search in Google Scholar
Ajduković, D., D. Čorkalo Biruški, M. Gregurović, J. Bojić Matić, and D. Župarić-Iljić. 2019. Challenges of Integrating Refugees into Croatian Society: Attitudes of Citizens and the Readiness of Local Communities. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/186615497.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Allport, G. W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Boston: Adison-Wesley.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. 2017. “The Moderating Role of Socially Desirable Responding in Implicit-Explicit Attitudes Toward Asylum Seekers.” International Journal of Psychology 54 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12439.Search in Google Scholar
Bagci, S. C., A. Turnuklu, and M. Tercan. 2020. “Positive Intergroup Contact Decreases the Likelihood that Prejudicial Attitudes Become Avoidant Behavioral Tendencies.” European Journal of Social Psychology 50 (3): 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2646.Search in Google Scholar
Barlow, F. K., S. Paolini, A. Pedersen, M. J. Hornsey, H. R. M. Radke, J. Harwood, C. G. Sibley, et al.. 2012. “The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (12): 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212457953.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, J. W. 2017. “Theories and Models of Acculturation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Acculturation and Health, edited by S. J. Schwarts, and J. B. Unger, 15–28. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190215217.013.2Search in Google Scholar
Berry, J. , W., and D. L. Sam. 2016. “Conceptual Approaches to Acculturation.” In Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology, edited by D. L. Sam, and J. W. Berry, 11–29. UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316219218.003Search in Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., J. E. Trimble, and E. Olmedo. 1986. “Assessment of Acculturation.” In Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research, edited by W. J. Lonner, and J. W. Berry, 290–327. New York: Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, J., K. Uichol, S. Power, M. Young, and M. Bujaki. 1989. “Acculturation Attitudes in Plural Societis.” Applied Psychology 38 (2): 185–206, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01208.x.Search in Google Scholar
Bogardus, E. S. 1933. “A social Distance Scale.” Social Research 17: 265–271.10.1002/ejsp.2357Search in Google Scholar
Bruneau, E., N. Kteily, and L. Laustsen. 2018. “The Unique Effects of Blatant Dehumanization on Attitudes and Behavior Towards Muslim Refugees During the European ‘Refugee Crisis’ Across Four Countries.” European Journal of Social Psychology 48 (5): 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2357.Search in Google Scholar
Canetti, D., K. L. G. Snider, A. Pedersen, and B. J. Hall. 2016. “Threatened or Threatening? How Ideology Shapes Asylum Seekers’ Immigration Policy Attitudes in Israel and Australia.” Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (4): 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/few012.Search in Google Scholar
Cowling, M. M., J. R. Anderson, and F. Rose. 2019. “Prejudice-Relevant Correlates of Attitudes Towards Refugees: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Refugee Studies 32 (3): 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fey062.Search in Google Scholar
Delacre, M., D. Lakens, and C. Leys. 2017. “Why Psychologists Should By Default Use Welch’s t-Test Instead Of Student’s t-Test.” International Review of Social Psychology 30 (1): 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82.Search in Google Scholar
Deslandes, C., and J. R. Anderson. 2019. “Religion and Prejudice Toward Immigrants and Refugees: A Meta-Analytic Review.” The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 29 (2): 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2019.1570814.Search in Google Scholar
Drews, E. 2018. Welcoming the Religious Stranger: Social Sources of Attitudes Towards Syrian Refugees. Unpublished thesis. Baylor University. https://baylor-ir.tdl.org/items/7134b0c0-ee2b-4156-b44b-d16c398378a0.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. 2005. A Common Agenda for Integration. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005DC0389.10.1348/014466609X470544Search in Google Scholar
Geschke, D., A. Mummendey, T. Kessler, and F. Friedrich. 2010. “Majority Members’ Acculturation Goals as Predictors and Effects of Attitudes and Behaviours Towards Migrants.” British Journal of Social Psychology 49 (3): 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X470544.Search in Google Scholar
Geschke, D. 2007. Prejudice Against and Discrimination of Asylum Seekers: Their Antecedents and Consequences in a Longitudinal Field Study. PhD diss. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena. http://psydok.psycharchives.de/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11780/445/1/Geschke_dissertation.pdf.10.2307/3510186Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, M. M. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. New York: Oxford University press.10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Graf, S., and S. Sczesny. 2019. “Intergroup Contact with Migrants is Linked to Support for Migrants Through Attitudes, Especially in People Who are Politically Right Wing.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 73 (November): 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.09.001.Search in Google Scholar
Gregurović, M., P. R. Kaufmann, D. Župarić-Iljić, and M. Dujmović. 2019. “Are Attitudes Determined By Location? Differences in Perceptions of Asylum Seekers Between Residents of Two Zagreb Neighbourhoods.” Geoforum 104 (August): 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.004.Search in Google Scholar
Healy, E., E. Thomas, and A. Pedersen. 2017. “Prejudice, Polyculturalism, and the Influence of Contact and Moral Exclusion: A Comparison of Responses Toward LGBI, TI, and Refugee Groups.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 47 (7): 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12446.Search in Google Scholar
Hercowitz-Amir, A., and R. Raijman. 2020. “Restrictive Borders and Rights: Attitudes of the Danish Public to Asylum Seekers.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 43 (4): 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2019.1606435.Search in Google Scholar
Hercowitz-Amir, A., R. Raijman, and E. Davidov. 2017. “Host or Hostile? Attitudes Towards Asylum Seekers in Israel and in Denmark.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 58 (5): 416–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715217722039.Search in Google Scholar
Hill, N., and K. Murray. 2020. “Psychological Sense of Community and Values: Understanding Attitudes Towards People Seeking Asylum and Australia’s First Nations People.” Australian Psychologist 55 (4): 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12459.Search in Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., and G. M. Vaughan. 2005. Social Psychology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.10.1186/s40878-023-00353-0Search in Google Scholar
Kiralj Lacković, J., D. Ajduković, D. Abdel-Fatah, L. Hertner, and W. Alkhatib. 2023. “Socio-Psychological Integration From the Perspective of Receiving Communities: A Cross-Country Comparison Between Sweden, Germany, Croatia and Jordan.” Comparative Migration Studies 11 (30): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00353-0.Search in Google Scholar
Kiralj, J., and D. Ajduković. 2020. “Literature review on socio-psychological integration of refugees and host communities.” In Unpublished Literature Review in “Mapping of Host-Community/Refugee Relations, edited by N. Irastorza, D. Ajduković, J. Kiralj, J. Tucker, P. MacDonagh, S. Creta, S. Murphy, M. Mackin, M. Bird, and A. Boschma, 43–77. Project FOCUS. https://www.focus-refugees.eu/wp-content/uploads/FOCUS-Deliverable-WP-2-FINAL-28JUN2019.pdf.10.5559/di.31.4.05Search in Google Scholar
Kiralj, J., and D. Ajduković. 2022. “Integration of Refugees in Croatia – A Qualitative Study of the Integration Process and Intergroup Relations of Refugees From Syria.” Društvena Istraživanja 31 (4): 661–682. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.31.4.05.Search in Google Scholar
Koc, Y., and J. R. Anderson. 2018. “Social Distance Toward Syrian Refugees: The Role of Intergroup Anxiety in Facilitating Positive Relations.” Journal of Social Issues 74 (4): 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12299.Search in Google Scholar
Kocak, O. 2021. “The Effects of Religiosity And Socioeconomic Status on Social Distance Towards Refugees and the Serial Mediating Role of Satisfaction with Life and Perceived Threat.” Religions 12 (9): 2–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090737.Search in Google Scholar
Lutterbach, S., and A. Beelmann. 2021. “How refugees’ Stereotypes Toward Host Society Members Predict Acculturation Orientations: The Role of Perceived Discrimination.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612427.Search in Google Scholar
Miles, E., and R. J. Crisp. 2013. “A Meta-Analytic Test of the Imagined Contact Hypothesis.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 17 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573.Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Republic of Croatia. 2022. Statistika: Tražitelji Međunarodne Zaštite [Statistics: Asylum Seekers]. https://mup.gov.hr/pristup-informacijama-16/statistika-228/statistika-trazitelji-medjunarodne-zastite/283234.Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Internal Affairs of Republic of Croatia. 2023. Statistika: Tražitelji Međunarodne Zaštite [Statistics: Asylum Seekers]. https://mup.gov.hr/UserDocsImages/statistika/2023/11/web%20statistike%202023%20Q3.xlsx.10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Navas, M., M. C. García, J. Sánchez, A. J. Rojas, P. Pumares, and J. S. Fernández. 2005. “Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM): New Contributions with Regard to the Study of Acculturation.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.001.Search in Google Scholar
Ndofor-Tah, C., A. Strang, J. Phillimore, L. Morrice, L. Michael, P. Patrick Wood, and J. Simmons. 2019. Home Office Indicators of Integration Framework. Home Office Research Report 109. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/835573/home-office-indicators-of-integration-framework-2019-horr109.pdf.10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751Search in Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., and L. R. Tropp. 2006. “A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90 (5): 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.Search in Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., L. R. Tropp, U. Wagner, and C. Oliver. 2011. “Recent Advances in Intergroup Contact Theory.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35 (3): 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
Schulz, M., and L. K. Taylor. 2018. “The Processes Underlying the Quality of Contact with the Primary Out-Group and in-Group Importance on Support for the Syrian Resettlement in a Post-Accord Context.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 24 (3): 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000321.Search in Google Scholar
Stephan, W. G., and C. W. Stephan. 2000. “An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice.” In The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination, edited by S. Oskamp. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 23–45.10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0162Search in Google Scholar
Stephan, W. G., and C. W. Stephan. 2017. “Intergroup Threat Theory.” In The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, edited by Y. Y. Kim, and L. Kelly, 131–148. McKay-Semmler.10.1111/jasp.12017Search in Google Scholar
Turoy, K. M., R. Kane, and A. Pedersen. 2013. “The Willingness of a Society to Act on Behalf of Indigenous Australians and Refugees: The Role of Contact, Intergroup Anxiety, Prejudice, and Support for Legislative Change.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 43 (2): 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12017.Search in Google Scholar
UNHCR. 2021. “Global Trends in Forced Displacement – 2020.” In UNHCR - Global Trends in Forced Displacement – 2020, 1–72. UNHCR. https://www.unhcr.org/fr-fr/en/media/global-trends-forced-displacement-2020.Search in Google Scholar
UNHCR. 2022. Global Trends in forced displacement – 2021. https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2022.Search in Google Scholar
University of Zagreb. 2019. “Career Management.” In A University Course Held at Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. Zagreb: University of Zagreb. https://theta.ffzg.hr/ECTS/Predmet/Index/7013.10.1371/journal.pone.0177369Search in Google Scholar
Van der Linden, M., M. Hooghe, T. de Vroome, and C. V. Laar. 2017. “Extending Trust to Immigrants: Generalized Trust, Cross-Group Friendship and Anti-Immigrant Sentiments in 21 European Societies.” PLoS One 12 (5): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177369.Search in Google Scholar
Vogt Isaksen, J. 2019. “The Impact of the Financial Crisis on European Attitudes Towards Immigration.” Comparative Migration Studies 7 (24): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0127-5.Search in Google Scholar
Vrdoljak, A., N. Stanković, D. Čorkalo Biruški, M. Jelić, R. Fasel, and F. Butera. 2022. ““We Would Love to, But…” – Needs in School Integration from the Perspective of Refugee Children, their Parents, Peers, and School Staff.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 37 (2): 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2061732.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/humaff-2023-0132).
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Beyond Factories and Laboratories: Reflecting the Relationships Between Archivists and Historians
- The Subject of Black Subjectivity
- What Do You Mean by Trust? The Free Associations of the Word “Trust”
- Towards the Use of Social Robot Furhat and Generative AI in Testing Cognitive Abilities
- Differences in Indicators of Socio-Psychological Integration Between Refugees from Syria and Receiving Community in Croatia
- Promoting Science Communication for the Purpose of Pandemic Preparedness and Response: An Assessment of the Relevance of Pre-COVID Pandemic “early warnings”
- Exploring the Social Context of Self-directed Learning in the Contemporary Workplace
- Book Review
- Bianchi G:Figurations of Human Subjectivity. A Contribution to Second-Order Psychology
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Beyond Factories and Laboratories: Reflecting the Relationships Between Archivists and Historians
- The Subject of Black Subjectivity
- What Do You Mean by Trust? The Free Associations of the Word “Trust”
- Towards the Use of Social Robot Furhat and Generative AI in Testing Cognitive Abilities
- Differences in Indicators of Socio-Psychological Integration Between Refugees from Syria and Receiving Community in Croatia
- Promoting Science Communication for the Purpose of Pandemic Preparedness and Response: An Assessment of the Relevance of Pre-COVID Pandemic “early warnings”
- Exploring the Social Context of Self-directed Learning in the Contemporary Workplace
- Book Review
- Bianchi G:Figurations of Human Subjectivity. A Contribution to Second-Order Psychology