Micro-Entrepreneurs’ Health Strategies During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic
-
Romana Marková Volejníčková
,
Hana Maříková
,
Marie Pospíšilová
und
Markéta Švarcová
Abstract
The topic of safeguarding against sickness grew in importance during the COVID-19 pandemic. People’s health was more at risk, yet not all had the same capacity and options to deal with it. Therefore, this article focuses on the under-researched topic of choice of strategies and individual practices for safeguarding against one’s sickness among micro-entrepreneurs (with 1–10 employees) before and during the pandemic, namely on the example of Czechia. We analyse 30 qualitative interviews with micro-entrepreneurs to demonstrate how their social location affects the attainability of strategies and individual practices for that purpose. It is primarily their family role (breadwinner vs caregiver) that, along with socioeconomic status, either limits or opens choices of strategies and individual practices or combinations thereof. Although the COVID-19 pandemic posed a high health risk to the entire society, it did not bring the micro-entrepreneurs to revise their often-risky choices in safeguarding against sickness. In contrast, it highlighted some specifics of micro-enterprises, e.g. their unclear organisational structure, which proved a high risk in the context of the health crisis.
Funding source: This article is co-financed from the state budget by the Technology agency of the Czech Republic under the Éta Progamme
Award Identifier / Grant number: TL03000670
-
Funding: This article is co-financed from the state budget by the Technology agency of the Czech Republic under the Éta Progamme under grant TL03000670.
-
Declaration: All individuals listed as authors qualify as authors and have approved the submitted version. Their work is original and is not under consideration by any other journal. They have permission to reproduce any previously published material.
References
Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.xSuche in Google Scholar
Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412448695Suche in Google Scholar
Boro, J. (2022). A study on micro-entrepreneurs: Problems and prospects in post pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5406–5414.Suche in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSuche in Google Scholar
Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(4), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00240.xSuche in Google Scholar
ČSSZ/CSSA. (2021). Přehledy o počtech klientů [Client count reports]. https://www.cssz.cz/web/cz/prehledy-o-poctech-klientu#section_1Suche in Google Scholar
ČSÚ/CSO. (2021a). Zaměřeno na ženy a muže − 2021. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/focus-on-women-andmen-240cttijhiSuche in Google Scholar
ČSÚ/CSO. (2021b). Práce a mzdy [Labour and wages]. https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/164109064/3000022204.pdf/32b6a28c-d429-4193-8ec3-87c24852501b?version=1.1Suche in Google Scholar
Giazitzoglu, A., & Down, S. (2017). Performing entrepreneurial masculinity: An ethnographic account. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615599244Suche in Google Scholar
Hašková, H., & Saxonberg, S. (2016). The revenge of history – the institutional roots of post-communist family policy in the Czech republic, Hungary and Poland. Social Policy and Administration, 50(5), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12129Suche in Google Scholar
Kaiserová, R. (2018). OSVČ jako prekérní práce z pohledu daní. [Self-employed as a precarious job from a tax perspective]. http://osvc.soc.cas.cz/sites/osvc.soc.cas.cz/fi les/osvc_jako_prekerni_%0Aprace_z_pohledu_dani_def.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Křížková, A., Pospíšilová, M., Jurik, N. C., & Cavender, G. (2018). Women’s entrepreneurial realities in the Czech republic and the United States: Gender gaps, racial/ethnic disadvantages, and emancipatory potential. In S. Yousafzai, A. Lindgreen, S. Saeed, C. Henry & A. Fayolle (Eds.), Women’s entrepreneurship: Going beyond the gender−neutral approach (pp. 180–193). Routledge.10.4324/9781315574042-13Suche in Google Scholar
Marlow, S. (2014). Exploring future research agendas in the field of gender and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-01-2013-0003Suche in Google Scholar
Mor, S., Madan, S., Archer, G. R., & Ashta, A. (2020). Survival of the smallest: A study of microenterprises in Haryana, India. Millennial Asia, 11(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399619900609Suche in Google Scholar
Nalweyiso, G., Mafabi, S., Kagaari, J., Munene, J., & Abaho, E. (2022). Theorizing relational people management in micro enterprises: A multi-theoretical perspective. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-02-2022-0008Suche in Google Scholar
Ogbor, J. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00196Suche in Google Scholar
Řeháčková, V., Bayerová, M., Madejová, L., & Veselá, J. (2021). Dopad pandemie COVID-19 na pracovní trh a budoucnost práce [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the labour market and the future of work]. https://ipodpora.odbory.info/soubory/uploads/STUDIE_ZAMESTNAVATELE_DOPAD_COVI.pdfSuche in Google Scholar
Simba, A., Wang, Y., & del Olmo García, F. (2023). Deconstructing self-organisation in microentrepreneurship: A social embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113916Suche in Google Scholar
Váchal, J., & Talíř, M. (2020). The development of organizational and management structures in small-scale and mid-scale entrepreneurship in the Czech republic. SHS Web of Conferences, 73, 02006. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207302006Suche in Google Scholar
Wang, Q., & Kang, W. (2021). What are the impacts of covid-19 on small businesses in the U.S.? Early evidence based on the largest 50 msas. Geographical Review, 111(4), 528–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2021.1927731Suche in Google Scholar
Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2003). Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(6), 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.6.440Suche in Google Scholar
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.xSuche in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, A. (1999). Employment relations in SMEs. Employee Relations, 21(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459910273062Suche in Google Scholar
Zavella, P. (1991). Reflections on diversity among chicanas. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 12(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3346849Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Monogamy as a Force of Social Progress and Women’s Empowerment
- “Sacred and Beautiful”: The Lived Experience of Slovak Women who had a Planned Homebirth
- The Effect of Social Capital on Perceived Stress: A Comparative Analysis of Employed and Non-Employed Women of Bangladesh
- Micro-Entrepreneurs’ Health Strategies During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Body Integrity Dysphoria and “Just” Amputation: State-of-the-Art and Beyond
- Creative and Research Segments of European Humanism: Development of a Single Cultural Space
- “Struggle for Peace, in their Own Land” as the Philosophy of the “Nevada-Semipalatinsk” Movement
- Unleashing the Beast: Exploring Incivility and Intolerance in Facebook Comments Under Populist and Non-populist Politicians’ Social Media Posts About Migration
- Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age
- Towards the Digital Risk Society: A Review
- Book Review
- Kasanda, A. and Hrubec, M.: Africa in a Multilateral World. Afropolitan Dilemmas
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Monogamy as a Force of Social Progress and Women’s Empowerment
- “Sacred and Beautiful”: The Lived Experience of Slovak Women who had a Planned Homebirth
- The Effect of Social Capital on Perceived Stress: A Comparative Analysis of Employed and Non-Employed Women of Bangladesh
- Micro-Entrepreneurs’ Health Strategies During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Body Integrity Dysphoria and “Just” Amputation: State-of-the-Art and Beyond
- Creative and Research Segments of European Humanism: Development of a Single Cultural Space
- “Struggle for Peace, in their Own Land” as the Philosophy of the “Nevada-Semipalatinsk” Movement
- Unleashing the Beast: Exploring Incivility and Intolerance in Facebook Comments Under Populist and Non-populist Politicians’ Social Media Posts About Migration
- Audience Democracy 2.0: Re-Depersonalizing Politics in the Digital Age
- Towards the Digital Risk Society: A Review
- Book Review
- Kasanda, A. and Hrubec, M.: Africa in a Multilateral World. Afropolitan Dilemmas
