“Sacred and Beautiful”: The Lived Experience of Slovak Women who had a Planned Homebirth

References

Andrews, A. (2004). Home birth experience 1: decision and expectation. British Journal of Midwifery, 12(8), 518–523. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2004.12.8.15283.Search in Google Scholar

Beck, C. T., & Watson, S. (2010). Subsequent childbirth after a previous traumatic birth. Nursing Research, 59(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181e501fdSearch in Google Scholar

Bernhard, C., Zielinski, R., Ackerson, K., & English, J. (2014). Homebirth after hospital birth: women’s choices and reflections. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 59(2), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12113Search in Google Scholar

Bommarito, R. K. (2018). Coping with the stigma of homebirth: Strategies of engagement and disengagement. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 6(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2018.73055Search in Google Scholar

Bonner, E. T., & Friedman, H. L. (2011). A conceptual clarification of the experience of awe: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. The Humanistic Psychologist, 39(3), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/08873267.2011.593372Search in Google Scholar

Boucher, D., Bennett, C., McFarlin, B., & Freeze, R. (2009). Staying home to give birth: Why women in the United States choose homebirth. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 54(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Brubaker, S. J., & Dillaway, H. E. (2009). Medicalization, natural childbirth and birthing experiences. Sociology Compass, 3(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00183.xSearch in Google Scholar

Buitendijk, S. (2011). Gender issues in determining the service and research agenda for pregnancy and birth care: The case of homebirth in The Netherlands. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801811X13013181961635Search in Google Scholar

Burns, E. (2015). More than four walls: The meaning of home in homebirth experiences. Social Inclusion, 3(2), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v3i2.203Search in Google Scholar

Čepelíková, K. (2019). Domácí porod je pro nás extrém, říká lékařka ze záchranky [Home birth is an extreme for us, says EMS physician]. Vitalia. https://www.vitalia.cz/clanky/domaci-porod-je-pro-nas-extrem-rika-lekarka-ze-zachranky/.Search in Google Scholar

Descieux, K., Kavasseri, K., Scott, K., & Beth Parlier, A. (2017). Why women choose home birth: A narrative review. MAHEC Online Journal of Research, 3(2), 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Dietz, H. P., & Exton, L. (2016). Natural childbirth ideology is endangering women and babies. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 56(5), 447–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12524Search in Google Scholar

Ďurnová, A., & Hejzlárová, E. (2021). Domácí porody v Česku: motivace, důvody a názory žen, které rodily plánovaně doma (2015-2020) [Homebirth in Czech Republic: motivation, reasons, and opinios of women who had planned homebirths (2015-2020)]. Fakulta sociálních věd Univerzity Karlovy.Search in Google Scholar

Galera‐Barbero, T. M., & Aguilera‐Manrique, G. (2022). Experience, perceptions and attitudes of parents who planned homebirth in Spain: A qualitative study. Women and Birth, 35(6), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Grünebaum, A., McCullough, L. B., Brent, R. L., Arabin, B., Levene, M. I., & Chervenak, F. A. (2015). Perinatal risks of planned homebirths in the United States. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 212(3), 350.e1–350.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021Search in Google Scholar

Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2009). Planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.). Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 371–401). Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195320916.003.015Search in Google Scholar

Happel-Parkins, A., & Azim, K. A. (2016). At pains to consent: a narrative inquiry into women’s attempts of natural childbirth. Women and Birth, 29(4), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.004.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, F. A., Padmadas, S. S., & Matthews, Z. (2013). Are women deciding against home births in low and middle income countries? PLoS One, 8(6), e65527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065527.Search in Google Scholar

Jouhki, M. R., Suominen, T., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2015). Supporting and sharing—home birth: fathers’ perspective. American Journal of Men’s Health, 9(5), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/155798831454941.Search in Google Scholar

Jouhki, M. R. (2012). Choosing homebirth–The women’s perspective. Women and Birth, 25(4), e56–e61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2011.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Koole, S. L. (2009). The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Cognition & Emotion, 23(1), 4–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802619031Search in Google Scholar

Leon-Larios, F., Nuno-Aguilar, C., Rocca-Ihenacho, L., Castro-Cardona, F., & Escuriet, R. (2019). Challenging the status quo: women’s experiences of opting for a homebirth in andalucia, Spain. Midwifery, 70, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Lindgren, H., & Erlandsson, K. (2011). She leads, he follows–Fathers’ experiences of a planned homebirth. A Swedish interview study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Malacrida, C., & Boulton, T. (2012). Women’s perceptions of childbirth “choices” competing discourses of motherhood, sexuality, and selflessness. Gender & Society, 26(5), 748–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243212452630Search in Google Scholar

McCutheon, R., & Brown, D. (2012). A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences and reflections upon giving birth at home. Evidence-based Midwifery, 10(1), 23–28.Search in Google Scholar

Morison, S., Hauck, Y., Percival, P., & McMurray, A. (1998). Constructing a homebirth environment through assuming control. Midwifery, 14(4), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-6138(98)90095-XSearch in Google Scholar

Murray-Davis, B., McNiven, P., McDonald, H., Malott, A., Elarar, L., & Hutton, E. (2012). Why homebirth? A qualitative study exploring women’s decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provinces. Midwifery, 28(5), 576–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.01.013Search in Google Scholar

Murray-Davis, B., McDonald, H., Rietsma, A., Coubrough, M., & Hutton, E. (2014). Deciding on home or hospital birth: Results of the ontario choice of birthplace survey. Midwifery, 30(7), 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Newnham, E., McKellar, L., & Pincombe, J. (2017). ‘It’s your body, but ’mixed messages in childbirth education: Findings from a hospital ethnography. Midwifery, 55, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Odent, M. (2009). The masculinisation of the birth environment. Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 23(3), 185.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01016.xSearch in Google Scholar

OECD (2021). Health at a glance 2021. OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.10.1787/ae3016b9-enSearch in Google Scholar

Pargament, K. I., & Mahoney, A. (2005). THEORY: “sacred matters: sanctification as a vital topic for the psychology of religion”. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(3), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1503_1Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Garrido, P., & Goberna-Tricas, J. (2021). Birth cultures: A qualitative approach to homebirthing in Chile. PLoS One, 16(4), e0249224. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249224Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In O. P. John, & R. W. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 654–678). The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ryazanov, A. A., & Christenfeld, N. J. (2018). The strategic value of essentialism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(1), e12370. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12370Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Redondo, M. D., Cernada, M., Boix, H., Fernández, M. G. E., González-Pacheco, N., Martín, A., Pérez-Muñuzuri, A., & Couce, M. L. (2020). Homebirths: A growing phenomenon with potential risks. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition), 93(4), 266.e1–266.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2020.04.012Search in Google Scholar

Sanfelice, C. F. D. O., & Shimo, A. K. K. (2015). Homebirth: Understanding the reasons for this choice. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 24, 875–882. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072015002850014.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, K. (2017). The resurgence of awe in psychology: Promise, hope, and perils. The Humanistic Psychologist, 45(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/hum0000060Search in Google Scholar

Schutz, W. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Science and Behavior Books.Search in Google Scholar

Sekulová, M., Hlinčíková, M., Debrecéniová, J., & Krišková, Z. (2015). Pôrodná skúsenosť v zdravotníckom zariadení na Slovensku optikou ľudských práv žien [Labour experience in Slovak healthcare facilities through the lens of women’s rights]. In J. Debrecéniová (Ed.), Ženy – matky – telá: Ľudské práva žien pri pôrodnej starostlivosti v zdravotníckych zariadeniach na Slovensku [Women – mothers – bodies: Women’s rights in obstestrical care in healthcare facilities in Slovakia] (pp. 57–126). Občan, demokracia a zodpovednosť.Search in Google Scholar

Sjöblom, I., Nordström, B., & Edberg, A. K. (2006). A qualitative study of women’s experiences of homebirth in Sweden. Midwifery, 22(4), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2005.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Skrondal, T. F., Bache-Gabrielsen, T., & Aune, I. (2020). All that I need exists within me: A qualitative study of nulliparous Norwegian women’s experiences with planned homebirth. Midwifery, 86, 102705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102705Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, Method and Research: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Starr, L. (2009). Legislation may drive homebirths underground. Australian Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 17(2), 31.Search in Google Scholar

Technical Working Group, World Health Organization (1997). Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Birth, 24(2), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.1997.00121.pp.x.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Pijl, M. S., Kasperink, M., Hollander, M. H., Verhoeven, C., Kingma, E., & De Jonge, A. (2021). Client-care provider interaction during labour and birth as experienced by women: Respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246697Search in Google Scholar

Vedam, S., Stoll, K., Schummers, L., Fairbrother, N., Klein, M. C., Thordarson, D., Kornelsen, J., Dharamsi, S., Rogers, J., Liston, R., & Kaczorowski, J. (2014). The Canadian birth place study: examining maternity care provider attitudes and interprofessional conflict around planned home birth. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-353.Search in Google Scholar

Wolfson, C. (1986). Midwives and homebirth: Social, medical, and legal perspectives. Hastings Law Journal, 37(5), 909.Search in Google Scholar