Home Social Sciences Micro-Entrepreneurs’ Health Strategies During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Micro-Entrepreneurs’ Health Strategies During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Romana Marková Volejníčková ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Hana Maříková ORCID logo , Marie Pospíšilová ORCID logo and Markéta Švarcová ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2023

Abstract

The topic of safeguarding against sickness grew in importance during the COVID-19 pandemic. People’s health was more at risk, yet not all had the same capacity and options to deal with it. Therefore, this article focuses on the under-researched topic of choice of strategies and individual practices for safeguarding against one’s sickness among micro-entrepreneurs (with 1–10 employees) before and during the pandemic, namely on the example of Czechia. We analyse 30 qualitative interviews with micro-entrepreneurs to demonstrate how their social location affects the attainability of strategies and individual practices for that purpose. It is primarily their family role (breadwinner vs caregiver) that, along with socioeconomic status, either limits or opens choices of strategies and individual practices or combinations thereof. Although the COVID-19 pandemic posed a high health risk to the entire society, it did not bring the micro-entrepreneurs to revise their often-risky choices in safeguarding against sickness. In contrast, it highlighted some specifics of micro-enterprises, e.g. their unclear organisational structure, which proved a high risk in the context of the health crisis.


Corresponding author: Mgr. Romana Marková Volejníčková, PhD., Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Jilská 1, Prague 1, 110 00, Czechia, E-mail:

Funding source: This article is co-financed from the state budget by the Technology agency of the Czech Republic under the Éta Progamme

Award Identifier / Grant number: TL03000670

  1. Funding: This article is co-financed from the state budget by the Technology agency of the Czech Republic under the Éta Progamme under grant TL03000670.

  2. Declaration: All individuals listed as authors qualify as authors and have approved the submitted version. Their work is original and is not under consideration by any other journal. They have permission to reproduce any previously published material.

References

Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412448695Search in Google Scholar

Boro, J. (2022). A study on micro-entrepreneurs: Problems and prospects in post pandemic. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(2), 5406–5414.Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar

Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2004). Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(4), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2004.00240.xSearch in Google Scholar

ČSSZ/CSSA. (2021). Přehledy o počtech klientů [Client count reports]. https://www.cssz.cz/web/cz/prehledy-o-poctech-klientu#section_1Search in Google Scholar

ČSÚ/CSO. (2021a). Zaměřeno na ženy a muže − 2021. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/focus-on-women-andmen-240cttijhiSearch in Google Scholar

ČSÚ/CSO. (2021b). Práce a mzdy [Labour and wages]. https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/164109064/3000022204.pdf/32b6a28c-d429-4193-8ec3-87c24852501b?version=1.1Search in Google Scholar

Giazitzoglu, A., & Down, S. (2017). Performing entrepreneurial masculinity: An ethnographic account. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615599244Search in Google Scholar

Hašková, H., & Saxonberg, S. (2016). The revenge of history – the institutional roots of post-communist family policy in the Czech republic, Hungary and Poland. Social Policy and Administration, 50(5), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12129Search in Google Scholar

Kaiserová, R. (2018). OSVČ jako prekérní práce z pohledu daní. [Self-employed as a precarious job from a tax perspective]. http://osvc.soc.cas.cz/sites/osvc.soc.cas.cz/fi les/osvc_jako_prekerni_%0Aprace_z_pohledu_dani_def.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Křížková, A., Pospíšilová, M., Jurik, N. C., & Cavender, G. (2018). Women’s entrepreneurial realities in the Czech republic and the United States: Gender gaps, racial/ethnic disadvantages, and emancipatory potential. In S. Yousafzai, A. Lindgreen, S. Saeed, C. Henry & A. Fayolle (Eds.), Women’s entrepreneurship: Going beyond the gender−neutral approach (pp. 180–193). Routledge.10.4324/9781315574042-13Search in Google Scholar

Marlow, S. (2014). Exploring future research agendas in the field of gender and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijge-01-2013-0003Search in Google Scholar

Mor, S., Madan, S., Archer, G. R., & Ashta, A. (2020). Survival of the smallest: A study of microenterprises in Haryana, India. Millennial Asia, 11(1), 54–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399619900609Search in Google Scholar

Nalweyiso, G., Mafabi, S., Kagaari, J., Munene, J., & Abaho, E. (2022). Theorizing relational people management in micro enterprises: A multi-theoretical perspective. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-02-2022-0008Search in Google Scholar

Ogbor, J. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00196Search in Google Scholar

Řeháčková, V., Bayerová, M., Madejová, L., & Veselá, J. (2021). Dopad pandemie COVID-19 na pracovní trh a budoucnost práce [The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the labour market and the future of work]. https://ipodpora.odbory.info/soubory/uploads/STUDIE_ZAMESTNAVATELE_DOPAD_COVI.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Simba, A., Wang, Y., & del Olmo García, F. (2023). Deconstructing self-organisation in microentrepreneurship: A social embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113916Search in Google Scholar

Váchal, J., & Talíř, M. (2020). The development of organizational and management structures in small-scale and mid-scale entrepreneurship in the Czech republic. SHS Web of Conferences, 73, 02006. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207302006Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Q., & Kang, W. (2021). What are the impacts of covid-19 on small businesses in the U.S.? Early evidence based on the largest 50 msas. Geographical Review, 111(4), 528–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2021.1927731Search in Google Scholar

Wardle, J., & Steptoe, A. (2003). Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(6), 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.6.440Search in Google Scholar

Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wilkinson, A. (1999). Employment relations in SMEs. Employee Relations, 21(3), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459910273062Search in Google Scholar

Zavella, P. (1991). Reflections on diversity among chicanas. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 12(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3346849Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-11-21
Accepted: 2023-08-31
Published Online: 2023-09-26
Published in Print: 2024-01-29

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2022-1002/html
Scroll to top button