Home Distribution of P2O5 between P-rich Phase and Matrix Phase in P-bearing Steelmaking Slag
Article Open Access

Distribution of P2O5 between P-rich Phase and Matrix Phase in P-bearing Steelmaking Slag

  • Lu Lin EMAIL logo , Yan-ping Bao , Chao Gu , Wei Wu and Jia-qing Zeng
Published/Copyright: September 15, 2017

Abstract

To recycle the phosphorus in P-bearing steelmaking slag and use the slag as phosphate fertilizer, it is necessary to study the distribution of P2O5 between the P-rich phase and matrix phase in P-bearing steelmaking slag. The addition of MgO and MnO into the slag has no effect on the phosphorus form of existence in the slag and has little effect on the %(P2O5)SS. In contrast, Na2O and CaF2 in the slag change the phosphorus form of existence in the slag and increase %(P2O5)SS obviously. Lp’, γP2O5(SS), γP2O5(M), CP(M) and CP(SS) were calculated, and it was found that %(CaO), %(T.Fe) and %(P2O5) in the P-rich phase and matrix phase significantly affect Lp’. MnO and MgO in the slag have little effect on the distribution of P2O5 between the P-rich phase and matrix phase, whereas Na2O and CaF2 affect the distribution of P2O5 between the P-rich phase and matrix phase.

Introduction

With the rapid development of steel industry in China, the cumulative amount of slag has increased to more than 200 million tons, which affects the environment. Owing to the dephosphorization in steel-making process and the past use of phosphorus-rich ore in recent years, slags rich in phosphorus are being produced. If P2O5 in the slag can be enriched and separated, the separated P2O5 phase may be used as phosphoric fertilizer or phosphoric fertilizer additives, while the rest of the ingredients may be recycled in the iron- and steel-making processes, e. g., sintering, hot metal desiliconization, and hot metal dephosphorization process. If steel slag recycling is realized, the utilization of converter slag in agriculture will minimize environmental pollution and create financial benefit.

The fertilizer efficiency of slag phosphate fertilizer depends on %(P2O5) and P2O5 solubility. The %(P2O5) in slag phosphate fertilizer is related to the phosphorus enrichment and separation from the slag, while the degree of phosphorus enrichment is dependent on the phosphorus distribution among the different phases in the slag [1, 2, 3]. Therefore, to efficiently recover phosphorus resources from slag to use as fertilizer, it is critical to study the phosphorus distribution between the P-rich phase and matrix phase in slag. To date, phosphorus existence form in slag and phosphorus distribution between steel and slag have been extensively studied [3, 4,, 5,, 6, 7]. Inoue and Suito [8] found that the phosphorous transfer rate from slag to 20 to 50 μm long dicalcium silicate (2CaO·SiO2) particles is considerably fast and the 2CaO·SiO2 particle changes to the particle with the composition of n2CaO·SiO2-3CaO·P2O5 (for short nC2S-C3P) solid solution within 5 s. Shimauchi et al. [9] studied the distribution of P2O5 between solid dicalcium silicate and liquid phases in the CaO–SiO2–Fe2O3 system, and found that high P2O5 content and reasonable T.Fe content were controlled to show the high distribution ratio, and the addition of MgO and MnO has no effect on the distribution ratio of P2O5. Panlevani et al. [10] studied the distribution of P2O5 between the nC2S-C3P solid solution and liquid phase, and investigated the effect of MgO, MnO, and Al2O3 on the distribution of P2O5 in slags with variable iron oxide (FeO or Fe2O3) content.

There is, however, lack of studies regarding the effect of CaF2 and Na2O on the distribution of P2O5 between P-rich phase and matrix phase in the slag. In this paper, the effect of MnO, MgO, Na2O and CaF2 on the phosphorus existence form and the distribution ratio of P2O5 between P-rich phase and matrix phase in slag was studied systematically, γP2O5 and CP in P-rich slag phase and matrix phase were analyzed, additionally, the effect of adding different oxides on distribution ratio of P2O5 between P-rich slag phase and matrix phase in slag was discussed, which provide the theoretical foundation for phosphorus enrichment and separation in slag, and provide the necessary research basis for the resource utilization of P-bearing steelmaking slag using as slag phosphate fertilizer.

Research method

Reagent grades CaO, SiO2, Fe2O3, P2O5, MgO, MnCO3, CaF2 and Na2CO3 were mixed in various ratios to produce the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-P2O5 slag system. To investigating the effect of other elements on the distribution of P2O5 between the P-rich phase and matrix phase, Na2O, CaF2, MgO and MnO were also added. The mixing conditions are summarized in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the compositional range of slags in the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3 ternary phase diagram calculated by using the FactSage 6.3 for samples X. As shown in Figure 1, all experimental slags were in the dicalcium silicate (C2S) primary zone, C2S precipitated first during the cooling process, and then nC2S-C3P solid solution (mainly Ca15(PO4)2(SiO4)6 and Ca5(PO4)2SiO4) formed. Most of the iron oxide would be in the form of FeO in steelmaking condition, but Fe2O3 was used as iron oxide in this experiment and the heating was carried out under the air atmosphere, the reasons are as follow: (1)Ito et al. [8] disclosed that the distribution behavior of P2O5 between solid solution and liquid phases was not different, when the iron oxide changed from FeO to Fe2O3. (2) Shimauchi et al. [9] found that FeO was solved into the solid solution but the content of Fe2O3 in solid solution was negligible small. (3) According to the preliminary experiments, it was found that phosphorus enrichment behavior between solid solution and liquid phases was not affected, when the iron oxide changed from FeO to Fe2O3.

Figure 1: Observed slag composition in the ternary phase diagram of the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3 system.
Figure 1:

Observed slag composition in the ternary phase diagram of the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3 system.

Table 1:

Composition of the synthetic slag samples (mass fraction, %).

No.CaOSiO2Fe2O3P2O5MgOMnOCaF2Na2O
A42.8617.143010
A(5%MgO)39.2915.7130105
A(10%MgO)35.7114.29301010
A(5%MnO)39.2915.7130105
A(10%MnO)35.7114.29301010
A(3%Na2O)40.7116.2930103
A(6%Na2O)38.5715.4330106
A(3%CaF2)40.7116.2930103
A(6%CaF2)38.5715.4330106

The mixed slags (200 g) were placed in magnesia crucible, 60 mm in diameter and 100 mm long that were subsequently placed inside graphite crucibles and heated in a MoSi2 electric resistance furnace up to 1773 K. The temperature was maintained for 30 min to ensure the slag fully melting. Then, the slags were cooled to 1623 K at 3 K/min and maintained at this temperature for 1 h to fully promote the precipitation of 3CaO·P2O5. Then, they were cooled to 1423 K at 3 K/min, and the furnace was subsequently turned off and the slag samples were left to cool in the furnace (Figure 2). The phase morphology of the prepared slag samples was observed by an S-360 scan electron microscope, and each phase composition was analyzed by a Tracor Northern spectrometer. After each experiment, the slags were ground to less than 300 mesh (48 μm), and mineralogical phases were determined by XRD analysis. Diffraction patterns were measured in a 2θ range of 10~90° using copper Kα radiation of 40 kV and 30 mA, and the scan speed was 5°/min.

Figure 2: Experimental conditions for precipitation of C2S-C3P solid solution.
Figure 2:

Experimental conditions for precipitation of C2S-C3P solid solution.

Experiment results

Figure 3 shows a SEM-BSE image (Scanning Electron Microscope- Back scattered Electron Imaging) of a sample after cooling. The EDS date for the sample is given in Table 2. Figure 4 shows the X-ray diffraction results of synthetic slag samples.

Figure 3: SEM-BSE image of experimental samples (1- P-rich phase, 2- RO phase, 3- Matrix phase).
Figure 3:

SEM-BSE image of experimental samples (1- P-rich phase, 2- RO phase, 3- Matrix phase).

Figure 4: XRD results of different slag composition modification.
Figure 4:

XRD results of different slag composition modification.

Table 2:

Chemical compositions of each phase from sample in Figure 3 by EDS (mass fraction, %).

No.Main phaseNa2OCaF2MnOMgOSiO2P2O5CaOFe2O3
AP-rich phase0002.9515.2420.7558.902.16
RO phase0005.300.070.170.6193.85
Matrix phase00011.4631.293.5653.680
A(5%MgO)P-rich phase0000.5812.9820.7665.240.44
RO phase0005.920.4001.0292.66
Matrix phase0007.8321.986.2361.372.58
A(10%MgO)P-rich phase0002.6315.3019.6660.821.60
RO phase00027.53000.6071.87
Matrix phase0007.7423.529.3357.761.66
A(5%MnO)P-rich phase001.220.3412.8322.6262.360.64
RO phase006.681.380.1500.9790.82
Matrix phase002.027.0526.842.5957.813.70
A(10%MnO)P-rich phase000014.6419.4364.960.97
RO phase0011.414.43000.7383.43
Matrix phase002.319.5929.901.7954.571.84
A(3%Na2O)P-rich phase2.1600014.5823.6359.610
RO phase0007.8200092.18
Matrix phase1.47009.5423.132.2363.601.03
A(6%Na2O)P-rich phase12.310008.6331.7447.010.31
RO phase0.85008.030.350.15090.62
Matrix phase3.700010.5222.511.4560.301.25
A(3%CaF2)P-rich phase04.43003.3034.0058.110.15
RO phase00.5305.420.1400.9992.93
Matrix phase0009.2927.981.6058.402.73
A(6%CaF2)P-rich phase04.59002.7137.7554.850.09
RO phase00.3006.12002.8490.74
Matrix phase00010.1131.951.8253.033.08

The results suggest that the P-bearing slag mainly consists of P-rich phase, matrix phase, and RO phase. The %(P2O5) in matrix phase is low, the matrix phase mainly comprise of nCaO·SiO2 and merwinite (Ca3MgSi2O8), and the RO phase mainly consists of iron oxide or iron and magnesium oxide.

%(P2O5) in the P-rich phase in A slag is about 20%, the phosphorus in P-rich phase is mainly in the existence of 6C2S-C3P solid solution. For adding MgO or MnO into the CaO-SiO2-P2O5-Fe2O3 slag, MnO and MgO mainly enters into RO phase to form MnFe2O4 and MgFe2O4, and has little change in the %(P2O5) in P-rich phase (also about 20%), so which has little effect on the degree of phosphorus enrichment and phosphorus occurrence form.

In the A(3%Na2O) slag, the added Na2O mainly replaces calcium ions(Ca2+) in the P-rich phase (6C2S-C3P solid solution) to form C2S-C3P and Na2Ca4(PO4)2SiO4, finally the P-rich phase is mainly 6C2S-C3P, C2S-C3P exists along with Na2Ca4(PO4)2SiO4, and generally contains about 23–26% P2O5, and its particle size increased to more than 100 μm. In the A(6%Na2O) slag, %(P2O5) in the P-rich phase further increased to 32%, and owning to the binding capacity of sodium ions(Na+) combine with phosphate ions((PO4)3−) are stronger than calcium ions(Ca2+), calcium ions(Ca2+) in phosphorus-rich phase (6C2S-C3P or Na2Ca4(PO4)2SiO4) are replaced by sodium ions(Na+), then Na3PO4 are formed, so the phosphorus existence form is changed.

In the A(3%Ca2F) slag, %(P2O5) in the P-rich phase is also obviously higher than in the A slag. The added fluorine mainly enters the P-rich phase to form fluorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3F), and %(P2O5) in the P-rich phase is generally about 34%, the particle size further increased to more than 100 μm. In the A(6%Ca2F) slag, %(P2O5) in theP-rich phase is increased to 37%, whereas the particle size remained the same as that in the A(3%Ca2F) slag, and the content and crystallization rate fluorapatite (Ca5(PO4)3F) in the P-rich phase increased with increasing of CaF2 content. The addition of CaF2 significantly increases the %(P2O5) in the P-rich phase. Fluorapatite cannot be dissolved in 2% citric acid solution, therefore, the P2O5 solubility of slag decreases [11, 12].To further verify existence form of phosphorus and fluorine in P-bearing slag, the phase diagram at 1273 K was calculated in CaO-P2O5-CaF2 system using the FactSage 6.3 software. As shown in Figure 5, P and Q in the diagram correspond to the area of A(3%Ca2F) slag and A(6%Ca2F) slag respectively. It shows that the phosphorus and fluorine mainly precipitated as fluorapatite crystal during the slag cooling process, which is consistent with the results of XRD.

Figure 5: The CaO-P2O5-CaF2 ternary phase diagram at 1273 K that calculated by FactSage 6.3.
Figure 5:

The CaO-P2O5-CaF2 ternary phase diagram at 1273 K that calculated by FactSage 6.3.

Discussion

Based on SEM and EDS date in Figure 3 and Table 2, the P-bearing slag consists of P-rich phase, matrix phase, and RO phase, and the phosphorus is mainly in the P-rich phase and matrix phase. To improve dephosphorization and to increase the applications of P-bearing slag, the distribution of P2O5 between the P-rich phase and matrix phase is discussed in this paper.

The effect of slag composition on Lp’ between P-rich phase and matrix phase

The phosphorus in slag is transferred from the matrix phases to the 2CaO·SiO2 particles to form nC2S-C3P solid solution. The distribution ratio of P2O5 between P-rich phase and matrix phase (Lp’=%(P2O5)SS/%(P2O5)M) is used to represent the degree of phosphorus enrichment in the slag in this study, %(P2O5)SS stands for the P2O5 mass fraction in the P-rich phase, and %(P2O5)M stands for the P2O5 mass fraction in the matrix phase. The bigger the Lp’ is, the more phosphorus is transferred from the matrix to the P-rich phase.

The relation between Lp’ and %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase of different slag systems is shown in Figure 6. Lp’ increases with increasing of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase. The addition of MgO and MnO into the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-P2O5 slag system affects the Lp’ negligibly. %(P2O5)SS increases with increasing Na2O in the slag, however, since %(P2O5)M also increases, Lp’ does not change. However, Lp’ increases evidently with increasing CaF2 in the slag. It is mainly due to that the melting point of slag is reduced effectively, the fluidity of the slag is increased, the phosphorus transfer from matrix phase to P-rich phase in the slag is promoted, and a new phase fluorapatite is formed with the addition CaF2 into the slag, so the %(P2O5)SS increases significantly.

Figure 6: The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on Lp’ in different slag systems.
Figure 6:

The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on Lp’ in different slag systems.

The basicity of matrix phase has an important effect on Lp’, the %(CaO) of the matrix phase is used to show the basicity, as shown in Figure 7. In the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-P2O5-X (X=MgO, MnO, Na2O and CaF2) slag system, Lp’ decreases with increasing of %(CaO) in the matrix phase.

Figure 7: The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on Lp’ in different slag systems.
Figure 7:

The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on Lp’ in different slag systems.

The effect of slag composition on the activity coefficient of P2O5

As the P-rich phase and the matrix phase of the final slag is in equilibrium, the activities of P2O5 in both phases are the same, thus, Lp’ is proportional to the ratio of the activity coefficient of P2O5 between the matrix phase and P-rich phase, as shown in eq. (1), where a is the activity; γ is the activity coefficient, X is the mol fraction, and kis the coefficient for converting the mass percentage to mol fraction. Subscripts P2O5 (M) and P2O5 (SS) denote the activity and activity coefficient of P2O5 in the matrix phase and P-rich phase, respectively. The activity coefficient of P2O5 in the matrix phase is calculated by using a regular solution model [7], while the activity coefficient of P2O5 in the P-rich phase is calculated by using eq. (1).

(1)LP=(%P2O5)SS(%P2O5)M=kaP2O5(SS)×γP2O5(M)aP2O5(M)×γP2O5(SS)=kγP2O5(M)γP2O5(SS)

Activity coefficient of P2O5 in the P-rich phase

Figures 8 and 9 show the relation between %(T.Fe), %(CaO) in matrix phase and the γP2O5(SS) in different slag systems. The γP2O5(SS) decreases with the addition of MgO, MnO, Na2O, and CaF2 in the slag, whereas the γP2O5(SS) decreases minimally for the addition MgO, MnO, and CaF2 in the slag, and the γP2O5(SS) decreases significantly after adding Na2O. Meanwhile, γP2O5(SS) increases with decreasing the %(CaO) in the matrix phase in different slag systems. In the regular model, the interaction energy between other cations and Ca2+ is negative, and the γP2O5(SS) and Ca2+ content in the slag is a negative correlation, which results in γP2O5(SS) increases with decreasing Ca2+ when the %(CaO) in the slag decreases.

Figure 8: The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on the γP2O5(SS)${\gamma _{{{\rm{P}}_2}{{\rm{O}}_5}(SS)}}$ in different slag systems.
Figure 8:

The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on the γP2O5(SS) in different slag systems.

Figure 9: The effect of slag compositions on the γP2O5(SS)${\gamma _{{{\rm{P}}_2}{{\rm{O}}_5}(SS)}}$ at different %(CaO) in the matrix phase.
Figure 9:

The effect of slag compositions on the γP2O5(SS) at different %(CaO) in the matrix phase.

Figure 10 shows the relation between %(P2O5)SS and the γP2O5(SS) in different slag systems. %(P2O5)SS minimally changes with increasing %(MgO) and %(MnO) in the slag, whereas %(P2O5)SS increases with increasing %(Na2O) and %(CaF2) in the slag. In the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-P2O5-X(X=MgO, MnO, Na2O and CaF2) slag system, γP2O5(SS) increases with increasing %(MnO), %(MgO) and %(CaF2), whereas γP2O5(SS) decreases with increasing %(Na2O).

Figure 10: The effect of %(P2O5)SS on the γP2O5(SS)${\gamma _{{{\rm{P}}_2}{{\rm{O}}_5}(SS)}}$ in different slag systems.
Figure 10:

The effect of %(P2O5)SS on the γP2O5(SS) in different slag systems.

Activity coefficient of P2O5 in the matrix phase

Figures 11 and 12 show respectively the relation between %(T.Fe), %(CaO) in the matrix phase and the γP2O5(M) in different slag systems. The γP2O5(M) minimally changes with increasing %(MgO), %(MnO) and %(CaF2) in the slag, whereas γP2O5(M) decreases with increasing %(Na2O) in the slag. Meanwhile, γP2O5(M) increases with decreasing %(CaO) in the matrix phase. As the P-rich phase and the matrix phase of the final slag are in equilibrium, the activities of P2O5 in both phases are the same (see eq. (1)), when the %(P2O5)SS and the matrix phase are constant, γP2O5(SS) also increases with decreasing %(CaO), which is consistent with the results shown in Figure 9.

Figure 11: The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on the γP2O5(M)${\gamma _{{{\rm{P}}_2}{{\rm{O}}_5}(M)}}$ in different slag systems.
Figure 11:

The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on the γP2O5(M) in different slag systems.

Figure 12: The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on the γP2O5(M)${\gamma _{{{\rm{P}}_2}{{\rm{O}}_5}(M)}}$ in different slag systems.
Figure 12:

The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on the γP2O5(M) in different slag systems.

The effect of slag composition on the phosphorus capacity

Phosphorus capacity (CP) is used to judge the capacity of a slag to contain phosphorus. The P-rich phase and the matrix phase in the slag are regarded as two different slag systems and the CP in the P-rich phase (CP(SS)) and the matrix phase (CP(M)) are studied to analyze the phosphorus distribution between P-rich phase and matrix phases. The CP was calculated by using eq. (2) [13].

(2)logCP=0.51×(23NCaO+17NMgO+8NFetO+33NNa2O+20NCaF2+13NMnO26NP2O5)+29920T19.280+log(%P)/NP2O51/2

Phosphorus capacity of the P-rich phase

Figures 13 and 14 show respectively the relation between %(T.Fe), %(CaO) in matrix phase and CP(SS) for in slag systems. CP(SS) increases with increasing MgO, MnO, Na2O and CaF2 in the slag. CP(SS) increases with increasing %(CaO) in the matrix phase, as shown in Figure 13. Figure 14 shows that when the %(T.Fe) in matrix phase is less than 2%, CP(SS) decreases with increasing %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase, whereas when %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase is more than 2%, CP(SS) increases with increasing %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase.

Figure 13: The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on CP(SS) in different slag systems.
Figure 13:

The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on CP(SS) in different slag systems.

Figure 14: The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on CP(SS) in different slag systems.
Figure 14:

The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on CP(SS) in different slag systems.

It can be seen from Figure 15 that CP(SS) linearly decreases with increasing %(P2O5)SS. CP(SS) is lowest in the slag with CaF2, whereas CP(SS) is highest in the slag with Na2O, which is consistent with the results of Suito [14]. The decreasing CP means that the capacity of containing phosphorus decreases as well.

Figure 15: The effect of %(P2O5)SS on CP(SS) in different slag systems.
Figure 15:

The effect of %(P2O5)SS on CP(SS) in different slag systems.

Phosphorus capacity of the matrix phase

Figures 16 and 17 show respectively the relation between %(T.Fe), %(CaO) in matrix phase and CP(M) in different slag systems. CP(M) increases with the addition of MgO, MnO, Na2O and CaF2 into the slag, and CP(M) increases with increasing %(CaO) in the matrix phase. From Figure 18, it can be seen that when %(P2O5)M is less than 3%, CP(M) linearly increases with increasing %(P2O5)M. When %(P2O5)M is more than 3%, CP(M) minimally changes with increasing %(P2O5)M. CP(M) is highest for the slag with Na2O, and lowest in the slag with CaF2.

Figure 16: The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on CP(M) in different slag systems.
Figure 16:

The effect of %(CaO) in the matrix phase on CP(M) in different slag systems.

Figure 17: The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on CP(M) in different slag systems.
Figure 17:

The effect of %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase on CP(M) in different slag systems.

Figure 18: The effect of %(P2O5)M on CP(M) in different slag systems.
Figure 18:

The effect of %(P2O5)M on CP(M) in different slag systems.

Conclusions

The effect of slag composition on phosphorus existence form in P-bearing slag was well researched, and the distribution behavior of P2O5 between P-rich phase and matrix phase was analyzed. The key findings are as follows:

  1. The slag is composed of P-rich phase, matrix phase, and RO phase. Phosphorus in the slag is mainly in the form of nC2S-C3P solid solution in the P-rich phase. For CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-P2O5-X (X=MgO, MnO, Na2O, and CaF2 respectively) slag system, MgO and MnO are in RO phase and have no effect on the phosphorus existence form in the slag and the %(P2O5)SS. Na2O and CaF2 in the slag change the phosphorus existence form in the slag, and significantly increase the %(P2O5)SS.

  2. With increasing %(T.Fe) and decreasing %(CaO) in the matrix phase, Lp’ increases. MnO and MgO have little effect on Lp’, whereas Na2O and CaF2 strongly affect Lp’. Furthermore, Lp’ clearly increases with increasing CaF2 in the slag.

  3. %(CaO) in the slag strongly affect γP2O5(SS) and γP2O5(M). Both γP2O5(SS) and γP2O5(M) decrease with increasing %(CaO) and γP2O5(SS) increases with increasing %(P2O5) in the slag. MgO, MnO and CaF2 in the slag minimally affects γP2O5(SS) and γP2O5(M), whereas Na2O in the slag causes γP2O5(SS) and γP2O5(M) to decrease obviously.

  4. With increasing %(P2O5)SS, CP(SS) decreases and CP(M) increases. When %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase is less than 2%, CP(SS) decreases with increasing %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase. When %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase is more than 2%, CP(SS) increases with increasing %(T.Fe) in the matrix phase. For %(P2O5)M is less than 3%, CP(M) linearly increases with increasing %(P2O5)M. For %(P2O5)M is more than 3%, CP(M) minimally changes with the increasing %(P2O5)M. CP(SS) and CP(M) increase with increasing %(CaO) in the matrix phase. In the CaO-SiO2-Fe2O3-P2O5-X (X=MgO, MnO, Na2O and CaF2) slag system, CP(SS) and CP(M) are highest when Na2O is added and lowest when CaF2 is added.

Funding

This research was supported financially by the Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Emission Reduction & Resources Recycling, Ministry of Education Foundation (KF17-01), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2172057) China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No.2014M560890&2015T80039) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51574019).

References

[1] S. Kitamura, S. Saito, K. Utagawa, H. Shibata and D.G.C. Robertson, ISIJ Int., 49 (2009) 1838–1844.10.2355/isijinternational.49.1838Search in Google Scholar

[2] X. Yang, H. Matsuura and F. Tsukihashi, ISIJ Int., 49 (2009) 1298–1307.10.2355/isijinternational.49.1298Search in Google Scholar

[3] P.K. Son and Y. Kashiwaya, ISIJ Int., 48 (2008) 1165–1174.10.2355/isijinternational.48.1165Search in Google Scholar

[4] X. Yang, H. Matsuura and F. Tsukihashi, ISIJ Int., 50 (2010) 702–711.10.2355/isijinternational.50.702Search in Google Scholar

[5] L. Lin, Y.P. Bao, M. Wang and H.M. Zhou, Ironmak Steelmak., 40 (2013) 521–527.10.1179/1743281212Y.0000000074Search in Google Scholar

[6] B. Deo, J. Halder, B. Snoeijer, A. Overbosch and R. Boom, Iron Steel Making, 32 (2005) 54–60.10.1179/174328105X23969Search in Google Scholar

[7] H.M. Zhou, Y.P. Bao and L. Lin, Steel Res., 84 (2013) 863–869.10.1002/srin.201200231Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. Inoue and H. Suito, ISIJ Int., 46 (2006) 174–179.10.2355/isijinternational.46.174Search in Google Scholar

[9] K. Shimauchi, S. Kitamura and H. Shibata, ISIJ Int., 49 (2009) 505–511.10.2355/isijinternational.49.505Search in Google Scholar

[10] F. Pahlevani, S. Kitamura, H. Shibata and N. Maruoka, ISIJ Int., 50 (2010) 822–829.10.2355/isijinternational.50.822Search in Google Scholar

[11] L. Lin, Y.P. Bao, M. Wang, W. Jiang and H.M. Zhou, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 21 (2014) 496–502.10.1016/S1006-706X(14)60077-7Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Diao, B. Xie, Y.H. Wang and X. Guo, ISIJ Int., 52 (2012) 955–959.10.2355/isijinternational.52.955Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Suito and R. Inoue, Tetsu to Hagane (J. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn.), 70 (1984) 366–373.10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.70.3_366Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. Suito and R. Inoue, ISIJ Int., 35 (1995) 258–265.10.2355/isijinternational.35.258Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-07-08
Accepted: 2017-06-11
Published Online: 2017-09-15
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2016-0151/html
Scroll to top button