Home Physical Sciences Effects of Rolling and Cooling Conditions on Microstructure of Umbrella-Bone Steel
Article Open Access

Effects of Rolling and Cooling Conditions on Microstructure of Umbrella-Bone Steel

  • Yan-Xin Wu , Jian-Xun Fu EMAIL logo , Hua Zhang , Jie Xu and Qi-Jie Zhai
Published/Copyright: May 23, 2017

Abstract

The effects of deformation temperature and cooling rate on the micro-structure evolution of umbrella-bone steel was investigated using a Gleeble thermal-mechanical testing machine and dynamic continuous cooling transformation (CCT) curves. The results show that fast cooling which lowers the starting temperature of ferrite transformation leads to finer ferrite grains and more pearlite. Low temperature deformation enhances the hardening effect of austenite and reduces hardenability, allowing a wider range of cooling rates and thus avoiding martensite transformation after deformation. According to the phase transformation rules, the ultimate tensile strength and reduction in area of the wire rod formed in the optimized industrial trial are 636 MPa and 73.6 %, respectively, showing excellent strength and plasticity.

Introduction

Umbrella-bone steel wire rods, which are used to fabricate high-level umbrella ribs and the frame of windscreen wipers, are largely demanded in China. Some cold deformations processes such as drawing, flattening and cold-forming are used in umbrella rib production. During the manufacture of umbrella ribs, drawing-induced fractures and cold-forming-induced cracks often occurred. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the strength and plasticity of umbrella-bone steel.

An important metallurgical strategy for simultaneously enhancing the strength and plasticity of metals is controlling the volume and distribution of hard precipitation embedded in a soft matrix [1, 2], which can be achieved by refining grains as well. In the steel industry, various thermomechanical treatments have been used to fabricate a variety of ultrafine-grained microstructures consisting of an ultrafine-grained ferrite (bcc-α) matrix and ceramic particles (θ-Fe3C, cementite) [3, 4, 5], which effectively improve the work-hardening capability and the strength and plasticity of ultrafine-grained ferritic steel [6].

Some methods have been proposed to improve the distribution of cementite in the matrix in medium carbon steel. Storojeva et al. [7] obtained a homogeneous distribution of cementite by heavy warm deformation and continuous recrystallization after the γ-α transformation in a medium-carbon steel (0.36 % wt. C). The cooling rate of about 10 K/s (ferrite–pearlite prior to heavy warm deformation) and deformation/coiling at 670–700 °C lead to a homogeneous cementite distribution with a cementite particle size of less than 1 μm. Houin et al. [8] studied the possibility of obtaining a fully pearlite structure with steels containing between 0.2 and 0.8 wt% C. It was noticed that the range of cooling rates that produced steel with a fully pearlite structure increased with less carbon content. And more carbon content is beneficial for strength but not for reduction in area. Yi [9] produced an almost fully pearlite microstructure in steel with 0.4 wt% C by slow cooling and controlling the content of manganese and aluminum. In which fine divorced-cementite lamellae formed in pearlite was found due to the huge driving force. Thermomechanical-controlled processing (TMCP) can improve the microstructure and mechanical properties of steels. The processing parameters associated with TMCP, including finish rolling and cooling conditions, have a great effect on pearlite morphology and ferrite grain size [10, 11].

In the present paper, the effects of cooling rate and deformation temperature on the microstructures of umbrella-bone steel were investigated using a thermodynamic simulation. According to the requirements of umbrella ribs, umbrella-bone steel with high strength and plasticity was trial manufactured.

Experimental procedure

Samples were taken from a circular slab of umbrella-bone steel after intermediate rolling. The chemical composition of the circular slab is shown in Table 1. The circular slab was machined into the shape shown in Figure 1.

Table 1:

Chemical composition of umbrella-bone steel (wt. %).

CSiMnPSNiCrCuBTi
0.350.250.80.00150.0150.0150.0250.010.0010.05
Figure 1: Sample for dynamic CCT.
Figure 1:

Sample for dynamic CCT.

In order to determine the processing parameters associated with TMCP, dynamic continuous cooling transformation (CCT) diagrams were obtained using a Gleeble 3500 thermal-mechanical testing machine. The experiment processing conditions are shown in Figure 2. The samples were reheated at 10 °C/s to 1,020 °C and then held for 5 min for fully austenitization. After deformed at 850 or 900 °C with a reduction of 36 %, the samples were cooled to room temperature at the rates of 0.1, 1, 10, 20, 30, 50 °C/s respectively.

Figure 2: Processing scheme for thermal simulation experiment.
Figure 2:

Processing scheme for thermal simulation experiment.

The dynamic CCT diagram was plotted according to the dilatometric curve obtained from the heat expansion test. The microstructure evolution of umbrella-bone steel under various deformation temperatures and cooling rates was investigated using optical microscopy and a Vickers hardness tester. The mechanism of microstructural evolution is discussed. An industrial rolling test was conducted according to the results obtained in the laboratory.

Results

Dynamic CCT diagrams of umbrella-bone steel

The starting and ending temperatures of phase transformation were determined according to the dilatometric curve and microstructure at various cooling rates. The beginning and ending temperatures of the austenite phase transformation, Ac1 and Ac3, respectively, were obtained from the dilatometric curve at a heating rate of 0.05 °C/s. The results show that Ac1 and Ac3 are 732 and 808 °C, respectively. The theoretical temperature of martensite transformation calculated using an empirical formula [12], is 394.7 °C. Based on these results, the dynamic CCT diagrams of umbrella-bone steel were plotted, as shown in Figure 3. Since the phase transformation was obtained according to the dilatometric curve, the tests and calculation was run by 3 times each to reduce the operating errors.

Figure 3: Dynamic CCT diagrams of umbrella-bone steel at deformation temperatures of (a) 850 °C and (b) 900 °C.
Figure 3:

Dynamic CCT diagrams of umbrella-bone steel at deformation temperatures of (a) 850 °C and (b) 900 °C.

As shown in the figure, the transformations of different phases occurs under different conditions. When the deformation temperature was 850 °C, the transformations for ferrite and pearlite occured in supercooled austenite for cooling rates blow 40 °C/s. The martensite transition is observed at above 40 °C/s. Similar results were obtained for a deformation of 900 °C, but the critical cooling rate of martensite decreased to 30 °C/s.

Microstructure evolution

The strain at the center of the compressed samples is higher than surface. [13]. In order to keep the same strain for all samples, the microstructure of the range at a distance of 0.5 R (radius of the samples) from the center was analyzed using an optical microscopy. Figure 4 shows the microstructure at a deformation of 850 °C. When the cooling rate was less than 10 °C/s, the microstructure at room temperature consisted of quasi-polygon ferrite and pearlite. When the cooling rate was between 10 and 30 °C/s, allotrimorphic ferrite and perlite, along with few Widmanstätten ferrite, appeared in the micrographs. When the cooling rate was 40 °C/s, martensite appeared. The microstructure at a deformation temperature of 900 °C is shown in Figure 5. The microstructure is similar to that at a deformation temperature of 850 °C for low cooling rates. However, martensite was found at a cooling rate of 30 °C/s.

Figure 4: Optical micrographs of samples at deformation temperature of 850 °C and cooling rates of (a) 0.1 °C/s, (b) 1 °C/s, (c) 10 °C/s, (d) 20 °C/s, (e) 30 °C/s, (f) 40 °C/s, and (g) 50 °C/s.
Figure 4:

Optical micrographs of samples at deformation temperature of 850 °C and cooling rates of (a) 0.1 °C/s, (b) 1 °C/s, (c) 10 °C/s, (d) 20 °C/s, (e) 30 °C/s, (f) 40 °C/s, and (g) 50 °C/s.

Figure 5: Optical micrographs of samples at deformation temperature of 900 °C and cooling rates of (a) 0.1 °C/s, (b) 1 °C/s, (c) 10 °C/s, (d) 20 °C/s, (e) 30 °C/s, (f) 40 °C/s, and (g) 50 °C/s.
Figure 5:

Optical micrographs of samples at deformation temperature of 900 °C and cooling rates of (a) 0.1 °C/s, (b) 1 °C/s, (c) 10 °C/s, (d) 20 °C/s, (e) 30 °C/s, (f) 40 °C/s, and (g) 50 °C/s.

The microstructure proportions corresponding to various cooling rates for deformation temperatures of 850 and 900 °C are shown in Figure 6(a) and (b), respectively. The proportion of ferrite decreased with larger cooling rate. The proportion of pearlite initially increased and then decreased. The proportion of martensite rapidly increased at high cooling rates. An increase in deformation temperature led to a decrease in the critical cooling rate of martensite.

Figure 6: Microstructure proportion corresponding to various cooling rates for deformation temperatures of (a) 850 °C and (b) 900 °C.
Figure 6:

Microstructure proportion corresponding to various cooling rates for deformation temperatures of (a) 850 °C and (b) 900 °C.

The curves of Vickers hardness of the samples and microstructure versus cooling rate for deformation temperatures of 850 and 900 °C are presented in Figure 7. The Vickers hardness of the samples increased with increasing cooling rate due to the decrease in ferrite and increase in pearlite. Furthermore, the hardness increased rapidly when martensite appeared. The Vickers hardness of pearlite initially increased and then remained constant with increasing cooling rate except the one below 1 °C/s. For a given cooling rate, a decrease of the deformation temperature resulted in a decrease in the Vickers hardness.

Figure 7: Variation of Vickers hardness with cooling rate.
Figure 7:

Variation of Vickers hardness with cooling rate.

Figure 8 shows the variation of the starting temperature of ferrite transformation with cooling rate. As shown, the starting temperature of ferrite transformation falls with increasing cooling rate while a reduction occurred with low deformation temperature for a given cooling rate.

Figure 8: Variation of starting temperature of ferrite transformation with cooling rate.
Figure 8:

Variation of starting temperature of ferrite transformation with cooling rate.

Discussion

Effects of cooling rate on microstructure

Fast cooling, which improves supercooling and increases the density of nucleation sites for ferrite, results in a decrease in the starting temperature of ferrite transformation and ferrite grain refinement [14, 15]. As previously presented, the morphology of ferrite changes from quasi-polygon to allotrimorphic and the grain is gradually refined at a high cooling rate. Fast cooling can suppress the γ-α transformation during cooling attributing to less time for diffusional transformation [10], namely the region of medium-temperature transformation is obtained quickly. As a result, proeutectoid ferrite is suppressed and the proportion of pearlite is improved. However, the appearance of martensite decreases the proportion of pearlite when the cooling rate exceeds the critical cooling rate of martensite. Due to the differences in the Vickers hardness among ferrite, pearlite, and martensite, fast cooling usually increases the Vickers hardness of a sample. Fast cooling results in high supercooling, which increases the density of nucleation sites for pearlite and reduces carbon diffusion. The interlamellar spacing of pearlite is determined mainly by the driving force for pearlite transformation, which is controlled by supercooling [16]. Decreasing interlamellar spacing promotes the strength and plasticity of the microstructure, which explains the variation of Vickers hardness in pearlite described above.

Effects of deformation temperature on microstructure

Austenite rolling, consisting of deformation and recrystallization, is divided into working hardening and softening processing. There are two stages in working hardening. Under a low strain stage, the dislocation density increases quickly, resulting in a rapid generation of low-angle boundaries. With increasing strain, ultrafine grains surrounded by new high-angle grain boundaries are gradually produced, which is attributed to deformation and dynamic recrystallization (DRX) [17, 18, 19]. The size of new grains in DRX is controlled by the Zener-Hollomon parameter [20], which can be expressed as:

Z=ε˙exp(Q/RT)

where ε˙ is the strain rate, T is the absolute temperature, R is the gas constant, and Q denotes the apparent activation energy for softening during deformation. The size of the new grains in DRX thus decreases with decreasing deformation temperature.

Softening processing after deformation is also critically affected by deformation temperature. At high temperature, recovery and static recrystallization occur simultaneously, named as the region of austenite recrystallization in rolling. Recovery only occurs in the region of austenite non-recrystallization at low temperature. For a given cooling rate after deformation, lower temperature weakens the effect of softening processing caused by recovery or recrystallization, enhancing the effect of strain accumulation in austenite.

Due to the low temperature and small strain in this experiment, the samples can be considered to be rolled in the region of austenite non-recrystallization. Lower temperature enhances the effect of working hardening and subsequently strain accumulation in the cooling process prior to the γ-α transformation. Therefore, the density of nucleation sites for ferrite increases at lower temperature, which decreases the hardenability of austenite. As a result, the starting temperature of ferrite and the critical cooling rate of martensite both increase.

Experiments of industrial rolling

It can be concluded from the dynamic CCT experiment that fast cooling refines the ferrite grains and increases the proportion of pearlite. A low deformation temperature enhances the hardening effect of austenite and reduces hardenability, allowing a wider range of cooling rate after deformation. Taking the limits of rolling mill and cooling equipment into account, the processing parameters were a finish rolling temperature of 850 °C and a cooling rate of 30 °C/s. Figure 9 shows the microstructure of the wire rod formed in production. Mechanical properties was measured under the schedule of standard GB/T 228.1-2010. The sample of mechanical properties test was hot rolled Φ6 mm wire rod without machining. The corresponding mechanical properties are presented in Table 2.

Table 2:

Mechanical properties of wire rod.

Tensile strength (MPa)Yield strength (MPa)Elongation (%)Reduction

in Area (%)
Area fraction of pearlite (%)
655405257773
Figure 9: Microstructure of wire rod in different magnifications.
Figure 9:

Microstructure of wire rod in different magnifications.

Compared to the microstructure observed in the laboratory, the average grain size was smaller and the proportion of pearlite was much lower. This can be explained by the multi-pass continuous deformation in industrial rolling. A large rolling reduction leads to the working hardening and refinement of austenite, which provides more nucleation sites for ferrite [21]. As a result, ferrite transformation takes place at high temperature and a more refined ferrite grain is obtained. Due to the enhancement of ferrite transformation, the proportion of pearlite decreased for a given cooling rate. The cooling rate can be further improved to increase the proportion of pearlite.

Conclusions

  1. Dynamic CCT diagrams were used to investigate the effects of deformation temperature and cooling rate on the microstructure evolutions of umbrella-bone steel. When the deformation temperature was 850 °C, the transformations for ferrite and pearlite occured in supercooled austenite at cooling rates of 40 °C/s, and martensite transition was observed above 40 °C/s. For a deformation temperature of 900 °C, similar results were obtained, but the critical cooling rate of martensite decreased to 30 °C/s.

  2. The cooling rate affects the microstructure of umbrella-bone steel. Fast cooling refines the ferrite grains and enhances the proportion of pearlite. The optimized proportion of pearlite is about 88 %.

  3. A low deformation temperature enhances the hardening effect of austenite and reduces hardenability, which allows a wider range of cooling rates after deformation.

  4. Taking the limits of rolling mill and cooling equipment into account, the optimized processing parameters were a finish rolling temperature of 850 °C and a cooling rate of 30 °C/s. The ultimate tensile strength and reduction in area of the wire rod formed in the optimized industrial trial were 636 MPa and 73.6 %, respectively, which indicates excellent strength and plasticity.

Funding statement: The authors would like to thank the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M580316), the Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (2013BAE07B00) and the State Natural Science Fund Projects of China (51474142) for supporting this work.

References

[1] C.S. Zheng, L.F. Li, Y.D. Wang, W.Y. Yang and Z.Q. Sun, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 631 (2015) 181–188.10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[2] N. Zhong, Q.L. Wu, Y.S. Yin and X.D. Wang, Steel Res. Int., 86 (2015) 252–256.Search in Google Scholar

[3] R. Song, D. Ponge and D. Raabe, Acta Mater., 53 (2005) 4881–4892.Search in Google Scholar

[4] R. Song, D. Ponge, D. Raabe and R. Kaspar, Acta Mater., 53 (2005) 845–858.Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Furuhara, T. Mizoguchi and T. Maki, ISIJ Int., 45 (2005) 392–398.Search in Google Scholar

[6] R. Yoda, K. Shibata, T. Morimitsu, D. Terada and N. Tsuji, Scripta Mater., 65 (2011) 175–178.Search in Google Scholar

[7] L. Storojeva, D. Ponge, R. Kaspar and D. Raabe, Acta Mater., 52 (2004) 2209–2220.Search in Google Scholar

[8] J.P. Houin, A. Simon and G. Beck, Trans. ISIJ., 21 (1981) 726–731.Search in Google Scholar

[9] H.L. Yi, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527 (2010) 7600–7604.10.1016/j.msea.2010.08.009Search in Google Scholar

[10] Z. Li, D. Wu and W. Lu J,. Iron Steel Res.Int., 19 (2012) 64–70.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Y.M. Li, D.S. Zheng and F.X. Zhu, Steel Res. Int., 81 (2010) 66–69.Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Trzaska and L.A. Dobrzański, J. Mater. Processing Tech., 192–193 (2007) 504–510.Search in Google Scholar

[13] T. Inoue, S. Torizuka, K. Nagai, K. Tsuzaki and T. Ohashi, Mater. Sci. Tech., 17 (2001) 1580–1588.Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. Zeng, Z.D. Li, X.J. Sun, Q.L. Yong and Y.Q. Weng, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 22 (2015) 272–278.Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Tomida, N. Imai, M. Yoshida and S. Fukushima, Mater. Sci. Forum, 539 (2007) 4708–4713.Search in Google Scholar

[16] N. Tsuji and T. Maki, Scripta Mater., 60 (2009) 1044–1049.Search in Google Scholar

[17] S.L. Zhu, H.Z. Cao, J.S. Ye, W.H. Hu and G.Q. Zheng, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 22 (2015) 264–271.Search in Google Scholar

[18] S. Torizuka, A. Ohmori, S.V.S. Narayana Murty and K. Nagai, Scripta Mater., 54 (2006) 563–568.Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. Dziedzic, K. Muszka, J. Majta and E.J. Palmiere, Steel Res. Int., 53 (2012) 1255–1258.Search in Google Scholar

[20] I. Salvatori, T. Inoue and K. Nagai, ISIJ Int., 42 (2002) 744–750.Search in Google Scholar

[21] T. Furuhara, K. Kikumoto, H. Saito, T. Sekine, T. Ogawa, S. Morito and T. Maki, ISIJ Int., 48 (2008) 1038–1045.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-3-14
Accepted: 2016-9-2
Published Online: 2017-5-23
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 12.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2016-0052/html
Scroll to top button