Startseite Long-term preservation of α-amylase activity in highly concentrated aqueous solutions of imidazolium ionic liquid
Artikel Öffentlich zugänglich

Long-term preservation of α-amylase activity in highly concentrated aqueous solutions of imidazolium ionic liquid

  • Konstantza Tonova

    Konstantza Atanassova Tonova studied chemical engineering in Sofia, Bulgaria and obtained her PhD in 2009 in the field of innovative liquid media (surfactant-based reversed micellar solvents) applied for bioseparations and biocatalysis. In 1994 Dr. Tonova started her professional career at the Institute of Chemical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Since 2010 she has become a leading researcher in the field of recovery of biomolecules and natural value-added substances by ionic liquids at the laboratory of “Transfer processes in multiphase media.”

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Mai 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The activity of the α-amylase enzyme incubated in aqueous solutions with a high concentration (80.2% w/v) of imidazolium ionic liquid, [C4C1im]Br, has been studied. Contrary to the complete deactivation hitherto reported in the literature, a way is found to preserve the enzyme, by adding the appropriate salt, so that the activity is saved for a long grace period. Different salts are studied and the concentration is optimized in view of the enzyme hydration. Due to the limited amount of free water available to the enzyme at higher salt concentrations, the activity decreases. The best results are obtained by adding potassium acetate, 0.200 mol dm−3. Some 90% of the activity is saved in a 2-week incubation, and a half activity remains in a month. Precipitates are observed in the samples of the solution without salt. No precipitation is noticed when acetate is present. Regardless of the fluorescence quenching, the activity is saved. The effect of the acetate on the α-amylase preservation is probably related to the ability of the acetate anion to interact with the imidazolium cation thus shielding the enzyme from being salted out and precipitated. Compared with potassium bromide, which does not interact with [C4C1im]Br, precipitation and fast inactivation are observed.

1 Introduction

Biotechnology currently trends towards the use of nonfood feedstocks instead of edible crops. The lignocellulosic residues derived from agricultural or forestry wastes have received constant attention in the recent years. Due to the recalcitrant nature of the lignocellulosic materials, nonconventional solvents based on ionic liquids (ILs) are exploited [1], [2] and various approaches have been developed for simultaneous pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of biomass by cellulases in ILs [3], [4]. Fortunately, there are natural IL-tolerant cellulases that show good levels of stability in many ILs and based on this significant advancement in cellulase catalytic performance has been achieved by applying the tools of medium engineering [5].

The progress, however, is far less remarkable regarding the other most abundant polysaccharide substrate, the starch, and the starch-converting enzymes, respectively. Starch dissolution, physico-chemical properties, and morphology in pure ILs or their concentrated aqueous solutions are intensively studied in the previous years [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]; however, the action of the starch-degrading enzymes in such media is ignored. The reason is that all studied ILs that dissolve starch are water-soluble and composed of imidazolium cation with short-chain substituents which tend to denaturate the amylolytic enzymes. The first study that reported about inactivation [12] concerns the catalytic behavior of two types of α-amylase enzyme (from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus licheniformis) in concentrated solutions of the water-miscible ILs, [C4/6C1im]Cl (up to 60% wt). Of late, some newly isolated α-amylases from natural [13] or recombinant species [14], [15] also showed deactivation in aqueous solutions of imidazolium halides, [C2−6C1im]Br/Cl, above 10% v/v. Therefore, high water contents are recommended when water-soluble ILs and α-amylase enzymes are employed together [16].

The use of dilute aqueous solutions of ILs, however, is inconsistent with the sense of dissolving polysaccharides in ILs as the ability of the IL’s anion to form H-bonds with the solute substantially weakens in the highly hydrated medium. The interactions of the IL’s anion with water could suppress the solvent effect on starch and an optimal IL-to-water ratio is usually required to achieve the maximal solubility of the starch species [6], [9], [17]. Therefore, the catalytic activity of the starch-hydrolyzing enzymes should be relevantly improved in order to operate at high concentrations of ILs in aqueous solutions.

It has been very recently shown [18] that the α-amylase enzyme keeps about 75% of its activity in 50% (v/v) aqueous solution of the hydrophobic and polar IL, [C8C1im][Sac]. The medium adjustment by adding the appropriate (acetate) ion has emerged as a key factor in recovering the amylolytic activity. Based on this finding, here, a concentrated aqueous solution of one of the most commonly used imidazolium halides, [C4C1im]Br, is employed to host the α-amylase enzyme and a long-term preservation of the amylolytic activity is manifested under small medium alteration.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide, [C4C1im]Br, of high purity (>99%) was purchased from IoLiTec (Heilbronn, Germany).

The α-amylase enzyme (EC 3.2.1.1 from Bacillus licheniformis, Type XII–A) was supplied as a saline solution by Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was certified to contain 21.7 mg [protein] per cm3 (Biuret). Its current specific activity was measured by iodine-starch protocol [18], [19], [20], [21] and was found to be 3043 U per mg protein. One unit (U) is defined as the catalytic activity that hydrolyzes 1 μmol of starch to dextrins in 1 min at pH=6.00 (0.100 mol dm−3 Ac-buffer), at 30°C.

The salts, CH3COONa×3H2O (NaAc) and Na2HPO4×12H2O, and the acid CH3COOH were puriss. p.a., bought from the local market (Teocom, Sofia, Bulgaria). CH3COOK (KAc) was a product of Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), K2HPO4 and KBr were products of Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland).

The substances required for the α-amylase activity assay (I2, KI, and starch) were of analytical grade purchased from Teocom (Sofia, Bulgaria).

2.2 Preparation of the [C4C1im]Br/salt aqueous solutions containing α-amylase

In all solutions, the IL concentration was fixed at 3.660 mol dm−3, which is ca. 80.2% w/v (61.7% v/v). The salt added varied by type and concentration, as it is described below. The [C4C1im]Br/salt aqueous solution was stirred for an hour at room temperature. After that, the same amount of the α-amylase enzyme was introduced in each IL/salt aqueous solution, so that the final protein concentration was 0.27125 g dm−3. The solutions were stirred for 2 h prior to start of the analysis of the α-amylase activity, except for the shorter mixing of the solutions where a rapid deactivation was detected.

The pH values of all solutions were measured by a pH meter equipped with a pH combination electrode (Hanna Edge, Cluj-Napoca, Romania).

2.3 α-Amylase activity assay

The α-amylase activity assay was executed by the following steps. Aliquots of 0.050 cm3 of the [C4C1im]Br/salt aqueous solutions containing the α-amylase enzyme were withdrawn during the course of incubation (noted on the kinetics’ curves) and diluted 50-fold in 0.100 mol dm−3 NaAc. The diluted samples were stirred for at least 1 h. The pH values of all samples were 7.26±0.03, except for the diluted phosphate-systems, which were a little higher, 7.38 (Na2HPO4) and 7.76 (K2HPO4). That way the α-amylase was set at the optimal pH condition. The diluted samples were subjected to activity assay according to the procedure described by Pantschev et al. [19] and elsewhere [18], [20], [21].

The α-amylase activity measured during the course of incubation was evaluated as % from the initial activity in the same solution but without the IL and was assigned relative (residual) activity.

2.4 UV/VIS and fluorescence spectrophotometric measurements

The α-amylase enzyme incubated in the IL/salt aqueous solutions was characterized by UV-absorbance and fluorescence emission. The UV-spectra were recorded on an UV/VIS spectrophotometer (UV-1600PC, VWR, Leuven, Belgium) and the fluorescence measurements were carried out on a spectrofluorimeter Shimadzu (Model DR–15, Japan). The samples for both analyses were prepared by 4 times dilution (in 0.100 mol dm−3 NaAc) of aliquots from the IL/salt solutions containing α-amylase. In order to overcome the interference from the IL, all the samples were measured vs. their analogously prepared blank (without the enzyme) samples.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Kinetics of activity of α-amylase incubated in aqueous solutions of [C4C1im]Br/NaAc

Aqueous solutions containing [C4C1im]Br and NaAc were prepared. The IL-concentration was fixed at 3.660 mol dm−3, which is ca. 80.2% (w/v), while the NaAc-concentration was varied from 0 to 0.828 mol dm−3, the later being the limit of NaAc solubility in the solution. After that, the same amount of the α-amylase enzyme was introduced in each IL/NaAc aqueous solution. The pH values of the solutions were as follows: 5.31 (0 mol dm−3 NaAc), 7.14 (0.050 mol dm−3 NaAc), 7.66 (0.200 mol dm−3 NaAc), 7.89 (0.675 mol dm−3 NaAc), and 8.29 (0.828 mol dm−3 NaAc). The solutions were stirred for 2 h at 360 rpm and afterwards they were stored at room temperature. Aliquots were withdrawn therefrom during the course of time and subjected to α-amylase activity assay.

Results about the relative activity are presented in Figure 1A and B. It is clearly seen that a trace amount of NaAc (0.050 mol dm−3) in the concentrated [C4C1im]Br aqueous solution has a huge effect on the preservation of fully active α-amylase for 2-day grace period (Figure 1A). In the absence of NaAc, the enzyme was totally deactivated for the same period. The increase in the NaAc concentration to 0.200 mol dm−3 enlarges twice the grace period of full activity, for more than 4 days. At high NaAc concentrations, 0.675 and 0.828 mol dm−3, however, an opposite effect is observed (Figure 1B). Table 1 represents data about the periods of relative activity above 90% and above the half activity interpolated from the kinetics’ dependences. The shortening of the time of activity preservation in the more concentrated NaAc solutions could be explained in terms of reduced water activity (the water available to the enzyme).

Figure 1: (A and B) Kinetics of activity of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions at different concentrations of NaAc.
Figure 1:

(A and B) Kinetics of activity of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions at different concentrations of NaAc.

Table 1:

Activity of α-amylase during incubation in aqueous solutions of [C4C1im]Br/NaAc.

NaAc concentration in the [C4C1im]Br aqueous solution (mol dm−3)Time period of
Activity above 90%Activity above 50%
02 h 16′4 h 33′
0.05057 h 27′118 h 5′
0.200110 h 11′196 h 43′
0.67573 h 43′199 h 42′
0.82835 h 33′96 h 30′

Water is a key component of the nonconventional (predominantly nonaqueous) biocatalytic media [22]. Most biocatalysts need a certain amount of water even though the quantity required could seem surprisingly small [23]. This water is directly bound to the enzyme molecule. The water present in a solution could hydrate the other compounds but without contributing to the biocatalyst’s activity. Obviously, with increasing NaAc quantity, more water molecules become involved in the salt solubilization and less free water remains to hydrate the enzyme. As a result, the activity decreases. This hypothesis is afterwards worked out.

3.2 Kinetics of activity of α-amylase incubated in aqueous solutions of [C4C1im]Br and other salts

In addition to NaAc (0.828 mol dm−3), aqueous solutions of [C4C1im]Br and the salts Na2HPO4 and K2HPO4 were prepared in a way to obtain saturation with respect to the salt. The IL concentration was fixed at 3.660 mol dm−3, while the saturation with Na2HPO4×12 H2O was reached at 0.115 mol dm−3 and with K2HPO4 – at 0.200 mol dm−3, the later borders the biphasic region of the aqueous system [C4C1im]Br/K2HPO4 [24], [25]. Then the α-amylase was added. The pH values of these aqueous solutions were 8.12 and 9.75, respectively. The three salts, NaAc, Na2HPO4, and K2HPO4, are commonly used to buffer the α-amylase solutions to desired pH values and normally could not negatively affect the catalytic activity. It is seen in Figure 2 that under limited hydration, both the IL and the salt strip the essential water from the biomolecule and its catalytic function is disturbed. In terms of inactivation, the system of the strongest kosmotrope (K2HPO4) is comparable to the solution without salt addition regardless of the mechanism of inactivation which is different, dehydration by the salt or formation of complex with the IL.

Figure 2: Kinetics of activity of α-amylase during incubation in salt-saturated [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions.
Figure 2:

Kinetics of activity of α-amylase during incubation in salt-saturated [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions.

First-order kinetics model is widely used in the literature to investigate the enzyme deactivation [26], including by ILs [27]. The fast α-amylase inactivation in the highly salted IL solutions (Figure 2) was found to approach the first-order kinetics behavior (model resolution is presented as Supplemental Figure S1). Under the most severe (anhydrous) conditions in the system of K2HPO4, the kinetics of the α-amylase deactivation perfectly obeys the model. The case of “no salt” system, however, is not so simple because the inactivation curve seems biphasic, i.e. a rapid inactivation is followed by a decelerated decay. Such biphasic behavior is a relatively common phenomenon in enzymatic inactivation kinetics [28] and is observed in cross-linked or immobilized enzymes. According to Lencki et al. [28] the slow decay is most likely due to irreversible aggregation and coagulation reactions. Regarding the present α-amylase system, such irreversible interactions could be attributed to the precipitation that was observed to occur in the samples of the IL aqueous solution without salt addition (as discussed below).

It can be concluded that a microenvironment which provides the enzyme with an appropriate water hydration and acetate concentration, could serve as a shield for the α-amylase from being exposed to a rapid inactivation by the IL, and as a result the grace period is substantially enlarged.

Potassium acetate was also tested for comparison with sodium and the best long-term protection from inactivation (the longest grace period) was obtained. In addition, incubation in [C4C1im]Br/KBr aqueous solution, which contains anions of the same type, was carried out. All solutions contained same IL and salt (NaAc, KAc, or KBr) concentrations, 3.660 and 0.200 mol dm−3, respectively. The pH values of the Ac solutions were also equal, 7.66 (NaAc) and 7.68 (KAc). The pH of KBr system was 5.58. The results about the residual activity monitored during a month of incubation are shown in Figure 3. The periods of time for activity conservation above 90% and 50% are compared in Table 2. The change of sodium with potassium extends 3 times the time of full activity. The activity was retained above 90% for 2 weeks, and the half of activity remained in the end of a month. For the same period, the activity of the α-amylase dissolved in a regular (without IL) aqueous solution could be only stored under sterility as it fed easily the microbial growth. KBr, which matches the α-amylase enzyme in the ordinary aqueous solutions [20], [22], here did not protect the enzyme from being rapidly inactivated by the IL. A plausible explanation is discussed below.

Figure 3: Kinetics of activity of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions with addition of different salts (0.200 mol dm−3), Na/KAc, or KBr.
Figure 3:

Kinetics of activity of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions with addition of different salts (0.200 mol dm−3), Na/KAc, or KBr.

Table 2:

Activity of α-amylase during incubation in aqueous solutions of [C4C1im]Br and different salt, 0.200 mol dm−3.

Salt (0.200 mol dm−3)Time period of
Activity above 90%Activity above 50%
NaAc110 h 11′196 h 43′
KAc337 h 8′732 h 30′
KBr2 h 15′6 h′

3.3 Towards an understanding of the effect of the acetate salt on the α-amylase activity preservation in aqueous solutions of [C4C1im]Br

The UV-spectroscopy is an effective and simple tool to explore the structural change in protein molecules [29]. The UV-spectra of IL systems containing α-amylase of different degrees of activity are shown in Figure 4A and B and the respective profiles in the regular (without IL) solutions are also presented for comparison. The interactions of the IL with the enzyme reflect on the UV-spectrum which is altered in the near-visible wavelength range (Figure 4A) due to the suspended precipitates that can be seen in the sample. Precipitation was also observed in the sample of the inactivated solution of IL/KBr.

Figure 4: (A and B) UV-spectra of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions.
Figure 4:

(A and B) UV-spectra of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions.

A compact α-amylase conformation was revealed in the sample of IL/0.200 mol dm−3 KAc with 90% activity (2-week incubation) where no precipitation was observed (Figure 4B). The profile remained almost unchanged in a month of incubation except for the very slightly higher absorption in the near-visible range. The inactivation in the salty system of [C4C1im]Br/NaAc (0.828 mol dm−3) is obviously caused by complete unfolding of the enzyme. When protein unfolds a loosened conformation is developed where more chromophores become exposed to interactions with the solvent and as a result the absorbance increases [29], as observed in Figure 4B.

The alteration in the biomolecule’s conformation is thought to be responsible for the activity loss. Tertiary structural change of a protein chain induced by molecules could be detected by measuring the fluorescence spectra [29]. Most of the intrinsic fluorescence emissions from a folded protein are due to the excitation of Trp residues, which are sensitive to the microenvironment surrounding the fluorophores [30]. The fluorescence emitted by the α-amylase incubated in the aqueous solution of IL and in the IL/KAc was monitored and compared with the intensity in the absence of IL (Figure 5). A substantial reduction in the fluorescence emitted from the excited Trp fluorophores was observed, as expected, in the IL solution, where suspended precipitates were noticed and a rapid deactivation was measured. However, quenching was also observed in the sample of the active α-amylase. There was a negligible difference between the spectra of the fully active α-amylase (IL/KAc, 4th hour) and the α-amylase with half activity (IL/KAc, 30th day). This means that regarding the α-amylase enzyme, the Trp fluorescence quenching is not necessarily accompanied by an activity loss, as elsewhere stated [12].

Figure 5: Fluorescence spectra of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions.
Figure 5:

Fluorescence spectra of α-amylase during incubation in [C4C1im]Br aqueous solutions.

In future, in order to unravel the arrangement around the enzyme, diverse spectrometric studies must be carried out, which should consider the groups involved in the substrate binding sites on the α-amylase surface, such as histidine residues, as well as the groups of the active site [31], [32].

The results obtained show that the acetate anion acts as preventer for the α-amylase enzyme from being rapidly inactivated by the imidazolium cation of the IL. An important interaction must be considered to understand this effect. It is found that the Ac anion is able to accept a proton from C2–H on the imidazolium cation to generate a carbene, a highly energetic intermediate [33], [34]. This interaction might be involved in the mechanism of prevention from inactivation. In the presence of KBr, which is not capable of forming carbenes with [C4C1im]Br, a rapid inactivation was measured (see Figure 3) and precipitates were clearly seen in the samples, similar to the solution without salt. No precipitation was noticed in the samples of [C4C1im]Br/KAc during the long-term incubation. The acetate protects the α-amylase from being salted-out and precipitated by the IL.

Apart from physical methods applied to investigate the enzyme deactivation by the IL, an alternative methodology relies on the enzyme kinetic approach. By measuring the rate of the starch hydrolysis at different substrate concentrations in the presence of IL and acetate, the interaction between enzyme-IL/acetate or (enzyme-substrate)-IL/acetate could be deduced, as it has been recently shown in the case of cellulase and [C4C1im]Cl [27]. This constitutes a platform for a further work.

4 Conclusions

The activity of the α-amylase enzyme incubated in aqueous solutions with high concentration of [C4C1im]Br (80.2% w/v) was studied. Hitherto, a complete deactivation of the α-amylase by the same IL has been only reported in the literature. Here, it was shown that a small addition of acetate salt in the concentrated IL solution could substantially improve the preservation of the enzyme so that its activity could be saved for a long grace period. Best results were obtained by the addition of potassium acetate, 0.200 mol dm−3. More than 90% of the α-amylase activity was retained in the 2-week incubation, and a half activity remained at the end of a month. When it was added in higher concentrations, the salt competed with the α-amylase for the free water available in the solutions and due to the limited hydration, the enzyme activity decreased. Suspended precipitates were observed in the samples of the IL aqueous solution without salt addition, which implies that the IL-enzyme interactions cause the inactivation, and change the native UV- and fluorescence spectra. No precipitation was noticed in the samples containing acetate salts during the long-term incubation of the α-amylase. Regardless of the fluorescence quenching, the enzyme activity could be fully restored. The effect of the acetate salt on the preservation of the α-amylase from inactivation by the IL for a grace period is probably related to the ability of the acetate anion to interact with the imidazolium cation and to form a stable carbene. In the presence of potassium bromide, which does not interact with the [C4C1im]Br, precipitation and fast inactivation of the α-amylase were observed.

α-Amylase is the primary enzyme involved in the starch degradation. The finding about the preservation effect of the acetate salt on the amylolytic activity in the concentrated IL solutions could support the utilization of the starchy wastes derived from extractions by ILs, for example lipid extracted alga which contain readily assimilable starch [35].

About the author

Konstantza Tonova

Konstantza Atanassova Tonova studied chemical engineering in Sofia, Bulgaria and obtained her PhD in 2009 in the field of innovative liquid media (surfactant-based reversed micellar solvents) applied for bioseparations and biocatalysis. In 1994 Dr. Tonova started her professional career at the Institute of Chemical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Since 2010 she has become a leading researcher in the field of recovery of biomolecules and natural value-added substances by ionic liquids at the laboratory of “Transfer processes in multiphase media.”

Acknowledgments

A grant (no. DFNI-B01/23) from the Bulgarian Science Fund, Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science, is gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1] Minnick DL, Flores RA, DeStefano MR, Scurto AM. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 7906–7919.10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b04309Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Heggset EB, Syverud K, Øyaas K. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016, 93, 194–200.10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.07.023Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Bernal B, Chacón FJ, Jara AG, Belleville M-P. Green Process. Synth. 2014, 3, 353–363.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Elgharbawy AA, Zahangir Alam M, Moniruzzaman M, Goto M. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 109, 252–267.10.1016/j.bej.2016.01.021Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Xu JX, Xiong P, He BF. Bioresource Technol. 2016, 200, 961–970.10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.031Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Tan X-Y, Li X-X, Chen L, Xie F-W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 27584–27593.10.1039/C6CP04426CSuche in Google Scholar

[7] Luo ZG, Ji GG, Lu XX. Asian J. Chem. 2016, 28, 1361–1366.10.14233/ajchem.2016.19705Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Yang X-D, Qiao C-D, Li Y, Li T-D. React. Funct. Polym. 2016, 100, 181–190.10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2016.01.017Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang B, Chen L, Xie F, Li X, Truss RW, Halley PJ, Shamshina JL, Rogers RD, McNally T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 13860–13871.10.1039/C5CP01176KSuche in Google Scholar

[10] Zhao D-D, Wang C-Y, Luo X-R, Fu X, Liu H-S, Yu L. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 78, 304–312.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.04.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Zhao D, Palaparthi AD, Huang Q, Fu X, Liu H, Yu L. Ind. Crops Products 2015, 77, 139–145.10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.063Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Dabirmanesh B, Daneshjou S, Sepahi AA, Ranjbar B, Khavari-Nejad RA, Gill P, Heydari A, Khajeh K. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 48, 93–97.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.10.001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Asoodeh A, Alemi A, Heydari A, Akbari J. Extremophiles 2013, 17, 339–348.10.1007/s00792-013-0520-1Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Asoodeh A, Shamsi E, Shirin E, Jalal R, Housaindokht MR. J. Mol. Catal. B Enz. 2014, 99, 114–120.10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.10.025Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Shamsi E, Asoodeh A, Shirin E. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 290–298.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.08.023Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Mohammadyazdani N, Bozorgmehr MR, Momen-Heravi M. J. Mol. Liquids 2016, 221, 463–468.10.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.030Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Mateyawa S, Xie DF, Truss RW, Halley PJ, Nicholson TM, Shamshina JL, Rogers RD, Boehm MW, McNally T. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 94, 520–530.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.024Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Tonova K, Bogdanov MG. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 812–823.10.1080/01496395.2016.1267211Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Pantschev C, Klenz G, Häfner B. Lebensmittel. Getränke 1981, 28, 71–74.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Tonova K, Lazarova Z. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 47, 43–51.10.1016/j.seppur.2005.06.003Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Tonova K, Svinyarov I, Bogdanov MG. J. Int. Sci. Publ. Mater. Methods Technol. 2015, 9, 442–451.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Tonova K, Lazarova Z. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 516–532.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.06.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Ulbert O, Bélafi-Bakó K, Tonova K, Gubicza L. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2005, 23, 177–183.10.1080/10242420500192940Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Li ZY, Pei YC, Wang HY, Fan J, Wang JJ. Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29, 1336–1346.10.1016/j.trac.2010.07.014Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Tonova K. J. Int. Sci. Publ. Mater. Methods Technol. 2011, 5, 256–265.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Lencki RW, Arul J, Neufeld RJ. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 40, 1421–1426.10.1002/bit.260401117Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Nemestóthy N, Megyeri G, Bakonyi P, Lakatos P, Koók L, Polakovic M, Gubicza L, Bélafi-Bakó K. Bioresource Technol. 2017, 229, 190–195.10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Lencki RW, Arul J, Neufeld RJ. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 40, 1427–1434.10.1002/bit.260401118Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Li QZ, Zhai T, Du K, Li YX, Feng W. Coll. Surf. B Biointerf. 2013, 112, 315–321.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.08.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Fan YC, Yan JL, Zhang SL, Li JH, Chen D, Duan PG. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 168, 592–603.10.1007/s12010-012-9801-xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Hwang KY, Song HK, Chang C, Lee J, Lee SY, Kim KK, Choe S, Sweet RM, Suh SW. Mol. Cells 1997, 7, 251–258.Suche in Google Scholar

[32] Liu YH, Fan SA, Liu XG, Zhang ZM, Wang JL, Wang ZX, Lu FP. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 898–904.10.4014/jmb.1402.02004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Du HB, Qian XH. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 1985–1990.10.1016/j.carres.2011.05.022Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Knappke CEI, Neudörfl JM, von Wangelin AJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 1695–1705.10.1039/b921655cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Gao K, Orr V, Rehmann L. Bioresource Technol. 2016, 206, 77–85.10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.036Suche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplemental Material

The online version of this article (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/gps-2017-0016) offers supplementary material.


Received: 2017-1-31
Accepted: 2017-2-27
Published Online: 2017-5-11
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 17.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2017-0016/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen