Article Open Access

Preparation of anhydrite from eggshell via pyrolysis

  • Nuchnapa Tangboriboon has been working in the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, since 2006. In 2006, she received her PhD in polymer science from the Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Her area of scientific interest includes alternative energy, industrial and agricultural waste recycling, advanced materials (nano/bio/composite/smart materials) and materials processing and development.

    ,

    Wanitcha Unjan is a graduate student of the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University Bangkok, Thailand. Her scientific interest and activities are industrial and agricultural waste recycling, advanced materials (nano/bio/composite/smart materials) and materials processing and development.

    ,

    Watchara Sangwan is a graduate student of the Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. His scientific interest and activities are conductive and electroactive polymers.

    and

    Anuvat Sirivat has been working as a professor of polymer engineering, Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, since 2008. In 1983, he received his PhD in mechanical engineering from Cornell University. His area of scientific interest includes conductive and electroactive polymers, rheology, stability, transition and turbulence of complex fluids and light scattering.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 16, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) was prepared from the chemical reaction between calcium carbonate from duck eggshell and sulfuric acid at 25°C. The CaSO4·2H2O was dried in an oven at 110°C and transformed into calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris (CaSO4·0.5H2O). The CaSO4·0.5H2O was calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C and transformed into anhydrite or anhydrous calcium sulfate (CaSO4). The raw material used in this research was the duck eggshell, the waste eggshell generated from food processing industries. The obtained anhydrous calcium sulfate or anhydrite has true density, color, specific surface area, pore diameter and particle size equal to 2.95 g/cm3, white powder, 3.57 m2/g, 96.98 Å and 3.983 μm, respectively. In addition, other characteristics, microstructures, phase transformation and physical properties of raw materials and calcium sulfates were investigated and reported here using X-ray fluorescencemeter, Fourier transform infrared spectrometer, differential thermal analyzer, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffractometer, pycnometer method and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller.

1 Introduction

Calcium sulfate is a ceramic material useful for various industrial applications: a binder for building materials, bone graft materials, periodontal disease treatment, endodontic lesions, alveolar bone loss, maxillary sinus augmentation, filler for plastics and rubber, coating, construction materials, desiccant, coagulant and catalysts [1], [2], [3]. In general, calcium sulfate compounds in the form of γ- or β-anhydrite (the nearly anhydrous), namely, anhydrous calcium sulfate, calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris and calcium dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) are the most abundant sulfate minerals in nature [4]. Natural gypsum or calcium sulfate dihydrate is a monoclinic-prismatic mineral with a layered crystal lattice containing water. When the crystal lattice is heated, it can be converted to the metastable hemihydrate and anhydrite III which has a similar lattice structure. The anhydrite III can be transformed to the anhydrite II possessing the most densely packed ion lattice which does not react very readily with water at high temperature [5]. The phase transformation, crystal structure, morphology and growth rate of calcium sulfate depend on temperature, pressure, dissolved electrolytes or organics and other minerals [6]. There are many types of calcium sulfate: calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O), subhydrate calcium sulfate (CaSO4·0.81H2O), α and β-hemihydrate calcium sulfate (CaSO4·1/2H2O) and calcium sulfate anhydrite I, II and III (CaSO4) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. The synonyms, characteristics (color, odor and density values), crystal structures, chemical solubility performances, physical-optical-mechanical properties (translucence, refractive index and hardness) and their applications are quite different. The calcium sulfate compounds can be prepared from a variety of processes: dissolving in aqueous sulfuric acid, flue gas desulfurization, reverse microemulsion, chemical precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption, reverse osmosis and electrochemical methods [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21].

Eggshell is a calcium source obtained from and consumed by food industries. The by-product eggshell represents about 11% of the approximate total weight of 60 g for an egg [22], [23], [24]. The main composition of eggshells is calcium carbonate (CaCO3) known as calcite of more than 94 wt% and other oxides and organic compounds of 6 wt% [22], [23], [24]. The eggshell is a waste that can be processed into useful materials for various applications [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27].

The objective of this work was to utilize the duck eggshell as a raw material to react with sulfuric acid to prepare various calcium sulfate compounds: calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum, hemihydrate or plaster of Paris and anhydrite. The characteristics, microstructures, phase transformation and physical properties of the calcium sulfate compounds were investigated and reported here by using X-ray fluorescencemeter (XRF), Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR), differential thermal analyzer (DTA), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscope (SEM), X-ray diffractometer (XRD), pycnometer method and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET).

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

Duck eggshell was collected from the cafeteria at Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. The duck eggshells were cleaned with tap water, dried in the air for 2 days and ground with high-speed mill for 120 min.

Hydrosulfuric acid (H2SO4) has a high purity of 98% and was purchased from Arsom Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand. Hydrosulfuric acid is colorless and odorless, with the melting temperature of 104°C at 1.0 atm.

2.2 Instruments

Muffle furnace (Nabertherm, Ceramotherm, Bangkok, Thailand) with a thermocouple of type K, NiCr-Ni was used to calcine the duck eggshells at 900°C for 2 h with a heating rate of 5°C/min. The muffle furnace was used to calcine the precipitated calcium sulfate powders, prepared from the reaction between duck eggshell and concentrated sulfuric acid at room temperature, at firing temperatures of 700, 800 and 900°C for 2 h with a heating rate of 10°C/min.

High-speed mill (Compound Clay, model RM 1105, Bangkok, Thailand) with a speed 500 rpm was used to grind calcium sulfate powders.

Particle size analyzer (Malvern, Mastersizer S long, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to analyze the particle size distribution and cumulative mass percent finer. The samples were dispersed in a water medium and vibrated in an ultrasonic cleaner for 20 min.

XRD (Bruker, AXS D8 Discover, Bangkok, Thailand) with a VANTEC-1 Detector was used to obtain X-ray diffraction patterns. Samples were analyzed using a double-crystal wide-angle goniometry. Scans were measured from 5°–80° 2θ at a scan speed of 5° 2θ/min in 0.05° or 0.03° 2θ increments using CuKα radiation (λ=0.15406 nm). Peak positions were consistent with those of the International Center for Diffraction Data Standard (JCPDS) patterns to identify crystalline phases.

XRF (Phillips, PW 2400, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to determine the chemical compositions using a tube current of 1000 mA and an acquisition lifetime of 30 s.

SEM (JEOL, 5200, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to obtain SEM images. The samples were mounted on stubs using a carbon paste and were sputter-coated to ~0.1 μm of gold to improve conductivity. The acceleration voltages of 11 and 13 kV with magnifications of 5000 times were used.

FTIR (PerkinElmer, Spectrum One, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to measure FTIR spectra at a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1 in the range 400–4000 cm−1 using ATR zinc selenide, ZnSe, as a reference.

TGA (Perkin-Elmer, TGA 7, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to investigate thermal properties of samples in terms of weight loss or residue mass with a heating rate of 10°C/min.

DTA (Perkin Elmer, DTA 7, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to study the thermal properties of the raw duck eggshell powder and the precipitated calcium sulfate prepared at room temperature (25°C).

An AUTOSORB-1 (Quantachrome, Bangkok, Thailand) was used to characterize the specific surface area, adsorption and/or desorption isotherms and pore size distribution. These material characteristics were evaluated by measuring of the quantity of gas adsorbed onto or desorbed from the solid surface at equilibrium vapor pressure by the static volumetric method. The volume-pressure data were interpreted by the AUTOSORB-1 software into the BET surface area (single and/or multipoint), the Langmuir surface area, adsorption and/or desorption isotherms and micro-pore volume. The determination of the surface area of the solid materials involved the use of the BET equation:

(1)1W((P/Po)1)=1WmC+C1WmC(PPo)

where W is the weight of the gas adsorbed at the relative pressure, P/Po, Wm is the weight of the adsorbate constituting a monolayer of the surface coverage; and C is the constant related to the energy of adsorption in the first adsorbed layer. The specific surface area, S, of the solid was calculated from the total surface area and the sample weight, according to Eqs. (2) and (3):

(2)S=St/W
(3)St=WmNAcsM

where S is the specific surface area of the solid, St is the total surface area, W is the sample weight, N is Avogadro’s number (6.023×1023 molecules/mol), M is the molecular weight of the adsorbate and Acs is the area occupied by one adsorbate molecule (16.2×10−20 m2 for N2 and 19.5×10−20 m2 for Kr). The characteristics of the gas adsorption can be categorized to three porosity classifications: (i) pores with openings exceeding 500 Å in diameter (called macropores); (ii) micropores, or pores with diameters not exceeding 20 Å; and (iii) pores of intermediate size or mesopores [28].

True density of the raw material (duck eggshells) and calcium sulfate powder was measured by a Gas Pycnometer (Quantachrome, Ultra pycnometer 1000) following Eq. (4):

(4)ρ=Weight(D)True volume

where ρ is the true density (g cm−3), D is the weight of dry sample (g) and the true volume is the volume of the solid component only (cm3). It was determined by crushing the sample into a powder form so that all pores were destroyed and then using a gas pycnometer method.

2.3 Calcium sulfate (CaSO4·2H2O, CaSO4·0.5H2O and CaSO4) powder preparation

The duck eggshell was ground for 120 min, as a calcium carbonate source (CaCO3) and then allowed to react with sulfuric acid at room temperature (25°C) according to the chemical reactions in Eqs. (5) and (6):

(5)2CaCO3+2H2SO42CaSO42H2O+2CO2
(6)or 2CaO+2H2SO42CaSO42H2O
(7)2CaSO42H2OGypsum or calcium dihydrateHeat at low temperatureCaSO40.5H2O+1.5H2OCalcium hemihydrate
(8)CaSO40.5H2OCalcium hemihydrateHeat at high temperatureCaSO4+0.5H2OAnhydrite or plaster of Paris

When the chemical reaction between CaCO3 and H2SO4 occurred, the precipitated calcium sulfate or calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) powder was filtered, rinsed with tap water two to three and then dried in the oven at 110°C for 24 h. Calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) was transformed into calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O) according to Eq. (7). Then, the dried calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder was calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C for 2 h. Calcium sulfate hemihydrate was converted to anhydrite or anhydrous calcium sulfate (CaSO4) according to Eq. (8). The obtained calcined powder was then used to investigate the physical properties and characterized by SEM, FTIR, TGA, DTA, XRD, particle size distribution, BET and pycnometer measurement.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characteristics of raw material and calcium sulfate powder

The chemical compositions of the duck eggshell and calcined duck eggshell were measured by XRF and data are tabulated in Table 1. The raw duck eggshell is composed of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) of 98.101 wt% and other oxide compounds of 1.899 wt%, while the calcined duck eggshell is composed of calcium oxide (CaO) of 97.805 wt% and other oxide compounds such as MgO, Na2O, K2O and SiO2 of 2.195 wt%. The raw duck eggshell and calcined duck eggshell reacted with sulfuric acid at room temperature (25°C) according to Eqs. (5) and (6) to obtain calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum. When calcium sulfate dihydrate was heated, it was transformed into calcium hemihydrate or plaster of Paris and anhydrite according to Eqs. (7) and (8), respectively.

Table 1:

Chemical compositions of raw materials as measured by XRF.

Duck eggshellsCalcined duck eggshells
ElementsCompoundsWeight (%)ElementsCompoundsWeight (%)
NaNa2O0.204NaNa2O0.161
MgMgO0.286MgMgO0.656
AlAl2O30.035SiSiO20.255
SiSiO20.073PP2O50.775
PP2O50.443SSO30.215
SSO30.764ClCl0.053
ClCl0.035KK2O0.059
KK2O0.038CaCaO97.805
CaCaCO398.101SrSrO0.019
CuCuO0.009
SrSrO0.013

3.2 Physical properties and microstructures of calcium sulfate powder

The physical properties (particle size, true density, specific surface area and pore diameter) of the raw duck eggshell and anhydrous calcium sulfate calcined at 800 and 900°C were measured and the data are tabulated in Table 2. The particle size of the raw duck eggshell is 32.33 μm. The true density, specific surface area and pore diameter of the raw duck eggshell are 2.25 g/cm3, 7.79 m2/g and 196.90 Å, respectively, while the particle size of the raw duck eggshell reacted with sulfuric acid and calcined at 900°C for 2 h is equal to 3.99 μm. The true density, specific surface area and pore diameter of the raw duck eggshell reacted with sulfuric acid and calcined at 900°C for 2 h are 2.95 g/cm3, 3.57 m2/g and 96.98 Å, respectively. The porosity of the anhydrous calcium sulfate calcined at 900°C for 2 h is in the range of meso-porous structure (20–500 Å). The adsorption-desorption isotherm of the anhydrous calcium sulfate or anhydrite is consistent with the isotherm of type IV according to the Kelvin equation having the hysteresis loop at a lower relative pressure, causing a lower free energy state and the thermodynamic equilibrium. The physical properties of the raw duck eggshell and calcium sulfate samples, namely, particle size and shape, specific surface area, true density and solubility, are important factors for calcium sulfate formation and applications [6], [9], [29].

Table 2:

Physical properties of samples.

SamplesParticle size (μm)True density (g/cm3)Specific surface area (m2/g)Pore diameter (Å)
Raw duck eggshell34.352.257.79196.90
CaSO4 calcined at 800°C5.5602.87N/AN/A
CaSO4 calcined at 900°C3.9832.953.5796.98
  1. N/A, not measured.

Figure 1 shows the DTA measurement of the dried precipitate calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder prepared from the chemical reaction between the duck eggshell and sulfuric acid from 25 to 1000°C. There are two sharp peaks in the exothermic reaction occurring at 163.70°C to form calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris (CaSO4·0.5H2O). The exothermic reaction still shows a metastable calcium sulfate up to 820.08°C, after which the calcium sulfate hemihydrate was converted to the calcium sulfate anhydrite. Kontrec et al. [12] reported the loss of water molecules from the calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum at about 160°C where the rest of H2O remained in the calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O) which was finally converted to the anhydrite or anhydrous calcium sulfate (CaSO4) at high temperature.

Figure 1: DTA measurement of the calcium sulfate dihydrate powder as prepared from the chemical reaction between duck eggshell and sulfuric acid from room temperature (25°C) to 1000°C.
Figure 1:

DTA measurement of the calcium sulfate dihydrate powder as prepared from the chemical reaction between duck eggshell and sulfuric acid from room temperature (25°C) to 1000°C.

TGA measurement of the calcium sulfate dihydrate powder prepared from the raw duck eggshell reacting with sulfuric acid is shown in Figure 2. The weight loss in the range of 25–1000°C is equal to 22.68 wt% or with a residue mass of 78.32 wt%. Water was released by about 6.0 wt% from the calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) to yield the calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O) at 163.70°C, consistent with the obtained DTA result. The obtained water release of 6.0 wt% is close to the theoretical water content of 6.30 wt% of the exothermic reaction at 160°C [21].

Figure 2: TGA measurement of the dried calcium sulfate dihydrate as prepared from the chemical reaction between duck eggshell and sulfuric acid measured in the range of 25–1000°C.
Figure 2:

TGA measurement of the dried calcium sulfate dihydrate as prepared from the chemical reaction between duck eggshell and sulfuric acid measured in the range of 25–1000°C.

The chemical compositions of the calcium sulfate before and after firing at 900°C for 2 h were measured by XRF and the data are tabulated in Table 3. The main compositions of the calcium sulfate dihydrate before firing at 900°C for 2 h are close to the chemical compositions after firing. The chemical composition of calcium sulfate dihydrate is CaO at 87.946 wt% and SO3 at 12.054 wt%, while the anhydrous calcium sulfate or anhydrite is composed of calcium oxide (CaO) of 86.017 wt% and sulfur trioxide (SO3) of 13.983 wt%. The SO2 and SO3 can react with CaCO3 to yield CaSO4 and CaSO4·2H2O as in Eq. (9):

Table 3:

Chemical compositions of calcium sulfate powders after firing measured by XRF.

ElementsWeight (%)CompoundsWeight of calcium sulfate before firing (wt%)Weight of calcium sulfate after firing 900°C (wt%)
S4.827CaO87.94686.017
Ca62.855SO312.05413.983
O32.318
(9)Ca2+(aq)+SO42(aq)+2H2ORoom temperatureCaSO42H2O(s)CaSO4(s)

The FTIR spectra of the obtained samples prepared from the chemical reaction between the raw duck eggshell reacted with sulfuric acid (H2SO4), before and after calcination at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h are shown in Figure 3. The FTIR spectrum of the dried precipitate calcium sulfate powder before firing is consistent with the results obtained by Greish [1] and Kontrec et al. [12]. They showed that the hemihydrate calcium sulfate spectrum consists of the ester peak S-O at 659.13 cm−1, the C-H bending at 874.98 cm−1, the S=O stretching at 1007.99, a sharp peak at 1088.99 cm−1, the S=O stretching at 1112.32 and 1142.56 cm−1 and the O-H stretching at 3556.02 and 3604.69 cm−1. When calcium sulfate hemihydrate samples were calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h, the corresponding FTIR spectra contain the anhydrite calcium sulfate peaks at 613.01 and 672.64 cm−1 (S-O ester), at 876.09 cm1 (C-H bending), at 1095.88 cm−1 (S=O stretching) and at 3642 cm−1 (O-H stretching), consistent with the result reported by Kontrec et al. [12]. From the obtained FTIR results, the SO2 or SO3 from the sulfuric acid reacted with CaCO3 to yield CaSO4·2H2O, CaSO4·0.5H2O and CaSO4.

Figure 3: FTIR spectra of the obtained calcium sulfate samples as prepared from the chemical reaction between the raw duck eggshell and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) before and after calcinations at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h, respectively.
Figure 3:

FTIR spectra of the obtained calcium sulfate samples as prepared from the chemical reaction between the raw duck eggshell and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) before and after calcinations at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h, respectively.

The XRD peak patterns of the raw duck eggshell before and after firing at 900°C for 2 h and the dried calcium sulfate powders obtained from the raw duck eggshell reacting with sulfuric acid and calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h, are shown in Figure 4. The XRD peak pattern of the raw duck eggshell shows the crystalline phase formation of rhombohedral or calcite consistent with the JCPDS file no. 01-086-2339 at the (hkl): (104) 29.364°, (012) 23.058° and (113) 39.424°. The XRD peak pattern of the calcined raw duck eggshell shows the crystalline phase formation of lime or calcia consistent with the JCPDS file no. 00-037-1497 at the (hkl): (200) 37.347°, (220) 53.856° and (111) 32.204°. The main XRD peak pattern of the dried precipitated calcium sulfate powder before firing shows the rhombohedral structure of the calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O), consistent with the obtained DTA and TGA results, the FTIR results and the JCPDS file no. 01-070-0909 at the (hkl): (020) 25.432°, (104) 29.364°, (012) 31.366°, (022) 38.648°, (212) 40.820° and (032) 48.696°. The dried precipitated sample, or the calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O) powder, was calcined at 700 and 800°C for 2 h. The XRD peak patterns show the anhydrous calcium sulfate (CaSO4) metastable phase belonging to the hexagonal structure consistent with the JCPDS file nos. 01-089-1458 and 01-070-0909 at the (hkl): (100) 14.665°, (200) 29.577°, (102) 32.011° and (020) 25.432°, (012) 31.366° and (212) 40.820°. The (CaSO4), present with a small amount of the calcium hydroxide or portlandite (Ca(OH)2), belongs to the orthorhombic structure consistent with the JCPDS file no. 00-004-0733 at the (hkl): (101) 34.089°, (102) 47.124° and (110) 50.795°. Furthermore, the dried precipitated calcium sulfate dihydrate sample calcined at 900°C for 2 h shows an XRD pattern consisting of a stable crystalline phase formation of a hexagonal structure, namely, the anhydrite structure (CaSO4), consistent with the JCPDS file no. 01-089-1458 at the (hkl): (020) 25.432°, (012) 31.366° and (022) 38.648, the anhydrite crystal structure [3]. Therefore, the obtained XRD patterns indicate that the calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) can transform into the calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris (CaSO4·0.5H2O) and then to the anhydrite (CaSO4) crystal structure depending on processing temperature and time, consistent with the dehydration-rehydration of calcium sulfates flowchart [30].

Figure 4: XRD peak patterns of the duck eggshell before and after calcination at 900°C for 2 h and calcium sulfate hemihydrate powders calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h, respectively.
Figure 4:

XRD peak patterns of the duck eggshell before and after calcination at 900°C for 2 h and calcium sulfate hemihydrate powders calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C, for 2 h, respectively.

The SEM micrographs of the duck eggshell powder, calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder before firing and dried precipitated calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 700, 800 and 900°C at the magnifications of 1000 and 5000 times are shown in Figure 5. The SEM micrographs of the ground raw duck eggshell powder show the agglomerate particles and non-uniform size as shown in Figure 5A. The SEM micrographs of the precipitated calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder dried at 110°C without firing show a uniform needle-shaped crystal (Figure 5B) [4], [13], [31]. The agglomeration of the needle shape to form a plate-like shape or a disk-like shape is due to the phase transformation at the firing temperature of 700°C as shown in Figure 5C consistent with the SEM result obtained by Gartner [31]. The microstructure changes to a more plate-like shape at the firing temperature of 800°C, as shown in Figure 5D. Furthermore, the microstructure crystallizes completely and changes to form the small rod-like shape at the calcination temperature of 900°C as shown in Figure 5E consistent with the SEM results obtained by Azimi et al. [30].

Figure 5: SEM micrographs of samples at magnifications of 5000 times: (A) duck eggshell powder; (B) calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O) powder before firing; (C) calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 700°C; (D) calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 800°C; and (E) calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 900°C.
Figure 5:

SEM micrographs of samples at magnifications of 5000 times: (A) duck eggshell powder; (B) calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·0.5H2O) powder before firing; (C) calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 700°C; (D) calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 800°C; and (E) calcium sulfate hemihydrate powder calcined at 900°C.

4 Conclusions

Duck eggshell is a potential material for use as the calcium carbonate (CaCO3) source to react with sulfuric acid in order to prepare the calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O), the calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris (CaSO4·0.5H2O) and the stable anhydrite (CaSO4) in terms of CaSO4·xH2O (x=0.0–2.0) by the thermal process. Calcium sulfate was formed by the hydration and dehydration process due to water adsorption-desorption ability within the layer microstructure. There are many advantages of the chemical precipitation method used in this study for the preparation of the calcium sulfate compounds: easy and convenient forming, low price and high purity calcium sulfate, in addition to waste eggshell reduction. The calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum was formed at room temperature. When the calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO4·2H2O) was dried at 110°C, they changed into the calcium sulfate hemihydrate or plaster of Paris (CaSO4·0.5H2O) and then transformed into the anhydrite or anhydrous calcium sulfate (CaSO4) at the calcination temperatures from 300°C to 1000°C. The XRD phase formation of calcium sulfates changed from the rhombohedral structure (gypsum) to the hexagonal (anhydrite) crystal structure. The SEM micrographs showed the changes from the needle-like shape (hemihydrate or plaster of Paris) to the plate- or disk-like shape and to the rod-like shape (anhydrite) with increasing calcination temperature. The true density, color, odor, specific surface area, average pore diameter and average particle size of anhydrite or anhydrous calcium sulfate calcined at 900°C were equal to 2.95 g/cm3, white powder, odorless, 3.57m2/g, 96.98 Å and 3.983 μm, respectively. Calcium sulfates can function as a binder, filler, adsorbent, catalyst and coagulant. The calcium sulfate dihydrate or gypsum is suitable for building and mold making, whereas the anhydrite or anhydrous calcium sulfate is suitable as filler in various applications such as paint, plastic, rubber, coating and cement [32], [33].

About the authors

Nuchnapa Tangboriboon

Nuchnapa Tangboriboon has been working in the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, since 2006. In 2006, she received her PhD in polymer science from the Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Her area of scientific interest includes alternative energy, industrial and agricultural waste recycling, advanced materials (nano/bio/composite/smart materials) and materials processing and development.

Wanitcha Unjan

Wanitcha Unjan is a graduate student of the Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University Bangkok, Thailand. Her scientific interest and activities are industrial and agricultural waste recycling, advanced materials (nano/bio/composite/smart materials) and materials processing and development.

Watchara Sangwan

Watchara Sangwan is a graduate student of the Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. His scientific interest and activities are conductive and electroactive polymers.

Anuvat Sirivat

Anuvat Sirivat has been working as a professor of polymer engineering, Petroleum and Petrochemical College, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, since 2008. In 1983, he received his PhD in mechanical engineering from Cornell University. His area of scientific interest includes conductive and electroactive polymers, rheology, stability, transition and turbulence of complex fluids and light scattering.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Department of Materials Engineering, Kasetsart University, for the use of analytical instruments and the Energy and Environmental Engineering Center, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, for the eggshell classification. This work was supported by the Agricultural Research Development Agency (ARDA; public organization) of the Ministry of Agricultural and Cooperatives, the Thailand Research Fund (fiscal year 2013–2014, grant no. PRP5605010080). In addition, A.S. also would like to acknowledge the partial financial support from the Conductive and Electroactive Polymers Research Unit and the CU 2nd Century Project (CUAASC) of Chulalongkorn University, the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) (grant no. RTA5580003) and the Royal Thai Government (grant no. GRB-APS-46-59-63-05).

References

[1] Greish YE. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 715–723.10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.09.046Search in Google Scholar

[2] Orsini G, Rieei J, Scarano A, Pecora G, Lezzi G, Biomed. J. Mater. Res. B. 2004, 68, 199–208.10.1002/jbm.b.20012Search in Google Scholar

[3] Zhao W, Yang H, Huo C. Colloids Surf. A. 2012, 393, 128–132.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.11.010Search in Google Scholar

[4] Freyer D, Voigt W. Monatshefte fur Chemie. 2003, 134, 693–719.10.1007/s00706-003-0590-3Search in Google Scholar

[5] Reisdorf K, Abriel W. Neues Jb Miner Abh. 1987, 157, 35–46.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cetin E, Eroglu I, Ozkar S. J. Cryst. Growth 2001, 231, 559–567.10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01525-1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hand RJ. Brit. Ceram. T. 1997, 96, 116–120.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Deer WA, Howie RA, Zussman J. In An Introduction to the rock-forming mineral, 2nd ed., Longman: London, 1992, p. 627.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Packter A. J. Cryst. Growth 1974, 21, 191–194.10.1016/0022-0248(74)90004-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] Klepetsanis PG, Dalas E, Koutsoukos PG. Langmuir 1999, 15, 1534–1540.10.1021/la9800912Search in Google Scholar

[11] Boisvert JP, Domenech M, Foissy A, Persello J, Mutin JC. J. Cryst. Growth 2000, 220, 579–591.10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00865-4Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kontrec J, Kralj D, Brecevic L. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 240, 203–211.10.1016/S0022-0248(02)00858-8Search in Google Scholar

[13] Licong D, Yifei Z, Fangfang C, Shaotao C, Shaowei Y, Yan L, Yi Z. J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 21, 1303–1312.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Baltpurvins KA, Burns RC, Lawrance GA. Waste Manage. 1996, 16, 717–725.10.1016/S0956-053X(97)00014-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] Baltpurvins KA, Burns RC, Lawrance GA, Stuart AD. Water Res. 1997, 31, 973–980.10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00327-2Search in Google Scholar

[16] Dabrowski A, Hubicki Z, Podkoscielny P, Robens E. Chemosphere 2004, 56, 91–106.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.03.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Wingenfelder U, Hasnsen C, Furrer G, Schulin R. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 4606–4613.10.1021/es048482sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Dipalma L, Ferrantelli P, Merli C, Petrucci E. Ann. Chim. 2003, 93, 1005–1011.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lai CL, Lin KS. J. Hazard Mater. 2006, 136, 183–187.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.05.042Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Boke H, Akkurt S, Ozdemir S, Gokturk H, Caner Saltik EN. Mater. Lett. 2004, 58, 723–726.10.1016/j.matlet.2003.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kong B, Yu J, Savino K, Zhu Y, Guan B. Colloids Surf. A. 2012, 409, 88–93.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.05.041Search in Google Scholar

[22] Tsai WT, Yang JM, Lai CW, Cheng YH, Lin CC, Yeh CW. Bioresource Technol. 2006, 97, 488–491.10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.050Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Nys Y, Gautron J, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Hincke MT. CR Palevol. 2004, 3, 549–562.10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] Murakami FS, Rodrigues PO. Cienc. Technol. Aliment. Campinas. 2007, 27, 658–662.10.1590/S0101-20612007000300035Search in Google Scholar

[25] Tangboriboon N, Kunaruraksapong R, Sirivat A. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2012, 13, 413–419.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tangboriboon N, Khongnakhon T, Kittikul S, Kunanuraksapong R, Sirivat A. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2011, 58, 33–41.10.1007/s10971-010-2351-1Search in Google Scholar

[27] Tangboriboon N, Phudkrachang P, Kunanuruksapong R, Sirivat A. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2011, 84, 543–564.10.5254/1.3614530Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ferreira JMF. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1998, 18, 1161–1169.10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00038-7Search in Google Scholar

[29] Singh NB, Middendorf B. Prog. Cryst. Growth. Charact. Mater. 2007, 53, 57–77.10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2007.01.002Search in Google Scholar

[30] Azimi G, Papangelakis VG. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 108, 122–129.10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[31] Gartner EM. Cohesion Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 289–295.10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.008Search in Google Scholar

[32] Muraiu M, Ferreira ADS, Duquesne E, Bonnaud L, Dubois P. Macromol. Symp. 2008, 272, 1–12.10.1002/masy.200851201Search in Google Scholar

[33] Gardette M, Therias S, Gardette JI, Muraiu M, Dubois P. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 616–623.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-16
Accepted: 2017-3-14
Published Online: 2017-5-16
Published in Print: 2018-4-25

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 10.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2016-0159/html
Scroll to top button