Home Mathematics 3D quadratic ODE systems with hidden oscillations
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3D quadratic ODE systems with hidden oscillations

  • Yongjun Li , Eduard Musafirov EMAIL logo , Alexander Grin and Andrei Pranevich
Published/Copyright: February 11, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

An autonomous three-dimensional quadratic system of ordinary differential equations with two parameters is considered. This system exhibits hidden oscillations at certain parameter values (it has a limit cycle, but does not have equilibrium points). We are looking for non-autonomous perturbations of this autonomous system that do not change the Mironenko reflecting function. Such so-called admissible perturbations preserve some qualitative properties of the solutions of the original system. For perturbed non-autonomous systems, we derived the Lyapunov stability of equilibrium solutions, proved the existence of the limit cycle and periodic solutions, as well as their stability (instability).

Award Identifier / Grant number: F23U-008

Funding statement: The first author was supported by the discipline construction project of Lanzhou City University. The work of the third author was carried out with financial support of the Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research, project no. F23U-008.

A Brief theory of MRF

In this appendix we give a brief information on the MRF theory from [11].

Consider the ODE system

(A.1) x ˙ = X ( t , x ) , t , x D n .

The MRF of system (A.1) is F ( t , x ) := φ ( - t ; t , x ) , where x = φ ( t ; t 0 , x 0 ) is the general solution in the Cauchy form of system (A.1). Although the MRF is formally defined by the general solution of the system under consideration, the MRF can sometimes be found even for systems that are not integrable by quadratures.

If some function F ( t , x ) is continuously differentiable and satisfies the condition F ( - t , F ( t , x ) ) F ( 0 , x ) x , then it is an MRF of the set of systems in the form

(A.2) x ˙ = - 1 2 F ( - t , F ( t , x ) ) x ( F ( t , x ) t - 2 S ( t , x ) ) - S ( - t , F ( t , x ) ) ,

where S ( t , x ) is an arbitrary vector-function for which the solutions of system (A.2) are uniquely determined by the initial conditions.

Moreover, all systems from this set have the same translation operator (see [5]) on any interval ( - β , β ) . Consequently, all 2 ω -periodic systems from this set have the same mapping over the period [ - ω , ω ] (Poincaré map).

For S ( t , x ) 0 , system (A.2) is called simple [10]. Note that any autonomous system is simple, the opposite assertion is not true (see [10, 15]).

Let the 2 ω -periodic system (A.1) and the system

(A.3) x ˙ = Y ( t , x ) , t , x D n ,

have the same MRF F ( t , x ) . Then if the solution φ ( t ; - ω , x ) of system (A.1) and the solution ψ ( t ; - ω , x ) of system (A.3) are extendible to the interval [ - ω , ω ] , then the mapping over period [ - ω , ω ] for system (A.1) is φ ( ω ; - ω , x ) F ( - ω , x ) ψ ( ω ; - ω , x ) , although system (A.3) may be non-periodic. That is, there is a one-to-one correspondence between 2 ω -periodic solutions of system (A.1) and solutions of the two-point boundary value problem y ( - ω ) = y ( ω ) for system (A.3).

References

[1] N. N. Bautin and E. A. Leontovich, Methods and Rules for the Qualitative Study of Dynamical Systems on the Plane (in Russian), 2nd ed., Math. Ref. Libr. 11, “Nauka”, Moscow, 1990. Search in Google Scholar

[2] V. I. Bulgakov, The phase portrait of a third-order autonomous system (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 24 (1988), no. 10, 1821–1822. Search in Google Scholar

[3] D. Dudkowski, S. Jafari, T. Kapitaniak, N. V. Kuznetsov, G. A. Leonov and A. Prasad, Hidden attractors in dynamical systems, Phys. Rep. 637 (2016), 1–50. 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. A. Krasnosel’skiĭ, The Operator of Translation Along the Trajectories of Differential Equations, Transl. Math. Monogr. 19 American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1968. Search in Google Scholar

[6] N. V. Kuznetsov, Theory of hidden oscillations and stability of control systems, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 59 (2020), no. 5, 647–668. 10.1134/S1064230720050093Search in Google Scholar

[7] G. A. Leonov and N. V. Kuznetsov, Hidden attractors in dynamical systems. From hidden oscillations in Hilbert–Kolmogorov, Aizerman, and Kalman problems to hidden chaotic attractor in Chua circuits, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 23 (2013), no. 1, Article ID 1330002. 10.1142/S0218127413300024Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. A. Leonov, N. V. Kuznetsov and T. N. Mokaev, Homoclinic orbits, and self-excited and hidden attractors in a Lorenz-like system describing convective fluid motion, Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 224 (2015), 1421–1458. 10.1140/epjst/e2015-02470-3Search in Google Scholar

[9] V. I. Mironenko, Reflecting function and classification of periodic differential systems (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 20 (1984), no. 9, 1635–1638. Search in Google Scholar

[10] V. I. Mironenko, Simple systems and periodic solutions of differential equations (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 25 (1989), no. 12, 2109–2114; translation in Differ. Equ. 25 (1989), no. 12, 1498–1502. Search in Google Scholar

[11] V. I. Mironenko, Reflecting Function and Investigation of Multivariate Differential Systems (in Russian), Gomel University, Gomel, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

[12] V. V. Mironenko, Time-symmetry-preserving perturbations of differential systems (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 40 (2004), no. 10, 1325–1332; translation in Differ. Equ. 40 (2004), no. 10, 1395–1403. Search in Google Scholar

[13] E. Musafirov, Admissible perturbations of the three-dimensional Hindmarsh–Rose neuron model, J. Appl. Anal. Comput. 13 (2023), no. 4, 1668–1678. 10.11948/20210098Search in Google Scholar

[14] E. Musafirov, A. Grin and A. Pranevich, Admissible perturbations of a generalized Langford system, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 32 (2022), no. 3, Article ID 2250038. 10.1142/S0218127422500389Search in Google Scholar

[15] E. V. Musafirov, On the simplicity of linear differential systems (in Russian), Differ. Uravn. 38 (2002), no. 4, 570–572; translation in Differ. Equ. 38 (2002), no. 4, 605–607. Search in Google Scholar

[16] E. V. Musafirov, Perturbations of the Lanford system which do not change the reflecting function, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 27 (2017), no. 10, Article ID 1750154. 10.1142/S0218127417501541Search in Google Scholar

[17] E. V. Musafirov, Admissible perturbations of the Lorenz-84 climate model, Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 29 (2019), no. 6, Article ID 1950080. 10.1142/S0218127419500809Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. V. Musafirov, Non-autonomously perturbed autonomous systems of ordinary differential equations, Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. Ser. B Appl. Algorithms 29 (2022), no. 6, 447–454. Search in Google Scholar

[19] V.-T. Pham, C. Volos and T. Kapitaniak, Systems with Hidden Attractors, Springer Briefs Appl. Sci. Technol., Springer, Cham, 2017. 10.1007/978-3-319-53721-4Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. C. Svistun, E. V. Musafirov, L. S. Gaida and E. V. Matuk, Localization of a dielectric spherical nanoparticle under the action of a gradient force in an interference field formed by the superposition of oncoming laser beams, J. Appl. Spect. 90 (2023), no. 4, 789–795. 10.1007/s10812-023-01597-5Search in Google Scholar

[21] X. Wang, N. V. Kuznetsov and G. Chen, Chaotic Systems with Multistability and Hidden Attractors, Emerg. Complex. Comput. 40, Springer, Cham, 2021. 10.1007/978-3-030-75821-9Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-10-25
Accepted: 2024-11-13
Published Online: 2025-02-11
Published in Print: 2025-10-01

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gmj-2025-2008/html
Scroll to top button