Home The effects of media exposure and language attitudes on grammaticality judgments
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The effects of media exposure and language attitudes on grammaticality judgments

  • Chun-Yi Peng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 10, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

While traditional 1st wave variationist sociolinguists resist citing media exposure as a source of language variation, this experimental study demonstrates that Mainland Mandarin speakers with reported exposure to Taiwanese TV were more likely to rate syntactic constructions found in Taiwanese Mandarin as grammatically acceptable. Data were collected through an online survey consisting of acceptability judgments, written-guise attitude tasks, reported viewing habits, and demographic questions. Principle Component Analysis was deployed to reduce data dimension, which allows for the identification of the key personality traits linked to Taiwanese Mandarin that contribute to the media effects. The results suggest an intertwined relationship in which the effects of media exposure on acceptability judgments are moderated by language attitudes.

References

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15. 38–59.10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38Search in Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2011. Meet mediatization. Language & communication 31. 163–170.10.1016/j.langcom.2011.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Bargh, John A., Mark Chen & Lara Burrows. 1996. Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71. 230–244.10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1991. Audience accommodation in the mass media. In Howard Giles, Justine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 69–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663673.002Search in Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Leonard. 1984. Some effects of thoughts on anti-social and prosocial influences of media effects: A cognitive-neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin 95. 410–427.10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.410Search in Google Scholar

Bourhis, Richard Y. & Howard Giles. 1977. The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Howard Giles (ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, 119–135. London: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006. Social stereotypes, personality traits and regional perception displaced: Attitudes towards the ‘new’ quotatives in the U.K. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(3). 362–81.10.1111/j.1360-6441.2006.00332.xSearch in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2014. Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584415Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22. 423–441.10.1017/S0954394510000177Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho, Ana M. 2004. I speak like the guys on TV: Palatalization and the urbanization of Uruguayan Portuguese. Language Variation and Change 16. 127–151.10.1017/S0954394504162030Search in Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack K. 1998. TV makes people sound the same. In Laurie Bauer & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language Myths, 123–131. New York: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Katherine H. Y. & M. Agnes Kang. 2015. Demeanor indexicals, interpretive discourses and the “Kong Girl” stereotype: Constructing gender ideologies in social media. Journal of Language and Sexuality 4(2). 193–222.10.1075/jls.4.2.02cheSearch in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. Dialect Stylisation in Radio Talk. Language in Society 30. 345–375.10.1017/S0047404501003013Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2009. The mediated performance of vernaculars. Journal of English Linguistics 37. 284–300.10.1177/0075424209341188Search in Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2011. Voice, place and genre in popular song performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15. 573–602.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00514.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dragojevic, Marko. 2016. Language attitudes as intergroup terrain. In Howard Giles & Anne Maass (eds.), Advances in intergroup communication, 51–66. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Dragojevic, Marko, Howard Giles & Bernadette Watson. 2013. Language ideologies and language attitudes: A fundamental framework. In Howard Giles & Bernadette Watson (eds.), The social meanings of language, dialect, and accent: International perspectives on speech styles. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Dragojevic, Marko, Dana Mastro, Howard Giles & Alexander Sink. 2016. Silencing nonstandard speakers: A content analysis of accent portrayals on American primetime television. Language in Society 45. 59–85.10.1017/S0047404515000743Search in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12. 453–476.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.xSearch in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87–100.10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145828Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, Jeffery R. 1999. Refining our understanding of language attitudes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18. 101–110.10.1177/0261927X99018001007Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard. 2016. The social origins of CAT. In Howard Giles (ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts, 1–12. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316226537Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard, Joustine Coupland & Nikolas Coupland. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, conext, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 7–21. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511663673Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard & Mikaela Marlow. 2011. Theorizing language attitudes: Existing frameworks, an integrative model, and new directions. Annals of the International Communication Association 35. 161–197.10.1080/23808985.2011.11679116Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard & Peter F. Powesland 1975. Speech style and social evaluation. London and New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Giles, Howard & T. Rakić 2014. Language attitudes: Social determinants and consequences of language variation. In T. M. Holtgraves (ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology, 11–26. New York, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gluszek, Agata & John F. Dovidio 2010. The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14. 214–237.10.1177/1088868309359288Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1956. The nature of deference and demeanor. American Anthropologist 58(3). 473–502.10.4324/9780203788387-3Search in Google Scholar

Gold, Thomas B. 1993. Go with your feelings: Hong Kong and Taiwan popular culture in Greater China. The China Quarterly. 907–925.10.1017/S0305741000032380Search in Google Scholar

Henry, Allison. 2004. Non-standard dialect and linguistic data. Lingua 115. 1599–1671.10.1016/j.lingua.2004.07.006Search in Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul & Ann Williams. 2002. “Salience” as an explanatory factor in language change: evidence from dialect leveling in urban England. In Vimala Herman, et al. (ed.), Language Change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 81–110. New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110892598.81Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski & Naomi Nagy. 2006. Listeners’ sensitivity to the frequency of sociolinguistic variables. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 12(2). 105–129.Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William, Sharon Ash, Maya Ravindranath, Tracey Weldon, Maciej Baranowski & Naomi Nagy. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15. 431–463.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00504.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lambert, W. E., R. C. Hodgson, R. C. Gardner & S. Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60. 44–51.10.1037/h0044430Search in Google Scholar

Levon, Erez & Sue Fox. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britian. Journal of English Linguistics 42. 185–217.10.1177/0075424214531487Search in Google Scholar

Ling, Lin. 1991. Language variation and change in Mandarin: The Mainland Chinese speech community in the United States. East Lansing: Michigan State Univeristy Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar

McQuail, Denis. 2000. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory, 4th edn. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam & Niedzielski, Nancy. 2003. The globalisation of vernacular variation. Journal of Sociolingusitics 7. 534–555.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00241.xSearch in Google Scholar

Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 1985. Authority in language: Investigating language prescription and standardisation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.10.4324/9780203267424Search in Google Scholar

Naro, Anthony J. 1981. The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language 57. 63–98.10.1353/lan.1981.0020Search in Google Scholar

Newman, Michael, Mireia Trenchs-Parera & Shukhan Ng. 2008. Normalizing bilingualism: The effects of the Catalonian linguistic normalization policy one generation after. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(3). 306–334.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00369.xSearch in Google Scholar

Palomares, Nicholas A., Howard Giles, Jordan Soliz & Cindy Gallois. 2016. Intergroup accommodation, social categories, and identities. In Howard Giles (ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts, 123–151. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316226537.007Search in Google Scholar

Pantos, Andrew J. & Andrew W. Perkins 2012. Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 3–20.10.1177/0261927X12463005Search in Google Scholar

Peng, Chun-Yi. 2016. Talk shows and language attitudes: A sociolinguistic investigation of language attitudes towards Taiwanese Mandarin among Chinese Mainlanders. New York: City University of New York disseration.Search in Google Scholar

Peng, Chun-Yi. forthcoming. Gei-Voice: The oscillation of the pre- and postverbal gei-phrases in spoken Mandarin varieties.Search in Google Scholar

Preston, D. R. 2003. Language with an Attitude. In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 40–66. Blackwell Publishing.10.1111/b.9781405116923.2003.00005.xSearch in Google Scholar

Ryan, E. B., H. Giles & R. J. Sebastian. 1982. An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. In E. B. Ryan & H. Giles (eds.), Attitudes toward language variation, 1–19. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Sayers, Dave. 2014. The mediated innovation model: A framework for researching media influence in language change. Journal of sociolinguistics. 185–212.10.1111/josl.12069Search in Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23. 193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2Search in Google Scholar

Sprouse, Jon. 2007. Continuous acceptability, categorical, grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1. 123–134.10.5964/bioling.8597Search in Google Scholar

Strasburger, Victor. 1995. Adolescents and the media: Medical and psychological impact. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2006. The influence of media on language. In C. Llamas, P. Stockwell & L. Mullany (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics, 140–148. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2007. The influence of media on language. In Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany & Peter Stockwell (eds.), The routledge companion to sociolinguistics, 140–148. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2010. English and the media: Television. In Alexander Berg & Laurel J. Brinton (eds.), Handbuecher zu Sprach-und Kommunikationswissenschaft: Historical linguistics of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane, Claire Timmins, Gwilym Pryce & Barrie Gunter. 2013. Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language 89. 501–536.10.1353/lan.2013.0041Search in Google Scholar

Su, Hsi-Yao. 2008. What does it mean to be a girl with qizhi?: Refinement, gender and language ideologies in contemporary Taiwan. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(3). 334–358.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00370.xSearch in Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Qing. 2005. A Chinese Yuppie in Beijing. Language in Society 34. 431–466.10.1017/S0047404505050153Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Ying. 2008. Television in post-reform China: Serial dramas, Confucian leadership and the global television market. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-04-10
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/glochi-2020-0003/html
Scroll to top button