Breaking out of the Regulatory Delusion. The Ban to Surrogacy and the Foundations of European Constitutionalism

References

Allen, Adeline A. 2018. “Surrogacy and Limitations to Freedom of Contract: toward Being More Fully Human.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 41 (3): 753–811.Suche in Google Scholar

Allen, Anita L. 1996. “The Socio-Economic Struggle for Equality: the Black Surrogate Mother.” In Applications Of Feminist Legal Theory, edited by D. Kelly Weisberg, 1117–25. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. 1976. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Book.Suche in Google Scholar

Arnold, Stefan. 2016. “Fortpflanzungstourismus und Leihmutterschaft im Spiegel des deutschen und österreichischen internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts.” In Das Recht der Fortpflanzungsmedizin 2015. Analyse und Kritik, edited by S. Arnold, E. Bernat, and Ch. Kopetzki, 125–67. Wien: Manz.Suche in Google Scholar

Aynès, Laurent. 2001. “Le préjudice de l’enfant né handicapé: le plant de Job devant la Cour de Cassation.” Dalloz 6: 492–96.Suche in Google Scholar

Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth. 2011. “Ware Kind? Kinderwunsch Transnational.” In Nachrichten aus den Innenwelten des Kapitalismus, edited by C. Koppetsch, 99–112. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-531-93482-2_5Suche in Google Scholar

Benanti, Claudia. 2015. “La maternità è della donna che ha partorito: contrarietà all’ordine pubblico della surrogazione di Maternità e conseguente adottabilità del minore.” Nuova Giurisprudenza Civile Commentata 31 (2): 235–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter. 1977. “Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischer Reproduzierbarkeit,” in Illuminationen. Ausgewählte Schriften,. Vol. I. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Brunet, Laurence, Carruthers Janeen, Davaki Konstantina, King Derek, Marzo Claire, and Mccandless Julie. “A Comparative Study on the Regime of Surrogacy in EU Member States.” Brussels, 2013. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL-JURI_ET(2013)474403 Suche in Google Scholar

Bureau of the Dutch National Rapporteur on Trafficking in Human Beings. 2012. Human Trafficking for the Purpose of the Removal of Organs and Forced Commercial Surrogacy. The Hague.Suche in Google Scholar

Cahn, Naomi, and June Carbone. 2019. “United States of America.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy, edited by J. Scherpe, C. Fenton-Glynn, and T. Kaan, 307–30. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780688633.019Suche in Google Scholar

Calabresi, Guido, and Philip Bobbitt. 1978. Tragic Choices. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Calderai, Valentina. 2017. “Modi di costituzione del rapporto di filiazione e ordine pubblico internazionale.” Nuova Giurisrudenza Civile Commentata 33 (7–8): 986–93.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Glenn. 2012. “Circumvention Tourism.” Cornell Law Review 97 (6): 1309–98.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, I. Glenn, and Katherine L. Kraschel. 2016. “Gestational Surrogacy Agreements: Enforcement and Breach.” In Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy: International Clinical Practice and Policy Issues, edited by E. Scott Sills, 85–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316282618.012Suche in Google Scholar

Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique pour les sciences de la vie et de la santé. “Avis du CCNE sur les demandes sociétales de recours à l’assistance médicale à la procréation.” http://www.ccne-ethique.fr (2017).Suche in Google Scholar

Danna, Daniela. 2014. “It’s Not Their Pregnancy L’aborto nei contratti di maternità surrogata statunitensi.” About Gender. International Journal of Gender Studies 3: 139–73.Suche in Google Scholar

Duden, Konrad. 2015. Leihmutterschaft im Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrecht: Abstammung und ordre public im Spiegel des Verfassungs- Völker- und Europarecht. Tübingen: Möhr Siebeck.10.1628/978-3-16-154025-7Suche in Google Scholar

Eekelaar, John. 2018. “Two Dimensions of the Best Interests Principle: Decisions about Children and Decisions Affecting Children.” In Implementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Best interests, Welfare and Well- Being, edited by E. Sutherland, and L. Barnes Macfarlane, 99–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316662977.007Suche in Google Scholar

Engelhardt, Lisa. 2018a. “Die Leihmutterschaft im Schweizerischen Recht.” In Regulierung der Leihmutterschaft. Aktuelle Entwicklungen und interdisziplinäre Herausforderungen, edited by B. Ditzen, and M.-Ph. Weller, 93–100. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Suche in Google Scholar

Engelhardt, Lisa. 2018b. “Die Leihmutterschaft im US-amerikanischen Recht am Beispiel von Kalifornien und New Hampshire.” In Regulierung der Leihmutterschaft. Aktuelle Entwicklungen und interdisziplinäre Herausforderungen, edited by B. Ditzen, and M.-Ph. Weller, 133–46. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Suche in Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. 1995. “Surrogacy: the Case for Full Contractual Enforcement.” Virginia Law Review 81: 2305–401.10.2307/1073580Suche in Google Scholar

Fabre-Magnan, Muriel. 2013. La gestation pour autrui. Fictions et réalité. Paris: Fayard.Suche in Google Scholar

Fenton-Glynn, Claire. 2016. “Outsourcing Medical Dilemmas: Regulating International Surrogacy Agreements.” Medical Law Review 24: 59–75.10.1093/medlaw/fwv044Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrando, Gilda. 2017. “Ordine pubblico e interesse del minore nella circolazione degli status filationis.” Corriere Giuridico 34: 946–66.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrando, Gilda. 2019. “I bambini, Le Loro Mamme E Gli Strumenti Del Diritto.” GenJus 6 (1): 6–17.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferri, Giovan Battista. 1999–2000. “Dall’intento liberale al cosiddetto impegno etico e superetico: ovvero l’economia della bontà.” Diritto Privato 6–7: 327–464.Suche in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2004. Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France, 1978–1978. Paris: Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Frison-Roche, Marie-Ange. 2015. “Comprendre la Cour de cassation (à propos des deux arrêts d’Assemblée plénière du 3 juillet 2015 sur la pratique des maternités de substitution (dite GPA).” Petites Affiches 404: 4–20.Suche in Google Scholar

Fulchiron, H., and C. Guilarte Martin-Calero. 2014. “L’ordre public international a l’épreuve des droits de l’enfant: non à la GPA internationale, oui à l’intégration de l’enfant dans sa famille. A propos de la décision du Tribunal supremo español du 6 février 2014.” Revue critique du droit international privé 6: 531–58.10.3917/rcdip.143.0531Suche in Google Scholar

Garrison, Martha. 2008. “Regulating Reproduction.” George Washington Law Review 76 (6): 1623–56.Suche in Google Scholar

Gattuso, Marco. 2019. “Dignità della donna, qualità delle relazioni familiari e identità personale del bambino.” Questione Giustizia 30 (2): 74–92.Suche in Google Scholar

Giuseppa, Palmeri. 2019. “Accordi di gestazione per altri, principio di autodeterminazione e responsabilità genitoriale.” in Riproduzione e relazioni. La surrogazione di maternità al centro della questione di genere, edited by M. Caielli, et al., 44–81. Torino: CIRSDe – Centro Interdisciplinare di Ricerche e Studi delle Donne e di Genere Università degli Studi di Torino.Suche in Google Scholar

Glenn, Cohen I. 2012. “S.H. And Others V. Austria and Circumvention Tourism.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online 25: 660–62.10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.009Suche in Google Scholar

Grasso, Alfio G. 2019. “Maternità surrogata e riconoscimento del rapporto con la madre intenzionale.” Nuova Giurisprudenza Civile Commentata 35 (4): 757–64.Suche in Google Scholar

Greely, Hank. 2016. The End of Sex and the Future of Human Reproduction. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674545755Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, Eliza. 2018. “From European Theory to American Practice: the United States as a Laboratory for Surrogacy Law.” In Regulierung der Leihmutterschaft. Aktuelle Entwicklungen und interdisziplinäre Herausforderungen, edited by B. Ditzen, and M.-Ph. Weller, 69–80. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Suche in Google Scholar

Halley, J. 2011. “What Is Family Law?: A Genealogy. Part II.” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 23 (2): 189–293.Suche in Google Scholar

Hansmann, Henry. 1989. “The Economics and Ethics of Markets for Human Organs.” Journal of Health politics, Policy & Law 14: 57–85.10.1215/03616878-14-1-57Suche in Google Scholar

Hirschmann, Albert O. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction. perversity, futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjnrs9qSuche in Google Scholar

Hollinger, J. H. 2019. Adoption Law and Practice. New York: Matthew Bender & C.Suche in Google Scholar

Hollinger, J. H., and N. Cahn. 2009. “Forming Families by Law - Adoption in America Today.” Human Rights 36: 16–19.Suche in Google Scholar

Hongladarom, Soraj. 2019. “Thailand.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy, edited by J. Scherpe, C. Fenton-Glynn, and T. Kaan, 499–511. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780688633.028Suche in Google Scholar

Horsey, Kirsty. 2010. “Challenging Presumptions: Legal Parenthood and Surrogacy Arrangements.” Child and Family Law Quarterly 22 (4): 449–74.10.4324/9781315090085-15Suche in Google Scholar

Jones, Holly. 2019. “Contracts for Children: Constitutional Challenges to Surrogacy Contracts and Selective Reduction Clauses.” Hastings Law Journal 70 (2): 595–620.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaplow, Louis, and Steven Shavell. 2002. Fairness versus Welfare. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674039315Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. 2001. “The Political Stakes in ‘Merely Technical’ Issues of Contract Law.” European Review of Private Law 1: 7–28.10.54648/399190Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. 2006. “Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought.” In The New Law and Economic Development: a Critical Appraisal, edited by D. M. Trubek, and A. Santos, 19–73. New York: Cabridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754425.002Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. 2010. “Savigny’s Family/Patrimony Distinction and Its Place in the Global Genealogy of Classical Legal Thought.” American Journal of Comparative Law 58: 811–41.10.5131/ajcl.2010.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Khazova, Olga A. 2019. “Russia.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy, edited by J. Scherpe, C. Fenton-Glynn, and T. Kaan, 281–306. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780688633.018Suche in Google Scholar

Kotiswaran, Prabha. 2019. “India.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy, edited by J. Scherpe, C. Fenton-Glynn, and T. Kaan, 499–511. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780688633.027Suche in Google Scholar

Krawiec, Kimberly D. 2009. “Altruism and Intermediation in the Market for Babies.” Washington & Lee Law Revew 66: 203–57.Suche in Google Scholar

Krawiec, Kimberly D. 2010. “Price and Pretense in the Baby Market.” In Baby Markets: money, morals, and the New Politics of Creating Families, edited by M. Goodwin, 41–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802379.006Suche in Google Scholar

Landes, Elisabeth, and Richard A. Posner. 1978. “The Economics of Baby Shortage.” Journal of Legal Studies 7: 323–48.10.1002/9780470752135.ch22Suche in Google Scholar

Lurger, B. 2013. “Das österreichische IPR bei Leihmutterschaft im Ausland – das Kindeswohl zwischen Anerkennung, europäischen Grundrechten und inländischem Leihmutterschaftsverbot.” Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 32: 282–89.Suche in Google Scholar

Marcella, Di Stefano. 2019. “The Best Interests of the Child Principle at the Intersection of Private International Law and Human Rights.” In Fundamental Rights and Best Interests of the Child in Transnational Families, edited by E. Bergamini, C. Ragni, E. Bergamini, and C. Ragni, 157–70. Cambrige: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780689395.010Suche in Google Scholar

Marella, Maria Rosaria. 2000. “Adozione.” In Digesto delle discipline provatistiche. Sezione civile, agg., Torino: Utet.Suche in Google Scholar

Marella, Maria Rosaria. 2007. “Il fondamento sociale della dignità umana. Un modello costituzionale per il diritto europeo dei contratti.” Rivista Critica Del Diritto Privato 25 (1): 67–103.Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, J. Kenyon. 2007. The Troubled Pregnancy. Legal Wrongs and Rights in Reproduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511495366Suche in Google Scholar

Mazer, Deborah S. 2017. “Born Breach: the Challenge of Remedies in Surrogacy Contracts.” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 28 (1): 211–40.Suche in Google Scholar

Morozzo Della Rocca, Paolo. 2014. “Diritti del minore e circolazione all’estero del suo stato familiare.” In La famiglia si trasforma. Status familiari costituiti all’estero e loro riconoscimento in Italia, tra ordine pubblico interno e interesse del minore, edited by G. O. Cesaro, et al., 35–48. MIlano: Franco Angeli Franco Angeli, Milano, 2014, 35.Suche in Google Scholar

Niccolai, Silvia. 2017a. “Alcune note intorno all’estensione, alla fonte e alla ratio del divieto di maternità surrogata in Italia.” GenIus 5 (2): 49–59.Suche in Google Scholar

Niccolai, Silvia. 2017b. “Liberare la maternità lesbica dal discorso neutro sull’omogenitorialità: un interesse di tutte (e di tutti).” In Nel nome della madre. Ripensare le figure della maternità, edited by D. Brogi, et al., 43–59. Roma: Del Vecchio.Suche in Google Scholar

Norrie, Kenneth McK. 2018. “Surrogacy in the United Kingdom: an Inappropriate Application of the Welfare Principle.” In Implementing Article 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Best interests, Welfare and Well- Being, edited by E. Sutherland, and L. Barnes Macfarlane, 165–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316662977.011Suche in Google Scholar

Olivito, Elisa. 2017. “Una visione costituzionale sulla maternità surrogata. L’arma spuntata (e mistificata) della legge nazionale.” In Maternità, filiazione, genitorialità. I nodi della maternità surrogata in una prospettiva di Diritto Costituzionale, edited by S. Niccolai, and E. Olivito, 3– 29. Napoli: Jovene.Suche in Google Scholar

Parizer-Krief, Karène. 2011. “Gestation pour autrui et intérêt de l’enfant en Grande-Bretagne. De l’indemnisation raisonnable de la gestatrice prévue par la loi à la reconnaissance judiciaire des contrats internationaux à but lucratif.” Revue intérnational de droit comparé 63 (3): 645–59.10.3406/ridc.2011.20020Suche in Google Scholar

Pennings, Guido. 2002. “Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion.” Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6): 337–41.10.1136/jme.28.6.337Suche in Google Scholar

Posner, Richard A. 1989. “The Ethics and Economics of Enforcing Contracts of Surrogate Motherhood.” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 5, (Spring): 21–31.Suche in Google Scholar

Radin, Margareth J. 2014. Boilerplate: the Fine print, the Vanishing rights, and the Rule of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400844838Suche in Google Scholar

Radin, Margareth J. 2017. “From Babyselling to Boilerplate: Reflections on the Limits of the Infrastructures of the Market.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 54: 339–76.10.2139/ssrn.2905141Suche in Google Scholar

Resta, Giorgio. 2002. “La disponibilità dei diritti fondamentali e i limiti della dignità (note a margine della carta dei diritti).” Rivista Di Diritto Civile 48 (6): 801–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Rute, Teixeira Pedro. 2019. “Portugal.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy, edited by J. Scherpe, C. Fenton-Glynn, and T. Kaan, 229–57. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780688633.016Suche in Google Scholar

Scalisi, Vincenzo. 2017. “Maternità surrogata: come «far cose con le regole».” Rivista di diritto civile 63 (5): 1097–114.Suche in Google Scholar

Scherpe, Jens. 2016. The Present and the Future of European Family Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781785363078Suche in Google Scholar

Scherpe, Jens, and Claire Fenton-Glynn. 2019. “Surrogacy in a Globalised World Comparative Analysis and Thoughts on Regulation.” In Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy, edited by J. Scherpe, C. Fenton-Glynn, and T. Kaan, 518–92. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780688633Suche in Google Scholar

Schuck, Peter H. 1990. “The Social Utility of Surrogacy.” Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 13, no. 1 (Winter): 132–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Elisabeth S. 2009. “Surrogacy and the Politics of Commodification.” Law and Contemporary Problems 72, no. 3 (Summer): 109–46.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Elisabeth S., and Robert E. Scott. 2015. “From Contract to Status: Collaboration and the Evolution of Novel Family Relationships.” Columbia Law Review 115, no. 2 (March): 293–374.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. 1979. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of the Nations. Oxford: Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar

Somek, Alexander. 2014. The Cosmopolitan Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199651535.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Spar, Debora L. 2005. “For Love and Money: the Political Economy of Commercial Surrogacy.” Review of International Political Economy 12, no. 2 (May): 287–209.10.1080/09692290500105615Suche in Google Scholar

Spar, Debora L. 2009. “As You like It: Exploring the Limits of Parental Choice in Assisted Reproduction.” Law & Inequality: A Journal of Theory and Practice 27 (2): 481–92.Suche in Google Scholar

Spivak, Carla. 2010. “The Law of Surrogate Motherhood in the United States.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 58, Supplement: Welcoming the World: U. S. National Reports to the XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law: 97–114.10.5131/ajcl.2009.0042Suche in Google Scholar

Stark, Johanna. 2019. Law for Sale: A Philosophical Critique of Regulatory Competition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198839491.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Stefanelli, Stefania. 2018. “Procreazione e diritti fondamentali.” In Trattato di Diritto Civile, edited by A. Sassi, F. Scaglione, and S. Stefanelli, Vol. IV, 93–175. Torino: UTET.Suche in Google Scholar

Storrow, Richard F. 2010. “The Pluralism Problem in Cross-border Reproductive Care.” Human Reproduction 25: 2939–43.10.1093/humrep/deq270Suche in Google Scholar

Storrow, Richard F. 2012. “Judicial Review of Restrictions on Gamete Donation in Europe.” Reproductive Bio Medicine Online 25: 655–59.10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.010Suche in Google Scholar

Susanna, Pozzolo. 2016. “Gestazione per altri (ed altre). Spunti per un dibattito in (una) prospettiva femminista.” BioLaw Journal – Rivista Di BioDiritto 3 (2): 93–110.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomale, Chris. 2015. Mietmutterschaft. Eine international- privatrechtliche Kritik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomale, Chris. 2017a. “State of Play of Cross-border Surrogacy Arrangements – Is There a Case for Regulatory Intervention by the EU?” Journal of Private International Law 13: 463–73.10.1080/17441048.2017.1353783Suche in Google Scholar

Thomale, Chris. 2017b. “Das Kinderwohl ex ante – Straßburger zeitgemäße Betrachtungen zur Leihmutterschaft.” Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 37 (6): 583–90.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Yan. 1995. “Fictio Legis. L’empire De La Fiction Romaine Et Ses Limites Médiévales.” Droits 21: 17–93.Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Yan. 1998. “Le sujet de droit, la personne et la nature. Sur la critique contemporaine du sujet de droit.” Le Débat 100, (Mai-Août): 85–107.10.3917/deba.100.0085Suche in Google Scholar

Thomas, Yan. 2002. “Le sujet concret et sa personne. Essai d’histoire juridique rétrospective.” In Du droit de ne pas naître. À propos de l’affaire Perruche, edited by O. Cayla, and Y. Thomas, 89–170. Paris: Gallimard.Suche in Google Scholar

Trimmings, Katarina. 2019. “Surrogacy Arrangements and the Best Intrerests of the Child.” In Fundamental Rights and Best Interests of the Child in Transnational Families, edited by E. Bergamini, and C. Ragni, 187–208. Cambrige: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780689395.012Suche in Google Scholar

Ugo, Salanitro. 2019. “Ordine pubblico internazionale, filiazione omosessuale e surrogazione di maternità.” Nuova Giurisprudenza Civile Commentata 35 (4): 737–41.Suche in Google Scholar

Valéry, Paul. 1960. “La conquête de l’ubiquité,” in Œuvres, Vol. II, 1283– 87. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Suche in Google Scholar

Van Beers, Britta. 2015. “Is Europe Giving in to Baby Markets? Reproductive Tourism in Europe and the Gradual Erosion of Existing Legal Limits to Reproductive Markets.” Medical Law Review 23, no. 1 (Winter): 103–34.10.1093/medlaw/fwu016Suche in Google Scholar

Van Hoof, Wannes, and Guido Pennings. 2012. “The Consequences of S.H. And Others V. Austria for Legislation on Gamete Donation in Europe: an Ethical Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights Judgments.” Reproductive Biomedicine Online 25: 665–69.10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.05.016Suche in Google Scholar

Venuti, Maria Carmela. 2018. “Procreazione medicalmente assistita: il consenso alle tecniche di PMA e la responsabilità genitoriale di single, conviventi e parti unite civilmente.” GenIus 6 (1): 85–100.Suche in Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1993. “calculativeness, trust, and Economic Organization.” Journal of Law & Economics 36, no. 1 (April): 453–86.10.1086/467284Suche in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1999. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar