Abstract
Data Mining (DM) is the analytical activity aimed at revealing new “knowledge” from data useful for further decision-making processes. These techniques have recently acquired enormous importance as they seem to fit perfectly the requests of the so called “Data Driven World”. In this paper, first I give an overview of DM, and of the most relevant criticisms raised so far. Then using a well-known case study and the European General Data Protection Regulation as benchmark, I show that there are some specific ambiguities in this use of “knowledge” which are relevant for the ethical and legal assessment of DM.
Published Online: 2019-10-17
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Research Articles
- Transnational Civil Society Influence on Anti-Corruption Courts: Ukraine’s Experience
- Combating the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: The Multifaceted Response to a Complex Challenge
- Climate Change Litigation: Global Trends and Critical Issues in the Light of the Urgenda 2018 Decision and the IPCC Special Report “global Warming of 1.5 °C”
- The Parliamentary Form of Government and Its Evolution in Recent Years
- Mineralizing the Right to Prior Consultation: From Recognition to Disregard of Indigenous and Peasant Rights in Peru
- Externalizing Migration Management through Soft Law: The Case of the Memorandum of Understanding between Libya and Italy
- Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Preliminaries for a Critical Examination of the Data Driven Society
- Re-Characterization Risk and True Sale Principle within the Context of Asset Securitization
- “Feeding the Hungry, Quenching the thirsty”: Shaping the Rights to Food and Water in Disaster Settings through Humanitarian Standards
- The Common Law (And Not Roman) Origins of Amicus Curiae in International Law – Debunking a Fake News Item
- Technical Solutions for Legal Challenges: Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings
- Lack of Statutory Foundation, Vagueness, and Violation of the Rule of Lenity of California Second Degree Felony Murder
- Legal Culture and Food Culture in Labelling Regulation: An EU/US Comparative Analysis
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
Data Mining;
knowledge discovery;
data protection;
law and ICT;
GDPR
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Research Articles
- Transnational Civil Society Influence on Anti-Corruption Courts: Ukraine’s Experience
- Combating the Illicit Trafficking of Cultural Property: The Multifaceted Response to a Complex Challenge
- Climate Change Litigation: Global Trends and Critical Issues in the Light of the Urgenda 2018 Decision and the IPCC Special Report “global Warming of 1.5 °C”
- The Parliamentary Form of Government and Its Evolution in Recent Years
- Mineralizing the Right to Prior Consultation: From Recognition to Disregard of Indigenous and Peasant Rights in Peru
- Externalizing Migration Management through Soft Law: The Case of the Memorandum of Understanding between Libya and Italy
- Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Preliminaries for a Critical Examination of the Data Driven Society
- Re-Characterization Risk and True Sale Principle within the Context of Asset Securitization
- “Feeding the Hungry, Quenching the thirsty”: Shaping the Rights to Food and Water in Disaster Settings through Humanitarian Standards
- The Common Law (And Not Roman) Origins of Amicus Curiae in International Law – Debunking a Fake News Item
- Technical Solutions for Legal Challenges: Equality of Arms in Criminal Proceedings
- Lack of Statutory Foundation, Vagueness, and Violation of the Rule of Lenity of California Second Degree Felony Murder
- Legal Culture and Food Culture in Labelling Regulation: An EU/US Comparative Analysis