Home Experimental evaluation of line-of-sight multiple input multiple output (MIMO) transmission for sub-6 GHz carrier frequencies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Experimental evaluation of line-of-sight multiple input multiple output (MIMO) transmission for sub-6 GHz carrier frequencies

  • Darko Cvetkovski ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Thomas Schlegel and Eckhard Grass
Published/Copyright: February 18, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

For the next generation wireless networks, backhaul links with data rates of several Gbit/s are required. Line-of-Sight-MIMO with optimally arranged antennas can exploit the full multiplexing gain of orthogonal MIMO streams to achieve high throughput, as shown in recent works utilizing the 60 GHz mm wave band. In contrast, conventional MIMO systems operating at sub-6 GHz carrier frequencies, as utilized in modern WLAN networks, rely on rich scattering channels to enable reliable transmissions. In this work, we explore the feasibility of applying the LoS-MIMO concept to wireless single-carrier links operating at sub-6 GHz frequencies. For this, we investigate the sub-6 GHz LoS-MIMO channel in a 4 × 4 MIMO configuration by performing measurements in an anechoic chamber and an outdoor backhaul-like environment. In addition, different adaptive equalizers are evaluated. The results show, that the LoS-MIMO concept holds for sub-6 GHz frequencies both in pure LoS and in outdoor environments. It provides high multiplexing gain; however, the multipath propagation limits the potential performance of the equalizers in terms of achievable BER.


Corresponding author: Darko Cvetkovski, Department of Computer Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin and System Architectures Department, IHP – Leibniz-Institut für innovative Mikroelektronik, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: SPP-1655

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported in part by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the framework of priority program SPP 1655 “Wireless Ultra High Data Rate Communication for Mobile Internet Access”.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

[1] The 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership, “Vision and mission – 5G PPP.” Available at: https://5g-ppp.eu/about-us/ [Last accessed: Sep. 25, 2018].Search in Google Scholar

[2] X. Song, C. Jans, L. Landau, D. Cvetkovski, and G. Fettweis, “A 60GHz LOS MIMO backhaul design combining spatial multiplexing and beamforming for a 100Gbps throughput,” in 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2015, pp. 1–6.10.1109/GLOCOM.2015.7417737Search in Google Scholar

[3] C. Sheldon, E. Torkildson, M. Seo, C. P. Yue, U. Madhow, and M. Rodwell, “A 60GHz line-of-sight 2x2 MIMO link operating at 1.2Gbps,” in 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 2008, pp. 1–4.10.1109/APS.2008.4619161Search in Google Scholar

[4] N. Bhushan, J. Li, D. Malladi, et al., “Network densification: the dominant theme for wireless evolution into 5G,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 82–89, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2014.6736747.Search in Google Scholar

[5] V. Marojevic, D. Chheda, R. M. Rao, R. Nealy, J. Park, and J. H. Reed, “Software-defined LTE evolution testbed enabling rapid prototyping and controlled experimentation,” in 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2017, pp. 1–6.10.1109/WCNC.2017.7925757Search in Google Scholar

[6] G. Durisi, A. Tarable, and T. Koch, “On the multiplexing gain of MIMO microwave backhaul links affected by phase noise,” in 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2013, pp. 3209–3214.10.1109/ICC.2013.6655038Search in Google Scholar

[7] T. Haustein and U. Kruger, “Smart geometrical antenna design exploiting the LOS component to enhance a MIMO system based on Rayleigh-fading in indoor scenarios,” in 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1144–1148.10.1109/PIMRC.2003.1260290Search in Google Scholar

[8] D. Cvetkovski, T. Hälsig, B. Lankl, and E. Grass, “Next generation mm-wave wireless backhaul based on LOS MIMO links,” in 2016 German Microwave Conference (GeMiC), 2016, pp. 69–72.10.1109/GEMIC.2016.7461558Search in Google Scholar

[9] D. Cvetkovski, E. Grass, T. Hälsig, and B. Lankl, “Hardware-in-the-loop demonstration of a 60GHz line-of-sight 2×2 MIMO link,” in IEEE EUROCON 2017 – 17th International Conference on Smart Technologies, 2017, pp. 631–636.10.1109/EUROCON.2017.8011188Search in Google Scholar

[10] L. Liu, W. Hong, H. Wang, et al., “Characterization of line-of-sight MIMO channel for fixed wireless communications,” IEEE Antenn. Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 6, pp. 36–39, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1109/lawp.2007.890761.Search in Google Scholar

[11] F. Bohagen, P. Orten, and G. E. Oien, “Design of optimal high-rank line-of-sight MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1420–1425, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1109/twc.2007.348338.Search in Google Scholar

[12] E. Kalashnikov, “An introduction to Golay complementary sequences,” Eureka, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2014, https://doi.org/10.29173/eureka22829.Search in Google Scholar

[13] 3rd generation partnership project: technical specification group Radio access network. Evolved universal terrestrial Radio access (E-UTRA). Physical Channels and Modulation, 10.0.0(TS 36.211), 2010–2012.Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Gesell, J. B. Huber, B. Lankl, and G. Sebald, “Data-aided symbol timing estimation for linear modulation,” Int. J. Electron. Commun., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 303–311, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1078/1434-8411-54100116.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Y. Jiang, M. K. Varanasi, and J. Li, “Performance analysis of ZF and MMSE equalizers for MIMO systems: An in-depth study of the high SNR regime,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theor., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2008–2026, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2011.2112070.Search in Google Scholar

[16] J. G. Proakis and D. G. Manolakis, Digital Signal Processing – Principles, Algorithms and Applications, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[17] M. Kuschnerov, M. Chouayakh, K. Piyawanno, et al., “Data-aided versus blind single-carrier coherent receivers,” IEEE Photonics J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 387–403, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2010.2048308.Search in Google Scholar

[18] MathWorks, “Adaptive equalizers – MATLAB & simulink,”. https://de.mathworks.com/help/comm/ug/adaptive-equalizers.html [Last accessed: Jan. 09, 2020].Search in Google Scholar

[19] B. Widrow and M. E. Hoff, “Adaptive switching circuits,” IRE Wescon Conv. Rec. Part, vol. 4, pp. 96–104, 1960.10.21236/AD0241531Search in Google Scholar

[20] E. Eweda, “Comparison of RLS, LMS, and sign algorithms for tracking randomly time-varying channels,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2937–2944, 1994, https://doi.org/10.1109/78.330354.Search in Google Scholar

[21] J. Dhiman, S. Ahmad, and K. Gulia, “Comparison between adaptive filter algorithms (LMS, NLMS and RLS),” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. Res., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1100–1103, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-21
Accepted: 2021-01-18
Published Online: 2021-02-18
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/freq-2020-0135/pdf
Scroll to top button