Determination of a pair of newforms from the product of their twisted central values

References

[1] A. Akbary, Simultaneous non-vanishing of twists, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134 (2006), no. 11, 3143–3151. 10.1090/S0002-9939-06-08369-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. C. Baker, G. Harman and J. Pintz, The difference between consecutive primes. II, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 83 (2001), no. 3, 532–562. 10.1112/plms/83.3.532Search in Google Scholar

[3] V. Blomer, É. Fouvry, E. Kowalski, P. Michel, D. Milicevic and W. Sawin, The second moment theory of families of l-functions, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 282 (2018), no. 1394, 1–154. Search in Google Scholar

[4] V. Blomer and D. Milićević, The second moment of twisted modular 𝐿-functions, Geom. Funct. Anal. 25 (2015), no. 2, 453–516. 10.1007/s00039-015-0318-7Search in Google Scholar

[5] G. Chinta and A. Diaconu, Determination of a GL 3 cuspform by twists of central 𝐿-values, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2005 (2005), no. 48, 2941–2967. 10.1155/IMRN.2005.2941Search in Google Scholar

[6] S. Das and R. Khan, Simultaneous nonvanishing of Dirichlet 𝐿-functions and twists of Hecke–Maass 𝐿-functions, J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 30 (2015), no. 3, 237–250. Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Ganguly, J. Hoffstein and J. Sengupta, Determining modular forms on SL 2 ⁢ ( Z ) by central values of convolution 𝐿-functions, Math. Ann. 345 (2009), no. 4, 843–857. 10.1007/s00208-009-0380-2Search in Google Scholar

[8] H. Iwaniec and E. Kowalski, Analytic Number Theory, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Iwaniec and P. Sarnak, The non-vanishing of central values of automorphic 𝐿-functions and Landau–Siegel zeros, Israel J. Math. 120 (2000), 155–177. 10.1007/s11856-000-1275-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. Khan, Simultaneous non-vanishing of G ⁢ L ⁢ ( 3 ) × G ⁢ L ⁢ ( 2 ) and G ⁢ L ⁢ ( 2 ) 𝐿-functions, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 152 (2012), no. 3, 535–553. 10.1017/S0305004111000806Search in Google Scholar

[11] W. Luo and D. Ramakrishnan, Determination of modular forms by twists of critical 𝐿-values, Invent. Math. 130 (1997), no. 2, 371–398. 10.1007/s002220050189Search in Google Scholar

[12] W. Luo, Z. Rudnick and P. Sarnak, On the generalized Ramanujan conjecture for GL ⁢ ( n ) , Automorphic Forms, Automorphic Representations, and Arithmetic, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 66, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1999), 301–310. 10.1090/pspum/066.2/1703764Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. Michel and J. Vanderkam, Simultaneous nonvanishing of twists of automorphic 𝐿-functions, Compos. Math. 134 (2002), no. 2, 135–191. 10.1023/A:1020544429383Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. Munshi, On effective determination of modular forms by twists of critical 𝐿-values, Math. Ann. 347 (2010), no. 4, 963–978. 10.1007/s00208-009-0465-ySearch in Google Scholar

[15] R. Munshi, A note on simultaneous nonvanishing twists, J. Number Theory 132 (2012), no. 4, 666–674. 10.1016/j.jnt.2011.09.004Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. Munshi and J. Sengupta, Determination of G ⁢ L ⁢ ( 3 ) Hecke–Maass forms from twisted central values, J. Number Theory 148 (2015), 272–287. 10.1016/j.jnt.2014.09.030Search in Google Scholar

[17] R. Munshi and J. Sengupta, On effective determination of Maass forms from central values of Rankin–Selberg 𝐿-function, Forum Math. 27 (2015), no. 1, 467–484. 10.1515/forum-2012-0094Search in Google Scholar

[18] D. Ramakrishnan and J. Rogawski, Average values of modular 𝐿-series via the relative trace formula, Pure Appl. Math. Q. 1 (2005), no. 4, 701–735. 10.4310/PAMQ.2005.v1.n4.a1Search in Google Scholar

[19] Z. Xu, Simultaneous nonvanishing of automorphic 𝐿-functions at the central point, Manuscripta Math. 134 (2011), no. 3–4, 309–342. 10.1007/s00229-010-0396-7Search in Google Scholar